Detection Of Bladder Cancer In Urine Research Articles

Bladder cancer detection in urine by novel methylation markers

Although cystoscopy is a reliable tool for detecting bladder cancer (BC) in patients with hematuria, it is invasive, costly and often unnecessary since most patients with hematuria do not have BC. Consequently, developing urinary biomarkers for non-invasive BC detection is a major clinical need. While DNA methylation markers hold promise, diagnostic performance can still be improved. We assessed 11 candidate methylation markers for urinary BC detection. Urine samples from 77 primary BC patients and 69 controls were used for marker selection and training, with independent validation conducted on samples from 63 primary BC patients and 71 controls. Samples were self-collected at home, mailed to the hospital and analyzed via quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. Marker performance was evaluated through univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Decision curve analysis (DCA) gauged clinical utility by potential cystoscopy reduction. Evaluation identified three most promising markers: NRN1, GALR1, and HAND2. These markers exhibited significantly elevated methylation levels in BC compared to controls in both cohorts (P < 0.001). The combined marker set demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 at 84% (95% CI: 76–92%) sensitivity and 96% (95% CI: 91–100%) specificity. Validation yielded nearly equivalent accuracy (AUC 0.89, sensitivity 76% (95% CI: 65–86%), specificity 93% (95% CI: 86–99%)). DCA indicated a potential of 20 to 35% reduction in cystoscopies depending on the clinical scenario. The excellent diagnostic potential of our methylation markers for non-invasive BC detection, emphasizes their significance for future diagnostic strategies.

P133 - Bladder cancer detection in urine using DNA methylation markers: A prospective preclinical validation

P133 - Bladder cancer detection in urine using DNA methylation markers: A prospective preclinical validation

Bladder cancer detection in urine using DNA methylation markers: a technical and prospective preclinical validation

BackgroundThe development of accurate urinary biomarkers for non-invasive and cost-effective detection of primary and recurrent bladder tumours is recognized as one of the major clinical needs in bladder cancer diagnostics. The purposes of this study were (1) to validate the results of a previous technical comparison by determining the diagnostic performance of nine methylation markers in urine pellet compared to full void urine, and (2) to validate the diagnostic performance of the optimal marker panel GHSR/MAL from a previous exploratory study in a preclinical setting.MethodsUrine samples of 108 patients with bladder cancer and 100 age- and gender-matched controls were prospectively collected for methylation analysis. Urinary methylation levels of the markers FAM19A4, GHSR, MAL, miR-129, miR-935, PHACTR3, PRDM14, SST and ZIC1 were determined with quantitative methylation-specific PCR in urine pellet. Area under the curves (AUCs) were determined for individual markers and the marker panel GHSR/MAL. The diagnostic performance of the marker panel GHSR/MAL was evaluated in the total study population and in different subgroups of patients with bladder cancer using the Chi-square test. The diagnostic accuracy was assessed by leave-one-out cross-validation.ResultsAll nine urinary methylation markers (FAM19A4, GHSR, MAL, miR-129, miR-935, PHACTR3, PRDM14, SST and ZIC1) showed significantly higher methylation levels in bladder cancer patients than in controls (p < 0.001). Area under the curves (AUCs) of the nine methylation markers tested in urine pellet were similar to AUCs in full void urine of an independent previous cohort. GHSR/MAL reached an AUC of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84–0.94), at 80% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Sensitivity of GHSR/MAL increased with higher tumour grades, higher tumour stages, in primary vs. recurrent tumours, and in males vs. females.ConclusionsThis technical validation supports the robustness of DNA methylation analysis in urine pellet and full void urine for the non-invasive detection of bladder cancer. Subsequent preclinical validation confirmed the diagnostic potential of GHSR/MAL. These findings underline the diagnostic potential of the marker panel GHSR/MAL for future bladder cancer diagnostics.

Urinary MicroRNAs as Potential Markers for Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer.

Currently, voided urine cytology (VUC) serves as the gold standard for the detection of bladder cancer (BCa) in urine. Despite its high specificity, VUC has shortcomings in terms of sensitivity. Therefore, alternative biomarkers are being searched, which might overcome these disadvantages as a useful adjunct to VUC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic potential of the urinary levels of selected microRNAs (miRs), which might represent such alternative biomarkers due to their BCa-specific expression. Expression levels of nine BCa-associated microRNAs (miR-21, -96, -125b, -126, -145, -183, -205, -210, -221) were assessed by quantitative PCR in urine sediments from 104 patients with primary BCa and 46 control subjects. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses revealed a diagnostic potential for miR-96, -125b, -126, -145, -183, and -221 with area under the curve (AUC) values between 0.605 and 0.772. The combination of the four best candidates resulted in sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (NPV), and accuracy of 73.1%, 95.7%, 97.4%, 61.1%, and 80.0%, respectively. Combined with VUC, sensitivity and NPV could be increased by nearly 8%, each surpassing the performance of VUC alone. The present findings suggested a diagnostic potential of miR-125b, -145, -183, and -221 in combination with VUC for non-invasive detection of BCa in urine.

631A comparative study of cytology and biomarkers: HA-HAASE, hemastix detection, BTA-STAT and UBC-rapid for bladder cancer detection in urine

631A comparative study of cytology and biomarkers: HA-HAASE, hemastix detection, BTA-STAT and UBC-rapid for bladder cancer detection in urine

The Simultaneous Use of Telomerase, Cytokeratin 20 and CD4 for Bladder Cancer Detection in Urine

Objective: Because of the low sensitivity of urinary cytological diagnosis of urinary bladder carcinoma, new molecular diagnostic methods have been proposed. We decided to verify the expression of telomerase mRNA coding for the catalytic component (hTRT), cytokeratin 20 (CK20) and CD4 antigen mRNAs in urine as possible diagnostic tool. Methods: Evaluation of hTRT, CK20, CD4 mRNAs was performed in 50 ml of naturally voided urine of 205 patients of which 153 with bladder cancer (Tis, n = 11; TaGx, n = 4; TaG1, n = 25; TaG2, n = 26; TaG3, n = 8; T1G1, n = 16; T1G2, n = 17; T1G3, n = 20; T2G2, n = 6; T2G3, n = 13; T3G3, n = 7) and 52 controls. A quantitative expression of hTRT at mRNA level versus TRAP (telomeric repeat amplification protocol) assay was performed in 20 patients and 14 controls. The expression of RT-PCR for hTRT, CK20, CD4 versus urinary cytology was analysed in 44 patients with bladder cancer. Evaluating the three molecular markers together, the result was considered correct when at least two of the markers were positive, suspected when only one marker was positive and negative for diagnosis of tumour when all markers were negative. The performance of the diagnostic model resulted from the logistic analysis evaluated with receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. Results: The sensitivity detected for each tumour marker was as follows: for hTRT 90.8%, for CK20 84.3% and for CD4 was 64.7%, while the specificity was 94.2% for CD4 and 78.8% for both hTRT and CK20. When a simultaneous evaluation of the three tumour markers was considered, 88.2% of the diagnoses were correct, 11.8% were suspected for tumour and none were mistaken. When compared with cytology, the simultaneous use of the three markers allowed reaching a correct diagnosis in 88% of the cases in comparison to 25% by urinary cytology. The sensitivity in the detection of bladder cancer was higher for hTRT at mRNA level in comparison with the enzymatic activity detection with TRAP (90% vs. 35%) while the specificity for both markers resulted very high (100%). Conclusions: These data show that in the future the diagnostic improvement of urine based molecular markers for the detection of bladder cancer in the urine could improve the sensitivity of urinary cytology reducing the need of a cystoscopy.

Genetic alterations as clonal markers for bladder cancer detection in urine

Bladder cancer is the result of a clonal expansion of cancer cells in which multiple genetic alterations have accumulated. Point mutations of the p53 gene are frequently observed in bladder cancer. Loss of a retinoblastoma (Rb) allele is also common in bladder cancer. Recent data have shown frequent loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and homozygous deletion of 9p21, including the region of p16INK4A, a putative tumor suppressor gene, in bladder cancer. LOH is also observed frequently at several other chromosome regions in bladder cancer. These genetic changes have proved useful as clonal markers in the detection of cancer cells in urine. Because of their complexity, most molecular diagnostic approaches are not considered promising cancer screening tools in patients or high-risk populations. However, a new molecular approach, the examination of microsatellite alterations in bladder cancer and urine specimens, is a promising screening tool for the disease. The common genetic alterations in bladder cancer and their use as clonal markers in screening or diagnosis strategies will be discussed.

Genetic alterations as clonal markers for bladder cancer detection in urine

Genetic alterations as clonal markers for bladder cancer detection in urine