Blunt Solid Organ Injury Research Articles

National Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Associated With Cirrhotic Blunt Trauma Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy Versus Non-operative Management: A Propensity Case-Matched Analysis.

This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes among severely injured trauma patients presenting with isolated blunt abdominal solid organ injuries with a pre-diagnosis of liver cirrhosis (LC) undergoing emergency laparotomy vs nonoperative management (NOM). This retrospective cohort study utilized the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Program Participant Use File (ACS-TQIP-PUF) dataset from 2017 to 2021. Adults (≥18years) with a pre-existing diagnosis of LC who presented with severe blunt (ISS ≥ 16) isolated solid organ abdominal injuries and underwent laparotomy or NOM were included. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS), and in-hospital complications such as acute renal failure and deep vein thrombosis. 929 patients were included in this analysis, with 355 undergoing laparotomy and 574 managed nonoperatively. Laparotomy patients suffered greater in-hospital mortality (n = 186, 52.3% vs n = 115, 20.0%; P < .01), required significantly more blood within 4hours (8.9 units vs 4.3 units, P < .01), and had a significantly longer ICU-LOS (10.2days vs 6.7days, P < .01). In the 1:1 propensity score matched analysis of 556 matched patients, in-hospital mortality was greater for laparotomy patients (52.3% vs 20.0%, P < .01). Laparotomy was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality in propensity-matched trauma patients, longer ICU-LOS, and more blood products given at 4hours compared to NOM. These findings illustrate that NOM may be a safe approach in managing severely injured trauma patients with isolated blunt abdominal solid organ injuries and a pre-diagnosis of LC.

Blunt Abdominal Trauma in Pregnancy: Higher Rates of Severe Abdominal Injuries.

Previous studies suggest increased abdominal girth in obese individuals provides a "cushion effect," against severe abdominal trauma. In comparison, the unique anatomic/physiological condition of pregnancy, such as the upward displacement of organs by an expanding uterus, may decrease risk of abdominal injury. However, increased overall blood volume and vascularity of organs during pregnancy raise concerns for increased bleeding and potentially more severe injuries. Therefore, this study aimed to elucidate whether the "cushion effect" observed in obese patients extends to pregnant trauma patients (PTPs). We hypothesized a lower risk of blunt solid organ injury (BSOI) (liver, spleen, and kidney) in pregnant vs non-pregnant blunt trauma patients. The 2020-2021 Trauma Quality Improvement Program was queried for all female blunt trauma patients (age<50 years) involved in motor vehicle collisions (MVCs). We compared pregnant vs non-pregnant patients. The primary outcomes were incidence of BSOI, and severity of abdominal trauma defined by abbreviated injury scale (AIS). From 94,831 female patients, 2598 (2.7%) were pregnant. When compared to non-pregnant patients, PTPs had lower rates of liver (5.5% vs 7.6%, P < .001) and kidney (1.8% vs 2.6%, P = .013) injury. However, PTPs had higher rates of serious (13.4% vs 9.0%, P < .001) and severe abdominal injury (7.5% vs 4.3%, P < .001). BSOI occurred at a lower rate in PTPs compared to non-PTPs; however, contrary to the "cushion effect" observed in obese populations, pregnant women had a higher rate of severe abdominal injuries. These data support comprehensive evaluations for PTPs presenting after a MVC. IV (therapeutic).

Use of a statewide solid organ injury procotcol to optimize triage, treatment, and transfer for pediatric abdominal trauma.

The Utah Pediatric Trauma Network (UPTN) is a non-competitive collaboration of all 51 hospitals in the state of Utah with the purpose of improving pediatric trauma care. Created in 2019, UPTN has implemented evidence-based guidelines based on hospital resources and capabilities with quarterly review of data collected in a network-specific database. A blunt solid organ injury (SOI) protocol was developed to optimize treatment of these injuries statewide. The purpose of this study was to review the effectiveness of the SOI guideline. The UPTN REDCap® database was retrospectively reviewed from 2021 through 2022. We compared admissions from the Level 1 pediatric trauma center (PED1) to non-pediatric hospitals (non-PED1) of children with low-grade (I-II) and high-grade (III-V) SOIs. In 2 years, 172 patients were treated for blunt SOI, with or without concomitant injuries. There were 48 (28%) low-grade and 124 (72%) high-grade SOIs. 33 (69%) patients were triaged with low-grade SOI injuries at a non-PED1 center, and 17 (35%) were transferred to the PED1 hospital. Most had multiple injuries, but 7 (44%) were isolated, and none required a transfusion or any procedure/operation at either hospital. Of the 124 patients with high-grade injuries, 41 (33%) primarily presented to the PED1 center, and 44 (35%) were transferred there. Of these, 2 required a splenectomy and none required angiography. Thirty-nine children were treated at non-PED1 centers without transfer, and 4 required splenectomy and 6 underwent angiography/embolization procedures. No patient with an isolated SOI died. Implementation of SOI guidelines across UPTN successfully allowed non-pediatric hospitals to safely admit children with low-grade isolated SOI, keeping families closer to home, while standardizing pediatric triage for blunt abdominal trauma in the state. Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Outcomes after Embolization in Pediatric Abdominal Solid Organ Injury: A Trauma Center Experience.

Background Trauma is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide among children. Nonoperative management is the standard of care in hemodynamically stable children with blunt abdominal solid organ injury. Embolization is a potential pathway, which has shown increasing evidence for benefit in adult trauma patients. However, the data in children is limited. Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis of hospital data of all children (<18 years of age), presenting to a tertiary-care trauma center in India, with history of blunt trauma from January 2021 to June 2023, was performed. Preprocedural imaging, angiographic and embolization details, number of blood transfusions, and length of hospital stay were assessed. Results Two hundred and sixteen children (average age: 11.65 years) presented with a history of abdominal trauma during the study period. Eighty four children were FAST positive, out of whom, 67 patients had abdominal solid organ injury on computed tomography. Liver was the most commonly injured solid organ ( n = 45), followed by the spleen and kidney. Ten children had solid abdominal organ arterial injuries for which eight children underwent embolization. The average length of hospital stay in embolization group ( n = 8) was 4 days, as compared to 11 days in children undergoing operative management ( n = 2). At 6 months follow-up, all children were asymptomatic. Conclusion Superselective embolization is a safe and feasible procedure in appropriately selected children with abdominal injury.

Similar rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and failure of non-operative management for early versus delayed VTE chemoprophylaxis in adolescent blunt solid organ injuries: a propensity-matched analysis

BackgroundEarly initiation of venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis in adults with blunt solid organ injury (BSOI) has been demonstrated to be safe but this is controversial in adolescents. We hypothesized that adolescent patients with BSOI undergoing non-operative management (NOM) and receiving early VTE chemoprophylaxis (eVTEP) (≤ 48 h) have a decreased rate of VTE and similar rate of failure of NOM, compared to similarly matched adolescents receiving delayed VTE chemoprophylaxis (dVTEP) (> 48 h).MethodsThe 2017–2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was queried for adolescents (12–17 years of age) with BSOI (liver, kidney, and/or spleen) undergoing NOM. We compared eVTEP versus dVTEP using a 1:1 propensity score model, matching for age, comorbidities, BSOI grade, injury severity score, hypotension on arrival, and need for transfusions. We performed subset analyses in patients with isolated spleen, kidney, and liver injury.ResultsFrom 1022 cases, 417 (40.8%) adolescents received eVTEP. After matching, there was no difference in matched variables (all p > 0.05). Both groups had a similar rate of VTE (dVTEP 0.6% vs. eVTEP 1.7%, p = 0.16), mortality (dVTEP 0.3% vs. eVTEP 0%, p = 0.32), and failure of NOM (eVTEP 6.7% vs. dVTEP 7.3%, p = 0.77). These findings remained true in all subset analyses of isolated solid organ injury (all p > 0.05).ConclusionsThe rate of VTE with adolescent BSOI is exceedingly rare. Early VTE chemoprophylaxis in adolescent BSOI does not increase the rate of failing NOM. However, unlike adult trauma patients, adolescent patients with BSOI receiving eVTEP had a similar rate of VTE and death, compared to adolescents receiving dVTEP.

Blunt solid organ injury: Resident operative experience on the decline

Introduction Duty-hour restrictions, improved non-operative management of injured patients, new or expanded fellowship programs, and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have hindered resident exposure to operative trauma in the United States. In this study, we investigated trends in resident operative experience in blunt trauma over a 22-year period. Methods Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) logs from 1999 to 2021 were reviewed. The yearly number of major trauma cases, trauma splenectomies (TS), and liver drainage/repairs (LDR) were extracted. We used the non-parametric Mann–Kendall test to analyze trends. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation or median (estimated interquartile range, eIQR); alpha = 0.05. Results Records from 24,062 respondents were examined. The average number of trauma cases performed by all residents decreased from 42 ± 22 in 1999–2000 to 31 ± 18 in 2020–2021 ( p &lt; .01); median number of cases decreased from 36 (30, 47) to 27 (22, 36). The proportion of TS performed by chief and junior residents among all trauma cases decreased from 9.5% to 7.1% (trend test, p &lt; .01), and from 6.6% to 6.1% (trend test, p = .03) respectively. The proportion of LDR performed by chief and junior residents decreased from 6.9% to 4.7% (trend test, p &lt; .01), and from 4.3% to 3.9% (trend test, p = .03) respectively. Conclusions Number of major trauma cases and two common procedures for blunt solid organ injury decreased significantly over the past two decades. These findings should serve as an indicator that structural changes in surgery residency training programs in the United States may be necessary to safeguard resident exposure to operative trauma cases.

Propensity Score Analysis of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta: Zone-1 Versus Zone-3 Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta Odds of Mortality

IntroductionThere are two zones for the placement of a Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) in trauma patients: above the mesenteric vessels (Zone-1) or below the renal arteries (Zone-3). Zone-1 REBOA diverts blood away from the visceral organs which leads to a systemic inflammatory response and reperfusion injury. We hypothesized that patients undergoing Zone-1 REBOA placement had a higher odds of mortality. MethodsThe 2017-2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients undergoing either Zone-1 or Zone-3 REBOA. We excluded all patients with prehospital cardiac arrest. We compared Zone-1 versus Zone-3 REBOA using a 1:2 propensity-score model, matching for age, mechanism, sex, hypotension, tachycardia, blunt solid organ injury grade, pelvic fracture, and injuries to the aorta, iliac artery, iliac vein, and inferior vena cava. ResultsWe matched 130 Zone-1 REBOA patients to 260 Zone-3 REBOA patients. There were no statistically significant differences in the matched variables (P > 0.05). Compared to Zone-3 REBOA, patients with Zone-1 REBOA who survived ≥48 h had similar rates of acute kidney injury (18.6% versus 10.9%, P = 0.19). Zone-1 REBOA patients had a higher mortality rate (71.4% versus 48.8%, P = 0.002) and mortality odds ratio (OR) (OR 1.85, OR 1.18-2.89, P = 0.007). Zone-1 REBOA remained associated with a higher odds of mortality after controlling for traumatic brain injury and injury severity score (OR 1.86, OR 1.18-2.92, P = 0.007). ConclusionsCompared to Zone-3, using a REBOA in Zone-1 is associated with higher odds of mortality. The use of REBOA Zone-1 deployment should be done with caution.

Pediatric vs Adult or Mixed Trauma Centers in Children Admitted to Hospitals Following Trauma

Adult trauma centers (ATCs) have been shown to decrease injury mortality and morbidity in major trauma, but a synthesis of evidence for pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) is lacking. To assess the effectiveness of PTCs compared with ATCs, combined trauma centers (CTCs), or nondesignated hospitals in reducing mortality and morbidity among children admitted to hospitals following trauma. MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science through March 2023. Studies comparing PTCs with ATCs, CTCs, or nondesignated hospitals for pediatric trauma populations (aged ≤19 years). This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Pairs of reviewers independently extracted data and evaluated risk of bias using the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool. A meta-analysis was conducted if more than 2 studies evaluated the same intervention-comparator-outcome and controlled minimally for age and injury severity. Subgroup analyses were planned for age, injury type and severity, trauma center designation level and verification body, country, and year of conduct. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess certainty of evidence. Primary outcomes were mortality, complications, functional status, discharge destination, and quality of life. Secondary outcomes were resource use and processes of care, including computed tomography (CT) and operative management of blunt solid organ injury (SOI). A total of 56 studies with 286 051 participants were included overall, and 34 were included in the meta-analysis. When compared with ATCs, PTCs were associated with a 41% lower risk of mortality (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46-0.76), a 52% lower risk of CT use (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26-0.89) and a 64% lower risk of operative management for blunt SOI (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.23-0.57). The OR for complications was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.41-1.56). There was no association for mortality for older children (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.47-1.06), and the association was closer to the null when PTCs were compared with CTCs (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53-0.99). Results remained similar for other subgroup analyses. GRADE certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, results suggested that PTCs were associated with lower odds of mortality, CT use, and operative management for SOI than ATCs for children admitted to hospitals following trauma, but certainty of evidence was very low. Future studies should strive to address selection and confounding biases.

Role of Serial Phlebotomy in the Management of Blunt Solid Organ Injury in Adults.

The management of blunt spleen and liver trauma has become increasingly nonoperative. There is no consensus on timing or duration of serial hemoglobin and hematocrit monitoring in this patient population. This study examined the clinical utility of serial hemoglobin and hematocrit monitoring. We hypothesized that most interventions occur early in the hospital course, based on hemodynamic instability or physical examination findings rather than serial monitoring. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult trauma patients with blunt spleen or liver injury from November 2014 through June 2019 at our Level II trauma center. Interventions were classified as no intervention, surgical intervention, angioembolization, or packed red blood cell transfusion. Demographics, length of stay, total blood draws, laboratory values, and clinical triggers preceding intervention were reviewed. A total of 143 patients were studied, of whom 73 (51%) received no intervention, 47 (33%) received an intervention within 4 hr of presentation, and 23 (16%) had interventions beyond 4 hr. Of these 23 patients, 13 received an intervention based on phlebotomy results alone. Most of these patients (n = 12, 92%) received blood transfusion without further intervention. Only one patient underwent operative intervention based on serial hemoglobin results on hospital day 2. The majority of patients with these injury patterns either require no intervention or declare themselves promptly after arrival. Serial phlebotomy after initial triage and intervention may add little value in the management of blunt solid organ injury.

Analysis of Blunt Abdominal Solid Organ Injury in Children: A Single Centre Study

Aim: To determine the management of solid organ injuries in blunt trauma abdomen (BTA) in children whether to conserve or operate. Study design: Descriptive case series. Place and duration of study: Department of Paediatric Surgery Sahiwal Teaching Hospital and Sahiwal Medical College Sahiwal from 1st January 2020 to 31st March 2022. Methodology: Fifty eight patients with blunt abdominal trauma due to any cause, the medical records of all patients with trauma of any kind age upto 13 years were carefully reviewed. Initial resuscitation was done according to ATLS protocol. Ultimate management decision was based on stability of patients after resuscitation. Results: The mean age was 5.34 years. Most of the patients suffered from road traffic accident, 50(86.2%). Fifty two (89.65%) patients showed free fluid in the abdomen. Organ injury in 27(46.55%) patients. CT abdomen with intravenous contrast confirmed findings of ultra sonography. Despite resuscitation, 17(43.9%) patients remained unstable and were operated. Forty one patients were kept on conservative treatment. Hospital stay ranged from 1-19 days. Conclusion: Although non-operative management is the treatment of choice in blunt trauma abdomen with solid organ injury but stability of the injured child is the central pivot around which the whole management revolves. Delay in presentation and failure of timely resuscitation results into high operative intervention. Keywords: Blunt trauma, solid, Liver, Spleen, children

In Solid Organ Injury Patients Requiring Blood Transfusion, Hemostatic Procedures are Associated with Improved Survival Over Observation.

Selective nonoperative management (NOM) is the standard of care for blunt solid organ injury (SOI). Hemodynamic instability is a contraindication for NOM, but it is unclear whether the need for blood transfusion should be a criterion for instability. This study looks at the outcome of blood-transfused SOI patients to determine whether NOM is safe for this group. This is a retrospective cohort study using the National Trauma Data Bank years 2017 through 2019. We selected patients with blunt liver, spleen, and kidney injuries. Within this group, we compared the mortality for those managed with NOM versus the hemostatic procedures of laparotomy and angioembolization. Significance for univariate analysis is tested with Chi-square for categorical variables. Multivariate analysis is performed with Cox proportional hazards regression with time-dependent covariate. 108,718 (3.5%) patients for the years 2017 through 2019 had a SOI. 20,569 (18.9%) of these received at least one unit of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) within the first 4 h. Of the SOI patients who received blood, 8264 (40.2%) underwent laparotomy only, 2924 (14.2%) underwent embolization only, and 1119 (5.4%) underwent both procedures. The adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of death for transfused SOI patients who underwent laparotomy only, embolization only, and both procedures are 0.93 (P = not significant), 0.27 (P < 0.001), and 0.48 (P < 0.001), respectively. The ORs of death with laparotomy for patients receiving >1 through 4 units are 0.87, 0.78, 0.75, and 0.72, respectively (P ≤ 0.01 for all). For embolization, the ORs are 0.27, 0.30, 0.30, and 0.30, respectively (P < 0.001 for all). Laparotomy is independently associated with survival for patients who receive >1 unit of PRBCs. Angioembolization is independently associated with survival for the entire cohort, including transfused patients. Given the protective association of laparotomy in the blood-transfused SOI group, need for blood transfusion should be considered a meaningful index of instability and a relative indication for laparotomy. The protective association with angioembolization supports current practices for angioembolization of high-risk patients in the transfused and nontransfused groups.

Timing of venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis using objective hemoglobin criteria in blunt solid organ injury

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of early venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis following blunt solid organ injury. MethodsA retrospective review of patients was performed for patients with blunt solid organ injury between 2009–2019. Enoxaparin was initiated when patients had <1g/dl Hemoglobin decline over a 24 h period. These patients were then categorized by initiation: ≤48 h and >48 h. ResultsThere were 653 patients: 328 (50.2%) <48 h and 325 (49.8%) ≥48 h. Twenty-nine (4.4%) developed VTE. Patients in ≥48 h group suffered more frequent VTE events (6.5% vs 2.4%, p = 0.021). Non-operative failure occurred in 6 patients (1.9%) in ≥48 h group, and 5 patients (1.5%) < 48 h group. Blood transfusion following chemophrophylaxis initiation was required in 69 (21.3%) in ≥48 h group, and 46 (14.0%) in < 48 h group, occurring similarly between groups (p=0.021). ConclusionStable hemoglobin in the first 24 h is an efficacious, objective measure that allows early initiation of VTE chemoprophylaxis in solid organ injury. This practice is associated with earlier initiation of and fewer VTE events.

Pseudoaneurysms after high-grade blunt solid organ injury and the utility of delayed computed tomography angiography.

Pseudoaneurysms (PSA) can occur following high-grade solid organ injury. PSA natural history is unclear but risk for spontaneous rupture and exsanguination exist. The yield of delayed CT Angiography (dCTA) for PSA diagnosis is not well delineated and optimal timing is undefined. The study objective was definition of dCTA utility in diagnosing and triggering intervention for PSA after high-grade blunt solid organ injury. All blunt trauma patients arriving to our ACS-verified Level 1 trauma center with AAST grade ≥ III liver, spleen, and/or kidney injury were included in this retrospective observational study (01/2017-10/2021). Exclusions were age < 18 year, transfers in, death < 48h, and immediate nephrectomy/splenectomy. dCTA performance was not protocolized and pursued at attending surgeon discretion. Demographics, clinical/injury data, and outcomes were collected. Primary outcome was dCTA-triggered intervention. Statistical testing with ANOVA/Chi squared compared outcomes by type of solid organ. 349 blunt trauma patients with 395 high-grade solid organ injuries met study criteria. Median AAST grade of solid organ injury was 3 [3-4]. dCTA for PSA screening was pursued in 175 patients (44%), typically on hospital day 4 [3-7]. dCTA identified vascular lesions in 16 spleen, 10 liver, and 6 kidney injuries. dCTA triggered intervention in 24% of spleen, 13% of kidney, and 9% of liver injured patients who were screened, for an overall yield of 14%. Intervention was typically AE (n = 23, 92%), although two splenic PSA necessitated splenectomy. Delayed CTA for PSA screening after high-grade blunt solid organ injury was performed in half of eligible patients. dCTA identified numerous vascular lesions requiring endovascular or surgical intervention, with highest yield for splenic injuries. We recommend consideration of universal screening of high-grade blunt solid organ injuries with delayed abdominal CTA to avoid missing PSA.

Thromboprophylaxis Timing After Blunt Solid Organ Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IntroductionTrauma patients with blunt abdominal solid organ injuries are at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), but the optimal time to safely administer chemical thromboprophylaxis is controversial, especially for patients who are managed nonoperatively due to increased risk of hemorrhage. We sought to compare failure of nonoperative management (NOM) and VTE events based on timing of chemical thromboprophylaxis initiation. MethodsA systematic review was conducted in PubMed and Embase databases. Studies were included if they evaluated timing of initiation of chemical thromboprophylaxis in trauma patients who underwent NOM of blunt solid organ injuries. Outcomes included failure of NOM and incidence of VTE. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed comparing patients who received late (>48 h) versus early thromboprophylaxis initiation. ResultsTwelve retrospective cohort studies, comprising 21,909 patients, were included. Three studies, including 6375 patients, provided data on adjusted outcomes. Pooled adjusted analysis demonstrated no difference in failure of NOM in patients receiving late versus early thromboprophylaxis (odds ratio [OR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]:0.4-2.14). When including all unadjusted studies, even those at high risk of bias, there remained no difference in failure of NOM (OR 1.16, 95% CI:0.72-1.86). In the adjusted analysis for VTE events, which had 6259 patients between two studies, patients receiving late chemical thromboprophylaxis had a higher risk of VTE compared with those who received early thromboprophylaxis (OR 1.89, 95% CI:1.15-3.12). ConclusionsBased on current observational evidence, initiation of prophylaxis before 48 h is associated with lower VTE rates without higher risk of failure of NOM.

Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Are Not Associated With Increased Bleeding in Blunt Solid Organ Injury.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are an effective nonopiate option for pain control. However, the antiplatelet aggregation of cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) inhibitors presents a concern in that they may exacerbate bleeding in patients with solid organ injuries. The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on blunt solid organ injury. We hypothesized that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs would not contribute to intra-abdominal bleed progression. This is a retrospective cohort study of blunt solid organ injury evaluated from June 1, 2015, to June 30, 2019, at an urban midwestern Level I trauma center. Patients receiving and those not receiving nonsterioidal anti-inflammatory drugs were compared on intra-abdominal bleeding progression as assessed by surgical intervention, angioembolization, and blood transfusions. We analyzed 706 patients, of whom 206 were given nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during their hospital course. Compared with those who were not given nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, patients given nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were less likely to have an operation (odds ratio, OR 0.46, 95% confidence interval, CI [0.25, 0.85], p = .012) and were less likely to have an embolization (OR 0.27, 95% CI [0.11, 0.70], p = .004). There was no difference in the need for packed red blood cell transfusion between the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug and non- nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug groups (95% CI [0.91, 1.99], p = .13). Patients given nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs had a decreased likelihood of receiving an organ-specific procedure or needing a blood transfusion and had no difference in mortality. Our findings indicate that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with blunt solid organ injuries were not associated with an increased risk of adverse events related to intra-abdominal bleeding.

Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Are Not Associated With Increased Bleeding in Blunt Solid Organ Injury.

Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Are Not Associated With Increased Bleeding in Blunt Solid Organ Injury.

Current Trends of Conservative Management of Blunt Abdominal Solid Organ Injury

Introduction: Bangladesh is one of the most densely inhabited countries in the world. Road traffic accidents are one of the leading causes of morbidity, and the incidence of blunt abdominal injuries is on the rise. Over the last several years, the treatment of blunt abdominal injury (BAI) has changed dramatically. Conservative or non-operative treatment (NOM) of liver, spleen, and kidney injuries has proven to be quite effective. Methods of study: A prospective observational study was done in Dhaka medical college with 50 consecutive patients included from January 2010 to June 2010. Results: Within the 50 consecutive patients 88% were male, and 64% were motor vehicular crashes. 26 patients (52%) had a liver injury; 5 (10%) had a renal injury; 7 (14%) had a splenic injury and 3 (6%) had a pancreatic injury; 9(18%), 2 patients (4%) had both liver and spleen injury, 3 patients (6%) had both spleen and kidney injury. 39 (78%) patients were managed successfully by a conservative approach. Compared with these patients who underwent non-operative management (NOM) initially, patients in the operative group had a higher injury severity score. (p &lt; 0.001). Twenty-seven patients (high risk) were successfully treated without surgery. No serious complication was found on routine image follow-up. Conclusion: Conservative or non-operative management of blunt abdominal solid organ injury in hemodynamically stable patients is highly successful in many fields when compared with the operative group, including the outcomes of morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay.

Nonoperative management of blunt abdominal solid organ injury: Are we paying enough attention to patients on preinjury anticoagulation?

BackgroundThis study aims to assess the impact of pre-injury anticoagulant use on outcomes of isolated blunt abdominal SOI patients who underwent NOM. MethodsA 1-year(2017) analysis of the ACS-TQIP. We included all ≥18yrs trauma patients with isolated blunt abdominal-SOI who underwent NOM. Patients were stratified into two groups based on their history of pre-injury anticoagulant use. Propensity score matching was performed. ResultsA matched cohort of 2709 patients (AC, 903; No-AC,1806) was analyzed. Compared to the No-AC group, the AC group had higher rates of failure of NOM(2.6% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.03), cardiac arrest (1.2%vs. 3.1%, p = 0.02), acute kidney injury (2.4% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.01), myocardial infarction (0.6% vs. 1.4%,p = 0.03), and mortality (5.1%vs. 7.6%,p = 0.01), and longer hospital LOS (17[10–24]vs.17[12–26]days,p = 0.04) and ICU LOS (11[6–17]vs.11[7–18]days,p = 0.01). ConclusionAmong nonoperatively managed blunt abdominal SOI patients, preinjury use of anticoagulants negatively impacts outcomes. Extra surveillance is required while managing patients with blunt abdominal SOI on pre-injury anticoagulants. Level of evidenceLevel III. Study typeTherapeutic/care management.

Timing of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis initiation for trauma patients with nonoperatively managed blunt abdominal solid organ injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundBlunt abdominal solid organ injury is common and is often managed nonoperatively. Clinicians must balance risk of both hemorrhage and thrombosis. The optimal timing of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (VTEp) initiation in this population is unclear. The objective was to evaluate early (< 48 h) compared to late initiation of VTEp in adult trauma patients with blunt abdominal solid organ injury managed nonoperatively.MethodsEmbase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to March 2021. Studies comparing timeframes of VTEp initiation were considered. The primary outcome was failure of nonoperative management (NOM) after VTEp initiation. Secondary outcomes included risk of transfusion, other bleeding complications, risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism, and mortality.ResultsTen cohort studies met inclusion criteria, with a total of 4642 patients. Meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant increase in the risk of failure of NOM among patients receiving early VTEp (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.01–3.05, p = 0.05). There was no significant difference in risk of transfusion. Odds of DVT were significantly lower in the early group (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.22–0.59, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in mortality (OR 1.50, 95% CI 0.82–2.75, p = 0.19). All studies were at serious risk of bias due to confounding.ConclusionsInitiation of VTEp earlier than 48 h following hospitalization is associated with an increased risk of failure of NOM but a decreased risk of DVT. Absolute failure rates of NOM are low. Initiation of VTEp at 48 h may balance the risks of bleeding and VTE.

Adolescent blunt solid organ injury: Differences in management strategies and outcomes between pediatric and adult trauma centers

BackgroundAdolescents with blunt solid organ injuries (BSOI) are cared for at both pediatric trauma centers (PTC) and adult trauma centers (ATC). Over the past decade, treatment strategies have shifted towards non-operative management with reported favorable outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare management strategies and outcomes between PTC and ATC. MethodsWe queried the 2016–2018 Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) datasets to identify adolescents between the ages of 16 and 19 with BSOI. Characteristics were stratified by center type (pediatric or adult) for comparative analyses. Separate logistic regressions were used to assess the association of hospital type, location of injury, age, gender, weight, Glascow Coma Score (GCS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions for outcomes of interest. ResultsAmong the 3,011,310 patients enrolled in the 2016–2018 TQIP datasets, 106,892 (3.5%) had a BSOI ICD9/10 code. Of those, 9,193 (8.6%) were between 16 and 19 years of age and included in this analysis. Within this cohort, 6,073 (66.1%) were managed at an ATC and 3,120 (33.9%) were managed at a PTC. While statistically different, there were no clinically relevant differences for age, weight, and sex between groups. A significantly higher ISS and lower GCS score were observed among those admitted to ATC compared to PTC. ICU admissions were more frequent at ATC. Number of blood transfusions by 4 h after presentation were also higher among those admitted to an ATC. Despite a lower ISS and higher GCS at presentation, mortality was higher among those treated at a PTC with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 2.42 (1.31–4.53). After excluding adolescents with a traumatic brain injury, a common cause of mortality among adolescent trauma patients, these differences in outcomes persisted. ConclusionsOur data suggest that adolescents with BSOI managed at a PTC are less likely to receive blood transfusions by 4 h of admission or be admitted to the ICU than those managed at an ATC. However, this more conservative approach may come at the expense of higher overall mortality. Further work is needed to understand these differences and determine if PTC need to be more aggressive in managing BSOI.