To the Editor, Infants with a craniofacial abnormality who are potentially difficult to mask ventilate may benefit from awake placement of a supraglottic device to aid in tracheal intubation. Moreover, in some syndromic infants, severe upper airway obstruction may be present at birth, which often requires a mandibular advancement procedure or a tracheostomy. As these procedures require general anesthesia, clinicians may be hesitant to proceed with induction of anesthesia until upper airway obstruction is relieved. Options with the potential to alleviate airway obstruction prior to induction of anesthesia include: a change in position of the patient from supine to lateral or prone, placement of a naso-pharyngeal airway, or awake insertion of a supraglottic airway device. In this clinical scenario, the primary advantage of a supraglottic device is to relieve upper airway obstruction while providing a reliable conduit for tracheal intubation. Awake placement of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) (LMA North America; San Diego, CA, USA) in the face of upper airway obstructions in syndromic infants is well tolerated without sedation or local anesthesia. However, the use of an air-Q intubating laryngeal airway (ILA) (Cookgas LLC; St. Louis, MO, USA) for this same purpose can be more stimulating and therefore require some degree of pharyngeal anesthesia to minimize the risk of gagging upon placement. In our experience, the following features of the ILA make its insertion more stimulating in the awake infant when compared with the LMA: 1) the mask size of the ILA is wider and deeper than the LMA of equivalent size; 2) the airway tube of the ILA is wider, hyper-curved, and more rigid than the LMA (Figure A); and 3) the silicone-based reusable LMAs have a softer mask than the ILA. For these reasons, we find that infants do not tolerate awake placement of the ILA as well as they tolerate placement of the LMA. The primary advantage of the ILA for tracheal intubation is the capacity to place cuffed tracheal tubes with subsequent easy removal after tracheal intubation; 4 therefore, we prefer use of the ILA over the LMA for purposes of tracheal intubation. The use of glossopharyngeal blocks in infants is effective to minimize the risk of gagging, but this method is invasive, and it can be more stressful and impractical in an awake child. We describe a simple technique that we employ in our practice to provide pharyngeal anesthesia prior to awake ILA placement. Prior to inserting the ILA, we make use of a standard infant pacifier (Figure B) to deliver 2% lidocaine jelly 20 mg mL (AstraZeneca; Wilmington, DE, USA). Lidocaine jelly is injected into the nipple portion of an infant pacifier, and the pacifier is placed in the infant’s mouth approximately 10 to 15 min prior to placement of the ILA. A maximum volume of approximately 5 mL can be accommodated within the nipple portion of an infant pacifier, this volume could be less based on the weight of the child, while adhering to the manufacturer’s recommended maximal dose of 6 mg kg. To achieve this dose, we mix lidocaine jelly with either a glucose solution or a surgical lubricant while remaining within these dosage guidelines. Several small perforations are then made in the nipple with a standard 20G needle to ensure pharyngeal spread upon infant sucking. Pharyngeal spread and systemic absorption of local anesthetic is governed by the N. Jagannathan, MD (&) C. T. Truong, MD Children’s Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA e-mail: simjag2000@yahoo.com A Xylocaine (Lidocaine HCl) 2%. Package insert and instructions for use. AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE 19850.
Read full abstract