You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Markers II1 Apr 2015MP6-07 SENSITIVITY OF [-2]PROPSA AS AN ULTRASENSITIVE PSA SURROGATE FOR THE PREDICTION OF EARLY BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: AN OBSERVATIONAL COHORT STUDY Massimo Lazzeri, Giovanni Lughezzani, Alberto Abrate, Andrea Losa, Alessandro Mistretta, Nicolò Maria Buffi, Giuliana Lista, Giulio Maria Gadda, Alessandro Larcher, Nicola Fossati, Paolo Dell'Oglio, Vittorio Bini, Ferruccio Ceriotti, and Giorgio Guazzoni Massimo LazzeriMassimo Lazzeri More articles by this author , Giovanni LughezzaniGiovanni Lughezzani More articles by this author , Alberto AbrateAlberto Abrate More articles by this author , Andrea LosaAndrea Losa More articles by this author , Alessandro MistrettaAlessandro Mistretta More articles by this author , Nicolò Maria BuffiNicolò Maria Buffi More articles by this author , Giuliana ListaGiuliana Lista More articles by this author , Giulio Maria GaddaGiulio Maria Gadda More articles by this author , Alessandro LarcherAlessandro Larcher More articles by this author , Nicola FossatiNicola Fossati More articles by this author , Paolo Dell'OglioPaolo Dell'Oglio More articles by this author , Vittorio BiniVittorio Bini More articles by this author , Ferruccio CeriottiFerruccio Ceriotti More articles by this author , and Giorgio GuazzoniGiorgio Guazzoni More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.254AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The clinical sensitivity for detecting biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is directly related to the analytical sensitivity of the PSA assays, which is expressed in ng/ml. [-2]proPSA (p2PSA) assay is normally expressed in pg/mL and demonstrated superior analytical sensitivity than generally use PSA assays. It might be more sensitive than PSA for detecting early BCR in patients after RP. The objective of the study is to test the hypothesis that p2PSA is more sensitive of total PSA for early detection of BCR after RP for localized prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS The current study is an observational, on-going, prospective, cohort study in a contemporary cohort of consecutive patients with localized PCa (pT2-3/N0, who underwent RP. Biochemical follow-up consisted of a blood sample drawn after 3–6-12 months and then every 6 months in the following years. The primary outcome is to determine whether or not elevation of p2PSA or kinetics in rising of p2PSA significantly outperform the sensitivity of tPSA driven BCR defined as two consecutive values of tPSA 0.2 ng/mL. The statistical analysis includes both Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the McNemar test for comparison of paired frequencies, considering 0.8 pg/ml the optimal threshold for p2PSA BCR. RESULTS From April 2012 to September 2014, a total of 134 patients were enrolled in the study. The median follow-up was 18 months (range 3–29). Over 134 patients, 10 (7.5%) developed a BCR according to PSA definition (4 after 3 mo; 1 after 6 mo; 3 after 12 mo and 2 after 24 mo). All the patients with a BCR had a p2PSA > 0.8 pg/ml at timing of the diagnosis; this correlation was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Two patients with a BCR after 12 months had a p2PSA > 0.8 pg/ml 9 months early and the other one 6 months early. One patient with a BCR detected after 24 months had a p2PSA > 0.8 pg/ml 21 months early and the other one 12 months early. At established cut-offs, the frequencies of p2PSA positive subjects were significantly higher than frequencies of positive subjects identified with tPSA after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months (p<0.0001). The mean survival BCR-free time was 14.1 months (95%CI: 11.4-16.89.0) for p2PSA, and 25 months (95%CI: 22.4-27.5) for PSA (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The current findings suggest that p2PSA could be more sensitive than tPSA in detecting early BCR. Further studies are mandatory for clinical practice purposes. © 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 193Issue 4SApril 2015Page: e56-e57 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Massimo Lazzeri More articles by this author Giovanni Lughezzani More articles by this author Alberto Abrate More articles by this author Andrea Losa More articles by this author Alessandro Mistretta More articles by this author Nicolò Maria Buffi More articles by this author Giuliana Lista More articles by this author Giulio Maria Gadda More articles by this author Alessandro Larcher More articles by this author Nicola Fossati More articles by this author Paolo Dell'Oglio More articles by this author Vittorio Bini More articles by this author Ferruccio Ceriotti More articles by this author Giorgio Guazzoni More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...