Reviewed by: Finding a New Midwestern History ed. by Jon K. Lauck, Gleaves Whitney and Joseph Hogan Amy Laurel Fluker Finding a New Midwestern History. Edited by Jon K. Lauck, Gleaves Whitney, and Joseph Hogan. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2018. ISBN 978-1-4962-0182-9. 396 pp., hardcover, $55.00. There is a popular perception that hangs over the Midwest, sometimes over its own inhabitants, that it is the “Lost Region”—a once-vibrant and important place that has now become culturally irrelevant. Finding a New Midwestern History directly challenges this pervasive stereotype by presenting a compelling portrait of a dynamic region. In the process, it calls for the reinvigoration of midwestern studies and appeals to midwesterners, as much as to anyone else, to embrace this unique region. The interconnectedness of identity and place is a central organizing theme that bridges the essays in Finding a New Midwestern History. This edited volume, born of the 2015 meeting of the Midwestern History Association, reflects the scale and diversity of this conference and the field of midwestern studies as a whole. It boasts 21 chapters, each by a different author, organized into six sections. Taken together, the chapters represent an impressive degree of accumulated expertise and offer a broad, interdisciplinary perspective on the study of the Midwest. Employing a variety of methodologies, including physical and human geography, social and cultural history, and literary analysis, the authors establish the Midwest as a region both real and imagined—not only a landscape formed by environmental forces but also a social, cultural, and political construction that became emblematic of American exceptionalism. In one particularly compelling essay, for example, Gleaves Whitney argues the Midwest embodied the [End Page 158] aspirations Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, and John Adams held for the future of the republic. Each viewed the Midwest as essential to the nation’s unfolding destiny and variously envisioned it as an incubator for liberty, commerce, and virtue. As much as the Midwest evoked a unifying national vision, however, historian Nicole Etcheson persuasively argues for its distinctiveness—even from the neighboring states of the upper South. According to Etcheson, “the Civil War opened a gap between the regions” and that while white Midwesterners harbored racist attitudes, they were far more likely to accept racial equality as an outcome of the war (40–41). Indeed, Michael C. Steiner asserts, the distinctiveness of the Midwest became increasingly evident in the late nineteenth century. Steiner details how the architects of midwestern identity, including historian Frederick Jackson Turner, positioned the region as the literal and figurative heart of the republic and as the wellspring of American virtues like democracy, productivity, and individuality. Finding a New Midwestern History also calls attention, however, to the pitfalls of this mythologized version of midwestern history and identity. In particular, as Susan E. Gray illustrates, it has encouraged the erasure of indigenous midwesterners. Gray suggests this erasure served Turner’s exceptionalist interpretation of American history but insists that it obscures the region’s significant indigenous population as well as its persistent activism. Furthermore, as Jeffrey Helgeson demonstrates, while the appeal of the mythic Midwest as a land of opportunity attracted thousands of black migrants to the region in the early twentieth century, their arrival amplified the deeply entrenched racism of the region. Thus, African Americans experienced the Midwest as “a land of hope and a place of profound disappointment” (112). As the contributions to this volume indicate, such contradictions are endemic to the study of the Midwest. At once rural and urban, agrarian and industrial, imagined and real, the Midwest defies generalization. Its uncertain relationship to the nation, the world, and its constituent parts introduces further ambiguities. As Jon Butler observes: “The real Midwest may not have been the Tower of Babel, but it comes close, with exuberant complications and bitter tensions” (196). Indeed, in this case, the metaphor of Babel is particularly apt. Finding a New Midwestern History raises important questions about voice and authenticity in midwestern studies. Who should tell the stories of the Midwest? Should it be confined to those academics living and working in the region? Is there an authentically midwestern voice? Author Zachary Michael Jack seems to think...
Read full abstract