Binaural Conditions Research Articles

Further investigations on binaural intelligibility of reverberant speech

There is a binaural intelligibility advantage for many subjects when listening to reverberant speech. Two processes offer explanations as to why the binaural advantage exists. First, directional information may identify echoes and remove a portion of the reverberation in a manner similar to the precedence effect. A more likely possibility is that the reverberation behaves as additive noise with a specific time and frequency dependence. In this case, subjects may utilize the coherence of the left and right channels to limit the effects of the incoherent reverberation, similar to binaural masking release. To test the latter hypothesis, subjects listen to diotic (L+R), binaural (L&R), and diotic (L or R) reverberant words. The diotic treatment (L+R) adds two recordings measured at the location of the listener’s ears. Since the listener faces the source, the direct signals are coherent while some cancellation is expected for the reverberation. The presentation will compare diotic (L+R) intelligibility to the binaural (L&R) condition as well as the diotic (L or R) control condition where the left or right signal plays to both ears.

Using a combined localization/detection model to simulate human localization performance near the masked detection threshold level

Recently, the perceptual lateralization of a partly masked target has been successfully simulated using the interaural cross-correlation difference (ICCD) model [Braasch, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 2597 (2000)]. However, in the accompanying listening tests, the target level was often found to be below the masked detection threshold level. To improve the model performance, a detection threshold model has been implemented in the localization model so that the localization process is triggered only when the target level is above a threshold. Otherwise, the position of the sound source is determined according to a behavioral pattern. The detection stage is based on an on- and offset detection algorithm that analyzes the derivative in time. For the simulation of the binaural conditions, the equalization-cancellation algorithm of Durlach [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 35, 1206–1218 (1963)] has been included in the model. It has been shown that for target levels above the masked detection threshold, the on-/offset detection algorithm is accurate enough to trigger the subtraction process of the ICCD algorithm. Furthermore, the improved model has resulted in better simulations of human localization patterns in the presence of a distracting sound.

Three-month results with bilateral cochlear implants.

To evaluate possible binaural listening advantages for speech in quiet, speech in noise, and for localization in a group of postlingually deafened adults with two cochlear implants functioning independently after 3 mo experience. Nine postlingually deafened subjects who had received a Cochlear Corporation CI24M implant in each ear were evaluated on a number of tasks. The subjects all had audiometric or biographical (e.g., duration of deafness) differences between the ears. Word and sentence materials were presented to the subjects in quiet and in noise with the signal always in the front and the noise from the front or either side. Results are reported for each ear and for both ears with the noise on either side. This allowed evaluation of head shadow and squelch effects. Additionally, localization ability was assessed for broadband noise presented either to the right or left of center at 45 degrees azimuth. Localization was assessed for each ear and for both ears. Results of speech testing in quiet showed a significant advantage for the binaural condition over the better ear in four subjects. In noise, with both signal and noise in front of the subject, a significant advantage of two ears over the better ear was found for four subjects. For noise to one side of the head, when the ear opposite the noise source was added to the ear ipsilateral to the noise, a significant advantage was demonstrated for seven of seven tested subjects. When the ear ipsilateral to the noise was added to the ear contralateral to the noise, a significant advantage was shown for only one of seven (noise on right) and three of seven (noise on left) tested subjects. The localization task showed that all seven tested subjects could discriminate 45 degrees left from 45 degrees right above chance with bilateral stimulation. Three subjects could perform the discrimination above chance with only one ear. However, performance with both ears was significantly better than performance with one ear for two of these latter subjects. We conclude that bilateral cochlear implants can provide real advantages, particularly when it is possible to utilize the ear that is away from a noise source, thus taking advantage of the head shadow effect. In addition, localization ability was generally better with two implants than with one.

Functional asymmetry in schizophrenic patients during auditory speech processing

In two experiments, functional laterality and interhemispheric transfer was investigated in schizophrenic patients ( n=14) and healthy controls ( n=17). In Experiment 1, words and pseudowords were presented either to the left or right ear (monaural condition) or simultaneously to both ears (binaural condition). In Experiment 2, subjects had to discriminate two tones differing in frequency during monaural and binaural stimulation. Healthy controls showed a right ear advantage (REA) for word stimuli, indicating left-hemispheric superiority for word processing. The same lateralization pattern was found in schizophrenic patients, indicating unimpaired functional lateralization of auditory language processing. In both groups, no REA was found for pseudowords resulting in significant Wordness×Ear interactions. When presented binaurally, auditory processing of words and pseudowords did not differ significantly from any of the two monaural conditions. Tone discrimination did not lead to any ear asymmetry. The results show normal patterns of functional asymmetry during auditory language processing and tone discrimination in schizophrenic patients.

Behavioral and physiological studies of binaural detection with reproducible noise in rabbit

This presentation will review studies of binaural detection in rabbit. Behavioral results include detection experiments with narrow band and wide band reproducible noise maskers using the Pavlovian conditioning technique. These results showed similar trends across bandwidths and binaural conditions as in a parallel study in human listeners. Comparison of the responses to the ensemble of reproducible noises across bandwidths demonstrates the influence on performance of spectral components that are outside a narrow frequency band (approximately a critical bandwidth) surrounding the tone. Physiological responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus to the ensemble of reproducible noises will be presented. These responses can be compared to decision variables provided by computational models that are being developed to predict the behavioral results. Strategies for ongoing combined studies of behavior and physiology related to detection will be presented. [Work supported by NIH-NIDCD.]

Duration tuning in the mouse auditory midbrain.

Temporal cues, including sound duration, are important for sound identification. Neurons tuned to the duration of pure tones were first discovered in the auditory system of frogs and bats and were discussed as specific adaptations in these animals. More recently duration sensitivity has also been described in the chinchilla midbrain and the cat auditory cortex, indicating that it might be a more general phenomenon than previously thought. However, it is unclear whether duration tuning in mammals is robust in face of changes of stimulus parameters other than duration. Using extracellular single-cell recordings in the mouse inferior colliculus, we found 55% of cells to be sensitive to stimulus duration showing long-pass, short-pass, or band-pass filter characteristics. For most neurons, a change in some other stimulus parameter, (e.g., intensity, frequency, binaural conditions, or using noise instead of pure tones) altered and sometimes abolished duration-tuning characteristics. Thus in many neurons duration tuning is interdependent with other stimulus parameters and, hence, might be context dependent. A small number of inferior colliculus neurons, in particular band-pass neurons, exhibited stable filter characteristics and could therefore be referred to as "duration selective." These findings support the idea that duration tuning is a general phenomenon in the mammalian auditory system.

Interdependence of spatial and temporal coding in the auditory midbrain.

To date, most physiological studies that investigated binaural auditory processing have addressed the topic rather exclusively in the context of sound localization. However, there is strong psychophysical evidence that binaural processing serves more than only sound localization. This raises the question of how binaural processing of spatial cues interacts with cues important for feature detection. The temporal structure of a sound is one such feature important for sound recognition. As a first approach, we investigated the influence of binaural cues on temporal processing in the mammalian auditory system. Here, we present evidence that binaural cues, namely interaural intensity differences (IIDs), have profound effects on filter properties for stimulus periodicity of auditory midbrain neurons in the echolocating big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus. Our data indicate that these effects are partially due to changes in strength and timing of binaural inhibitory inputs. We measured filter characteristics for the periodicity (modulation frequency) of sinusoidally frequency modulated sounds (SFM) under different binaural conditions. As criteria, we used 50% filter cutoff frequencies of modulation transfer functions based on discharge rate as well as synchronicity of discharge to the sound envelope. The binaural conditions were contralateral stimulation only, equal stimulation at both ears (IID = 0 dB), and more intense at the ipsilateral ear (IID = -20, -30 dB). In 32% of neurons, the range of modulation frequencies the neurons responded to changed considerably comparing monaural and binaural (IID =0) stimulation. Moreover, in approximately 50% of neurons the range of modulation frequencies was narrower when the ipsilateral ear was favored (IID = -20) compared with equal stimulation at both ears (IID = 0). In approximately 10% of the neurons synchronization differed when comparing different binaural cues. Blockade of the GABAergic or glycinergic inputs to the cells recorded from revealed that inhibitory inputs were at least partially responsible for the observed changes in SFM filtering. In 25% of the neurons, drug application abolished those changes. Experiments using electronically introduced interaural time differences showed that the strength of ipsilaterally evoked inhibition increased with increasing modulation frequencies in one third of the cells tested. Thus glycinergic and GABAergic inhibition is at least one source responsible for the observed interdependence of temporal structure of a sound and spatial cues.

Influence of spatial and temporal coding on auditory gap detection.

This study investigated the effect on gap detection of perceptual channels, hypothesized to be tuned to spatial location or fundamental frequency (f0). Thresholds were measured for the detection of a silent temporal gap between two markers. In the first experiment, the markers were broadband noise, presented either binaurally or monaurally. In the binaural conditions, the markers were either diotic, or had a 640-micros interaural time difference (ITD) or a 12-dB interaural level difference (ILD). Reversing the ITD across the two markers had no effect on gap detection relative to the diotic condition. Reversing the ILD across the two markers produced a marked deterioration in performance. However, the same deterioration was observed in the monaural conditions when a 12-dB level difference was introduced between the two markers. The results provide no evidence for the role of spatially tuned neural channels in gap detection. In the second experiment, the markers were harmonic tone complexes, filtered to contain only high, unresolved harmonics. Using complexes with a fixed spectral envelope, where the f0 (of 140 or 350 Hz) was different for the two markers, produced a deterioration in performance, relative to conditions where the f0 remained the same. A larger deterioration was observed when the two markers occupied different spectral regions but had the same f0. This supports the idea that peripheral coding is dominant in determining gap-detection thresholds when the two markers differ along any physical dimension. Higher-order neural coding mechanisms of f0 and spatial location seem to play a smaller role and no role, respectively.

Binaural sluggishness in the perception of tone sequences and speech in noise.

The binaural system is well-known for its sluggish response to changes in the interaural parameters to which it is sensitive. Theories of binaural unmasking have suggested that detection of signals in noise is mediated by detection of differences in interaural correlation. If these theories are correct, improvements in the intelligibility of speech in favorable binaural conditions is most likely mediated by spectro-temporal variations in interaural correlation of the stimulus which mirror the spectro-temporal amplitude modulations of the speech. However, binaural sluggishness should limit the temporal resolution of the representation of speech recovered by this means. The present study tested this prediction in two ways. First, listeners' masked discrimination thresholds for ascending vs descending pure-tone arpeggios were measured as a function of rate of frequency change in the NoSo and NoSpi binaural configurations. Three-tone arpeggios were presented repeatedly and continuously for 1.6 s, masked by a 1.6-s burst of noise. In a two-interval task, listeners determined the interval in which the arpeggios were ascending. The results showed a binaural advantage of 12-14 dB for NoSpi at 3.3 arpeggios per s (arp/s), which reduced to 3-5 dB at 10.4 arp/s. This outcome confirmed that the discrimination of spectro-temporal patterns in noise is susceptible to the effects of binaural sluggishness. Second, listeners' masked speech-reception thresholds were measured in speech-shaped noise using speech which was 1, 1.5, and 2 times the original articulation rate. The articulation rate was increased using a phase-vocoder technique which increased all the modulation frequencies in the speech without altering its pitch. Speech-reception thresholds were, on average, 5.2 dB lower for the NoSpi than for the NoSo configuration, at the original articulation rate. This binaural masking release was reduced to 2.8 dB when the articulation rate was doubled, but the most notable effect was a 6-8 dB increase in thresholds with articulation rate for both configurations. These results suggest that higher modulation frequencies in masked signals cannot be temporally resolved by the binaural system, but that the useful modulation frequencies in speech are sufficiently low (<5 Hz) that they are invulnerable to the effects of binaural sluggishness, even at elevated articulation rates.

Localization of moving sounds by hemispherectomized subjects

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the localization abilities of the residual auditory structures in hemispherectomized subjects (Hs) during monaural and binaural listening. The monaural stimulus presentations were aimed at evaluating the relative contribution of crossed and uncrossed afferents to the perception of a moving auditory target. Three Hs and ten control subjects (Cs) were asked to localize a simulated moving sound source of fixed intensity presented on the horizontal plane. The moving stimulus was delivered randomly through 16 loudspeakers which were mounted at 10° intervals on a calibrated perimeter frame located inside an anechoic chamber. The apparent movement traveled in either direction over three different distances in the peri-central and lateral fields. Listeners had to report the movement trajectory by pointing with the index finger where they thought the beginning and the ending of the stimulus occurred on the perimeter. Hs were less accurate than Cs in the binaural condition, suggesting that the residual hemisphere and/or subcortical structures are not by themselves as efficient to accurately analyze motion as when the two hemispheres are present. In the monaural testing conditions, most of the subjects showed a prominent lateral displacement of the perceived localization towards the functional ear. However, all subjects, particularly the Cs, were able to perceive different lengths of trajectories although they did not discriminate the direction of the motion. For the Hs, the pattern of performance differed for each subject. One right Hs was more accurate for localizing the sources delivered on the side of the functional ear when relying on crossed-input. A left Hs was able to detect the appropriate side of the moving sound source even when it was presented on the side to the obstructed ear. The other left Hs who had developed normally until the age of 5, was more affected by the hemidecortication in both the binaural and the monaural listening conditions. These findings suggest that it is possible to detect moving sounds in the absence of binaural cues and without the integration carried out by both cerebral hemispheres. However it appears that interaural disparities and bihemispheric integration are required for finer analysis.

Speech intelligibility and localization in a multi-source environment.

Natural environments typically contain sound sources other than the source of interest that may interfere with the ability of listeners to extract information about the primary source. Studies of speech intelligibility and localization by normal-hearing listeners in the presence of competing speech are reported on in this work. One, two or three competing sentences [IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. 17(3), 225-246 (1969)] were presented from various locations in the horizontal plane in several spatial configurations relative to a target sentence. Target and competing sentences were spoken by the same male talker and at the same level. All experiments were conducted both in an actual sound field and in a virtual sound field. In the virtual sound field, both binaural and monaural conditions were tested. In the speech intelligibility experiment, there were significant improvements in performance when the target and competing sentences were spatially separated. Performance was similar in the actual sound-field and virtual sound-field binaural listening conditions for speech intelligibility. Although most of these improvements are evident monaurally when using the better ear, binaural listening was necessary for large improvements in some situations. In the localization experiment, target source identification was measured in a seven-alternative absolute identification paradigm with the same competing sentence configurations as for the speech study. Performance in the localization experiment was significantly better in the actual sound-field than in the virtual sound-field binaural listening conditions. Under binaural conditions, localization performance was very good, even in the presence of three competing sentences. Under monaural conditions, performance was much worse. For the localization experiment, there was no significant effect of the number or configuration of the competing sentences tested. For these experiments, the performance in the speech intelligibility experiment was not limited by localization ability.

Monaural and binaural minimum audible angles for virtual sound sources

A number of researchers have employed the minimum audible angle (MAA) paradigm to investigate the precision with which listeners can discriminate differences of sound-source location in the free field [A. W. Mills, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 30, 237–246 (1958); W. M. Hartmann and B. Rakerd, ibid. 85, 2031–2041 (1989)]. Surprisingly, this has been done only for binaural listening conditions, although Man’s capacity for monaural localization is well documented [J. R. Angell and W. Fite, Psych. Rev. 8, 225–246 (1901); R. A. Butler, R. A. Humanski, and A. D. Musicant, Perception 19, 241–256 (1990)]. In the present study, monaural and binaural MAAs were determined using a broadband stimulus for seven virtual sound-source positions in the horizontal plane. Listeners indicated via a three-alternative, forced-choice paradigm whether the stimulus presented in the second interval appeared to move clockwise, counterclockwise, or not at all, with respect to that presented in the first interval. Results will be discussed in terms of data obtained in previous studies of binaural MAA, and compared with data on monaural and binaural localization acuity.

Masking with interaurally delayed stimuli: the use of "internal" delays in binaural detection.

Detectability of 500-Hz tones was measured in the presence of broadband masking noise using three types of binaural conditions. In the first, the masker was presented diotically and the tone was interaurally delayed. In the second, the masker was interaurally delayed and the 500-Hz tone was presented either in phase (S0) or out of phase (S pi). In the third, the masker consisted of the sum of two independent noises having interaural delays of equal magnitude and opposite sign. The signal was, once more, presented either in phase (S0) or out of phase (S pi). Comparisons among the data and quantitative analyses assuming the use of compensatory "internal delays" suggested that internal delays are operative and compensate accurately for external delays of up to approximately 750 microseconds. The analyses also indicated that larger internal delays (i.e., up to 2 to 3 ms) are probably also operative. However, performance using such large internal delays appears to be degraded in accord with the hypothesis that their application introduces "noise" in the internal representation of the stimuli.

Binaural and monaural auditory filter bandwidths and time constants in probe tone detection experiments.

Auditory filter bandwidths and time constants were obtained with five normal-hearing subjects for different masker configurations both in the frequency and time domain for monaural and binaural listening conditions. Specifically, the masking level in the monaural condition and the interaural correlation in the binaural conditions, respectively, was changed in a sinusoidal, stepwise, and rectangular way in the frequency domain. In the corresponding experiments in the time domain, a sinusoidal and stepwise change of the masker was performed. From these results, a comparison was made across conditions to evaluate the influence of the factors "shape of transition," "monaural versus binaural," "frequency domain versus time domain," and "subject." Also, the respective data from the literature were considered using the same model assumptions and fitting strategy as used for the current data. The results indicate that the monaural auditory filter bandwidths and time constants fitted to the data are consistent across conditions both for the data included in this study and the data from the literature. No consistent relation between individual auditory filter bandwidths and time constants were found across subjects. For the binaural conditions, however, considerable differences were found in estimates of the bandwidths and time constants, respectively, across conditions. The reason for this mismatch seems to be the different detection strategies employed for the various tasks that are affected by the consistency of binaural information across frequency and time. While monaural detection performance appears to be modeled quite well with a linear filter or temporal integration window, this does not hold for the binaural conditions where both larger bandwidth and time constant estimates are found.

Physiological studies of the precedence effect in the inferior colliculus of the cat. II. Neural mechanisms.

We studied the responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus (IC) of cats to stimuli known to evoke the precedence effect (PE). This paper focuses on stimulus conditions that probe the neural mechanisms underlying the PE but that are not usually encountered in a natural situation. Experiments were conducted under both free-field (anechoic chamber) and dichotic (headphones) conditions. We found that in free field the amount of suppression of the lagging response depended on the location of the leading source. With stimuli in the azimuthal plane, the majority (84%) of units showed stronger suppression of the lagging response for a leading stimulus placed in the cell's responsive area as compared with a lead in the unresponsive field. A smaller number of units showed stronger suppression for a lead placed in the unresponsive field, and a few showed little effect of the lead location. In the elevational plane, there was less sensitivity of the leading source to changes in location, but for those cells in which there was sensitivity, suppression was always stronger when the lead was in the cell's responsive area. Studies on stimulus locations also were conducted under dichotic conditions by varying the interaural differences in time (ITD) of the leading source. Results were consistent with those obtained in free field, suggesting that ITDs play an important role in determining the amount of suppression that was observed as a function of leading stimulus location. In addition to location and ITD, we also studied the effect of varying the relative levels of the lead and lag as well as stimulus duration. For all units studied, increasing the level of the leading stimulus while holding the lagging stimulus constant resulted in increased suppression. Similar effects of leading source level were observed in azimuth and elevation. The effect of varying the duration of the leading source also showed that longer duration stimuli produce stronger suppression; this finding was observed both in azimuth and elevation. We also compared the suppression observed under binaural and monaural contralateral conditions and found a mixed effect: some neurons show stronger suppression under binaural conditions, others to monaural contralateral conditions, and still others show no effect. The results presented here support the hypothesis that the PE reflects a long-lasting inhibition evoked by the leading stimulus. Five possible sources for the inhibition are considered: the auditory nerve, intrinsic circuits in the cochlear nucleus, medial and lateral nuclei of the trapezoid body inhibition to the medial superior olive, dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus (DNLL) inhibition to the ICC, and intrinsic circuits in the ICC itself.

Effects of interaural intensity and time disparity on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions

Monaural and binaural 11/s, 65 dB pe SPL clicks with interaural time and intensity disparities known to affect central auditory processing were used to study contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in 10 subjects (20 ears). Psychophysical assessment of sound lateralization induced by the same stimuli was also conducted. TEOAEs were recorded to monaural (ipsilateral to the OAE recording probe) and to binaural clicks when clicks to the contralateral ear were synchronous and symmetrical in intensity, or, in the binaural intensity disparity conditions, synchronous but 10 dB higher or 10 dB lower in the ear contralateral to the OAE recording probe. When interaural time disparities were studied, the clicks to the contralateral ear were of the same intensity throughout, but 400 μs earlier or 400 μs later than to the ear with the probe. The TEOAE components at 13–15.8 ms showed suppression, relative to monaural responses, under all binaural conditions. This contralateral suppression did not correlate with the psychophysical findings. Suppression effects were more pronounced with binaural disparity than with binaurally symmetrical clicks. Thus, although contralateral click intensity was the same with time disparities, suppression was paradoxically enhanced compared to the binaurally symmetrical stimulation. To explain these results we propose that two factors are involved in TEOAE suppression with binaural clicks: (1) contralateral intensity and (2) interaural disparity (time or intensity). The latency of the suppressions observed, the effect of interaural disparity on these suppressions, coupled with the anatomical origin of the crossed efferent fibers and the disparity sensitivity of the superior olivary complex (SOC), all suggest SOC involvement in these TEOAE suppressions.

Effect of monaural and binaural altered auditory feedback on stuttering frequency

The effect of monaural and binaural alterations in auditory feedback on stuttering frequency was investigated. Eleven participants who stutter read aloud under nonaltered auditory feedback (NAF) and monaural and binaural conditions of frequency altered feedback [(FAF), on-quarter octave shift upward] and delayed auditory feedback [(DAF), 50-ms delay] at a normal speech rate. Relative to the NAF condition, reductions in stuttering frequency of approximately 60%-75% were found with the altered auditory feedback conditions. Post hoc single-df comparisons revealed a reduction in stuttering frequency with altered auditory feedback versus NAF (p < 0.0001), a greater reduction in stuttering frequency for binaural compared to monaural altered auditory feedback (p = 0.028), and nonsignificant differences in stuttering frequencies for right versus left monaural conditions (p = 0.54) and DAF versus FAF (p = 0.70).

Measurements of precedence phenomena in binaural and monaural conditions

The precedence effect is a compelling auditory illusion which is thought to negotiate competition for perception and localization between the direct sound and its reflections. Three perceptual phenomena that have been related to the precedence effect are known to occur: (1) the two sounds are fused into one auditory event (fusion); (2) the perceived location of the fused auditory event is dominated by the leading source (localization dominance); and (3) directional information from the lagging source is inaccessible (discrimination suppression). Performance was measured on the above tasks under both binaural and monaural conditions, in both the azimuthal and median-sagittal planes, and in listeners with profound monaural deafness. Results suggest that: (1) Fusion occurs at similar delays under monaural and binaural conditions; (2) discrimination suppression is strong under binaural conditions but weak or absent under monaural conditions; (3) localization dominance is similar in the azimuthal and median-sagittal planes. It is tentatively concluded that the precedence effect may not be mediated solely by binaural circuits, but that monaural pathways may be involved as well. [Work supported by NIH Grant Nos. DC02692 and DC00100.]

Quantitative analysis of sound localization with ocular positioning.

We studied the capacity for sound localization in the horizontal plane with measurement of the ocular position of the listener. The eye position responses elicited by tonal sound were asymmetrical in all six subjects and there was individual variation of frequency dependence. The sound pressure level and the angle of the loudspeaker also affected the accuracy of localization. Sound localization was more accurate, and individual variation lower, when the sound pressure level and the angle of the sound source were in the range 50 dBSL and 30 degrees, respectively. In the monoaural condition, the ear on the occluded side consistently showed displacement of responses toward the side of the non-occluded ear. Sound localization on the non-occluded side, however, showed various patterns of change in the monaural condition relative to the binaural condition. Cues as to the sound localization thus seem to differ with the side of the sound source.

Phoneme recognition with a model of binaural hearing

This work presents a method for phoneme recognition based on a model of the human binaural auditory system. Performance of the binaural system is compared to that of an equivalent monaural system across a range of signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and simulated azimuth separations of speech and noise sources. Comparison of binaural and monaural phoneme recognition accuracy for both speech and noise at 0/spl deg/ suggests an effective increase in SNR of 5 dB for the binaural system. Experiments are also conducted to investigate binaural system performance for speech and noise at differing azimuth angles. Two binaural speech and noise conditions are considered: i) speech from 0/spl deg/ plus noise from 0/spl deg/; and ii) speech from 0/spl deg/ plus noise from 90/spl deg/. A comparison of relative performance differences for each binaural system with the monaural system shows the greatest increase in phoneme recognition accuracy when the speech and noise are simulated using different azimuth angles (0/spl deg/ speech plus noise from 90/spl deg/).