Biochemical Control Research Articles

Trimodality Therapy With Iodine-125 Brachytherapy, External Beam Radiation Therapy, and Short- or Long-Term Androgen Deprivation Therapy for High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: Results of a Multicenter, Randomized Phase 3 Trial (TRIP/TRIGU0907)

This phase 3 randomized investigation was designed to determine whether 30 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was superior to 6 months of ADT when combined with brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for localized high-risk prostate cancer. This study was conducted at 37 hospitals on men aged 40 to 79 years, with stage T2c-3a, prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/mL, or Gleason score >7, who received 6 months of ADT combined with iodine-125 brachytherapy followed by EBRT. After stratification, patients were randomly assigned to either no further treatment (short arm) or 24 months of adjuvant ADT (long arm). According to the Phoenix definition of failure, the primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of biochemical progression. Secondary endpoints included clinical progression, metastasis, salvage treatment, disease-specific mortality, overall survival, and grade 3+ adverse events. An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted using survival estimates determined using competing risk analyses. Of 332 patients, 165 and 167 were randomly assigned to the short and long arms, respectively. The median follow-up period was 9.2 years. The cumulative incidence of biochemical progression at 7 years was 9.0% (95% CI, 5.5-14.5) and 8.0% (4.7-13.5) in the short and long arms, respectively (P=.65). The outcomes of secondary endpoints did not differ significantly between the arms. Incidence rates of endocrine- and radiation-related grade 3+ adverse events for the short versus long arms were 0.6 versus 1.8% (P=.62) and 1.2 versus 0.6% (P=.62), respectively. Both treatment arms showed similar efficacy among selected populations with high-risk features. The toxicity of the trimodal therapy was acceptable. The present investigation, designed as a superiority trial, failed to demonstrate that 30-month ADT yielded better biochemical control than 6-month ADT when combined with brachytherapy and EBRT. Therefore, a noninferiority study is warranted to obtain further evidence supporting these preliminary results.

Long-Term Quality-of-Life Outcomes After Prostate Radiation Therapy With or Without High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost: Post Hoc Analysis of TROG 03.04 RADAR

Adding high-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT) boost to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) improves biochemical control but may affect patient-reported quality of life (QOL). We sought to determine long-term QOL outcomes for EBRT+BT versus EBRT alone. This was a post hoc analysis of the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group 03.04 Randomized Androgen Deprivation and Radiotherapy (TROG 03.04 RADAR) trial. Only patients who received 74 Gy conventionally fractionated EBRT (n = 260) or 46 Gy conventionally fractionated EBRT plus 19.5 Gy in 3 fractions high-dose-rate BT boost (n = 237) were included in this analysis. The primary endpoint was patient-reported QOL measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL (EORTC QLQ-C30) and prostate-specific QOL module (EORTC QLQ-PR25) questionnaires. We evaluated temporal changes in QOL scores, rates of symptom resolution, and the proportion of men who had decrements from baseline of >2 × the threshold for minimal clinically important change (2 × MCIC) for each domain. At 5, 17, and 29 months after radiation therapy, the EBRT+BT group had 2.5 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-4.2; P < .001), 2.9 times (95% CI, 1.7-4.9; P < .001), and 2.6 times (95% CI, 1.4-4.6; P = .002) greater odds of reporting 2 × MCIC in urinary QOL score compared with EBRT. There were no differences beyond 29 months. EBRT+BT led to a slower rate of urinary QOL symptom score resolution up to 17 months after radiation therapy compared with EBRT (P < .001) but not at later intervals. In contrast, at the end of the radiation therapy period and at 53 months after radiation therapy, the EBRT+BT group had 0.65 times (95% CI, 0.44-0.96; P = .03) and 0.51 times (95% CI, 0.32-0.79; P = .003) the odds of reporting 2 × MCIC in bowel QOL symptom scores compared with EBRT. There were no significant differences in the rate of bowel QOL score resolution. There were no significant differences in global health status or sexual activity scores between the 2 groups. There were no persistent differences in patient-reported QOL measures between EBRT alone and EBRT+BT. BT boost does not appear to negatively affect long-term, patient-reported QOL.

Long-Term Outcomes Associated with Different High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Dose Regimens for Favorable and Unfavorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer.

To present long-term efficacy outcomes of prostate high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy monotherapy using 38 Gy in 4 fractions, 24 Gy in 2 fractions, and 27 Gy in 2 fractions for men with favorable and unfavorable intermediate risk prostate cancer. Patients treated with HDR brachytherapy monotherapy for NCCN favorable (FIR) or unfavorable (UIR) intermediate risk prostate cancer from 1999-2020 were identified in a prospectively maintained, single institution database. Patients with less than two years of follow-up and those treated with single fraction HDR brachytherapy were excluded. Biochemical failure was determined using Phoenix criteria. 10-year biochemical control (BC), local control (LC), and distant metastasis (DM) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Two hundred sixty-seven patients were included. One hundred eighty-nine had FIR and 78 had UIR prostate cancer, with median follow-up of 9.6 years and 7.2 years, respectively. Of the 189 patients with FIR prostate cancer, 59 (31.2%) received 38 Gy in 4 fractions, 26 (13.7%) received 24 Gy in 2 fractions, and 104 (55.0%) received 27 Gy in 2 fractions. Of the 78 patients with UIR prostate cancer, 20 (25.6%) received 38 Gy in 4 fractions, 11 (14.1%) received 24 Gy in 2 fractions, and 47 (60.2%) received 27 Gy in 2 fractions. Date ranges of treatment for the respective fractionation schedules were 1999-2010, 2007-2016, and 2009-2020. Upfront androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was given to 12 (6.3%) patients with FIR and 10 (12.8%) patients with UIR. 10-year rates of BC for FIR and UIR patients were 90.1% and 78.8% (p = 0.004), respectively. 10-year rates of LC were 92.4% and 85.0% (p = 0.06), respectively. 10-year rates of DM were 1.9% and 4.7% (p = 0.12), respectively. For FIR patients, 10-year BC rates were 96.2% for patients receiving 38 Gy in 4 fractions vs. 86.3% (p = 0.07) for those treated with the 2-fraction regimens, while 10-year LC rates were 97.9% and 89.0% (p = 0.049), respectively. Within the UIR subset, the 10-year BC rates for patients receiving 38 Gy in 4 fractions and patients receiving treatment in 2 fractions were 95.0% and 70.6% (p = 0.038). 10-year LC rates were 100% and 77.8% (p = 0.045), respectively. 10-year BC rates by treatment schedule are shown in the table below. HDR brachytherapy monotherapy results in excellent long-term local control for intermediate risk prostate cancer. Improvements in biochemical and local disease control for patients treated with 38 Gy in 4 fractions warrants consideration of prospective study of optimal treatment dosing regimens.

MR-Guided HDR Brachytherapy Boost in Localized Prostate Cancer - Results of a Phase II Trial.

Dose escalation in localized prostate cancer using brachytherapy combined with external beam radiation (EBRT) has demonstrated improved biochemical control compared to EBRT alone. However, ultrasound guided LDR brachytherapy might be associated with increased GU toxicity. We report the results of a prospective study of MR-guided HDR brachytherapy (MRgHDR) in combination with EBRT for localized prostate cancer. Intermediate- (IR) and high-risk (HR) prostate cancer patients were eligible. Patients received either 15Gy single fraction or 10Gy x 2 fractions using MRgHDR technique, followed by EBRT (37.5 Gy, [prostate only] -IR or 45-46 Gy - [prostate + pelvic nodes] -HR). Toxicity (CTCAE v4) and HRQoL (EPIC) were recorded at 1, 3 and 6 months, then at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was used according to the appropriate disease risk category. Biochemical failure was defined according to Phoenix definition (nadir+2). From 2010-2018, 120 patients were enrolled, 53 (44%) had IR and 67 (56%) had HR disease. Median age was 69 years (range, 46-78), median PSA was 12.1 ng/ml (3.2-148). ADT was used in 84 (70%) of patients, of whom 51 (60%) patients received <1 year and 33 (40%) received >1 year of ADT. A single fraction of 15Gy was given to 94 patients (78%) and the remaining 26 patients (22%) received 10Gy x 2 fractions. EBRT dose was 37.5Gy in 52 (43%) patients while 67 (56%) received 45-46Gy. One patient received only the first fraction of 10Gy, declined the second fraction and subsequently received 60Gy EBRT to the prostate. The median follow up was 58 months (11-134). Overall, 5-year biochemical control was 90% while it was 95% and 86% for IR and HR, respectively. At 5 years 7% patient had nodal or distant relapse or both. While the 5-yr distant control rates were 95% and 91% in the IR, HR, respectively. Acute grade ≥2 GU and GI toxicity was 6.7% and 5% respectively. Acute toxicity trended back to baseline by 6 months in all patients except one. Late grade ≥ 2 GU and GI worst toxicity was seen in 10% and 4.2%, respectively. As with acute toxicity, late toxicity tended to improve over time. Only one patient experienced severe toxicity (Grade 3 GU - frequency) at 6 months but subsequently this resolved. HRQol will be reported separately. MRgHDR brachytherapy boost in conjunction with EBRT provides comparable biochemical outcomes compared to the literature. Severe toxicity rates were minimal. Further follow-up will determine if these outcomes are sustained.

Prostate Advanced Radiation Technologies Investigating Quality of Life (PARTIQoL): A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial of Proton Therapy vs. IMRT for Low or Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer.

Prostate cancer is the most common non-cutaneous cancer diagnosed among men in the United States, and the majority of patients are diagnosed with localized disease. Men with localized prostate cancer have several treatment options including external beam radiotherapy with either photons or protons. Proton beam therapy (PBT) has certain dosimetric advantages and the potential to reduce treatment-associated morbidity and improve oncologic outcomes, but current PBT is significantly more costly than intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The PARTIQoL trial (NCT01617161) is the first multicenter phase 3 randomized trial comparing protons to photons in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Patients with low or intermediate risk prostate cancer (Stage T1c-T2c, PSA < 20, Gleason score ≤ 7) are randomized to receive either PBT or IMRT, with targeted recruitment efforts for minority populations. A companion registry study has concurrently enrolled patients who declined randomization or whose insurance denied coverage for PBT. Patients are stratified by clinical site, age, use of rectal spacer, and fractionation schedule (conventional fractionation: 79.2 Gy in 44 fractions vs moderate hypofractionation: 70.0 Gy in 28 fractions). Participants are followed longitudinally to assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of bowel, urinary, and erectile function for 60 months after completion of radiotherapy (with an option for additional follow up through 10 years). Participants may also participate in correlative studies, including serial CT imaging during treatment and analyses of biopsy tissue, blood and urine specimens. The primary objective is to compare PROs of bowel function using the EPIC score at 24 months following completion of radiation. Secondary objectives are to assess treatment-related differences in urinary and erectile functions, adverse events, efficacy endpoints (biochemical control, metastasis-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival), health state utilities, perceptions of care, late effects, cost-effectiveness, association between radiotherapy dose distribution and PROs, and to identify biomarkers of radiation response and toxicity. The randomized trial has completed accrual, with 450 patients enrolled at 27 sites between June 2012 and November 2021. 20.3% of patients enrolled are non-white. Accrual on the companion registry is active, with 354 patients enrolled as of February 2023. Follow-up for the primary endpoint on the randomized trial will be reached in 2024. The PARTIQoL randomized clinical trial will rigorously assess the clinical benefits of PBT relative to IMRT and results will inform decision making by patients, providers, policymakers, and payers.

Effects of Radiation Doses on Clinical Recurrence in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer after Prostatectomy.

Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) to the prostate bed is the only curative treatment for patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Although several systematic reviews indicated that a dose escalation in the range of 60-70 Gy improved biochemical control, the effects of radiation doses on clinical relapse after SRT remain unclear. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between radiation doses and clinical relapse-free survival (cRFS) after SRT. We identified 295 eligible patients receiving SRT for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after RP between 2005 and 2018 at 15 institutions. Sixteen patients (5%) received short-term (< 6 months) androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) following RP and/or concurrently with SRT. SRT was delivered to the prostate and seminal vesicle bed using photon beams at a median (range) dose of 66 Gy (61-85) in 1.8-3.0 Gy fractions. The primary outcome was cRFS. Clinical relapse was identified on radiological imaging and/or biopsy and included local recurrence, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis. In all analyses, doses were recalculated as an equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) with α/β = 1.5 Gy. Clinical RFS between the EQD2 ≥ 66 Gy (n = 229) and EQD2 < 66 Gy (n = 66) groups were compared using the Log-rank test, followed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses and a subgroup analysis. The median follow-up duration was 73 months. Among patients with BCR (n = 119), 79 of 96 (82%) in the EQD2 ≥ 66 Gy group and 21 of 23 (91%) in the EQD2 < 66 Gy group received second salvage ADT (p = 0.36). Among all patients (n = 295), clinical relapse was identified in 22 (7%) patients after SRT. Six-year biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS), cRFS, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 58%, 93%, 98%, and 94%, respectively. Six-year cRFS rates were 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90-97) in the EQD2 ≥ 66 Gy group and 87% (95% CI, 75-93) in the EQD2 < 66 Gy group (p = 0.020). The multivariate analysis revealed that EQD2 < 66 Gy, Gleason score ≥ 8, seminal vesicle involvement, and PSA at BCR ≥ 0.5 ng/ml correlated with clinical relapse (p = 0.0016, 0.014, 0.011, and 0.027, respectively). The subgroup analysis showed the consistent benefit of EQD2 ≥ 66 Gy in patients across most subgroups including PSA at BCR after RP, extracapsular extension, and age at SRT. This large multi-institutional observational study demonstrated that a higher SRT dose (EQD2 ≥ 66 Gy) resulted in superior cRFS. The present result supports the dose recommendations in the 2023 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines (64-72 Gy) even in terms of clinical relapse. Prospective trial is warranted to investigate an upper threshold for optimal SRT dose.

Management of Localized Prostate Cancer in Men With Human Immunodeficiency Virus: Analysis of a Large Retrospective Cohort.

We aimed to characterize the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of HIV-positive patients with clinically localized, prostate cancer (PCa). A retrospective study was conducted of HIV-positive patients from a single institution with elevated PSA and diagnosis of PCa by biopsy. PCa features, HIV characteristics, treatment type, toxicities, and outcomes were analyzed by descriptive statistics. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine progression-free survival (PFS). Seventy-nine HIV-positive patients were included with a median age at PCa diagnosis of 61 years-old and median duration from HIV infection to PCa diagnosis of 21 years. The median PSA level at diagnosis and Gleason Score was 6.85 ng/mL and 7, respectively. The 5-year PFS was 82.5% with the lowest survival observed in patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP)+radiation therapy (RT), followed by cryosurgery (CS). There were no reports of PCa-specific deaths, and the 5-year overall survival was 97.5%. CD4 count declined post-treatment in pooled treatment groups that included RT (P=.02). We present the characteristics and outcomes of the largest cohort of HIV-positive men with prostate cancer in published literature. RP and RT ± ADT is well-tolerated in HIV-positive patients with PCa as seen by the adequate biochemical control and mild toxicity. CS resulted in worse PFS compared to alternative treatments for patients within the same PCa risk group. A decline in CD4 counts was observed in patients treated RT, and further studies are needed to investigate this relationship. Our findings support the use of standard-of-care treatment for localized PCa in HIV-positive patients.

Initial Clinical Outcomes of a Phase II Trial of Focal Salvage LDR Brachytherapy for Local Recurrence of Prostate Cancer after External Beam Radiation Therapy.

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of focal salvage low dose rate brachytherapy (FSB) for biopsy proven local recurrence of prostate cancer after definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Patients with a Phoenix definition PSA recurrence (nadir + 2.0ng/dL) after definitive EBRT for localized prostate cancer and a negative metastatic work up were enrolled in a Phase II clinical trial. Patients first underwent MR-guided transperineal mapping biopsy of the prostate using a template grid. Patients with a pathologically confirmed recurrence underwent FSB using iodine-125 seeds to a prescription dose of 145 Gy. The brachytherapy planning target volume (PTV) was defined by the positions of the pathologically negative core biopsies adjacent to the positive core biopsies as recorded on the template grid during the biopsy procedure. An intraoperative treatment plan was then developed to cover the PTV with the 145 Gy isodose line. Follow up included assessment of genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 (CTCAEv4.03), patient reported outcomes using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index-26 (EPIC-26) forms, and serial PSA blood draws. Ten patients underwent FSB. The median prior EBRT dose was 7805 cGy (interquartile range IQR 7560-7920) and the median time from completion of EBRT to FSB was 81 months (IQR 68-134). The median PSA prior to FSB was 3.2 ng/dL (IQR 2.3 - 4.5). The median follow up after FSB was 32 months (IQR 18-57). Eight patients were free of Phoenix definition PSA failure at last follow up. Of the two patients who experienced a PSA failure, one developed distant metastases 5 months after FSB and the other a biopsy proven seminal vesicle recurrence 3 years after FSB. The median change in post FSB IPSS score compared to the pre-FSB IPSS score was an increase of 1.5 (IQR -1.5 to 8) at 3 month follow up and an increase of 3.5 (IQR 0.5 to 5.5) at last follow up (≥1 year). The median change in post FSB EPIC-26 urinary domain score compared to the pre-FSB score was -1 (IQR -26 to +14.5) at 3 month follow up and +2 (IQR -12.5 to +14.5) at last follow up (≥1 year). The median change in post FSB EPIC-26 bowel domain score compared to the pre-FSB score was -2 (IQR -9.5 to 0.0) at 3 month follow up and 0 (IQR -6.0 to +3.0) at last follow up (≥1 year). No patients experienced post FSB Grade 3 or higher GU or GI toxicities. High dose FSB for a local recurrence of prostate cancer after EBRT can be delivered with good biochemical control and a favorable toxicity profile. Further clinical trial enrollment and longer follow up will be needed to better assess long term outcomes.

A Phase I Trial of Focal Salvage Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer.

Locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy (RT) is an increasingly recognized entity with no standard management. NCT03253744 was a phase I trial with a primary objective of identifying the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of a course of image-guided, focal, salvage stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with local recurrence after prior definitive RT. Additional objectives included biochemical control and imaging response on mpMRI and 18F-DCFPyL (PSMA) PET/CT. SBRT was prescribed to three dose levels (DLs): 40Gy (DL1), 42.5Gy (DL2), and 45Gy (DL3) in 5 fractions. The prescription dose was delivered to a PTV defined by mpMRI and PSMA imaging and biopsy confirmed tumor volume. Dose escalation followed a 3+3 design with a 3-patient expansion at the MTD. Toxicities above baseline were scored using CTCAE v5.0 criteria for two years after completion of SBRT. Escalation was halted if 2 dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. DLTs were defined as any persistent (>4 days) grade 3 toxicity occurring within the first 3 weeks after SBRT, and any grade 3 GU or grade 4 GI toxicity thereafter. Imaging response was compared between baseline and 6-months by the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Between 08/2018 and 05/2022, 8 patients underwent salvage SBRT to 11 intraprostatic lesions with a median follow-up of 27 months. No DLTs were observed on DL1. Two patients were enrolled on DL2 and both experienced grade 3 GU toxicities, prompting de-escalation and expansion (n = 6) on DL1, the MTD. The most common toxicities were grade 2 GU toxicities: acute urinary urgency/frequency, acute weak urinary stream, and noninfective cystitis. One patient at DL1 had a self-limited episode of grade 2 GI toxicity (proctitis). No grade 3 GI toxicities were observed. All but two patients achieved an undetectable PSA nadir. Only one of these experienced biochemical failure (nadir + 2.0) at 33 months with suspicion of distant metastatic failure on restaging PET/CT. Imaging response was demonstrated by MRI in all lesions with heterogeneity in volumetric response (6% to 100%). A significant (p<0.01) response on PSMA PET/CT was observed for all measured parameters (SUVMax, SUVMean, GTVPSMA, Total Lesion PSMA [SUVMean × GTVPSMA]). Of the 11 lesions, 1 (9%) demonstrated a complete response (CR) by MRI and 9 (82%) by PSMA PET/CT. A single lesion increased in volume by 0.06 cc (16%) at 6-month PSMA PET/CT compared to baseline in the only patient who did not achieve an undetectable PSA nadir and did not have imaging suggestive of distant failure. On this phase I dose escalation study of salvage SBRT for isolated intraprostatic local failure after definitive RT, the MTD was 40Gy in 5 fractions. producing a 100% 24-month bPFS, with one late failure at 33 months occurring after the 24-month study period. The most frequent clinically significant toxicity was late grade 2 GU toxicity. Imaging response was demonstrated in all lesions on MRI and PSMA PET/CT with exception of a single lesion.

A Phase I/II Dose-Escalation Study Evaluating the Safety of 21 Gy, 23 Gy, and 25 Gy for High Dose Rate (HDR) Prostate Brachytherapy: An Interim Toxicity Report.

Single-fraction high dose rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy has shown improved actuarial biochemical control rates from 66% to 82% with dose escalation from 19 to 20.5 Gy, respectively, but is still inferior to the reported low dose rate brachytherapy control rates of over 90%. We aimed to identify whether dose escalation to 21, 23, and 25 Gy can be safely accomplished. Patients with previously untreated, pathologically confirmed, low-risk (cT1-T2a, Gleason ≤6, PSA <10 ng/mL) or favorable intermediate risk (Gleason 3+4, percentage of positive biopsy cores <50%, ≤1 NCCN intermediate risk factor) prostate adenocarcinoma were enrolled from a single institution. PSA and toxicity assessment were performed at baseline and at routine 6-month follow-ups. From May 9, 2018 to May 12, 2022, 18 patients were enrolled. None had received prior androgen deprivation therapy, 44% had low risk disease, and 61% were ECOG 0 at baseline. Median age was 68 years (total range: 43-79), and 83% were Caucasian. Eight patients received 21 Gy, nine patients received 23 Gy, and one patient received 25 Gy, with the 25 Gy cohort still accruing. The mean prostate size and range, determined by pre-operative prostate volume study on trans-rectal ultrasound, were as follows: 21Gy cohort (mean: 41.2cc; range: 21.9-63.1cc), 23Gy Cohort (mean: 41.2cc, range 28.3-71.7cc), 25Gy cohort (65.3cc). A median of 17 catheters (range: 16-20) were implanted. At a median follow-up of 35.7 months (range: IQR 4.4 - 50.2), only one grade 3 toxicity was reported, which was an ulcerative colitis (UC) flare noted in a patient whose UC was poorly controlled, requiring multiple courses of prednisone in the 6 months prior to his brachytherapy. Regarding toxicities attributable to therapy, fourteen and four patients experienced a grade 1 and 2 genitourinary toxicity respectively; four and four patients experienced a grade 1 and 2 reproductive system toxicity respectively; one patient experienced a grade 1 GI toxicity. Two patients needed foley catheters upon discharge, with neither requiring the foley long term. There were two treatment failures in the 21Gy cohort at 1.39 and 1.67 years from date of HDR brachytherapy; date of failure was defined by the first PSA 2.0ng/mL over nadir. Of these patients, one underwent focal salvage HDR, whilst the other underwent radical prostatectomy with only 1% of the volume involved by prostate cancer. Of note, there was seminal vesicle involvement on restaging prostate biopsy for the patient that underwent radical prostatectomy, however, this was not appreciated on the final prostatectomy specimen. Both patients have no evidence of disease currently. HDR brachytherapy appears well tolerated in patients with low to favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer at 21 and 23 Gy, with more accrual needed at 25Gy. Long-term follow-up needed to assess efficacy.

Focal Brachytherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Advances in image-guided brachytherapy have increased the interest in focal brachytherapy (F-BT) approaches to optimize disease control, while reducing the toxicities associated whole gland treatments for prostate cancer (PCa). In this study we performed a systematic review to report biochemical control (BC), and genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity rates in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with F-BT as a definitive or salvage modality. This project was registered in the PROSPERO database (ID CRD42022320921). A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Cochrane Central databases, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase Classic +Embase, and Medline ALL, all from the OvidSP platform and Web of Science from Clarivate, from each database's inception to July 2022. Search was restricted to English and included terms: focal brachytherapy/prostate cancer, partial brachytherapy/prostate cancer. In total, 14862 articles were identified. Manuscripts that not related to focal or partial prostate brachytherapy, review papers and studies not reporting BC were excluded. After eliminating duplicates, and studies deemed irrelevant by consensus among three independent reviewers, 44 articles remained for in-depth review and data extraction. Thirty studies that included BC outcomes were included for this analysis, comprising 1556 patients treated with F-BT for PCa. Of these, 1094 (70%) and 462 (30%) underwent F-BT as definitive monotherapy or salvage, respectively; while 585 (38%) and 971 (62%) received HDR or LDR, respectively. For F-BT as monotherapy, the most commonly prescribed dose for HDR was 19 Gy in 1 fraction (range 19-24 Gy), and for LDR, 145 Gy (90-160Gy). Whereas for salvage F-BT, most common dose schedule of HDR was 19Gy in 1 fraction (19-27GY) and LDR 145Gy (144-145Gy). BC random effects estimate for F-BT monotherapy at 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-years were 100% (P = 1.0), 96% (P = 0.45), 91% (P = 0.45) and 87% (P< 0.01), respectively. Whereas BC random effects estimate for salvage at 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-years were 91% (P = 0.86), 68% (0.17), and 57% (P = 0.20), respectively. GI and GU grade 3-4 crude toxicity rates for monotherapy and salvage ranged from 0-3.33% and 0-17%, respectively. Over the last decade, there has been increasing interest in F-BT approaches, both as monotherapy and in the salvage setting. BC and toxicity profiles of F-BT appear favorable, and future studies directly comparing with whole-gland treatments are warranted.

Long-Term Outcomes of Prospective Clinical Trial HDR-Brachytherapy Monotherapy in Single Day in Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer

This prospective clinical trial to evaluated long-term outcomes associated with 2 fractions in a single day, one implant, high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as monotherapy for patients with localized prostate cancer. We report Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity and Disease control. Between November 2010 and Feb 2016 a total of 120 patients diagnosed with low/intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer were treated. The prescribed dose was 27 Gy in 2 fractions in a day using a single implant. 34 patients (28%) were intermediate-risk cancer. 38 patients (31,7%) received hormonal therapy. We measured the incidence of no biochemical evidence of disease (bNED) based on the Phoenix definition of failure (nadir prostate-specific antigen (PSA) + 2 ng/mL). GU and GI toxicity were evaluated by CTCAE v4.0 and sexual function were prospectively documented at each follow up visit. With a median follow-up was 123 months (range 9-148) the actuarial rates of Local Control were 96%, Biochemical Control 93.4%, Distant Failure 3.3%, Disease-Free Survival 92.3 %, Metastasis-free survival 96.67% and Overall Survival was 86.7%. The cumulative incidence of acute grade (G) 1-2 GU toxicity was 20.8%, mainly frequency/urgency (10%), dysuria (10%), dribbling/hesitancy (0.8%). 3 patients required a Foley catheter during 1 week. No acute GI toxicities were recorded. Chronic G1-2 GU toxicities were 29 %, mainly dysuria (12.6%), urinary frequency/urgency (5.8%) and urinary Incontinence G2 (1.6%). 1 patient had G2 rectal bleeding and 2 patients had G3 GU toxicity requiring transurethral resection of bladder (TURB). 23.7% of patients without Hormonal therapy reported G1-2 sexual impotence after 2 years therapy. With 10 years of follow-up, our prospective data are sufficiently mature to report on efficacy and toxicity outcomes, making a single implant, 2 fractions HDR-BT an attractive option for patients with localized low/intermediate-risk prostate cancer and be able to consider it a standard of care in this setting. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report regarding single day HDR-BRT as monotherapy with a median follow-up of 10 years.

Focal Boosted IMRT Treatment of Prostate Cancer to 84 Gy in 28 Fractions: Preliminary Clinical Outcomes and Dosimetry

The FLAME trial reported that focal boosting of prostate tumor to 95 Gy in 35 fractions improves biochemical control. However, this treatment is not commonly used in the United States. We investigated a focally boosted treatment of 84 Gy in 28 fractions (EQD2 108 Gy, BED 252 Gy). Between 2019-2022, men with unfavorable intermediate risk (uIR) and high risk (HR) prostate cancer were enrolled on a prospective registry and received a novel IMRT regimen. The dose levels were 84 Gy to the gross tumor volume (GTV) as defined on mpMRI (T2W and ADC) with no added margin, 70 Gy to the prostate and proximal seminal vesicles, and optional 50.4 Gy to elective pelvic lymph nodes (all 28 fractions). Patients received fiducial markers and hydrogel spacer. The treatment planning goal was to cover 95% of the GTV at 84 Gy, and also meet the target and normal tissue dosimetry criteria of the hypofractionated treatment arm of NRG-GU005. VMAT was used for treatment delivery. ADT was given at the discretion of the treating physician. A total of 20 men were included in the study, 2 (10%) uIR and 18 (90%) HR. 9 (45%) tumors were GS 7, 7 (35%) were GS 8, and 4 (20%) were GS 9. There were 13 (65%) stage cT1, 4 (20%) cT2 and 3 (15%) cT3. One (5%) patient received short term ADT, 18 (95%) long term ADT, and 1 (5%) refused ADT. 18 (90%) men received elective nodal radiation. The mean baseline PSA was 25.1 (range 4.2-73.4). The median baseline IPSS score was 11.1 (IQR 4.5-12), and 4 patients had severe baseline urinary symptoms (IPSS ≥20). The mean baseline prostate volume was 57.4 cc (range 26.8-198.3). The mean volume of the 84 Gy boost target was 7.1 cc (range 2.3-15.0) and the mean proportion of the prostate boosted was 14.8% (range 2% - 47%). There were 10 (50%) men with 1 boost target, 6 (30%) with two, 3 (15%) with three, and 1 (5%) had 4 boost targets. Targets were located in peripheral zone (85%), transition zone (30%), and central zone (5%). Patients met all per-protocol normal tissue criteria of NRG-GU005, except for bladder D0.03cc. The mean±SD (Gy) rectum D15%, D25%, and D30% were 51±5, 45±5, 42±4. The mean±SD (Gy) bladder D0.03cc, D30%, D50% were 79±4, 50±8, 38±10. At a median follow up time of 21.3 months (range 7.1-38.2), no patients have developed biochemical progression, local recurrence, distant progression, or death from prostate cancer. One patient died at 18 months from metastatic colorectal cancer, unrelated to prostate cancer treatment. Acute grade 1-2 GU toxicity occurred in 13 (65%) patients, and acute grade 1-2 GI toxicity occurred in 4 (20%) patients. No patients developed grade 3+ acute or late GU or GI toxicity. Two patients required temporary foley catheter for obstruction during RT, and both had IPSS >20 at baseline. The patient who refused ADT had a PSA bounce of magnitude 2.2 ng/mL at 14 months, PSA values declined without additional treatment. A novel 28-fraction focal boosted IMRT treatment is feasible and has an acceptable early toxicity profile. Oncologic results are promising but require longer follow up.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and High-Dose Rate Brachytherapy Boost in Combination with Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Single-Institution Cohort Study

The use of dose-escalated external beam radiation (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BT) boost with ADT has emerged as an option with superior biochemical control compared to dose-escalated EBRT alone. BT is traditionally delivered using low-dose rate techniques, but more recently high-dose rate (HDR) BT has also emerged as a boost option for these patients with promise of low toxicity rates. SBRT is a favorable modality for monotherapy for low and intermediate risk group patients, however its safety and efficacy as a boost in combination with EBRT is less well understood. The aim of this study is to compare SBRT boost, HDR boost and LDR boost for localized prostate cancer. A single-institution retrospective chart review was performed of men receiving EBRT delivered using intensity modulated RT and either SBRT boost (650cGy x 3), HDR-BT boost (1500cGy x 1), or LDR boost with I-125 (110Gy). Of patients treated w/ SBRT boost, 39 (80%) were treated with an SIB to the MRI-detectable lesion(s) to 700cGy x 3. Treatment characteristics for each strategy were reviewed and on-treatment toxicity outcomes for each of the cohorts were compared using Chi-square tests. From 2017-2022, 49 patients were treated with EBRT+SBRT boost, 44 patients received EBRT+ HDR-BT boost, and 46 patients received EBRT+ LDR-BT boost. The average age of patients included in the study was 71.2 years (median age 69.55 years, range 51.42-83.70 years) with average baseline PSA of 11 (median 7.6, range 3.3-64). In addition, 55% of the patients had high-risk/very high-risk disease, 39% had unfavorable intermediate disease and 6% had favorable intermediate disease. 139 patients received androgen deprivation therapy (93%). There were no differences in these baseline demographics and clinical or treatment factors between SBRT, HDR and LDR boost (p>0.05). The median dose/fx of EBRT was 4500cGy/25 fx (range 4500-5040cGy/23-28 fractions). At the end of treatment, 69% of the patients had 0-1 change in nocturia. There is an increase in nocturia episodes of 2-3 from baseline in 27% of the patients, while 4% had an increase in nocturia episodes of 4 or more from baseline with no difference between the SBRT, HDR and LDR boost. At baseline 36 patients (26%) reported urinary frequency symptoms, increasing to 80 patients (58%) by end of treatment with no difference between the SBRT, HDR and LDR boost. Similarly, there was a trend to increased use of urinary modifiers at end of treatment in patients treated with EBRT+HDR boost compared to EBRT+SBRT and EBRT+ LDR boost (89% vs. 71% v 72% respectively). There was no significant difference in acute urinary toxicity and nocturia between SBRT, HDR and LDR boost (p>0.05).

Predictors of long-term remission in acromegaly – an updated review

Abstract Acromegaly is a rare chronic disorder due to growth hormone (GH) - secreting pituitary tumor. The first-line treatment of acromegaly is a transsphenoidal adenomectomy. Surgical remission rates range from 30-50% for macroadenomas to 70-90% for microadenomas. Thus in patients with active acromegaly after surgery, medical treatment is recommended. Treatment outcome on medical therapy differs a lot depending on medications. The aim of this paper is to summerize the current knowledge of factors predicting acromegaly remission after surgery and biochemical control on medical treatment. Factors affecting treatment outcome, not related to the patient and the tumor, are neurosurgeon’s experience and visualisation tools used during surgery. Younger patients, as well as women tend to achieve acromegaly remission after surgery less often. Patients with lower GH and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) concentrations at diagnosis, in oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and postoperatively have a greater chance of surgical remission. However, some publications do not confirm that. Patients presenting with larger and more invasive tumors achieve surgical remisson less often. Hypointensive tumors on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are associated with better response to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) and to pasireotide. Pathologic factors increasing the chance of acromegaly remission are densely granulated tumors, lower Ki-67 index, high expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) and high expression of E-cadherin. A thorough analysis of the abovementioned factors predicting the treatment outcome in acromegaly may be helpful for selecting the best treatment option for each patient.

MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: The Next Frontier in Ultrahypofractionation.

Technological advances in MRI-guided radiation therapy (MRIgRT) have improved real-time visualization of the prostate and its surrounding structures over CT-guided radiation therapy. Seminal studies have demonstrated safe dose escalation achieved through ultrahypofractionation with MRIgRT due to planning target volume (PTV) margin reduction and treatment gating. On-table adaptation with MRI-based technologies can also incorporate real-time changes in target shape and volume and can reduce high doses of radiation to sensitive surrounding structures that may move into the treatment field. Ongoing clinical trials seek to refine ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy treatments for prostate cancer using MRIgRT. Though these studies have the potential to demonstrate improved biochemical control and reduced side effects, limitations concerning patient treatment times and operational workflows may preclude wide adoption of this technology outside of centers of excellence. In this review, we discuss the advantages and limitations of MRIgRT for prostate cancer, as well as clinical trials testing the efficacy and toxicity of ultrafractionation in patients with localized or post-prostatectomy recurrent prostate cancer.

Morphological, Biochemical and Quality Control Analysis of Peas Genotypes under Cadmium Toxicity at the Seedling Stage

Cadmium toxicity is an emerging problem as it is the most abundant heavy metal in Pakistani soils. Peas are being grown near cities where an elevated level of cadmium persists. So, this study was conducted for the evaluation of 10 peas genotypes (TRIPLET, MID No. 2, Oskar, LM (OSE), METEOR, P-1, Rohina, PEA-09, LM-POIS, and LAMPO) under cadmium stress at the seedling stage in the greenhouse of Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad. There were 3 treatments of cadmium (0, 4, and 8 mg/kg soil) and each treatment was replicated five times in a completely randomized design. Different morphological traits i.e., fresh root weight, fresh seedling weight, root length, seedling length, dry root weight, dry seedling weight and biochemical traits i.e., Cd in the root, shoot, and soil were recorded by atomic absorption spectrometry. Generally, T1 reduced root and shoot parameters while 8 ppm Cd application comparatively enhanced the growth of peas genotypes. LM-POIS and LM (OSE) genotypes performed well under Cd stress and LM-POIS had also an elevated level of Cd in the shoot on the other hand TRIPLET and LAMPO were the least performing genotypes. It is suggested that Cd contamination significantly reduces pea growth; therefore, Cd-tolerant-peas genotypes should be developed or introduced. Further, Cd exposure in the soil should be minimized and already Cd-polluted soils should be remediated.

Pasireotide effects on biochemical control and glycometabolic profile in acromegaly patients switched from combination therapies or unconventional dosages of somatostatin analogs.

To evaluate the impact of pasireotide (PAS) therapy on hormonal and glycometabolic outcome in patients with acromegaly previously treated with combination medical therapies or unconventional dosages of first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRLs). Retrospective study carried out in two referral centers for pituitary diseases. Twenty-one acromegalic patients were switched to PAS (12 had biochemical control, 9 were uncontrolled). Data were collected after 3- and 6-months PAS treatment, and at the last available visit (median 35months). After switching to PAS therapy, a significant reduction in IGF-1 values was observed [median 39%; 0.79 xULN (IQR 0.5-1.01) vs 1.29 xULN (IQR 1.06-1.83); p = 0.009]. IGF-1 reduction was statistically significant in the 9 patients previously uncontrolled (61%, p = 0.016), and in the 12 controlled subjects (33%, p = 0.037). At last follow-up, the number of patients reaching an acceptable biochemical control (IGF-1 < 1.3 xULN) raised from 57 to 90% (p = 0.032). Mean HbA1c levels increased from 5.7% (5.5-5.9) to 6.0% (5.9-7) (p = 0.002), and the percentage of diabetic patients raised from 14% (3/21) to 67% (14/21) (p = 0.004). At the last evaluation HbA1c was ≥ 7.0% in 5 patients (24%). Antidiabetic drugs were initiated in 9 new patients, and in 7 out of 9 metformin alone was effective. Younger age and male sex were predictors for the maintenance of glucose homeostasis. PAS monotherapy can be effective in acromegalic patients previously treated with combination medical therapies or unconventional dosages of fg-SRLs. Glucose imbalance can be managed in the vast majority of cases by use of lifestyle interventions and metformin.

Long-term control of acromegaly after pituitary surgery in South-Eastern Norway

PurposeSustained cure of acromegaly can only be achieved by surgery. Most growth hormone (GH) secreting pituitary adenomas are macroadenomas (≥ 10 mm) at diagnosis, with reported surgical cure rates of approximately 50%. Long-term data on disease control rates after surgery are limited. Our aim was to estimate short- and long-term rates of biochemical control after pituitary surgery in acromegaly and identify predictive factors.MethodsPatients operated for GH-secreting pituitary adenomas between 2005–2020 were included from the local pituitary registry (n = 178). Disease activity and treatment data were recorded at one-year (short-term) and five-year (long-term) postoperative follow-up. Biochemical control was defined as insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) ≤ 1.2 × upper limit of normal value. Multivariate regression models were used to identify factors potentially predicting biochemical control.ResultsA total of 178 patients with acromegaly (median age at diagnosis 49 (IQR: 38–59) years, 46% women) were operated for a pituitary adenoma. Biochemical control was achieved by surgery in 53% at short-term and 41% at long-term follow-up, without additional treatment for acromegaly. Biochemical control rates by surgery were of same magnitude in paired samples (45% vs. 41%, p = 0.213) for short- and long-term follow-up, respectively. At short-term, 62% of patients with microadenomas and 51% with macroadenomas, achieved biochemical control. At long-term, the biochemical control rate was 58% for microadenomas and 37% for macroadenomas (p = 0.058). With adjunctive treatment, 82% achieved biochemical control at long-term. Baseline IGF-1 levels significantly predicted biochemical control by surgery at short-term (OR: 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96–0.99), p = 0.011), but not at long-term (OR: 0.76 (95% CI: 0.57–1.00), p = 0.053).ConclusionIn unselected patients with acromegaly, the long-term biochemical control rate remains modest. Our findings indicate a need to identify patients at an earlier stage and improve therapeutic methods and surgical outcomes.

46 Patterns of Relapse and Biochemical Control in Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Treated with High Dose Rate Brachytherapy (HDRB) Monotherapy

46 Patterns of Relapse and Biochemical Control in Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Treated with High Dose Rate Brachytherapy (HDRB) Monotherapy