Event Abstract Back to Event A microfabricated platform with hydrogel arrays and on-chip strain sensing for mechanical stimulation of 3D cell-seeded hydrogels Haijiao Liu1, 2*, Yu Sun1, 2 and Craig A. Simmons1, 2* 1 University of Toronto, Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Canada 2 University of Toronto, Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, Canada Introduction: Cellular microenvironments present cells with multiple stimuli, including not only biochemical and matrix cues but also mechanical factors[1]. Biomaterial arrays enable systematic screening of the combined effects of microenvironmental cues on cell function[2], but these array platforms typically fail to include the effects of dynamic mechanical stimulation, which is relevant to native and engineered connective and cardiovascular tissues. To address this need, we present a deformable membrane array that enables complex mechanical loading to cells embedded in 3D hydrogel constructs and has on-chip strain sensors for continuously monitoring of the samples’ stiffness. Materials and Methods: Stretching soft hydrogels is a challenge addressed by using off-stoichiometry thiol-ene based polydimethylsiloxane (OSTE-PDMS)[3] membranes to covalently bond polyethylene glycol norbornene (PEG-NB) hydrogels, a clinically-relevant model biomaterial with tunable properties[4], via a thiol-ene reaction (Fig.1A-C). Blends of carbon nanotube (CNT) and PDMS exhibit strain-dependent resistivity[5] and are patterned as strain sensors to monitor the membrane deflection. Sensors were preconditioned to ensure reliable strain signals, then calibrated with experimentally measured membrane deflection (Fig.1D-E). Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) embedded in PEG-NB were cultured and stimulated (17% max strain, 0.1 Hz, 10 hrs/day) for 11 days. The resistive strain amplitude |ΔR/R0| was used to calculate sample elastic modulus by inverse finite element analysis (Fig. 1F). To assess the 3D mechanical stimulation effect, MSCs were stained for α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA) for myofibroblast differentiation and collagen type I (Col I) for collagen production. Results and Discussion: PEG-NB gels remained firmly attached to and deformed elastically with the OSTE-PDMS membranes up to at least 40% strain under tensile stretching (Fig. 1C). The CNT sensors were able to measure the elastic modulus of non-degradable PEGNB gels with stiffnesses up to 30 kPa. Mechanically-stimulated cell-seeded PEG-NB gels stiffened during culture, as evidenced by a 20% decrease in the time-dependent |ΔR/R0| (Fig. 2A top), in comparison with less than 10% reduction in |ΔR/R0| for the control sensors without gels. This corresponded to a ~2-fold increase in the elastic modulus of the stimulated gels from ~15 to ~30 kPa (Fig. 2A bottom). Cells within the mechanically-stimulated gels were spread throughout the gel volumes and expressed αSMA with visible stress fibers, indicating myofibroblastic differentiation (Fig.2B). Abundant collagen was evident in the gel peripheries (Fig. 2C). Conclusion: MSCs embedded in PEG-NB gels and subjected to dynamic mechanical stimulation undergo myofibroblast differentiation and synthesize collagen, leading to gel stiffening. This system can be scaled up to larger arrays to enable systematic screening of 3D microenvironmental cues on cell function and tissue formation in vitro.
Read full abstract