Network neuroscience, a multidisciplinary field merging insights from neuroscience and network theory, offers a profound understanding of neural network intricacies. However, the impact of varying node sizes on computed graph metrics in neuroimaging data remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by adopting a data-driven methodology to delineate functional nodes and assess their influence on graph metrics. Using the Neuromark framework, automated independent component analysis is applied to resting state fMRI data, capturing functional network connectivity (FNC) matrices. Global and local graph metrics reveal intricate connectivity patterns, emphasizing the need for nuanced analysis. Notably, node sizes, computed based on voxel counts, contribute to a novel metric termed 'node-metric coupling' (NMC). Correlations between graph metrics and node dimensions are consistently observed. The study extends its analysis to a dataset comprising Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and control subjects, showcasing the potential of NMC as a biomarker for brain disorders. The two key outcomes underscore the interplay between node sizes and resultant graph metrics within a given atlas, shedding light on an often-overlooked source of variability. Additionally, the study highlights the utility of NMC as a valuable biomarker, emphasizing the necessity of accounting for node sizes in future neuroimaging investigations. This work contributes to refining comparative studies employing diverse atlases and advocates for thoughtful consideration of intra-atlas node size in shaping graph metrics, paving the way for more robust neuroimaging research.
Read full abstract