“Datums” in the biostratigraphic record are based on phylogeny, meaning speciation and extinction, and sometimes on coiling changes. We can also employ various nonphylogenetic configurationssuch as disjunct distributions, extratropical excursions and correlations with isotopic spikes. Progress in Cainozoic geohistory depends on rigorous, refined correlations between all environments on the earth. In practice, that means an opportunistic groping “outward” from the most secure and refined realm of our chronology (tropical oceanic succession based on planktonic skeletonized protists) towards the more difficult realms such as larger benthonic foraminifera in neritic sediments, extra-tropical oceanic and neritic successions, continental faunas, floras and palynofloral successions, and, finally and most elusively, continental geomorphic successions. Formal zones are necessary, but their proliferation is not. A Late Eocene example of coincidence in time between planktonic foraminiferal, marine dinoflagellate and terrestrial pollen zones suggests that heterogeneous Oppelzones may be the soundest basis for local and regional stratigraphic systems. The overall Cainozoic climatic deterioration was reversed substantially in the Eocene and in the Miocene by shortlived, far-reaching, bipolar events, signalled by extratropical excursions by tropical-type foraminifera, in some cases correlated solidly with isotopic spikes. Widespread oceanic hiatuses appear to correlate with episodes of global warming and transgression better than with episodes of global cooling, marginal hiatus and of intensified oceanic circulation. Australia's northward “drift” since the Middle Eocene notwithstanding, wholesale diachronism no longer is a useful paradigm; we are better off thinking in terms of virtually isochronous shifts in climate, watermass, and in planktonic and benthonic assemblages.
Read full abstract