Civil Rights activity since 1967 has taken a new direction and added a new dimension. The national Civil Rights organizations have elected to emphasize a variety of programs to improve the economic status of the American Negro. This is a significant change from the emphasis placed on local action in the courts.1 Although all of the economic programs advocated by militant and Black Civil Rights leaders are characterized by diversity, there are three basic solutions-oriented alternatives now advocated. The first is skills training and employment emphasis. The Urban League!2 and the NAACP3 have been active in programs to improve employment opportu? nities either through job placement or skills training, in new industrial firms in the ghetto or in established business. The primary participants in the jobs-oriented approach, however, are the private sector's large corpo? rations. For example, large corporations responded to former President Johnson's plea for help by establishing a JOBS Program under the sponsorship of the National Alliance of Businessmen. Firms participating in JOBS have already created 105,000 permanent jobs and have promised to provide at least 267,000 more for the hard core urban unemployed. A second general approach to the solution of the economic plight of the Negro is the Black economic development or the Black capitalism approach. One course of action would establish Negro businesses within the existing economic community. Negro businesses and capitalists would face competition across the color line. The alternative course would establish an economic substructure for the Blacks. In this environ? ment, newly formed Black businesses would operate in a market com? posed of Blacks. In extreme form, the latter alternative has a geographical or spatial dimension of a separate Black economic system. CORE, the Black Muslims, and the Black Panthers have already given evidence of a preference for the Black capitalism approach that leads to a separate Black economy.4