AbstractBackgroundIn healthy ageing, there is evidence of sex differences in vulnerability of hippocampal subfields to volume loss. However, this has not been investigated in early‐onset Alzheimer’s disease (<65 years; EOAD).MethodWe included 106 subjects: 62 EOAD (A+T+N+, MMSE>15) and 44 healthy controls (HC; A‐T‐N‐) that underwent lumbar puncture for analysis of AD biomarkers, 3T‐MRI scan and neuropsychological assessment. Hippocampal subfield segmentation was performed using T1‐weighted images and Freesurfer 6.0. Volume was adjusted by intracranial volume. Adjusted linear models were used to analyze differences between EOAD and HC and differences between sexes. We calculated Cohen’s d as a measure of the effect size of volume change by sex, restricted to volume differences between EOAD and HC. In EOAD, we used linear models adjusted by age and education to investigate the association of volume loss with 18 cognition z‐scores. Results were adjusted using Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.ResultThere were no demographic differences across groups. APOEε4 carriers were higher in EOAD‐female/EOAD‐male than HC‐female. EOAD‐female showed higher T‐Tau and P‐Tau levels than EOAD‐male (all p<0.05; Table1). Comparing EOAD vs. HC, differences were found in volume of all subfields and hippocampus (p<0.05, Bonferroni corrected), except for bilateral parasubiculum and right cornu ammonis (CA) 2/3. No differences were found between EOAD‐female and EOAD‐male (p>0.05). When compared to HC of the same sex, EOAD‐female showed differences in the same regions as the whole sample, while EOAD‐male showed differences in bilateral hippocampal tail and left presubiculum and hippocampus (all p<0.05, Bonferroni corrected, Figure 1). We observed larger effect sizes than in women in these regions, except for left hippocampus (Figure 2).In EOAD, higher volume in left CA2/3 predicted higher memory z‐scores, including free and total learning and delayed total recall (p<0.05 Bonferroni corrected; Figure 3). No associations were found in EOAD‐female nor EOAD‐male.ConclusionIn EOAD, the pattern of volume loss in hippocampal subfields was similar between sexes. However, females showed more marked differences from HC, except for bilateral hippocampal tail and left presubiculum. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the existence of sex differences in EOAD and their implication for cognitive impairment.