Bladder EpiCheck Research Articles

P273 Optimizing HighRrisk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (HR-NMIBC) follow-up: Is it safely reducing cystoscopies with Bladder Epicheck®? – A Real-World Practice Protocol

P273 Optimizing HighRrisk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (HR-NMIBC) follow-up: Is it safely reducing cystoscopies with Bladder Epicheck®? – A Real-World Practice Protocol

The Simultaneous Use of Bladder Epicheck® and Urinary Cytology Can Improve the Sensitivity and Specificity of Diagnostic Follow-Up of Urothelial Lesions: Up-to-Date Data from a Multi-Institutional Cohort.

Background/Objectives: Bladder cancer is a prevalent urinary system malignancy and urinary cytology is widely used for its screening and follow-up. A novel diagnostic tool called Bladder Epicheck® (BE) is increasingly being used for monitoring the recurrence of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The simultaneous use of BE and urinary cytology can increase the diagnostic performances in the follow-up of bladder neoplasms. Methods: In this multicenter study, we retrospectively evaluated the data of 322 patients in follow-up for a high-grade bladder carcinoma over a six-year period (from January 2018 to March 2024). The diagnostic performances of both cytology and BE and their combination were calculated using histology as gold standard. Results: Recurrences were diagnosed as high-grade urothelial carcinoma NMIBC in 18 cases, low-grade papillary NMIBC in 8 cases, and carcinoma in situ (CIS) in 4 cases. Cytological analysis correctly identified 26 out of 30 carcinomas, while 286 were correctly diagnosed as negative results. BE correctly identified 25 out of 30 carcinomas, 285 were correctly diagnosed as negative results. The combination of BE and urinary cytology correctly identified 29 out of 30 carcinomas, while 289 were correctly diagnosed as negative results. Conclusions: The combination of BE and cytology could be the most effective approach for follow-up diagnosis in patients with high-grade NMIBC, reducing unnecessary invasive procedures.

Noninvasive Tests for Bladder Cancer Detection and Surveillance: A Systematic Review of Commercially Available Assays.

An important reason for the high health care costs associated with bladder cancer is the need for frequent cystoscopy for detection and surveillance of this disease. Cytologic analysis of voided urine specimens can assist, but is too inaccurate to replace cystoscopy. In an effort to create reliable, objective, noninvasive mechanisms for detecting bladder cancer, a number of urine-based molecular tests have been developed with the ultimate goal of reducing the frequency of cystoscopy. To summarize the performance of urine-based biomarker tests, currently commercially available in the US, as part of the initial workup for hematuria and for bladder cancer surveillance. In accordance with PRISMA guidelines we performed a systematic review of the literature on the performance of NMP22, BTA, UroVysion, ImmunoCyt/uCyt, CxBladder, and Bladder EpiCheck. Median sensitivity, specificity, negative (NPV) and positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated for each test based on the included studies. Twenty-eight studies met inclusion criteria for the performance of five urine-based biomarker tests in the setting hematuria workup. Median sensitivity ranged from 65.7% -100% and specificity ranged from 62.5% -93.8%. Median NPV ranged from 94.2% -98.3% and PPV ranged from 29% -58.7%. Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria for the performance of six tests in the setting of bladder cancer surveillance. Median sensitivity ranged from 22.6% -92.0% and specificity from 20.5% -97.9%. Median NPV ranged from 52.9% -96.5% and PPV ranged from 48.1% -75.7%. Our analysis finds that while these tests may provide some clinical utility, none of the assays have thus far demonstrated objective evidence to supplant the gold diagnostic standard.

Prospective evaluation of the RT-PCR based urinary marker Bladder Epicheck® as a diagnostic tool in upper urinary tract tumor.

Upper-tract-urothelial-carcinoma (UTUC) represents 5-10% of all urothelial-neoplasms with increasing incidence in the last decades. Current standard tools for diagnosis of UTUC include cytology, computed tomography (CT) urography and ureterorenoscopy (URS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of Bladder Epicheck® Test as diagnostic tool for UTUC diagnosis and recurrence. Overall, 136 urine samples, selective collected from upper-urinary-tract before URS for suspicion of UTUC were analyzed with cytology and Bladder Epicheck® Test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of both markers were calculated and compared to URS and/or histology as reference. UTUC was detected in 40 cases (33.3%), among them 30 were classified as low-grade (LG) and 10 as high-grade (HG). Overall sensitivity of Bladder Epicheck® for UTUC detection was 65% compared to 42.5% for cytology, increasing to 100% for Bladder Epicheck® and 90% for cytology if considering only HG tumors. Overall specificity of Bladder Epicheck® was 81.2% and of cytology 93.7%. PPV and NPV were 63.4% and 82.2% for Bladder Epicheck® and 77.2% and 76.5% for cytology. Considering an EpiScore cut-off >75, instead of 60, specificity of Bladder Epicheck® improves to 89% and PPV to 74.2%. Limitations include the use of a marker validated only for bladder-cancer and the relatively small number of cases. Due to its high sensitivity for HG tumors, the Bladder Epicheck® Test can be used in diagnosis and treatment decision-making of UTUC. Furthermore, it could be very useful in follow-up of UTUC, after endoscopic treatment to postpone or avoid unnecessary endoscopic exploration. Even if further studies are needed to validate these findings, Bladder Epicheck® could be a promising clinical tool for detection of UTUC.

Methylation Analysis of Urinary Sample in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Carcinoma: Frequency and Management of Invalid Result.

Numerous studies showed that methylation analysis represents a newly developed urinary marker based on DNA methylation changes in a panel of genomic biomarkers and it could represent a valid tool in terms of the diagnosis and prediction of high-grade urothelial carcinoma recurrences. One of the limits of the use of this new molecular method during a follow-up is represented by the number of invalid tests in routine practice. A total of 782 patients with a diagnosis of non-muscle-invasive high-grade carcinoma (NMIBC) was studied. The Bladder EpiCheck test (BE) was performed together with cytology in all cases within 1 year after the end of treatment. In 402 patients, the urinary samples were voided urine (UV), while, in 380 cases, the samples were collected after bladder washing (IU). For all the patients with invalid BE results, a second BE test was performed following the instructions for use that indicated the test should be repeated with a new urinary sample in the case of an invalid result. Analyzing the two different groups (UV and IU), we found the invalid BE results seemed to be not related to urinary samples (p = 0.13 Fisher's exact test), suggesting that the collection method was not relevant in order to reduce the number of invalid tests. In the follow-up for NMIBC, for patients for whom a BE test is planned, a combined approach of cytology and a methylation test is recommended in order to repeat the BE test with an invalid result only in those cases with a cytological diagnosis of atypical urothelial cells (AUC) suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (SHGUC) and high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC).

Bladder Epicheck Test: A Novel Tool to Support Urothelial Carcinoma Diagnosis in Urine Samples.

Bladder cancer and upper urothelial tract carcinoma are common diseases with a high risk of recurrence, thus necessitating follow-up after initial treatment. The management of non-muscle invasive bladder carcinoma (NMIBC) after transurethral resection involves surveillance, intravesical therapy, and cytology with cystoscopy. Urinary cytology, cystoscopy, and radiological evaluation of the upper urinary tract are recommended during follow-up in the international urological guidelines. Cystoscopy is the standard examination for the first assessment and follow-up of NMIBC, and urine cytology is a widely used urinary test with high sensitivity for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) and carcinoma in situ (CIS). In recent years, various urinary assays, including DNA methylation markers, have been used to detect bladder tumors. Among these, the Bladder EpiCheck test is one of the most widely used and is based on analysis of the methylation profile of urothelial cells to detect bladder neoplasms. This review assesses the importance of methylation analysis and the Bladder EpiCheck test as urinary biomarkers for diagnosing urothelial carcinomas in patients in follow-up for NMIBC, helping cytology and cystoscopy in doubtful cases. A combined approach of cytology and methylation analysis is suggested not only to diagnose HGUC, but also to predict clinical and histological recurrences.

Clinical performance of Bladder EpiCheck methylation test for active surveillance of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

e16597 Background: Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) has a favorable 5-year survival, but up to 60% of patients experience cancer recurrence within the first year of diagnosis. The current gold standard for active surveillance is periodic cystoscopy, but this is expensive and invasive. An alternative non-invasive method involves urine cytology, but it has poor sensitivity. Recently developed urine-based molecular diagnostics such as the EpiCheck (Nucleix, Rehovot, Israel) test offers non-invasive and quick testing for active surveillance. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of Bladder EpiCheck in active surveillance of NMIBC. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant studies published between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2022. The primary outcome was the sensitivity / negative predictive value (NPV) and specificity (PPV) of Bladder EpiCheck in active surveillance of NMIBC. We also performed a subgroup analysis to evaluate the performance of EpiCheck in detecting the recurrence of high-grade and low-grade NMIBC. Results: Our systematic search identified 110 articles, from which 6 studies were included in the final analysis. Compared with urine cytology, EpiCheck had a higher pooled sensitivity (73% [95% CI: 59-83] vs. 51% [95% CI: 30-72]) and NPV (90% [95% CI: 79.5-95.2] vs. 84% [95 % CI: 69-92]. However, EpiCheck had a lower pooled specificity (63% [95% CI: 48-76] vs. 97% [95% CI: 89-99]) and PPV (63% [95% CI: 48-76] vs. 85% [95 % CI: 69-94] than urine cytology. Similarly in subgroup analysis, EpiCheck had a higher pooled sensitivity than urine cytology in detecting both high-grade (86% [95% CI: 78-91] vs. 63% [95% CI: 43-80]) and low-grade (44% [95% CI: 34-55] vs. 13% [95% CI: 7-23]) NMIBC. Conclusions: The Bladder EpiCheck test has a better sensitivity than urine cytology and may be utilized as a part of the active surveillance strategy for NIMBC recurrence.

Diagnostic value of Xpert® BC Detection, Bladder Epicheck®, Urovysion® FISH and cytology in the detection of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Following the current guidelines, diagnosis and staging for upper urinary tract tumours (UTUC) can be performed with Computed Tomography, urography, ureterorenoscopy (URS) and selective cytology. The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of the Xpert®-BC-Detection and the Bladder-Epicheck®-test in the detection of UTUC and compare it with cytology and the Urovysion®-FISH test using histology and URS as gold standard. A total of 97 analyses were collected through selective catheterization of the ureter before URS to test for cytology, Xpert®-BC-Detection, Bladder-Epicheck® and Urovysion®-FISH. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated using histology results/URS as reference. Overall sensitivity was 100% for Xpert®-BC-Detection, 41.9% for cytology, 64.5% for Bladder-Epicheck® and 87.1% for Urovysion®-FISH. The sensitivity of Xpert®-BC-Detection was 100% in both, LG and HG tumours, sensitivity of cytology increased from 30.8% in LG to 100% in HG, for Bladder-Epicheck® from 57.7% in LG to 100% in HG and of Urovysion®-FISH from 84.6% in LG to 100% in HG tumours. Specificity was 4.5% for Xpert®-BC-Detection, 93.9% for cytology, 78.8% for Bladder-Epicheck® and 81.8% for Urovysion®-FISH. PPV was 33% for Xpert®-BC-Detection, 76.5% for cytology, 58.8% for Bladder-Epicheck® and 69.2% for Urovysion®FISH. NPV was 100% for Xpert®-BC-Detection, 77.5% for cytology, 82.5% for Bladder-Epicheck® and 93.1% for Urovysion®FISH. Bladder-Epicheck® and Urovysion®FISH along with cytology could be a helpful ancillary method in the diagnosis and follow-up of UTUC while due to its low specificity Xpert®-BC Detection seems to be of limited usefulness.

Bladder EpiCheck methylation test predicts short- and long-term HG events in bladder cancer patients treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin

Bladder EpiCheck methylation test predicts short- and long-term HG events in bladder cancer patients treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin

Bladder EpiCheck urine test in the follow-up of NMIBC: a cost analysis.

In the Netherlands yearly more than 5000 patients are diagnosed with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). With a specificity of 88.0% and a negative predictive value (NPV) for high grade NMIBC of 99.3%, the Bladder EpiCheck (BE) urine test may be used in NMIBC to reduce the burden of follow-up cystoscopies. In this study a cost analysis of the BE follow-up strategy in the Dutch healthcare system was performed. In half of the follow-up appointments, BE was used as a rule-in for cystoscopy. In addition, the possible delay in recurrence detection was estimated. A cost calculation tool was developed using Microsoft Excel. The BE strategy results in an estimated cost reduction of 8%, 4% and 9% in low, intermediate and high risk patients, respectively. In the Netherlands this may result in a cost reduction of approximately 1.6 million euro per year. The estimated delay in the detection of recurrent disease would be 3.9, 1.7 and 1.3months in low, intermediate and high risk NMIBC patients respectively. To conclude, the BE can be used to reduce the costs of NMIBC follow-up, with a small delay in diagnosis of recurrent disease.

DNA methylation analysis in urinary samples: A useful method to predict the risk of neoplastic recurrence in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in the high-risk group.

Recently, it was reported that the Bladder EpiCheck test is likely to represent a valid tool in the diagnostic process of patients who have suspected bladder carcinoma, with some controversial management decisions because of the technical limitations of cytology. Two hundred ninety patients with a diagnosis of nonmuscle-invasive bladder carcinoma who were admitted at the authors' department from March 2019 to December 2019 were treated and followed for 1year. During follow-up, all patients were evaluated by voided urine cytology, white-light cystoscopy (according to European Association of Urology guidelines), and the Bladder EpiCheck test. The cytologic diagnoses of high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) and suspicious for HGUC were histologically confirmed in 5 of 20 patients (25%) who had quantitative Bladder EpiCheck scores (EpiScores) from 60 to 69, in 23 of 36 patients (64%) who had EpiScores from 70 to 79, and in 42 of 56 patients (75%) and 57 of 63 patients (90%) who had EpiScores between 80 and 89 and EpiScores >90, respectively. Of 48 patients who had a cytologic diagnosis of HGUC or suspicious for HGUC with EpiScores ≥60 and negative histology, 20 (42%) had a recurrence of HGUC, which was cytologically and histologically confirmed, at 6-12months during follow-up. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study in which patients at high risk for HGUC were stratified using the Bladder EpiCheck EpiScore. The results validate this methylation analysis tool as a useful method for predicting recurrent HGUC during the follow-up of patients with nonmuscle-invasive bladder carcinoma.

The Role of Bladder Epicheck Test In Follow-Up of Patients with Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.

EpiCheck is a new urinary test that analyses DNA methylation biomarkers in order to identify high-risk urothelial cancer MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective single centre study was performed. We analysed Epicheck results in a population of 231 patients in follow-up for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. The primary endpoint was to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of Epicheck in detecting any type of bladder cancer recurrence. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate specificity and sensitivity of Epicheck in patients with high-risk recurrence and in patients recently treated with endovesical therapy (< 3 months). Negative predictive value (NPV) for cytology was 83 % while for bladder Epicheck it was 89 %, while positive predictive value (PPV) was 67 % and 73 % for cytology and Epicheck respectively. Considering only high grade non muscle invasive bladder cancer the sensitivity of Epicheck was 91 % and for cytology was 81 %, specificity was 85 % and 83 % and negative predictive value of Epicheck outreached 96 % compared to 92 % of cytology. Among patients with an ongoing or recent endovesical treatment it appears that sensitivity of Epicheck was 88% % compared to 73 % of cytology, specificity was 97 % and 85 % and NPV was 92 % compared to 82 % for cytology. The EpiCheck (test showed very high diagnostic values, higher than the currently, gold standard. The test might clinically improve the BCa management in terms of, reduced number of inconclusive/suspicious reports of cytology and endoscopy, reduced number of further examinations, reduced associated patient and economic.

Usefulness of the Urine Methylation Test (Bladder EpiCheck®) in Follow-Up Patients with Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer and Cytological Diagnosis of Atypical Urothelial Cells-An Institutional Study.

Urothelial bladder cancer is a heterogeneous disease and one of the most common cancers worldwide. Bladder cancer ranges from low-grade tumors that recur and require long-term invasive surveillance to high-grade tumors with high mortality. After the initial contemporary treatment in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, recurrence and progression rates remain high. Follow-up of these patients involves the use of cystoscopies, cytology, and imaging of the upper urinary tract in selected patients. However, in this context, both cystoscopy and cytology have limitations. In the follow-up of bladder cancer, the finding of urothelial cells with abnormal cytological characteristics is common. The main objective of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of a urine DNA methylation test in patients with urothelial bladder cancer under follow-up and a cytological finding of urothelial cell atypia. In addition, we analyzed the relationship between the urine DNA methylation test, urine cytology, and subsequent cystoscopy study. It was a prospective and descriptive cohort study conducted on patients presenting with non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma between 1 January 2018 and 31 May 2022. A voided urine sample and a DNA methylation test was extracted from each patient. A total of 70 patients, 58 male and 12 female, with a median age of 70.03 years were studied. High-grade urothelial carcinoma was the main histopathological diagnosis. Of the cytologies, 41.46% were cataloged as atypical urothelial cells. The DNA methylation test was positive in 17 urine samples, 51 were negative and 2 were invalid. We demonstrated the usefulness of a DNA methylation test in the follow-up of patients diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma. The methylation test also helps to diagnose urothelial cell atypia.

MP54-11 THE ROLE OF A DNA METHYLATION TEST IN THE SURVEILLANCE OF BLADDER CANCER: A SINGLE-CENTER BLINDED PROSPECTIVE STUDY

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022MP54-11 THE ROLE OF A DNA METHYLATION TEST IN THE SURVEILLANCE OF BLADDER CANCER: A SINGLE-CENTER BLINDED PROSPECTIVE STUDY Marialaura Righetto, Daniele Modonutti, Monica Montopoli, Francesco Pagano, Fabrizio Dal Moro, and Mariangela Mancini Marialaura RighettoMarialaura Righetto More articles by this author , Daniele ModonuttiDaniele Modonutti More articles by this author , Monica MontopoliMonica Montopoli More articles by this author , Francesco PaganoFrancesco Pagano More articles by this author , Fabrizio Dal MoroFabrizio Dal Moro More articles by this author , and Mariangela ManciniMariangela Mancini More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002633.11AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Non-invasive tests based on DNA methylation profiles in the urine have been introduced as a possible alternative to cystoscopies, such as the Bladder EpiCheck (BE) test. METHODS: In this single-center prospective study we included patients (pts) on follow-up (FU) for any-risk BC who underwent cystoscopy between 01/2019 and 02/2020. Pts with positive pathology results were considered positive according to the reference standard (RS). In case of positive cystoscopy, we considered the result of the subsequent endoscopic resection. In case of negative/inconclusive pathology result and positive cytology, the RS was evaluated at the subsequent operative cystoscopy. Pts without pathology/cytology were excluded. DNA methylation status was analyzed after urine centrifugation. An EpiScore ≥ 60 was considered positive. We performed a sensitivity analysis testing the performance of the BE for the detection of high-grade (HG)/any-grade (AG) BC. A multivariable logistic regression analysis assessed the association between BE and AG/HG BC. RESULTS: We included 120 pts. 33 (27%) pts had a BC recurrence. Median (IQR) FU was 25 (24-29) mths. 22 (18%) pts without an RS were excluded from the study. Mean EpiScore was 41(SD:31). 45/98 (46%) pts were positive according to the RS. 34/98(35%) had a positive and 64/98(65%) a negative BE result. Among the positive pts, 27(79%) were the true positive tests, 7(21%) were false positives. Among pts with a negative BE result, 47(73%) were the true negative, and 17 (27%) were false-negative. None of the true negatives relapsed at FU. All HG BCs but 2 had a positive BE test. Overall sensitivity was 61%( 95% confidence interval-CI:21-92); specificity was 87%(95%CI:40-100). The overall negative predictive value (NPV) was 73%(95%CI:29-97), the positive (PPV) was 79%(95%CI:33-98). Excluding low-grades (LG), sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 79% (95%CI:33-98), 89% (95%CI:41-100), 77%(95%CI:31-97) and 90%(95%CI:42-100). For LG BC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 27% (95%CI:4-53), 21% (95%CI:3-48), 15% (9-44) and 65%(95%CI:46-81). An increase in 1 EpiScore corresponded to a 5% increase in the risk of harboring an HG BC. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, BE was independently associated with the presence of AG(OR:14;95%CI:6-43;p<0.001) and HG BC (OR:20;95%CI:3-126;p<0.001). The AUC was 81%(95%CI:73-89) for AG BC, and 96%(95%CI:88-100) for HG BC. CONCLUSIONS: BE showed high diagnostic performance in HG BC. Source of Funding: None © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e930 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Marialaura Righetto More articles by this author Daniele Modonutti More articles by this author Monica Montopoli More articles by this author Francesco Pagano More articles by this author Fabrizio Dal Moro More articles by this author Mariangela Mancini More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...

The bladder epicheck test and cytology in the follow-up of patients with non-muscle-invasive high grade bladder carcinoma.

The management of non-muscle invasive bladder carcinoma (NMIBC) after transurethral resection of a bladder tumor consists of adjuvant intravesical therapy and strict and long surveillance with urine cytology and cystoscopy. The Bladder EpiCheck test (Nucleix Ltd) (BE) is a newly developed urinary markers based on DNA methylation changes in a panel of 15 genomic biomarkers, with a promising performance in term of non-invasive NMIBC detection.In this study we prospectively enrolled 151 consecutive patients with high grade NMIBC, treated with intravesical BCG and mitomycin C therapy and evaluated during the follow-up by voided urine cytology and white-light cystoscopy, according to the European Association of Urology Guidelines. The Bladder EpiCheck test was performed at the same time of urine cytology in voided specimen. In all cases with positive cytology the diagnosis was confirmed by histology and a diagnosis was made according to the 2017 tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) classification and graded using both the 1973 and the 2004 World Health Organization (WHO) classifications.At three months of follow-up, we reported similar overall specificity rates for BE and urine cytology (85,1% vs 86,3%). In the group of patients with carcinoma in situ (CIS), we found the same specificity for BE and urine cytology (81,4%), while in the groups of patients with papillary high grade NMIBC, the specificity of BE was higher compared to cytology (96,3% vs 90,4%). The sensitivity of BE was always higher compared to cytology during all the follow-up both for papillary NMIBC and CIS.In the early follow-up of NMIBC the EpiCheck test might replace urinary cytology.

A0145 - Bladder EpiCheck in clinical decision making in the follow up of non muscle invasive bladder cancer

A0145 - Bladder EpiCheck in clinical decision making in the follow up of non muscle invasive bladder cancer

A0077 - Utility of bladder EpiCheck methylation test for the surveillance of bladder cancer patients treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin

A0077 - Utility of bladder EpiCheck methylation test for the surveillance of bladder cancer patients treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin

Bladder EpiCheck for NMIBC

Bladder EpiCheck for NMIBC

Upper urothelial tract high-grade carcinoma: comparison of urine cytology and DNA methylation analysis in urinary samples

Numerous studies showed that bladder urothelial carcinoma and upper urothelial tract carcinoma (UTUC) display clinical and genomic similarities. In order to analyze that the same panel of biomarkers used in the diagnosis of bladder urothelial carcinoma could be suitable for early detection of UTUC, we performed a retrospective study in which we analyzed Bladder EpiCheck scores in the urinary samples obtained by selective ureteral catheterization in a high-grade UTUC cohort, correlating the results with urinary cytology and diagnostic urethral biopsies. The present study represents a retrospective analysis of 82 patients with clinically localized high-grade UTUC (60 renal pelvis UTUC, 22 ureter UTUC) who had undergone a radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) at our Urology department from June 2018 to November 2020. Before any surgical procedure, one sample of urine, obtained by selective ureteral catheterization, was collected for each patient for cytological examination, and the remaining material was stored for the Bladder EpiCheck test. Our results showed that the sensitivity of the methylation test for high-grade UTUC was about 97.4%, significantly higher than the sensitivity of urinary cytology either considering the HGUC cytological diagnosis or including in the positive cases the SHGUC cytological diagnosis (97.4% versus 59% or 70.5%). The methylation analysis of urinary samples may represent a valid tool in the diagnostic process of patients with suspected UTUC. In cases with a difficult clinical decision after upper urinary tract biopsy and cytology, the methylation test could assist in the clinical management of UTUC patients.

Alternating Cystoscopy with Bladder EpiCheck® in the Surveillance of Low-Grade Intermediate-Risk NMIBC: A Cost Comparison Model.

Bladder cancer surveillance is invasive, intensive and costly. Patients with low grade intermediate risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are at high risk of recurrence. The objective of this model is to compare the cost of a strategy to alternate surveillance with cystoscopy and a urine marker, Bladder EpiCheck, to standard surveillance. A decision tree model was built using TreeAge Pro Healthcare to compare standard surveillance (Standard) with a modified surveillance incorporating Bladder EpiCheck. The model was based on 2 years of surveillance. Outcomes were obtained from literature. Costs were obtained from US and 9 European countries. Sensitivity analyses were performed. The efficacy of the model was equivalent in terms of recurrence for each arm with median recurrence rate of 22%. When setting marker price at 200 local currency, the marker arm was less expensive in the USA, Netherlands, Switzerland, Belgium, Italy, Austria and UK by 154€ to 329£ per patient, for a 2-year period. Cost was higher in France, Spain, and Germany by 33-103€. Cost parity was achieved with marker price between 148€ and $421. Marker cost and specificity have the greatest impact on the overall model cost. A strategy alternating the urine marker Bladder EpiCheck with cystoscopy in the surveillance of patients with low grade intermediate risk bladder cancer is cost equivalent in the US and European countries when the marker is priced 148€ -$421, as a result of the marker's high specificity (86%). Prospective studies will be necessary to validate these findings.