The development of a computational tool capable of simulating and completing the experimental data obtained on a constant volume cyclic combustion (CV2) bench available at the Pprime Institute is the major objective of this study. The main difficulty is that, no matter how good the models used or the mesh refinement, specifying the boundary and initial conditions for the simulation of a specific cycle independently of the previous cycles requires an unattainable amount and accuracy of experimental data. In addition, high-fidelity simulation of all previous cycles is too costly. Developing a modeling framework compatible with coarse meshes for which the computational cost is reasonable is the first step necessary to simulate multiple cycles. However, the LES of CV2 presents numerous modeling difficulties due to the interactions of turbulent flow with fast and slow chemical reactions, compressible effects, walls and heat losses. Consequently, the wide spectrum of unresolved scales in the presence of so many correlated physical mechanisms leads to the introduction of several modeling parameters. Specific modeling developments are provided in this paper for turbulent combustion in the presence of residual burnt gases and the database takes into account the self-similar nature of the thermochemical properties. A detailed time-function for the inlet and outlet mass flow rates and a new blending function for the wall heat fluxes are also introduced. The sensitivity of the numerical results to the values of key modeling parameters such as injected air mass mair, ejected mass mout, segregation rate S∈[0.7;0.8], wall heat losses parameter κT∈[0.41;2.36] is studied. A quantitative comparison of the results and computational data is performed based on the pressure and heat flux signals in the case of propane-air combustion. The chamber pressure and temperature of air is 1 bar and 307K for the initial cycle. The calculated pressure profiles are in very good agreement with the experimental results. The values obtained for the calculated pressure peaks respectively for the first three reactive cycles are 17.4, 13.1 and 14.4 bars. For the experimental pressure peaks, the values obtained are 17.8, 14 and 14.6 bars which shows the validity of the modeling strategy. A qualitative comparison of the numerical results with other measurements, i.e PIV, flame visualization and MIE tomography, is also presented. The numerical results are then used to describe the flow during the successive phases, i.e injection, combustion and exhaust, of one specific cycle. Finally, the numerical pressure signal and wall heat flux obtained from the simulation of a sequence of ten cycles is compared to the experimental data. This last result demonstrates the ability of the LES tool to study the cycle-to-cycle variability observed in CV2 but further work is now required.
Read full abstract