Historically, focus on C-peptide has been relegated to the exploitation of its peculiar pharmacokinetics (i.e. distribution and elimination) to derive accurate assessment of beta cell secretion, whereas, more recently, greater interest has been placed on its pharmacodynamics (i.e. the biological actions it exerts). In the present paper we will address the latter subject, but to put things in perspective—and because it is well known that kinetics and the time course of dynamics are intimately linked—we will begin with a brief overview of the kinetic properties of C-peptide. C-peptide is stored together with insulin in the mature granules within the beta cell. It is secreted intraportally with insulin, on an equimolar basis, and shows the characteristic biphasic shape in response to i.v. challenges [1, 2]. Whereas newly secreted insulin undergoes a large (∼50%) hepatic extraction [3], the rate of which probably varies, all of the released C-peptide reaches the peripheral circulation without appreciable extraction by the liver. For this reason, C-peptide has proven to be a fundamental tool for accurate quantification of beta cell secretion. In fact, with the aid of kinetic modelling and deconvolution (the so-called Eaton– Polonsky approach [4, 5]), C-peptide levels can be used to provide a reliable measure of the insulin secretory rate. To estimate C-peptide secretion by deconvolution, knowledge of C-peptide kinetics is required. C-peptide kinetics are usually determined by analysing the C-peptide decay curve following a bolus injection of biosynthetic C-peptide. Polonsky described the kinetics of peripherally administered biosynthetic human C-peptide in terms of a linear, two-compartment model. The half-life of C-peptide has been shown to be relatively slow (approximately 35 min), and glomerular filtration is the major route of its removal. The slow metabolism of C-peptide is consistent with the hypothesis that C-peptide diffuses into the extracellular space, but is not integrated into cell membranes. In contrast, insulin is rapidly removed from the circulation (half-life approximately 5 min) via insulin receptor-mediated uptake followed by lysosomal degradation. In terms of its biological action, C-peptide has been long believed to be biologically inert, a sort of useless byproduct of insulin. In recent years, several intracellular effects of C-peptide have been described in vitro, and some in vivo studies have shown that C-peptide has an effect on clinical manifestations of diabetes complications (mainly in the short term). Such biological effects have been reviewed in the companion paper by Wahren et al. [6]. The key point of our argument is not whether C-peptide does or does not have a biological effect (this has been already proven beyond any reasonable doubt), but whether such a biological effect is actually relevant and can be profitably exploited to improve the health of diabetic patients by fending off the complications associated with diabetes. The crucial question is: Are the in vitro and in vivo data sufficient to consider C-peptide an endogenous molecule with a distinct physiology that makes it a suitable addition to the arsenal of therapeutic agents available to the clinician? In our opinion, this is not the case. We believe that C-peptide is neither the ‘shavings of the carpenter’s Diabetologia (2007) 50:500–502 DOI 10.1007/s00125-006-0576-x
Read full abstract