TATA-binding Protein Binding Research Articles

Experimentally determined weight matrix definitions of the initiator and TBP binding site elements of promoters

The basal elements of class II promoters are: (i) a-30 region, recognized by TATA binding protein (TBP); (ii) an initiator (Inr) surrounding the start site for transcription; (iii) frequently a downstream (+10 to +35) element. To determine the sequences that specify an Inr, we performed a saturation mutagenesis of the Inr of the SV40 major late promoter (SV40-MLP). The transcriptional activity of each mutant was determined both in vivo and in vitro. An excellent correlation between transcriptional activity and closeness of fit to the optimal Inr sequence, 5'-CAG/TT-3', was found to exist both in vivo and in vitro. Employing a neural network technique we generated from these data a weight matrix definition of an Inr that can be used to predict the activity of a given sequence as an Inr. Using saturation mutagenesis data of TBP binding sites we likewise generated a weight matrix definition of the -30 region element. We conclude the following: (i) Inrs are defined by the nucleotides immediately surrounding the transcriptional start site; (ii) most, if not all, Inrs are recognized by the same general transcription factor(s). We propose that the mechanism of transcription initiation is fundamentally conserved, with the formation of pre-initiation complexes involving the concurrent binding of general transcription factors to the -30, Inr and, possibly, downstream elements of class II promoters.

Specific targeting of protein-DNA complexes by DNA-reactive drugs (+)-CC-1065 and pluramycins.

To gain insight into the interactions between transcriptional factor proteins and DNA, the DNA-reactive drugs (+)-CC-1065 and pluramycin were used to target specific protein-DNA complexes. The structural features of the complex between the transcriptional activator Sp1 and the 21-base-pair repeat of the early promoter region of SV40 DNA were examined using hydroxyl-radical footprinting; (+)-CC-1065, a sequence-specific minor groove bending probe; and circularization experiments. The results show that the 21-base-pair repeat region has an intrinsically in-phase bent structure that is stabilized upon saturation Sp1 binding by protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions to produce a looping structure. The intercalating drug pluramycin was used to probe the structural details of the interaction between the TATA binding protein (TBP) and the TATA box DNA sequence. TBP, which directs initiation of RNA transcription, exhibits two-fold symmetry and apparently interacts with the TATA box in a symmetrical fashion. However, the interaction results in an asymmetric effect, in that transcription is initiated only in the downstream direction. Using pluramycin as a probe, it was determined that TBP binding to the human myoglobin TATA sequences enhances pluramycin reactivity at a site immediately downstream of the TATA box. The implications on transcriptional control of ternary complexes comprised of transcriptional factors, DNA, and DNA-reactive compounds will be presented.

Adenovirus E1A functions as a cofactor for retinoic acid receptor beta (RAR beta) through direct interaction with RAR beta.

Transcription regulation by DNA-bound activators is thought to be mediated by a direct interaction between these proteins and TATA-binding protein (TBP), TFIIB, or TBP-associated factors, although occasionally cofactors or adapters are required. For ligand-induced activation by the retinoic acid receptor-retinoid X receptor (RAR-RXR) heterodimer, the RAR beta 2 promoter is dependent on the presence of E1A or E1A-like activity, since this promoter is activated by retinoic acid only in cells expressing such proteins. The mechanism underlying this E1A requirement is largely unknown. We now show that direct interaction between RAR and E1A is a requirement for retinoic acid-induced RAR beta 2 activation. The activity of the hormone-dependent activation function 2 (AF-2) of RAR beta is upregulated by E1A, and an interaction between this region and E1A was observed, but not with AF-1 or AF-2 of RXR alpha. This interaction is dependent on conserved region III (CRIII), the 13S mRNA-specific region of E1A. Deletion analysis within this region indicated that the complete CRIII is needed for activation. The putative zinc finger region is crucial, probably as a consequence of interaction with TBP. Furthermore, the region surrounding amino acid 178, partially overlapping with the TBP binding region, is involved in both binding to and activation by AF-2. We propose that E1A functions as a cofactor by interacting with both TBP and RAR, thereby stabilizing the preinitiation complex.

Recruiting TATA-Binding Protein to a Promoter: Transcriptional Activation without an Upstream Activator

The binding of TATA-binding protein (TBP) to the TATA element is the first step in the initiation of RNA polymerase II transcription from many promoters in vitro. It has been proposed that upstream activator proteins stimulate transcription by recruiting TBP to the promoter, thus facilitating the assembly of a transcription complex. However, the role of activator proteins acting at this step to stimulate transcription in vivo remains largely speculative. To test whether recruitment of TBP to the promoter is sufficient for transcriptional activation in vivo, we constructed a hybrid protein containing TBP of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae fused to the DNA-binding domain of GAL4. Our results show that TBP recruited by the GAL4 DNA-binding domain to promoters bearing a GAL4-binding site can interact with the TATA element and direct high levels of transcription. This finding indicates that binding of TBP to promoters in S. cerevisiae is a major rate-limiting step accelerated by upstream activator proteins.

Thermodynamic and Kinetic Characterization of the Binding of the TATA Binding Protein to the Adenovirus E4 Promoter

A thermodynamic analysis of the binding of the TATA binding protein (TBP) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the adenovirus E4 promoter was conducted using quantitative DNase I "footprint" titration techniques. These studies were conducted to provide a foundation for studies of TBP structure-function relations and its assembly into transcription preinitiation complexes. The binding of TBP to the E4 promoter is well described by the Langmuir binding polynomial, suggesting that no linked equilibria contribute to the binding reaction under the conditions examined. Van't Hoff analysis yielded a nonlinear dependence on temperature with the TBP-E4 promoter interaction displaying maximal affinity at 30 degrees C. An unusually negative value of the apparent standard heat capacity change, delta Cp degrees = -3.5 +/- 0.5 kcal/mol.K, was determined from these data. The dependence of the TBP-E4 promoter interaction on [KCl] indicates that 3.6 +/- 0.3 K+ ions are displaced upon complex formation. Within experimental error, no linkage of proton binding with the TBP-E4 promoter interaction is detectable between pH 5.9 and 8.7. Rates of association of TBP for the E4 promoter were obtained using a novel implementation of a quench-flow device and DNase I "footprinting" techniques. The value determined for the second-order rate constant at pH 7.4, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 30 degrees C (ka = 5.2 +/- 0.5) x 10(5) M-1 s-1) confirms the results obtained by Hawley and co-workers [Hoopes, B.C., LeBlanc, J.F., & Hawley, D.K. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 11539-11547] and extends them through TBP concentrations of 636 nM.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

DNA Bending is an Important Component of Site-specific Recognition by the TATA Binding Protein

We have used gel electrophoretic methods to analyze the extent, location and direction of the DNA bend induced by the TATA binding protein (TBP) upon binding to a consensus TATA box sequence. Our observations were consistent with the proposed models for the X-ray crystal structure of the TBP-TATA box complex. We have also measured the magnitude and direction of the bend induced by TBP upon binding a number of variant TATA box sequences for which we have measured TBP binding affinity. We found that the extent to which the DNA was bent in the complex differed among the various sequences and was correlated with the stability of the complex; that is, the greater the stability of the complex, the more DNA appeared to be bent by TBP. This study provides the first evidence that the structure of the TBP-DNA complex vary with different DNA sequences. In addition, we propose, based on our findings, that the energetics of bending contribute significantly to the overall binding affinity of TBP for different sequences.

TBP binding to the TATA box induces a specific downstream unwinding site that is targeted by pluramycin.

The TATA-binding protein (TBP) is one of the major components of the human TFIID multiprotein complex. It is important in directing the initiation of RNA transcription at a site immediately downstream of the TATA sequence (TATA box) found in many eukaryotic promoters. The crystal structure of TBP complexed with an oligonucleotide containing the TATA box revealed a protein with an approximate two-fold symmetry which apparently has symmetrical interactions with DNA. It is not known how an asymmetric effect involving downstream activation can be produced by an apparent symmetric complex. We set out to examine the state of DNA in the TBP-DNA complex using pluramycin, a small molecular weight probe of DNA accessibility. Binding of TBP to the TATA box facilitates intercalation of pluramycin at a defined site immediately downstream of the TATA sequence through an apparent transient unwinding of the DNA. Pluramycin adducts are detected by the production of DNA strand breakage products upon heating. Incubation of pluramycin with the TBP-DNA complex facilitates the trapping of the specific complex by intercalation. Gel mobility shift and circularization assays reveal that the binding of pluramycin on the 3'-side of the TATA box region considerably stabilizes the TBP-DNA complex. We propose that the TBP-DNA-pluramycin ternary complex is a 'specific' binding mode in which TBP and pluramycin make compensatory alterations in DNA, accounting for the improved stability of the ternary complex. We also propose a model of the ternary complex that explains the observed asymmetric effect of TBP binding to the TATA box.

Dynamic protein-DNA architecture of a yeast heat shock promoter.

Here we present an in vivo footprinting analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HSP82 promoter. Consistent with current models, we find that yeast heat shock factor (HSF) binds to strong heat shock elements (HSEs) in non-heat-shocked cells. Upon heat shock, however, additional binding of HSF becomes apparent at weak HSEs of the promoter as well. Recovery from heat shock results in a dramatic reduction in HSF binding at both strong and weak HSEs, consistent with a model in which HSF binding is subject to a negative feedback regulation by heat shock proteins. In vivo KMnO4 footprinting reveals that the interaction of the TATA-binding protein (TBP) with this promoter is also modulated: heat shock slightly increases TBP binding to the promoter and this binding is reduced upon recovery from heat shock. KMnO4 footprinting does not reveal a high density of polymerase at the promoter prior to heat shock, but a large open complex between the transcriptional start site and the TATA box is formed rapidly upon activation, similar to that observed in other yeast genes.

The bovine papillomavirus 1 E2 protein contains two activation domains: one that interacts with TBP and another that functions after TBP binding.

The E2 transactivator of bovine papillomavirus type-1 is unable to activate minimal promoters in vivo that contain only E2 binding sites and a TATA box. This block can be overcome by over-expression of human TATA binding protein (TBP) or by the addition of either SP1 binding sites or an initiator element to the promoter, suggesting that the binding of TFIID may normally be a rate-limiting step for activation by E2. Surprisingly, purified E2 and TBP bind co-operatively to DNA in vitro when the sites are closely spaced. E2 does not affect the on rate of association but reduces the off rate. The E2 region responsible for this effect is located in the hinge region that links the classic transactivation and DNA binding domains. We demonstrate that the TBP stabilizing domain contributes in vivo to co-operativity with co-expressed TBP and to activation of the major late minimal promoter (MLP) containing E2 sites. In contrast, promoters with SP1 sites are activated to wild-type levels by such a mutant. This promoter specificity is also evident in vitro. A truncated E2 mutant, lacking the classic transactivation domain but containing the TBP stabilizing domain, stimulates transcription of the MLP in vitro, but does not activate promoters with SP1 sites. In conclusion, our results show that the E2 transactivation domain has a modular structure. We have identified one domain which probably acts at an early step in the assembly of the pre-initiation complex and which is involved in reducing the dissociation rate of bound TBP in vitro. The classic N-terminal activation domain of E2 might affect one or several step(s) in the assembly of the preinitiation complex occurring after the binding of TFIID.

HUMAN ONCOPROTEIN MDM2 INTERACTS WITH THE TATA-BINDING PROTEIN IN-VITRO AND IN-VIVO

Human oncoprotein MDM2 inhibits p53-induced transcriptional activation of promoters containing p53-binding sites. In this report we show that MDM2 interacts with the human TATA binding protein (TBP), in vivo and in. vitro, in the absence of p53. The C-terminal boundary of the TBP-binding domain on MDM2 resides between amino acids 221 and 276, whereas the N-terminal boundary is beyond amino acid 120. Thus, the acidic domain of MDM2 overlaps with the TBP binding domain and is needed for the interaction. The C-terminal conserved domain of TBP is required for MDM2 binding. MDM2-TBP interaction suggests a p53-independent, transcription regulatory role of MDM2.

Role of flanking E box motifs in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 TATA element function.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) gene expression is dependent on a number of cis-acting DNA elements present in the HIV-1 long terminal repeat. Previous studies have demonstrated that the TATA element is critical for basal and Tat-induced HIV-1 gene expression. The HIV-1 TATA region has an unusual structure in that the TATA sequence is flanked by two palindromic sequence motifs (CANNTG) known as E boxes which can serve as binding sites for the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) class of DNA-binding proteins. In this study, we performed site-directed mutagenesis of both the TATA and the flanking E box sequences of HIV-1. We also substituted the sequences flanking the adenovirus E3 promoter TATA sequence for those flanking the HIV-1 TATA sequence. Constructs were assayed for their levels of basal and Tat-induced gene expression by both in vitro transcription and transient expression assays. Both the TATA box and flanking sequences including the E box motifs were found to be important in modulating both basal gene expression and Tat-induced HIV-1 gene expression. Gel retardation analysis demonstrated that binding of both the recombinant TATA-binding protein (TBP) and the TFIID fraction which contains both TBP and TBP-associated factors was dependent primarily on the TATA element. However, competition analysis suggested that the E boxes may play a role in stabilizing the binding of TFIID but not recombinant TBP. Two proteins representing different classes of bHLH proteins, E47 and AP-4, were assayed for their ability to bind to the flanking E box motifs. We isolated a cDNA clone encoding the complete AP-4 protein and demonstrated that both AP-4 and E47 bound specifically to the 3' E box motif, which contains sequences that correspond to the consensus binding site (CAGCTG). Gel retardation analysis indicated that the binding of AP-4 to the E boxes excluded the binding of TBP to the TATA box. These studies are consistent with a model in which different classes of cellular bHLH proteins may be involved in regulating HIV-1 TATA element function by either inhibiting or promoting the assembly of different preinitiation transcriptional complexes.

Mammalian cell growth controls reflected through protein interactions with the adenovirus E1A gene products

The adenovirus early region 1A (E1A) products infiltrate host transcription control pathways by binding directly to key cellular proteins through several distinct protein binding sites. Closely-spaced sites within E1A conserved region 3 bring various promoter-specific transcription factors into close proximity with the TATA binding protein (TBP) through simultaneous binding of TBP and any one of these factors. These activated transcription complexes are exploited to transcribe the remaining viral genes. To replicate in quiescent cells, the virus must additionally take control of transcription factors that regulate cell cycle specific gene expression and host cell DNA synthesis pathways. Two protein binding sites in E1A mediate these functions. The region 2-specific site activates the cellular transcription factor, E2F. The role of E1A region 2 is to bind negative regulators of E2F, and dissociate them from E2F transcription complexes. As a result of their binding by E1A, several cellular proteins have been recognized as components of E2F complexes. These include the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene product, pRB, as well as pRB-related proteins and cellular cyclins and kinases associated with them. Equally critical for E1A-mediated host cell proliferation is the function of the E1A amino terminal active site. The apparent target of this protein binding site is a large cellular protein designated p300. The protein sequence derived from the recently cloned p300 cDNA suggests that p300 is involved with cyclic AMP responsive pathways. E1A can bind p300 and the pRB related proteins simultaneously, and thus has the potential to promote interactions between them. These genetically manipulatable interactions make the E1A proteins important guides in deciphering the complex transcription network mediating the changing gene expression patterns characteristic of regulated cell growth and differentiation.

Mot1, a global repressor of RNA polymerase II transcription, inhibits TBP binding to DNA by an ATP-dependent mechanism.

Basal transcription of many genes in yeast is repressed by Mot1, an essential protein which is a member of the Snf2/Swi2 family of conserved nuclear factors. ADI is an ATP-dependent inhibitor of TATA-binding protein (TBP) binding to DNA that inhibits transcription in vitro. Here we demonstrate that ADI is encoded by the MOT1 gene. Mutation of MOT1 abolishes ADI activity and derepresses basal transcription in vitro and in vivo. Recombinant Mot1 removes TBP from DNA and Mot1 contains an ATPase activity which is essential for its function. Genetic interactions between Mot1 and TBP indicate that their functions are interlinked in vivo. These results provide a general model for understanding the mechanism of action of a large family of nuclear factors involved in processes such as transcription and DNA repair.

Facilitated binding of TATA-binding protein to nucleosomal DNA.

BINDING of the TATA-binding protein (TBP) to the TATA box is required for transcription from many eukaryotic promoters in gene expression. Regulation of this binding is therefore likely to be an important determinant of promoter activity. Incorporation of the TATA sequence into nucleosomes dramatically reduces transcription initiation, presumably because of stereochemical constraints on binding of general transcription factors. Biochemical and genetic studies imply that cellular factors such as yeast SWI/SNF are required for activator function and might alter chromatin structure. One step that could be regulated during the activation process is TBP binding in chromatin 12, 13. We show here that binding of TBP to the TATA sequence is severely inhibited by incorporation of this sequence into a nucleosome. Inhibition can be overcome by ATP-dependent alterations in nucleosomal DNA structure mediated by hSWI/SNF, a putative human homologue of the yeast SWI/SNF complex. Additionally, the orientation of the TATA sequence relative to the surface of the histone core affects the access of TBP. We propose that the dynamic remodelling of chromatin structure to allow TBP binding is a key step in the regulation of eukaryotic gene expression.

Transcription factor (TF) IIB and TFIIA can independently increase the affinity of the TATA-binding protein for DNA.

The general transcription factors (TF) IIB and TFIIA are the first factors to associate with the TATA-binding protein (TBP) during formation of a transcription initiation complex on RNA polymerase II promoters. DNase I footprint titration was used to measure the effects of TFIIB and TFIIA on binding of TBP to a consensus TATA box. Under reaction conditions optimized for TBP-DNA complex formation, the presence of TFIIB increased affinity of TBP for the TATA box by 2.5-fold, while TFIIA had no effect. When TBP binding conditions were sub-optimal, both TFIIB and TFIIA independently increased TBP affinity by approximately 10-fold. Therefore both TFIIB and TFIIA have the intrinsic ability to directly increase the affinity of TBP for the TATA box. We suggest that this property of TFIIA and TFIIB may increase the range of conditions under which high affinity TBP-DNA interactions can occur and may therefore favor the formation of the preinitiation complex.

Mechanism of Initiator-Mediated Transcription: Evidence for a Functional Interaction between the TATA-Binding Protein and DNA in the Absence of a Specific Recognition Sequence

Promoters containing Sp1 binding sites and an initiator element but lacking a TATA box direct high levels of accurate transcription initiation by using a mechanism that requires the TATA-binding protein (TBP). We have begun to address the role of TBP during transcription from Sp1-initiator promoters by varying the nucleotide sequence between -14 and -33 relative to the start site. With each of several promoters containing different upstream sequences, we detected accurate transcription both in vitro and in vivo, but the promoter strengths varied widely, particularly with the in vitro assay. The variable promoter activities correlated with, but were not proportional to, the abilities of the upstream sequences to function as TATA boxes, as assessed by multiple criteria. These results confirm that accurate transcription can proceed in the presence of an initiator, regardless of the sequence present in the -30 region. However, the results reveal a role for this upstream region, most consistent with a model in which initiator-mediated transcription requires binding of TBP to the upstream DNA in the absence of a specific recognition sequence. Moreover, in vivo it appears that the promoter strength is modulated less severely by altering the -30 sequence, consistent with a previous suggestion that TBP is not rate limiting in vivo for TATA-less promoters. Taken together, these results suggest that variations in the structure of a core promoter might alter the rate-limiting step for transcription initiation and thereby alter the potential modes of transcriptional regulation, without severely changing the pathway used to assemble a functional preinitiation complex.

Mechanism of initiator-mediated transcription: evidence for a functional interaction between the TATA-binding protein and DNA in the absence of a specific recognition sequence.

Promoters containing Sp1 binding sites and an initiator element but lacking a TATA box direct high levels of accurate transcription initiation by using a mechanism that requires the TATA-binding protein (TBP). We have begun to address the role of TBP during transcription from Sp1-initiator promoters by varying the nucleotide sequence between -14 and -33 relative to the start site. With each of several promoters containing different upstream sequences, we detected accurate transcription both in vitro and in vivo, but the promoter strengths varied widely, particularly with the in vitro assay. The variable promoter activities correlated with, but were not proportional to, the abilities of the upstream sequences to function as TATA boxes, as assessed by multiple criteria. These results confirm that accurate transcription can proceed in the presence of an initiator, regardless of the sequence present in the -30 region. However, the results reveal a role for this upstream region, most consistent with a model in which initiator-mediated transcription requires binding of TBP to the upstream DNA in the absence of a specific recognition sequence. Moreover, in vivo it appears that the promoter strength is modulated less severely by altering the -30 sequence, consistent with a previous suggestion that TBP is not rate limiting in vivo for TATA-less promoters. Taken together, these results suggest that variations in the structure of a core promoter might alter the rate-limiting step for transcription initiation and thereby alter the potential modes of transcriptional regulation, without severely changing the pathway used to assemble a functional preinitiation complex.

An ATP-dependent inhibitor of TBP binding to DNA.

An activity in yeast nuclear extracts (termed ADI) is described that inhibits the binding of the TATA-binding protein (TBP) to DNA in an ATP-dependent manner. The effect is reversible, ATP specific, rapid, and is not promoter specific. ADI is specific for TBP because three other protein-DNA complexes are not affected by ADI. The action of ADI is blocked by association of TFIIA with the TBP-DNA complex. ADI activity at the adenovirus major late promoter requires a segment of DNA upstream from the TATA sequence, suggesting that ADI recognizes aspects of both TBP and DNA. The evolutionarily conserved carboxy-terminal domain of TBP is sufficient for ADI recognition, and amino acids in the basic region of TBP are required for ADI action. ADI can repress transcription in vitro in an ATP-dependent manner. In the presence of ADI, both TFIIA and TBP are required to commit a template to transcription. A model of ADI action is proposed, and possible roles of ADI in the regulation of the transcription complex assembly are discussed.

Effect of the non-conserved N-terminus on the DNA binding activity of the yeast TATA binding protein.

We have studied the DNA binding activity of recombinant yeast TATA Binding Protein (TBP) with particular interest in the role played by the non-conserved N-terminal domain. By comparing the DNA binding activity of wild type yeast TBP with a mutant form of TBP that lacks the non-conserved N-terminal domain (TBP delta 57), we have determined that the N-terminus of TBP alters both the shape and the stability of the TBP-DNA complex. Measurements of the DNA bending angle indicate that the N-terminus enhances the bending of the DNA that is induced by TBP binding and greatly destabilizes the TBP-DNA complex during native gel electrophoresis. In solution, the N-terminus has only a slight effect on the equilibrium dissociation constant and the dissociation rate constant. However, the N-terminal domain reduces the association rate constant in a temperature dependent manner and increases the apparent activation energy of the TBP-DNA complex formation by 3 kcal/mole. These data suggest that a conformational change involving the N-terminus of TBP may be one of the isomerization steps in the formation of a stable TBP-DNA complex.

The TATA-binding protein and associated factors are components of pol III transcription factor TFIIIB

RNA polymerases I, II, and III require the TATA-binding protein (TBP) to initiate promoter-specific transcription. We have separated HeLa TBP into four phosphocellulose fractions that elicit polymerase specificity in supplying TBP activity to TBP-depleted pol II and pol III transcription reactions. Polymerase specificity might arise in part through distinct TBP-associated factors (TAFs), which have recently been identified in pol I and II transcription. However, the requirement for pol III TAFs has not been established. Here we show that classical pol III transcription involves a minimum of two novel TAFs: TAF-172 and TAF-L. Not only does TAF-172 activate pol III transcription, but it also inhibits the binding of TBP to the TATA box, thereby repressing pol II transcription. The TBP-TAF-172-TAF-L complex can replace TFIIIB both in transcription reactions reconstituted with TFIIIC and in template commitment assays. Thus SL1, TFIID, and TFIIIB might be functionally similar TBP-TAF complexes that direct pol I, II, and III transcription, respectively.