Bipolar Cancellation Research Articles

The Effects of Bipolar Cancellation Phenomenon on Nano-Electrochemotherapy of Melanoma Tumors: In Vitro and In Vivo Pilot.

The phenomenon known as bipolar cancellation is observed when biphasic nanosecond electric field pulses are used, which results in reduced electroporation efficiency when compared to unipolar pulses of the same parameters. Basically, the negative phase of the bipolar pulse diminishes the effect of the positive phase. Our study aimed to investigate how bipolar cancellation affects Ca2+ electrochemotherapy and cellular response under varying electric field intensities and pulse durations (3-7 kV/cm, 100, 300, and 500 ns bipolar 1 MHz repetition frequency pulse bursts, n = 100). As a reference, standard microsecond range parametric protocols were used (100 µs × 8 pulses). We have shown that the cancellation effect is extremely strong when the pulses are closely spaced (1 MHz frequency), which results in a lack of cell membrane permeabilization and consequent failure of electrochemotherapy in vitro. To validate the observations, we have performed a pilot in vivo study where we compared the efficacy of monophasic (5 kV/cm × ↑500 ns × 100) and biphasic sequences (5 kV/cm × ↑500 ns + ↓500 ns × 100) delivered at 1 MHz frequency in the context of Ca2+ electrochemotherapy (B16-F10 cell line, C57BL/6 mice, n = 24). Mice treated with bipolar pulses did not exhibit prolonged survival when compared to the untreated control (tumor-bearing mice); therefore, the bipolar cancellation phenomenon was also occurrent in vivo, significantly impairing electrochemotherapy. At the same time, the efficacy of monophasic nanosecond pulses was comparable to 1.4 kV/cm × 100 µs × 8 pulses sequence, resulting in tumor reduction following the treatment and prolonged survival of the animals.

Threshold Interphase Delay for Bipolar Pulses to Prevent Cancellation Phenomenon during Electrochemotherapy.

Electroporation-based procedures employing nanosecond bipolar pulses are commonly linked to an undesirable phenomenon known as the cancelation effect. The cancellation effect arises when the second pulse partially or completely neutralizes the effects of the first pulse, simultaneously diminishing cells' plasma membrane permeabilization and the overall efficiency of the procedure. Introducing a temporal gap between the positive and negative phases of the bipolar pulses during electroporation procedures may help to overcome the cancellation phenomenon; however, the exact thresholds are not yet known. Therefore, in this work, we have tested the influence of different interphase delay values (from 0 ms to 95 ms) using symmetric bipolar nanoseconds (300 and 500 ns) on cell permeabilization using 10 Hz, 100 Hz, and 1 kHz protocols. As a model mouse hepatoma, the MH-22a cell line was employed. Additionally, we conducted in vitro electrochemotherapy with cisplatin, employing reduced interphase delay values (0 ms and 0.1 ms) at 10 Hz. Cell plasma membrane permeabilization and viability dependence on a variety of bipolar pulsed electric field protocols were characterized. It was shown that it is possible to minimize bipolar cancellation, enabling treatment efficiency comparable to monophasic pulses with identical parameters. At the same time, it was highlighted that bipolar cancellation has a significant influence on permeabilization, while the effects on the outcome of electrochemotherapy are minimal.

Negative effects of cancellation during nanosecond range High-Frequency calcium based electrochemotherapy in vitro

Drug delivery using nanosecond pulsed electric fields is a new branch of electroporation-based treatments, which potentially can substitute European standard operating procedures for electrochemotherapy. In this work, for the first time, we characterize the effects of ultra-fast repetition frequency (1–2.5 MHz) nanosecond pulses (5–9 kV/cm, 200 and 400 ns) in the context of nano-electrochemotherapy with calcium. Additionally, we investigate the feasibility of bipolar symmetric (↑200 ns + ↓200 ns) and asymmetric (↑200 ns + ↓400 ns) nanosecond protocols for calcium delivery. The effects of bipolar cancellation and the influence of interphase delay (200 ns) are overviewed. Human lung cancer cell lines A549 and H69AR were used as a model. It was shown that unipolar pulses delivered at high frequency are effective for electrochemotherapy with a significant improvement in efficiency when the delay between separate pulses is reduced. Bipolar symmetric pulses trigger the cancellation phenomenon limiting applications for drug delivery and can be compensated by the asymmetry of the pulse (↑200 ns + ↓400 ns or ↑400 ns + ↓200 ns). The results of this study can be successfully used to derive a new generation of nsPEF protocols for successful electrochemotherapy treatments.

Control of the Electroporation Efficiency of Nanosecond Pulses by Swinging the Electric Field Vector Direction.

Reversing the pulse polarity, i.e., changing the electric field direction by 180°, inhibits electroporation and electrostimulation by nanosecond electric pulses (nsEPs). This feature, known as "bipolar cancellation," enables selective remote targeting with nsEPs and reduces the neuromuscular side effects of ablation therapies. We analyzed the biophysical mechanisms and measured how cancellation weakens and is replaced by facilitation when nsEPs are applied from different directions at angles from 0 to 180°. Monolayers of endothelial cells were electroporated by a train of five pulses (600 ns) or five paired pulses (600 + 600 ns) applied at 1 Hz or 833 kHz. Reversing the electric field in the pairs (180° direction change) caused 2-fold (1 Hz) or 20-fold (833 kHz) weaker electroporation than the train of single nsEPs. Reducing the angle between pulse directions in the pairs weakened cancellation and replaced it with facilitation at angles <160° (1 Hz) and <130° (833 kHz). Facilitation plateaued at about three-fold stronger electroporation compared to single pulses at 90-100° angle for both nsEP frequencies. The profound dependence of the efficiency on the angle enables novel protocols for highly selective focal electroporation at one electrode in a three-electrode array while avoiding effects at the other electrodes. Nanosecond-resolution imaging of cell membrane potential was used to link the selectivity to charging kinetics by co- and counter-directional nsEPs.

The influence of asymmetrical bipolar pulses and interphase intervals on the bipolar cancellation phenomenon in the ovarian cancer cell line

The application of negative polarity electrical pulse (↓) following positive polarity pulses (↑) may induce bipolar cancellation (BPC), a unique physiological response believed to be specific to nanosecond electroporation (nsEP). The literature lacks analysis of bipolar electroporation (BP EP) involving asymmetrical sequences composed of nanosecond and microsecond pulses. Moreover, the impact of interphase interval on BPC caused by such asymmetrical pulse needs consideration. In this study, the authors utilized the ovarian clear carcinoma cell line (OvBH-1) model to investigate the BPC with asymmetrical sequences. Cells were exposed to pulses delivered in 10-pulse bursts but as uni- or bipolar, symmetrical, or asymmetrical sequences with a duration of 600 ns or 10 µs and electric field strength equal to 7.0 or 1.8 kV/cm, respectively. It was shown that the asymmetry of pulses influences BPC. The obtained results have also been investigated in the context of calcium electrochemotherapy. The reduction of cell membrane poration, and cell survival have been observed following Ca2+ electrochemotherapy. The effects of interphase delays (1 and 10 µs) on the BPC phenomenon were reported. Our findings show that the BPC phenomenon can be controlled using pulse asymmetry or delay between the positive and negative polarity of the pulse.

Next generation CANCAN focusing for remote stimulation by nanosecond electric pulses

Focusing electric pulse effects away from electrodes is a challenge because the electric field weakens with distance. Previously we introduced a remote focusing method based on bipolar cancellation, a phenomenon of low efficiency of bipolar nanosecond electric pulses (nsEP). Superpositioning two bipolar nsEP into a unipolar pulse canceled bipolar cancellation (“CANCAN” effect), enhancing bioeffects at a distance despite the electric field weakening. Here, we introduce the next generation (NG) CANCAN focusing with unipolar nsEP packets designed to produce bipolar waveforms near electrodes (suppressing electroporation) but not at the remote target. NG-CANCAN was tested in CHO cell monolayers using a quadrupole electrode array and labeling electroporated cells with YO-PRO-1 dye. We routinely achieved 1.5–2 times stronger electroporation in the center of the quadrupole than near electrodes, despite a 3–4-fold field attenuation. With the array lifted 1–2 mm above the monolayer (imitating a 3D treatment), the remote effect was enhanced up to 6-fold. We analyzed the role of nsEP number, amplitude, rotation, and inter-pulse delay, and showed how remote focusing is enhanced when re-created bipolar waveforms exhibit stronger cancellation. Advantages of NG-CANCAN include the exceptional versatility of designing pulse packets and easy remote focusing using an off-the-shelf 4-channel nsEP generator.

Action spectra and mechanisms of (in) efficiency of bipolar electric pulses at electroporation

The reversal of the electric field direction inhibits various biological effects of nanosecond electric pulses (nsEP). This feature, known as “bipolar cancellation,” enables interference targeting of nsEP bioeffects remotely from stimulating electrodes, for prospective applications such as precise cancer ablation and non-invasive deep brain stimulation. This study was undertaken to achieve the maximum cancellation of electroporation, by quantifying the impact of the pulse shape, duration, number, and repetition rate across a broad range of electric field strengths. Monolayers of endothelial cells (BPAE) were electroporated in a non-uniform electric field. Cell membrane permeabilization was quantified by YO-PRO-1 (YP) dye uptake and correlated to local electric field strength. For most conditions tested, adding an opposite polarity phase reduced YP uptake by 50–80 %. The strongest cancellation, which reduced YP uptake by 95–97 %, was accomplished by adding a 50 % second phase to 600-ns pulses delivered at a high repetition rate of 833 kHz. Strobe photography of nanosecond kinetics of membrane potential in single CHO cells revealed the temporal summation of polarization by individual unipolar nsEP applied at sub-MHz rate, leading to enhanced electroporation. In contrast, there was no summation for bipolar pulses, and increasing their repetition rate suppressed electroporation. These new findings are discussed in the context of bipolar cancellation mechanisms and remote focusing applications.

Electromodulation of cellular innate immune response

Pulsed electric fields are widely used to permeabilize cell membranes in a variety of applications, from cancer therapy to food processing, although the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are not yet fully understood. While for long-duration pulses (in the millisecond and microsecond range) the bioeffect of successive positive and negative cycles is additive, the electric field reversal of shorter nanosecond pulses was shown to reduce their efficiency. This paradoxical response has been called bipolar cancellation.

On the molecular mechanisms implicated in the bipolar cancellation of membrane electroporation

Bipolar cancellation is the phenomenon in which the permeability of cell membranes subjected to high intensity short pulsed electric field (ns-μs range) is reduced or eliminated when the system is subjected to bipolar instead of monopolar pulses. Although several studies have tried to explain bipolar cancellation, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Very few articles study bipolar cancellation by means of molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. In this paper, we investigated the molecular mechanisms underlying the difference in electroporation induced by bipolar and monopolar picosecond electric pulses (EPs) using MD simulation. The electric field gradients and electric forces on water molecules of the two pulses were analyzed in detail for the first time. For a certain pulse width, when the field intensity is relatively small, the direction of bipolar electric force on the interfacial water molecule reverses as the bipolar EPs reverse, while the electric force on interfacial water molecules of the cathode side remains in the same direction as that of applied monopolar EPs. The bipolar electric force reversal delays the water protrusion and increases the pore formation time. Therefore, this phenomenon could correspond to bipolar cancellation. When the field intensity is relatively large, although the bipolar electric force direction still reverses, half of the total time of the monopolar EPs has no electric fields. The electric forces of monopolar no-field half-cycles are much smaller than those of the bipolar EPs. Therefore, the pore formation time of bipolar EPs reduces, and this phenomenon is called bipolar enhancement. The occurrence of bipolar cancellation or bipolar enhancement depends on conditions such as the width and intensity of the pulse.

Multiphysics modelling of electroporation under uni- or bipolar nanosecond pulse sequences

A nonlinear dispersive multiphysics model of single-cell electroporation was proposed in this paper. The time-domain Debye model was utilised to describe the membrane dispersion while the dynamic pore radius function was deployed to modify the plasma membrane conductivity. The dynamic spatial distributions of the ion concentration were dominated by the Nernst-Planck function. First, a single nanosecond pulsed electric field was applied to verify our model and to explore the effects of dispersion and dynamic pore radius on the redistribution of the electric field. The dispersive membrane was found to increase the transmembrane potential, expedite the electroporation process, and weaken the membrane permeability; however, adding the dynamic pore radius function had the opposite effect on transmembrane potential and membrane permeability. The responses of the cells exposed to unipolar and bipolar nanosecond pulse sequences were subsequently simulated. During the application of unipolar pulse sequences, the pore radius and perforation area showed a step-like accumulation, and significant increases in the perforation area and intracellular ion concentration were observed with higher frequency pulse sequences and wider subpulse intervals. The bipolar cancellation effect was also observed in terms of membrane permeability and pore radius.

Interference targeting of bipolar nanosecond electric pulses for spatially focused electroporation, electrostimulation, and tissue ablation

Stimulation and electroporation by nanosecond electric pulses (nsEP) are distinguished by a phenomenon of bipolar cancellation, which stands for a reduced efficiency of bipolar pulses compared to unipolar ones. When two pairs of stimulating electrodes are arrayed in a quadrupole, bipolar cancellation inhibits nsEP effects near the electrodes, where the electric field is the strongest. Two properly shaped and synchronized bipolar nsEP overlay into a unipolar pulse towards the center of the electrode array, thus canceling the bipolar cancellation (a “CANCAN effect”). High efficiency of the re-created unipolar nsEP outweighs the weakening of the electric field with distance and focuses nsEP effects to the center. In monolayers of CHO, BPAE, and HEK cells, CANCAN effect achieved by the interference of two bipolar nsEP enhanced electroporation up to tenfold, with a peak at the quadrupole center. Introducing a time interval between bipolar nsEP prevented the formation of a unipolar pulse and eliminated the CANCAN effect. Strong electroporation by CANCAN stimuli killed cells over the entire area encompassed by the electrodes, whereas the time-separated pulses caused ablation only in the strongest electric field near the electrodes. The CANCAN approach is promising for uniform tumor ablation and stimulation targeting away from electrodes.

High-voltage 10 ns delayed paired or bipolar pulses for in vitro bioelectric experiments

Recent studies proved that classical bio-effects induced by nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) can be reduced by the delivery of a negative polarity pulse generated immediately after a positive polarity pulse. This phenomenon is known as “bipolar cancellation” and it was reported for a wide range of bipolar pulses with pulse duration from 2 ns to 900 ns. On the contrary, paired pulses, i.e., two identical pulses with the same polarity, increased traditional nsPEF outcomes. Herein, we propose a novel robust and flexible generator, based on the frozen-wave concept, able to produce a broad range of pulses with the duration of 10 ns and delay between 17 and 360 ns. Numerical simulations and experimental measurements were performed to fully characterize the proposed generator. YO-PROTM-1 uptake was investigated in the U87-MG human glioblastoma cell line as a marker of membrane permeabilization in response to 10 ns, 11.5MV/m nsPEF. Our results showed that bipolar cancellation occurred for delays of 0–30 ns and decreased as a function of the interphase interval. In addition, we observed that cellular response following the application of paired nsPEF was more than two-fold compared to the unipolar pulse response and was independent from the interphase interval.

Quadrupoles for Remote Electrostimulation Incorporating Bipolar Cancellation.

Introduction: A method that utilizes nanosecond bipolar cancellation (BPC) near a quadrupole electrodes to suppress a biological response but cancels the distal BPC at the quadrupole center, i.e., cancellation of cancellation (CANCAN), may allow for a remote focused stimulation at the quadrupole center. Objectives: The primary object of this study was to outline the requirement of the CANCAN implementation and select an effective quadrupole configuration. Results: We have studied three quadrupole electrode configurations, a rod quadrupole, a plate quadrupole (Plate-Q), and a resistor quadrupole. The pulse shapes of electric fields include monophasic pulses, cancellation pulses, and additive pulses. The Plate-Q appears the best for CANCAN as it shows the highest percentage of cancellation pulses among all pulse shapes, allowing for the best spatial focus. Conclusion: For the region of interest characterized in the Plate-Q configuration, the maximum magnitude of bipolar field is twice as that of the unipolar field, which allows for the CANCAN demonstration that involves membrane electropermeabilization.

Interpretation of the molecular mechanism of the electroporation induced by symmetrical bipolar picosecond pulse trains

Picosecond pulse trains (psPTs) are emerging as a new characteristic diagnostic and therapeutic tool in biomedical fields. To specifically determine the stimulus provided to cells, in this article, we use a molecular dynamics (MD) model to show the molecular mechanisms of electroporation induced by symmetrical bipolar psPTs and predict a bipolar cancellation for the studied picosecond pulses. Electric field conditions that do not cause electroporation reveal that the interfacial water molecules continuously flip and redirect as the applied bipolar psPT reverses, and the molecules cannot keep moving in one direction or leave the lipid-water interface. Based on our simulation results, we determine the threshold for electroporation with symmetrical bipolar psPTs. For a fixed electric field intensity, a lower repetition frequency leads to more rapid electroporation. For a fixed repetition frequency, a higher electric field intensity leads to more rapid electroporation. We found that the water dipole relaxation time decreases as the electric field magnitude increases. Additionally, the influences of the symmetrical bipolar psPT intensity and frequency on the pore formation time are presented. Discrete nanoscale pores can form with the applied psPT at terahertz (THz) repetition frequency. When the psPT amplitude increases or the frequency decreases, the number of water bridges will increase. Moreover, for the first time, the molecular mechanism of bipolar cancellation for the studied picosecond pulse is discussed preliminarily. Our results indicate that the influence of the unipolar picosecond pulse on the interfacial water dipoles will accumulate in one direction, but the bipolar picosecond pulse does not cause this effect.

Selective distant electrostimulation by synchronized bipolar nanosecond pulses

A unique aspect of electrostimulation (ES) with nanosecond electric pulses (nsEP) is the inhibition of effects when the polarity is reversed. This bipolar cancellation feature makes bipolar nsEP less efficient at biostimulation than unipolar nsEP. We propose to minimize stimulation near pulse-delivering electrodes by applying bipolar nsEP, whereas the superposition of two phase-shifted bipolar nsEP from two independent sources yields a biologically-effective unipolar pulse remotely. This is accomplished by electrical compensation of all nsEP phases except the first one, resulting in the restoration of stimulation efficiency due to cancellation of bipolar cancellation (CANCAN-ES). We experimentally proved the CANCAN-ES paradigm by measuring YO-PRO-1 dye uptake in CHO-K1 cells which were permeabilized by multiphasic nsEP (600 ns per phase) from two generators; these nsEP were synchronized either to overlap into a unipolar pulse remotely from electrodes (CANCAN), or not to overlap (control). Enhancement of YO-PRO-1 entry due to CANCAN was observed in all sets of experiments and reached ~3-fold in the center of the gap between electrodes, exactly where the unipolar pulse was formed, and equaled the degree of bipolar cancellation. CANCAN-ES is promising for non-invasive deep tissue stimulation, either alone or combined with other remote stimulation techniques to improve targeting.

Cancellation of nerve excitation by the reversal of nanosecond stimulus polarity and its relevance to the gating time of sodium channels.

The initiation of action potentials (APs) by membrane depolarization occurs after a brief vulnerability period, during which excitation can be abolished by the reversal of the stimulus polarity. This vulnerability period is determined by the time needed for gating of voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSC). We compared nerve excitation by ultra-short uni- and bipolar stimuli to define the time frame of bipolar cancellation and of AP initiation. Propagating APs in isolated frog sciatic nerve were elicited by cathodic pulses (200ns-300µs), followed by an anodic (canceling) pulse of the same duration after a 0-200-µs delay. We found that the earliest and the latest boundaries for opening the critical number of VGSC needed to initiate AP are, respectively, between 11 and 20µs and between 100 and 200µs after the onset of depolarization. Stronger depolarization accelerated AP initiation, apparently due to faster VGSC opening, but not beyond the 11-µs limit. Bipolar cancellation was augmented by reducing pulse duration, shortening the delay between pulses, decreasing the amplitude of the cathodic pulse, and increasing the amplitude of the anodic one. Some of these characteristics contrasted the bipolar cancellation of cell membrane electroporation (Pakhomov et al. in Bioelectrochemistry 122:123-133, 2018; Gianulis et al. in Bioelectrochemistry 119:10-19, 2017), suggesting different mechanisms. The ratio of nerve excitation thresholds for a unipolar cathodic pulse and a symmetrical bipolar pulse increased as a power function as the pulse duration decreased, in remarkable agreement with the predictions of SENN model of nerve excitation (Reilly and Diamant in Health Phys 83(3):356-365, 2002).

Nanopore occlusion: A biophysical mechanism for bipolar cancellation in cell membranes

Extraordinarily large but short electric field pulses are reported by many experiments to cause bipolar cancellation (BPC). This unusual cell response occurs if a first pulse is followed by a second pulse with opposite polarity. Possibly universal, BPC presently lacks a mechanistic explanation. Multiple versions of the “standard model” of cell electroporation (EP) fail to account for BPC. Here we show, for the first time, how an extension of the standard model can account for a key experimental observation that essentially defines BPC: the amount of a tracer that enters a cell, and how tracer influx can be decreased by the second part of a bipolar pulse. The extended model can also account for the recovery of BPC wherein the extent of BPC is diminished if the spacing between the first and second pulses is increased. Our approach is reverse engineering, meaning that we identify and introduce an additional biophysical mechanism that allows pore transport to change. We hypothesize that occluding molecules from outside the membrane enter or relocate within a pore. Significantly, the additional mechanism is fundamental and general, involving a combination of partitioning and hindrance. Molecules near the membrane can enter pores to block transport of tracer molecules while still passing small ions (charge number ±1) that govern electrical behavior. Our extension of the standard model accounts for key BPC behavior.

The interphase interval within a bipolar nanosecond electric pulse modulates bipolar cancellation.

Nanosecond electric pulse (nsEP) exposure generates an array of physiological effects. The extent of these effects is impacted by whether the nsEP is a unipolar (UP) or bipolar (BP) exposure. A 600 ns pulse can generate 71% more YO-PRO-1 uptake compared to a 600 ns + 600 ns pulse exposure. This observation is termed "bipolar cancellation" (BPC) because despite the BP nsEP consisting of an additional 600 ns pulse, it generates reduced membrane perturbation. BPC is achieved by varying pulse amplitudes, and symmetrical and asymmetric pulse widths. The effect appears to reverse by increasing the interphase interval between symmetric BP pulses, suggesting membrane recovery is a BPC factor. To date, the impact of the interphase interval between asymmetrical BP and other BPC-inducing symmetrical BP nsEPs has not been fully explored. Additionally, interpulse intervals beyond 50 μs have not been explored to understand the impact of time between the BP nsEP phases. Here, we surveyed different interphase intervals among symmetrical and asymmetrical BP nsEPs to monitor their impact on BPC of YO-PRO-1 uptake. We identified that a 10 microsecond (ms) interphase interval within a symmetrical 600 ns + 600 ns, and 900 ns + 900 ns pulse can resolve BPC. Furthermore, the interphase interval to resolve asymmetric BPC from a 300 ns + 900 ns pulse versus 600 ns pulse exposure is greater (<10 ms) compared to symmetrical BP nsEPs. From these findings, we extended on our conceptual model that BPC is balanced by localized charging and discharging events across the membrane. Bioelectromagnetics. 39:441-450, 2018. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

The second phase of bipolar, nanosecond-range electric pulses determines the electroporation efficiency

Bipolar cancellation refers to a phenomenon when applying a second electric pulse reduces (“cancels”) cell membrane damage by a preceding electric pulse of the opposite polarity. Bipolar cancellation is a reason why bipolar nanosecond electric pulses (nsEP) cause weaker electroporation than just a single unipolar phase of the same pulse. This study was undertaken to explore the dependence of bipolar cancellation on nsEP parameters, with emphasis on the amplitude ratio of two opposite polarity phases of a bipolar pulse. Individual cells (CHO, U937, or adult mouse ventricular cardiomyocytes (VCM)) were exposed to either uni- or bipolar trapezoidal nsEP, or to nanosecond electric field oscillations (NEFO). The membrane injury was evaluated by time-lapse confocal imaging of the uptake of propidium (Pr) or YO-PRO-1 (YP) dyes and by phosphatidylserine (PS) externalization. Within studied limits, bipolar cancellation showed little or no dependence on the electric field intensity, pulse repetition rate, chosen endpoint, or cell type. However, cancellation could increase for larger pulse numbers and/or for longer pulses. The sole most critical parameter which determines bipolar cancellation was the phase ratio: maximum cancellation was observed with the 2nd phase of about 50% of the first one, whereas a larger 2nd phase could add a damaging effect of its own. “Swapping” the two phases, i.e., delivering the smaller phase before the larger one, reduced or eliminated cancellation. These findings are discussed in the context of hypothetical mechanisms of bipolar cancellation and electroporation by nsEP.

Asymmetrical bipolar nanosecond electric pulse widths modify bipolar cancellation

A bipolar (BP) nanosecond electric pulse (nsEP) exposure generates reduced calcium influx compared to a unipolar (UP) nsEP. This attenuated physiological response from a BP nsEP exposure is termed “bipolar cancellation” (BPC). The predominant BP nsEP parameters that induce BPC consist of a positive polarity (↑) front pulse followed by the delivery of a negative polarity (↓) back pulse of equal voltage and width; thereby the duration is twice a UP nsEP exposure. We tested these BPC parameters, and discovered that a BP nsEP with symmetrical pulse widths is not required to generate BPC. For example, our data revealed the physiological response initiated by a ↑900 nsEP exposure can be cancelled by a second pulse that is a third of its duration. However, we observed a complete loss of BPC from a ↑300 nsEP followed by a ↓900 nsEP exposure. Spatiotemporal analysis revealed these asymmetrical BP nsEP exposures generate distinct local YO-PRO®-1 uptake patterns across the plasma membrane. From these findings, we generated a conceptual model that suggests BPC is a phenomenon balanced by localized charging and discharging events across the membrane.