Blunt Solid Organ Injury Research Articles

Management of Blunt Pediatric Hepatic and Splenic Injury: Similar Process, Different Outcome

Though nonoperative management of stable children with blunt solid organ injury has been shown to be effective, we hypothesize that hepatic injuries represent a higher mortality risk than splenic injuries and that combination hepatosplenic injury is a marker of even greater mortality potential. A multi-institutional pediatric trauma registry was queried for all children with blunt injuries to the liver (H) or spleen (S), excluding those with severe brain injury. Incidence and mortality of H, S, and all combinations of H/S were compared. The mortality rate for patients with H was significantly higher (2.5%) than in patients with S (0.7%), and the overall mortality of H/S (8.6%) was significantly higher than both. Furthermore, the mortality of H/S injuries was associated with increasing severity of either the hepatic or splenic injury. In childhood injury, H and S occur with almost equal frequency but with different mortality, and H/S is less common but associated with increased mortality.

High-intensity ultrasound treatment of blunt abdominal solid organ injury: an animal model.

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is effective in producing hemostasis in injuries from organ lacerations and punctures in animals but has not been evaluated in impact injuries. High-energy blows were applied to 11 heparinized and anesthetized pigs, resulting in solid organ injury. HIFU was applied to injuries via laparotomy. The animals were closed, administered saline, observed under general anesthesia for 3.6 +/- 0.4 hours, reopened, and inspected, and abdominal free fluid was aspirated. Organ hemostasis was achieved (mean +/- SD) with 15 +/- 6 minutes of HIFU treatment and 54 +/- 3 minutes of operating time, and 18.8 +/- 13.1 mL/kg of blood was recovered from the abdomen. One animal died from an untreated occult injury to a large vein. HIFU-treated sites were hemostatic at relaparotomy, with 8.6 +/- 6.2 mL/kg abdominal serosanguinous fluid recovered. HIFU is effective in producing hemostasis by direct treatment of injured parenchyma in blunt trauma.

Concomitant Blunt Enteric Injuries with Injuries of the Liver and Spleen: A Dilemma for Trauma Surgeons

Prompt identification of enteric injuries after blunt trauma remains problematic. With the increased utilization of nonoperative management of blunt abdominal trauma gastrointestinal disruptions may escape timely detection and repair. The purpose of this study was to evaluate blunt enteric injuries requiring operative repair in adult patients and the association of concomitant hepatic and/or splenic injuries. Over a 10-year period (January 1990 through December 1999) 1648 patients suffered blunt liver, spleen, and/or enteric injuries, with 87 (5.3%) of these requiring operative repairs of the enteric injury. These patients had enteric injury only (EI) (60.9%; 53 of 87), concomitant enteric/splenic injury (ESI) (10.3%; 9 of 87), concomitant enteric/hepatic injury (EHI) (13.8%; 12 of 87), and enteric/hepatic/splenic injury (EHSI) 14.9% (13 of 87). A delay in treatment of >8 hours from presentation of EI compared with either EHI or ESI was not significantly different between the two groups. EHSI had exploratory laparotomy more expeditiously related to hemodynamic instability. Mortality rates were higher with EHI related to hemorrhagic shock and/or severe traumatic brain injury. Morbidity was not related to a delay in diagnosis until the period of delay was greater than 24 hours. The nonoperative management of blunt solid organ injury does not delay the detection and treatment of concomitant bowel injuries compared with isolated blunt enteric injuries. Occult enteric injury with solid organ injury has a low incidence and represents a continuing challenge to the clinical acumen of the trauma surgeon.

Cell count ratio: new criterion of diagnostic peritoneal lavage for detection of hollow organ perforation.

Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) had been widely used in evaluating patients with suspected intraperitoneal injuries due to its high sensitivity. If the positive criteria are strictly followed, however, the incidence of nontherapeutic laparotomies will be unacceptably high. This realization has become more important recently with the popularization of nonoperative treatment for blunt solid organ injuries. For these patients, the early diagnosis of an associated hollow organ perforation is mandatory. Three hundred and twenty patients undergoing DPL over an 18-month period were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the usefulness of "cell count ratio" in diagnosing hollow organ perforation. The cell count ratio was defined as the ratio between white blood cell count and red blood cell count in the lavage fluid divided by the ratio of the same parameters in the peripheral blood. Two hundred twelve patients were diagnosed as having a positive DPL according to the classic criteria. Forty-four patients (21%) had a cell count ratio of greater than or equal to 1. The diagnosis at laparotomy was small bowel perforation in 31 patients, colon perforation in eight patients, diaphragmatic hernia in one patient, pancreatic transection in two patients, and liver laceration in two patients. None of the patients with a cell count ratio of less than I sustained hollow organ perforation. The average interval from injury to DPL was 5 hours, with the shortest being 1.5 hours. A cell count ratio of greater than or equal to 1 predicted hollow organ perforation with a specificity of 97% and a sensitivity of 100%. The selective use of the cell count ratio has improved the probability of early diagnosis of bowel perforation without increasing the cost of care. Nonoperative management can be applied more confidently to those patients sustaining a blunt solid viscus injury of the abdomen if the cell count ratio is low. We conclude that the cell count ratio of DPL effluent is a very sensitive and specific indicator of hollow organ perforation. In the treatment of blunt abdominal injuries, if the cell count ratio is positive, nonoperative treatment should be abandoned and a laparotomy undertaken.

Practice patterns of pediatric surgeons caring for stable patients with traumatic solid organ injury.

Managed care financing has resulted in pressure to decrease hospital days and lower per diem costs. This influence may ultimately affect nonoperative management of blunt solid organ injuries in children (spleen, liver, kidneys). Pediatric surgeons caring for trauma patients were surveyed regarding current practice patterns. One survey was sent to a representative staff pediatric surgeon at each major children's hospital or children's unit involved in the care of the injured child in the United States. There were 87 responses to 117 surveys (75%). Relatively few children fail nonoperative management. For major management decisions, including radiographic study of choice; when to transfuse; and when to allow out of bed, home, and back to school, there was often a clear majority opinion of appropriate care. However, there was a wide variance in response for some questions. Surgical judgment must be individualized, but a low number of failures of nonoperative management is helpful in delineating safe practice guidelines. Surgeons using fewer resources than the norm may help delineate management schemes that are equally effective to more expensive care. Based on these responses a management protocol is recommended.

A Statewide, Population-Based Time-Series Analysis of the Increasing Frequency of Nonoperative Management of Abdominal Solid Organ Injury

Emergency operative intervention has been one of the cornerstones of the care of the injured patient. Over the past several years, nonoperative management has increasing been recommended for the care of selected blunt abdominal solid organ injuries. The purpose of this study was to utilize a large statewide, population-based data set to perform a time-series analysis of the practice of physicians caring for blunt solid organ injury of the abdomen. The study was designed to assess the changing frequency and the outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatments for blunt hepatic and splenic injuries. Data were obtained from the state hospital discharge data base, which tracks information on all hospitalized patients from each of the 157 hospitals in the state of North Carolina. All trauma patients who had sustained injury to a solid abdominal organ (kidney, liver, or spleen) were selected for initial analysis. During the 5 years of the study, 210,256 trauma patients were admitted to the state's hospitals (42,051 +/- 7802 per year). The frequency of nonoperative interventions for hepatic and splenic injuries increased over the period studied. The frequency of nonoperative management of hepatic injuries increased from 55% in 1988 to 79% in 1992 in patients with hepatic injuries and from 34% to 46% in patients with splenic injuries. The rate of nonoperative management of hepatic injuries increased from 54% to 64% in nontrauma centers compared with an increase from 56% to 74% in trauma centers (p = 0.01). In patients with splenic injuries, the rate of nonoperative management increased from 35% to 44% in nontrauma centers compared with an increase from 33% to 49% in trauma centers (p < 0.05). The rate of nonoperative management was associated with the organ injury severity, ranging from 90% for minor injuries to 19%-40% for severe injuries. Finally, in an attempt to compare blood use in operatively and nonoperatively treated patients, the total charges for blood were compared in the two groups. When compared, based on organ injury severity, the total blood used, as measured by charges, was lower for nonoperatively treated patients. This large, statewide, population-based time-series analysis shows that the management of blunt injury of solid abdominal organs has changed over time. The incidence of nonoperative management for both hepatic and splenic injuries has increased. The study indicates that the rates of nonoperative management vary in relation to the severity of the organ injury. The rates increase in nonoperative management were greater in trauma centers than in nontrauma centers. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that this newer approach to the care of blunt injury of solid abdominal organs is being led by the state's trauma centers.