HighlightsA protocol was developed to determine feed spillage from broiler pan feeders at different bird ages and feed forms.Two validation studies (14 and 42 d) showed that excreta and wood shavings can be accounted for in live bird trials.This protocol could be used in commercial broiler houses with only an internal screen and recover feed spillage >90%.Abstract. Feed constitutes between 70% and 80% of total costs in commercial poultry production. As of today, it is unknown how much feed is spilled by broilers during a production flock. The objective of this project was to develop and validate a protocol to determine feed spillage from commercial broiler feeder pans. A 69 × 69 cm feed spillage capture unit consisted of a perforated top platform, internal secondary screen, and a bottom pan lined with plastic sheeting. Two experiments were conducted to simulate feed spillage rates (1%, 5%, and 10%) of broilers at 14 and 42 d of age. Feed spillage rates were applied to capture units using two internal screen approaches [no screen (NS) and secondary screen (SS)] and two corrections using an indigestible feed marker [non-corrected vs. TiO2-corrected] in a factorial arrangement. A total of 24 capture units were used to estimate recovery rates of fixed amounts of feed, wood shavings, and stone-ground mustard (as a substitute for bird excreta). Data were analyzed as a two-way ANOVA to determine interactions and main effects of screen and TiO2 correction on recovery rates. The use of a secondary screen in the capture unit aided in preventing wood shavings and simulated excreta from reaching the bottom pan. The use of TiO2 combined with the use of SS aided in segregating feed from wood shavings and simulated excreta, resulting in the best approach to determine feed spillage. When collecting feed spillage in the bottom pan using a SS followed by TiO2 correction for young birds (14 d) using crumbled feed, the percent error was within 8%, 13%, and 16% for the 1%, 5%, and 10% feed spillage rates, respectively. The larger errors for the 5% and 10% spillage rates resulted from some feed being caught by excessive wood shavings on the SS. When collecting feed spillage in the bottom pan using a SS and TiO2 correction for older birds (42 d) using pelleted feed, the percent error was within 3%, 4%, and 3% for the 1%, 5%, and 10% feed spillage rates, respectively. The proposed method can be used to accurately capture feed spillage at different broiler ages using different feed forms and to compare different commercial broiler feeders. Keywords: Broiler, Feed form, Feed spillage, Feeder.
Read full abstract