Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment Research Articles

Evaluation Of Subjective Cognitive Function Using The Cognitive Complaints In Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment (COBRA) In Japanese Adults.

PurposeTo examine the relationship between depressive symptoms, subjective cognitive function, and quality of life in Japanese adults using the Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment (COBRA).Patients and methodsWe evaluated 585 adult community volunteers using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for evaluation of depressive symptoms and the COBRA for evaluation of subjective cognitive function. We additionally used the 8-item Short-Form Health Survey and the Sheehan Disability Scale to evaluate the quality of life (QoL).ResultsMeasures of subjective cognitive function were significantly correlated with depressive symptoms and QoL. Structural equation modeling demonstrated that depressive symptoms directly and indirectly decreased QoL via their effects on subjective cognitive dysfunction. Measures of depressive symptoms were more closely related to QoL than were measures of subjective cognitive function.LimitationsStudy participants were general adult population community volunteers and included healthy people; thus, these results may not be generalizable to patients with depression or bipolar disorder. In addition, the cross-sectional design of this study prevented the identification of causal relationships among the parameters.ConclusionChanges in subjective cognitive function may affect QoL via depressive symptoms. Evaluations of subjective cognitive function may help identify factors that reduce QoL.

The effects of cognitive reserve on predicting and moderating the cognitive and psychosocial functioning of patients with bipolar disorder

BackgroundCognitive reserve (CR) reflects the resilience of the brain to cope with neuropathological changes and minimize clinical manifestations. In the present study, we explore the association between CR and cognitive and psychosocial functioning, and examined the potential moderating role of CR in patients with bipolar disorder (BD). MethodsOne hundred and twenty-five outpatients with BD type I and sixty healthy individuals were recruited. All participants were assessed with a neuropsychological battery examining attention and processing speed, working memory, visual memory and executive functioning, the Global Assessment of Functioning scale and the Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment. Proxies for cognitive reserve included premorbid intelligence and educational level. ResultsPatients with bipolar disorder presented with worse cognitive performance and psychosocial functioning than healthy controls. Multiple regression models revealed that educational level negatively associated with all assessed domain-specific cognition scores and premorbid intelligence predicted attention and processing speed and psychosocial functioning. Notably, premorbid intelligence significantly moderated the associations between the number of episodes (total, hypo/manic and depressed) and neurocognitive functioning, and the educational level also moderated the relationships between the numbers of hypo/manic and total episodes and subjective cognitive functioning. ConclusionsCognitive reserve contributes to functional outcomes in patients with BD and may emerge as a key factor contributing to the course and prognosis of patients with BD. In the future, cognitive reserve must be considered in both research and clinical interventions related to bipolar disorder.

The associations between subjective and objective cognitive functioning across manic or hypomanic, depressed, and euthymic states in Chinese bipolar patients

BackgroundPatients may present cognitive deficits during all stages of bipolar disorder (BD). Few studies have examined self-reported cognitive difficulties and its relation to neurocognitive dysfunction during symptomatic periods of BD. This study aimed to compare subjective cognitive functioning and explore associations between subjective and objective cognitive functioning across different BD clinical states, and investigate the predicting and moderating roles of mood symptoms. MethodsSubjective cognitive functioning (measured by Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment, COBRA) and several domains of cognitive functioning (assessed by a neuropsychological battery), including executive functions, attention and processing speed, and visual memory, were examined in 48 hypomanic or manic patients, 42 depressed bipolar patients, 50 euthymic bipolar patients and 60 healthy comparisons. ResultsAll patients exhibited subjective and objective cognitive deficits in relation to healthy comparisons. There was a significant association between subjective and objective cognitive functioning in euthymic group, but the association was not significant in acute symptomatic groups, which could be moderated by depressive or manic symptoms in depressive or manic group, respectively. Subjective cognitive functioning was significantly correlated with mood symptoms, and the best predictor of subjective cognitive functioning was depressive symptoms. LimitationsThis was a cross-sectional study with a mixed sample of inpatients and outpatients. The medication effect was not adjusted. ConclusionsThe associations between subjective and objective cognitive dysfunction varied in clinical states, and mood symptoms moderated the associations. A neuropsychological test battery is required to substantiate actual cognitive dysfunction in clinical settings, irrespective of subjective cognitive deficits.

Cognitive Reserve Assessment Scale in Health (CRASH): the reliability and validity

Cognitive reserve (CR) reflects the resilience of the brain to cope with neuropathological changes and minimize clinical manifestations. In the present study, we explore the association between CR and cognitive and psychosocial functioning, and examined the potential moderating role of CR in patients with bipolar disorder (BD).One hundred and twenty-five outpatients with BD type I and sixty healthy individuals were recruited. All participants were assessed with a neuropsychological battery examining attention and processing speed, working memory, visual memory and executive functioning, the Global Assessment of Functioning scale and the Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment. Proxies for cognitive reserve included premorbid intelligence and educational level.Patients with bipolar disorder presented with worse cognitive performance and psychosocial functioning than healthy controls. Multiple regression models revealed that educational level negatively associated with all assessed domain-specific cognition scores and premorbid intelligence predicted attention and processing speed and psychosocial functioning. Notably, premorbid intelligence significantly moderated the associations between the number of episodes (total, hypo/manic and depressed) and neurocognitive functioning, and the educational level also moderated the relationships between the numbers of hypo/manic and total episodes and subjective cognitive functioning.Cognitive reserve contributes to functional outcomes in patients with BD and may emerge as a key factor contributing to the course and prognosis of patients with BD. In the future, cognitive reserve must be considered in both research and clinical interventions related to bipolar disorder.

Identifying cognitive subgroups in bipolar disorder: A cluster analysis.

Evidence has shown heterogeneity of cognitive function among patients with bipolar disorder (BD). Our study aims to replicate recent findings of cognitive subgroups, as well as we assessed subjective cognitive difficulties and functioning in each cluster. Hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted to examine whether there were distinct neurocognitive subgroups based on neurocognitive battery. Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment (COBRA) and Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) were used to assess subjective cognitive difficulties and functional impairment. We found three distinct subgroups: a first cluster with intact cognition (n = 30, 43.5%), a second cluster with selective cognitive impairment (n = 23, 33.3%), and a third cluster with globally cognitive impairment (n = 16, 23.3%). The intact group had more years of education (p < .001) and higher estimated IQ (p < .001) than globally and selectively impaired subgroups. Additionally, they were younger (p = .011), had an earlier age at bipolar diagnosis (p < .037) and earlier age of first hospitalization (p < .035) compared to individuals with globally cognitive impairment. This is a cross-sectional design with a small sample including only patients from a tertiary hospital. Our results give support to the existence of a continuum of severity from patients without impairment to those with poor cognitive functioning. Patients in the intact group seem to have higher cognitive reserve than other two groups. However, they also experienced cognitive complaints and some degree of functional impairment. These findings suggest the importance of using a combo of instruments (e.g., objective and subjective cognitive measures plus functioning instruments) for a complete assessment of patients with BD.

Validity and reliability of the Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment (COBRA) in Brazilian bipolar patients

In Brazil, there is no valid instrument to measure subjective cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder. The present study analyzed the psychometric properties of the Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment (COBRA) in Brazilian bipolar patients. We further investigated the relationship between the COBRA, objective cognitive measures, and illness course variables. The total sample (N=150) included 85 bipolar disorder patients and 65 healthy controls. The psychometric properties of the COBRA (e.g., internal consistency, concurrent validity, discriminative validity, factor analyses, ROC curve, and feasibility) were analyzed. The COBRA showed a one-factor structure with very high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.890). Concurrent validity was indicated by a strong correlation with the cognitive domain of the FAST (r=0.811, p<0.001). Bipolar patients experienced greater cognitive complaints (mean=14.69; standard deviation [SD]=10.03) than healthy controls (mean=6.78; SD=5.49; p<0.001), suggesting discriminative validity of the instrument. No significant correlations were found between the COBRA and objective cognitive measures. Furthermore, higher COBRA scores were associated with residual depressive (r=0.448; p<0.001) and manic (r=0.376; p<0.001) symptoms, number of depressive episodes (r=0.306; p=0.011), number of total episodes (r=0.256; p=0.038), and suicide attempts (r=0.356; p=0.003). The COBRA is a valid instrument to assess cognitive complaints, and the combined use of subjective-objective cognitive measures enables the correct identification of cognitive dysfunctions in bipolar disorder.

Assessing and addressing cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder: the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Targeting Cognition Task Force recommendations for clinicians.

Cognition is a new treatment target to aid functional recovery and enhance quality of life for patients with bipolar disorder. The International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) Targeting Cognition Task Force aimed to develop consensus-based clinical recommendations on whether, when and how to assess and address cognitive impairment. The task force, consisting of 19 international experts from nine countries, discussed the challenges and recommendations in a face-to-face meeting, telephone conference call and email exchanges. Consensus-based recommendations were achieved through these exchanges with no need for formal consensus methods. The identified questions were: (I) Should cognitive screening assessments be routinely conducted in clinical settings? (II) What are the most feasible screening tools? (III) What are the implications if cognitive impairment is detected? (IV) What are the treatment perspectives? Key recommendations are that clinicians: (I) formally screen cognition in partially or fully remitted patients whenever possible, (II) use brief, easy-to-administer tools such as the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry and Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment, and (III) evaluate the impact of medication and comorbidity, refer patients for comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation when clinically indicated, and encourage patients to build cognitive reserve. Regarding question (IV), there is limited evidence for current evidence-based treatments but intense research efforts are underway to identify new pharmacological and/or psychological cognition treatments. This task force paper provides the first consensus-based recommendations for clinicians on whether, when, and how to assess and address cognition, which may aid patients' functional recovery and improve their quality of life.

Epigenetic signatures of early life adversities and the risk for psychopathology

Many patients with bipolar disorder (BD) experience debilitating cognitive deficits, with risk of impaired occupational and psychosocial functioning. However, knowledge of how these deficits impact the patients’ ability to perform Activities of Daily Living (ADL), tasks related to self-care and domestic life is limited. We explored the relation between impaired cognitive function and the ability to perform ADL in patients with BD. A total of 42 outpatients (mean age 36 years (range 19.0–58.0 years), 69% women) with BD in remission and with subjective cognitive complaints (≥ 13 on the Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment questionnaire (COBRA)) were included. Objective neurocognitive function was evaluated with a short comprehensive cognitive test battery and ADL ability was evaluated with the performance-based Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) in the homes of the patients. Our findings indicate that low processing speed correlated with decreased ADL ability, and processing speed as measured by the cognitive test battery thus seems to be significantly related to patients’ ability to live independently in the community. Overall, adding a performance based test to assess ADL ability in patients with BD home-surroundings seems to provide new insights regarding the effect of cognitive impairment in patients with BD.

Validity and reliability of the Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment (COBRA) in Japanese patients with bipolar disorder

In Japan, there are currently no reliable rating scales for the evaluation of subjective cognitive impairment in patients with bipolar disorder. We studied the relationship between the Japanese version of the Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment (COBRA) and objective cognitive assessments in patients with bipolar disorder. We further assessed the reliability and validity of the COBRA. Forty-one patients, aged 16–64, in a remission period of bipolar disorder were recruited from Hokkaido University Hospital in Sapporo, Japan. The COBRA (Japanese version) and Frankfurt Complaint Questionnaire (FCQ), the gold standard in subjective cognitive assessment, were administered. A battery of neuropsychological tests was employed to measure objective cognitive impairment. Correlations among the COBRA, FCQ, and neuropsychological tests were determined using Spearman's correlation coefficient. The Japanese version of the COBRA had high internal consistency, good retest reliability, and concurrent validity—as indicated by a strong correlation with the FCQ. A significant correlation was also observed between the COBRA and objective cognitive measurements of processing speed. These findings are the first to demonstrate that the Japanese version of the COBRA may be clinically useful as a subjective cognitive impairment rating scale in Japanese patients with bipolar disorder.

Influences of patient informed cognitive complaints on activities of daily living in patients with bipolar disorder. An exploratory cross-sectional study

Many patients with bipolar disorder (BD) experience debilitating cognitive deficits, with risk of impaired occupational and psychosocial functioning. However, knowledge of how these deficits impact the patients’ ability to perform Activities of Daily Living (ADL), tasks related to self-care and domestic life is limited. We explored the relation between impaired cognitive function and the ability to perform ADL in patients with BD. A total of 42 outpatients (mean age 36 years (range 19.0–58.0 years), 69% women) with BD in remission and with subjective cognitive complaints (≥ 13 on the Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment questionnaire (COBRA)) were included. Objective neurocognitive function was evaluated with a short comprehensive cognitive test battery and ADL ability was evaluated with the performance-based Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) in the homes of the patients. Our findings indicate that low processing speed correlated with decreased ADL ability, and processing speed as measured by the cognitive test battery thus seems to be significantly related to patients’ ability to live independently in the community. Overall, adding a performance based test to assess ADL ability in patients with BD home-surroundings seems to provide new insights regarding the effect of cognitive impairment in patients with BD.

Screening for cognitive dysfunction in unipolar depression: Validation and evaluation of objective and subjective tools

BackgroundPersistent cognitive dysfunction in unipolar depression (UD) contributes to socio-occupational impairment, but there are no feasible methods to screen for and monitor cognitive dysfunction in this patient group. The present study investigated the validity of two new instruments to screen for cognitive dysfunction in UD, and their associations with socio-occupational capacity. MethodParticipants (n=53) with UD in partial or full remission and healthy control persons (n=103) were assessed with two new screening instruments, the Danish translations of the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP-D) and Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment (COBRA) and with established neuropsychological and self-assessment measures. Depression symptoms and socio-occupational function were rated with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Functional Assessment Short Test respectively. ResultsThe SCIP-D and COBRA were valid for detection of objective and subjective cognitive impairment, respectively. The three parallel SCIP-D forms were equivalent. A combined SCIP-D-COBRA measure showed high sensitivity and good specificity for objective cognitive impairment (91% and 70%, respectively). There was no correlation between subjective and objective measures of cognition. Subjective cognitive difficulties correlated more with socio-occupational impairment (r=0.7, p<0.01) than did objective cognitive difficulties, for which there was a weak correlation with the executive skills domain only (r =−0.3, p=0.05). LimitationsA modest sample size. ConclusionsThe SCIP-D and COBRA are valid measures of objective and subjective cognitive impairment, respectively, and should ideally be implemented together in the screening for cognitive dysfunction in UD.