Billroth-I Reconstruction Research Articles

8016 Resolution of Refractory Hypoglycemia Following Pancreatic Solitary Fibrous Tumor Resection

Abstract Disclosure: M.E. Horowitz: None. S. Stefan: None. Introduction: Solitary fibrous tumors (SFT) are exceptionally rare mesenchymal tumors, accounting for only 3.7% of all cases of soft-tissue sarcoma with an incidence of 0.35 cases per 100,000 persons per year. SFT may arise in various anatomical locations, approximately 30% occuring in the abdomen. SFT can manifest with paraneoplastic syndromes, with the most commonly described being non-islet cell hypoglycemia. We present a case of refractory hypoglycemia which resolved following the resection of a large pancreatic SFT. Clinical Case: A 75-year-old male with a history of hypertension presented from oncology clinic with hypoglycemia. Two weeks prior, a 26cm mass of the pancreatic head was identified after he presented to the hospital for one month of abdominal pain and distention, and biopsy of the mass confirmed an SFT. The patient complained of nighttime weakness, confusion, nausea, vomiting, and urinary incontinence for two nights prior to arrival. During this time, the patient had multiple fingersticks showing hypoglycemia below 70 mg/dL, the lowest at 37 mg/dL. On arrival, fingerstick glucose was 38 mg/dL and serum glucose was 27 mg/dL, with a c-peptide level of 0.28 ng/mL (1.00-4.00 ng/mL). Despite hypoglycemia, he was asymptomatic at the time of presentation, indicating hypoglycemia unawareness. Investigation into the cause of hypoglycemia included normal morning cortisol levels, normal thyroid function tests, and normal liver and renal function tests. Further assessment for paraneoplastic disease was conducted, revealing an IGF1 level of 36 ng/dL (5-34 ng/dL) and IGF2 241 ng/dL (267-616 ng/dL), with a ratio of IGF2:IGF1 of 6.7:1. He underwent surgical removal of the large abdominal mass with distal gastrectomy and Billroth-I reconstruction. Pathology was consistent with a 34cm retroperitoneal SFT, STAT6 positivity, and negative margins. Following surgery, the patient did not experience any further hypoglycemia or related symptoms, and glucose ranged 78-135 mg/dL through discharge. Clinical Lessons: Refractory hypoglycemia resulting from a tumor's production of IGF2 is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome known as Doege-Potter Syndrome. This syndrome is observed in fewer than 5% of patients with SFT. The first documented case of hypoglycemia in a patient with "fibrous sarcoma" dates back to 1930. To establish a diagnosis, a ratio of IGF2:IGF1 exceeding 3:1 is suggestive of tumor-mediated production, while a ratio exceeding 10:1 is considered diagnostic. A positive immunohistochemical stain for STAT6 confirms the diagnosis. Patients with these tumors should be routinely monitored for hypoglycemia and related symptoms. Presentation: 6/3/2024

Survival outcomes of billroth-I reconstruction following distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients in Vietnam: A 5-year follow-up

This study aims to describe the long-term survivorship of Billroth I (or Pean's) reconstruction technique in patients with distal gastric cancer. A single-arm longitudinal observational study was conducted at Viet Duc University Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam, from 2018 to 2021. A total of 103 patients who were diagnosed with primary carcinoma in the lower third of the stomach and underwent lower pole gastrectomy with Péan anastomosis were recruited. The Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to estimate the survival outcome. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to measure the factors associated with survivorship. Results showed that 8.7% died during the study period. The Restricted Mean Survival Time (RMST) was 61.9 (95%CI=59.4-64.4) months. RMST was significantly different across the stages of cancer, T and N. Specifically, patients with advanced stage (III) had a substantially lower RMST (49.2 months) compared to those with early-stage (I&II). Patients with T4 or N3 also had the lowest RMST compared to those with other characteristics (p<0.05). Female patients had a lower risk of dying than their male counterparts (HR=0.092, 95%CI=0.013-0.661). Patients with a higher level of Node (N) had a significantly higher risk of dying than those with a lower level (HR=5.103; 95%CI=1.716-15.178). Having comorbidities was associated with a lower risk of dying (HR=0.066; 95%CI=0.008-0.531) than not having comorbidity. To conclude, the findings indicate favourable long-term results for patients with distal gastric cancer undergoing the Billroth I (or Pean's) reconstruction technique. The practice above may be the established protocol for managing these particular patients.

Safe and Accurate Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer With Severe Adhesions Using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging: Guidance in Detection of the Accurate Dissection Layer to Avoid Organ Injury.

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) requires advanced techniques due to severe postoperative adhesions and anatomic changes. We performed LTG in 2 patients with RGC using intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging. Both cases previously underwent distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I reconstruction for gastric cancer and were subsequently diagnosed with early-stage gastric cancer of the remnant stomach. Indocyanine green (2.5mg/body) was administered intravenously during surgery. The liver and common bile duct were clearly visualized during surgery using near-infrared fluorescence laparoscopy, and the adhesions between the hepatobiliary organs and remnant stomach were safely dissected. Laparoscopic total gastrectomy was successfully performed without complications, and the postoperative course was uneventful in both cases. Intraoperative real-time ICG fluorescence imaging allows clear visualization of the liver and common bile duct and can be useful in LTG for RGC with severe adhesions.

Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic-assisted Distal Gastrectomy Versus Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy Billroth I for Gastric Cancer.

The present study aimed to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy versus totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) Billroth I (BI) for gastric cancer and to assess the impact of the initial introduction phase of TLDG BI anastomosis. The study analyzed the prospectively collected data of patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy BI from 2014 to 2021 at Seoul National University Hospital. Among 1116 patients, laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy BI was performed in 566 patients and TLDG BI was performed in 550 patients. The total laparoscopic arm had a faster mean operative time (190 vs 208 min; P < 0.001) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (7.4 vs 7.9 d; P < 0.001). Local complications were higher in the total laparoscopic group (17.6% vs 9.9%; P = 0.008) during the early introduction phase. The total laparoscopic approach for BI reconstruction is safe and effective with faster operative time, shorter hospital stays, and less wound infection, but it may be associated with an increase in postoperative surgical complications and hospital stay in the early introduction phase.

Risk factors for remnant gastric cancer after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective database review.

The number of patients with remnant gastric cancer (RGC) following gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC) is increasing due to the increasing number of patients undergoing function-preserving gastrectomy and improved outcomes for patients with GC. A few studies involving a small number of cases reported male sex, old age, differentiated type, tumor depth and synchronous multiple GC were associated with RGC development. However, the risk factors for RGC development had not been fully understood. This study aimed to examine the clinicopathological features, followed up patients with GC after they underwent distal gastrectomy (DG), and evaluated the potential risk factors for RGC development. A retrospective database review of 438 patients who underwent DG for GC at a single institution, from 2006 to 2017, was conducted. We investigated the relationship of clinicopathological features, operative findings, and postoperative course with RGC development was estimated using Cox proportional hazard analysis. The cumulative incidences of RGC were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We retrospectively analyzed 405 cases. The median patient age was 69 years, and the patient cohort consisted of 263 men and 142 women. The Billroth-I reconstruction method was used in 204 cases, Billroth-II method was used in 3 cases, and Roux-en Y method was used in 198 cases. RGC was diagnosed in 11 of the 405 patients. The median follow-up period was 5 years. The cumulative incidences of RGC calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method were 3.0%, 4.1%, and 10.5% at 5, 10, and 15 years after DG, respectively. During the initial surgery, differentiated type was significantly associated with RGC development [hazard ratio (HR): 4.71, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-21.80, P=0.05]. Male sex (HR: 2.97, 95% CI: 0.64-13.75, P=0.16), old age (≥70 years) (HR: 2.72, 95% CI: 0.78-9.47, P=0.11), and synchronous multiple GC (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 0.28-6.08, P=0.73) were not associated with RGC development. Patients who have undergone DG for differentiated type GC were statistically significantly associated with developing RGC. Intensive endoscopic surveillance would be needed for the patients who underwent DG for differentiated type GC.

Dynamics of perioperative pancreatic exocrine function in patients undergoing reconstruction after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Each method of reconstruction after gastrectomy results in a change in the digestive and absorptive status. However, there are few reports on the changes in pancreatic exocrine function after gastrectomy. We conducted this study to investigate the dynamics of pancreatic exocrine function after gastrectomy according to the method of reconstruction performed. The subjects of this study were 45 patients who underwent pancreatic exocrine function tests preoperatively and postoperatively, from among all patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer at our hospital between September, 2020 and March, 2022. We assessed pancreatic exocrine function using the Pancreatic Function Diagnostant (PFD) test. The mean preoperative PFD test result values for the distal gastrectomy (DG) Billroth I reconstruction (B-I) group and the DG Roux-en-Y reconstruction (R-Y) group were 62.6 and 67.3 (p = 0.36), respectively, and the mean postoperative PFD test result values for each group were 65.8 and 46.9 (p = 0.0094), respectively. A significant decrease in postoperative pancreatic function was observed in the DG R-Y group but not in the DG B-I group. The logistic regression analysis identified that age and the R-Y group were significantly correlated with a 10% decrease in the PFD value after gastrectomy. Our study suggests that R-Y reconstruction may result in more impaired pancreatic exocrine function than B-I reconstruction.

Can prospective monitoring improve complication rates after gastrectomy? Experience of Billroth I reconstruction at a high-volume tertiary center

IntroductionProspective database is imperative in surgical outcome monitoring and has shown success in providing a comprehensive complication index to monitor surgical quality. This study aims to review whether prospective monitoring has an effect on postoperative complication rates, especially leakage after Billroth I (BI) anastomosis and to identify risk factors of anastomosis leakage after BI anastomosis. Materials and methodsPatients who underwent distal gastrectomy with BI reconstruction at Seoul National University Hospital between January 2018 and April 2021 were enrolled. Clinicopathological characteristics and perioperative variables were retrieved. The risk factor that was statistically significant in univariate analysis was further analyzed by binomial logistic regression analysis. ResultsBI leakage rate in three years has declined by half on a yearly basis from 5.7% to 1.8%. The leakage group patients were predominantly male (100%) when compared to the non-leakage group (67.6%) (p = 0.04). The BMI (25.00 ± 1.42 vs. 24.16 ± 3.15, p = 0.048) and CRP measured on POD#2 (16.47 ± 5.64 vs. 9.99 ± 5.42, p < 0.001) showed significant differences between the two groups. POD#2 CRP greater than 12.7 mg/dL was able to predict risk of anastomosis leak with sensitivity 73.3% and specificity 73.1%. ConclusionUnderstanding variations in outcomes is important for improvements in surgical care, and through prospective monitoring and intra-departmental feedback, it is possible to reduce complication rates after gastrectomy. This study shows that age, gender and BMI are risk factors to BI leakage and POD#2 CRP greater than 12.7 mg/dL can be used to suspect leakage after BI anastomosis.

Postoperative reflux esophagitis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I reconstruction for gastric cancer: Nutritional effect and preoperative risk factors.

Postoperative reflux esophagitis represents a major complication of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with Billroth-I reconstruction (LDGBI). This study aimed to evaluate the nutritional effect and preoperative risk factors of postoperative reflux esophagitis in patients undergoing LDGBI for gastric cancer. We retrospectively analyzed data of patients with (reflux [+]) and without (reflux [-]) postoperative reflux esophagitis who underwent LDGBI in our institution. Patient backgrounds, surgical outcomes, and perioperative nutritional status were compared. Preoperative risk factors for postoperative reflux esophagitis were also evaluated. Between January 2009 and December 2016, 242 patients underwent LDG for gastric cancer. Of these, 218 underwent Billroth-I reconstruction. Seventy-three patients were excluded because of nutritional or oncological reasons. Finally, 23 patients were enrolled as the reflux (+) group and 122 as the reflux (-) group. Although the preoperative/postoperative bodyweight ratio and albumin and hemoglobin values plateaued beyond 6 months postoperatively in the reflux (-) group, these parameters continued to decrease beyond this time in the reflux (+) group. The mean ± SD bodyweight ratios at 3 years postoperatively were 82.83% ± 9.73% and 89.45% ± 8.04% for the reflux (+) and reflux (-) group, respectively (P = .0006). Multivariate analysis revealed that postoperative reflux esophagitis was associated with postoperative body weight loss. Another multivariate analysis revealed preoperative hiatal hernia as an independent predictive factor for postoperative reflux esophagitis. The risk of reflux esophagitis after LDGBI in patients with hiatal hernia should be considered when deciding therapeutic approaches for such patients.

Late complication after gastrectomy for clinical stage I cancer:supplementary analysis of JCOG0912.

Late complications following gastric cancer surgery, including postgastrectomy syndromes, are complex problems requiring a solution. Reported risk factors for developing late complications include surgery-related factors, such as the surgical approach and the extent of resection and reconstruction. However, this has not been assessed in a prospective study with a large sample size. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate associations between surgery-related factors and the development of late complications. Data from the JCOG0912 trial were used. It compared laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) to open distal gastrectomy (ODG) in clinical stage I gastric cancer patients. This study included 881/921 patients enrolled in the JCOG0912 trial. The incidence of late complications was compared between the ODG and the LADG arms. In addition, associations between surgery-related factors and the development of late complications were assessed by multivariable analyses using the proportional odds model to identify relevant risk factors. There was no difference in the type or number of patients with late complications between the LADG and the ODG arms. The multivariable analysis for each late complication revealed that the Billroth-I reconstruction (vs. R-en-Y or Billroth-II) had a lower risk of cholecystitis [odds ratio (OR) 0.187, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.039-0.905, P = 0.037] or ileus (OR 0.116, 95%CI 0.033-0.406, P < 0.001), and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (vs. R-en-Y or Billroth-II) had a higher risk of reflux esophagitis (OR 3.348, 95% CI 1.371-8.176, P = 0.008). The surgical approach was not a risk factor for any late complications. Differences in surgical approaches did not constitute a risk for developing late complications after gastrectomy. Billroth-I reconstruction reduced the risk of ileus and cholecystitis, but pylorus-preserving gastrectomy carried a risk for reflux esophagitis.

Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in a patient with situs inversus: a case report

BackgroundSitus inversus (SI) is a rare congenital condition characterized by organ transposition from their normal positions. Careful preoperative planning is important for the safe operation of patients with SI because only a few surgeons have operated on such patients. Here, we report the case of a patient with SI who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with D2 lymph node dissection (LND) for advanced gastric cancer (GC).Case presentationThe patient was a 72-year-old man diagnosed with GC. Upper endoscopy revealed a type 3 tumor in the anterior wall of the stomach body. Multidetector computed tomography showed no obvious GC metastasis or inverted organs. The preoperative diagnosis was cStage IIB (i.e., cT3, cN0, and cM0) GC with SI. Although liver retracting and intracorporeal suturing required special attention, LDG with D2 LND and Billroth-I reconstruction were safely performed by reversing the usual procedure. The patient was discharged 10 days after the surgery.ConclusionsTo safely perform laparoscopic surgery for GC in patients with SI, sufficient preoperative preparation is necessary. In particular, a reversible method of liver retraction should be prepared.

How does Roux-en-Y reconstruction compare with Billroth-I reconstruction after distal gastrectomy in people with gastric cancer?

How does Roux-en-Y reconstruction compare with Billroth-I reconstruction after distal gastrectomy in people with gastric cancer?

What is necessary to shorten the operative time in initial introduction of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer?

Robotic gastrectomy (RG) is a good alternative to laparoscopic gastrectomy, as it improves treatment outcomes and reduces the burden of technical difficulties; however, prolonged operative time may be a disadvantage. This study aimed to identify measures to shorten the operative time during the initial introduction of RG at an institution. We assessed 33 patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I reconstruction and divided them into three groups: laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG), robotic distal gastrectomy in the early phase (RDG-E), and in the late phase (RDG-L). Operative time, six technical steps, and junk time, including the roll-in/roll-out, docking/undocking, and instrument exchange times, were compared among the groups. The median (range) overall operative times of LDG, RDG-E, and RDG-L were 248 (179-323), 304 (249-383), and 263 (220-367) min, respectively, but no significant differences were observed. For each surgical step of RG, RDG-L in suprapancreatic lymph node dissection was significantly shorter than that in RDG-E. The median (range) junk times of LDG, RDG-E, and RDG-L were 16.7 (12.7-26.4), 48.3 (38.6-67.7), and 42.0 (35.4-49.2) min, respectively. Junk time was significantly longer in RDG-L than in LDG (p=0.003), but not significant between RDG-E and RDG-L. The learning curve effect of overall, console, and junk times were achieved in four cases of RDG. Junk time is a major factor in prolonging RDG operative time. However, to reduce the time after initial introduction, measures to promote robot-specific standardization and more effective use of robotic instruments are essential.

Techniques for reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for cancer: updated network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The choice of the best reconstruction technique after distal gastrectomy (DG) remains controversial and still not defined. The purpose was to perform a comprehensive evaluation within the major type of intestinal reconstruction after DG for gastric cancer. Systematic review and network meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare Billroth I (BI), Billroth II (BII), Billroth II Braun (BII Braun), Roux-en-Y (RY), and Uncut Roux-en-Y (URY). Risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) were used as pooled effect size measures while 95% credible intervals (CrI) were used to assess relative inference. Ten RCTs (1456 patients) were included. Of these, 448 (33.7%) underwent BI, 220 (15.1%) BII, 114 BII Braun (7.8%), 533 (36.6%) RY, and 141 URY (9.6%). No significant differences were found among treatments for 30-day mortality, anastomotic leak, anastomotic stricture, and overall complications. At 12-month follow-up, RY was associated with a significantly reduced risk of remnant gastritis compared to BI (RR=0.56; 95% Crl 0.35-0.76) and BII reconstruction (RR=0.47; 95% Crl 0.22-0.97). Similarly, despite the lack of statistical significance, RY seems associated with a trend toward reduced endoscopically proven esophagitis compared to BI (RR=0.58; 95% Crl 0.24-1.51) and bile reflux compared to BI (RR=0.48; 95% Crl 0.17-1.41), BII (RR=0.74; 95% Crl 0.20-2.81), and BII Braun (RR=0.65; 95% Crl 0.30-1.43). This network meta-analysis shows that there are five main options for intestinal anastomosis after DG. All techniques seem equally safe with comparable anastomotic leak, anastomotic stricture, overall morbidity, and short-term outcomes. In the short-term follow-up (12 months), RY seems associated with a reduced risk of remnant gastritis and a trend toward a reduced risk of bile reflux and esophagitis.

Impact of the different biliopancreatic limb length on diabetes and incretin hormone secretion following distal gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients

The present study aimed to investigate changes in glucose metabolism and incretin hormone response following longer intestinal bypass reconstruction after distal gastrectomy (DG) in low BMI patients with gastric cancer and type 2 diabetes. A total of 20 patients were prospectively recruited and underwent either conventional Billroth I (BI), Billroth II with long-biliopancreatic limb (BII), or Roux-en-Y anastomosis with long-Roux limb (RY) after DG. A 75g-oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was given preoperatively; and at 5 days, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Serum glucose, insulin, glucagon, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) were serially measured. At 6 months after surgery, complete diabetes remission was achieved in 57.1% of the BII group but in no patients in the other two groups (p = 0.018). BII group showed a significant reduction in glucose concentration during OGTT at 6 months in contrast to the other 2 groups. In the BII group, a significant increase in GLP-1 secretion was observed after surgery but not maintained at 6 months, while postoperative hyperglucagonemia was alleviated along with a reduction in GIP. BII gastrojejunostomy with long biliopancreatic limb achieved better diabetes control with favorable incretin response after DG compared to BI or RY reconstruction.

Percutaneous transhepatic obliteration-related procedures for isolated gastric varices: experience of three cases.

Percutaneous transhepatic obliteration (PTO) can facilitate antegrade embolization of variceal veins. We herein report three patients who underwent percutaneous transhepatic sclerotherapy(PTS) or percutaneous transportal outflow-vessel-occluded sclerotherapy (PTOS) for isolated gastric varices. PTS was performed in Cases 1 and 2, and PTOS was performed in Case 3. Technical success was achieved in all patients without a decline in liver function; however, lack of a therapeutic benefit with rupture of esophageal varices occurred in Case 3. Case 3 had a history of pylorus gastrectomy plus Billroth-I reconstruction for gastric cancer and multiple feeding veins existed. PTO-related procedures are good treatment options for isolated gastric varices, but clinicians should be aware of the risk of treatment failure, especially the cases which have multiple feeding veins.

Roux-en-Y versus Billroth-I reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer diagnosed worldwide. Due to improved early detection rates of gastric cancer and technological advances in treatments, a significant improvement in survival rates has been achieved in people with cancer undergoing gastrectomy. Subsequently, there has been increasing emphasis on postgastrectomy syndrome (e.g. fullness, delayed emptying, and cold sweat, amongst others) and quality of life postsurgery. However, it is uncertain which types of reconstruction result in better outcomes postsurgery. To assess the evidence on health-related quality of life and safety outcomes of Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I reconstructions after distal gastrectomy for people with gastric cancer. We searched the Cochrane Library and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and Embase on 4 May 2021. We checked the reference lists of the included studies and contacted manufacturers and professionals in the field. There were no language restrictions. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) allocating participants to Roux-en-Y reconstruction or Billroth-I reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Two review authors independently screened studies identified by the search for eligibility and extracted data. The primary outcomes were health-related quality of life after surgery and incidence of anastomotic leakage. The secondary outcomes included body weight loss, incidence of bile reflux, length of hospital stay, and overall morbidity. We used a random-effects model to conduct meta-analyses. We assessed risk of bias of the included studies in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, and the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We included eight RCTs (942 participants) in the review. One study included both cancer patients and benign disease patients such as stomach ulcers. Two studies compared Roux-en-Y, Billroth-I, and Billroth-II reconstructions, whilst the other studies compared Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I directly. For the primary outcomes, the evidence suggests that there may be little to no difference in health-related quality of life between Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I reconstruction (standardised mean difference 0.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.11 to 0.18; I² = 0%; 6 studies; 695 participants; low-certainty evidence due to study limitations and imprecision). The evidence for the effect of Roux-en-Y versus Billroth-I reconstruction on the incidence of anastomotic leakage is very uncertain (risk ratio (RR) 0.63, 95% CI 0.16 to 2.53; I² = 0%; 5 studies; 711 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The incidence of anastomotic leakage was 0.6% and 1.4% in the Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I groups, respectively. For the secondary outcomes, the evidence suggests that Billroth-I reconstruction may result in little to no difference in loss of body weight compared to Roux-en-Y reconstruction (mean difference (MD) 0.41, 95% CI -0.77 to 1.59; I² = 0%; 4 studies; 541 participants; low-certainty evidence). Roux-en-Y reconstruction probably reduces the incidence of bile reflux compared to Billroth-I reconstruction (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.63; I² = 22%; 4 studies; 399 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Billroth-I reconstruction may shorten postoperative hospital stay, but the evidence for this outcome is very uncertain (MD 0.96, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.76; I² = 56%; 7 studies; 894 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Billroth-I reconstruction may reduce postoperative overall morbidity compared to Roux-en-Y reconstruction (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.11; I² = 0%; 7 studies; 891 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence suggests that there is little to no difference between Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I reconstruction for the outcome health-related quality of life. The evidence for the effect of Roux-en-Y versus Billroth-I reconstruction on the incidence of anastomotic leakage is very uncertain as the incidence of this outcome was low. Although the certainty of evidence was low, we found some possibly clinically meaningful differences between Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I reconstruction for short-term outcomes. Roux-en-Y reconstruction probably reduces the incidence of bile reflux into the remnant stomach compared to Billroth-I reconstruction. Billroth-I reconstruction may shorten postoperative hospital stay compared to Roux-en-Y reconstruction, but the evidence is very uncertain. Billroth-I reconstruction may reduce postoperative overall morbidity compared to Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Future trials should include long-term follow-up of health-related quality of life and body weight loss.

Roux-en-Y Reconstruction Following Distal Gastrectomy Reduced Endoscopic Reflux Esophagitis in Older Adults: Propensity Score–Matching Analysis

Objective This study aimed to examine the functional outcomes of Roux-en-Y (RY) and Billroth I (BI) reconstruction methods following distal gastrectomy in patients ages ≥75 years with gastric cancer. Summary of background data RY and BI reconstructions are commonly performed after distal gastrectomy. However, no study has compared the 2 procedures in older adults. Methods We identified older patients who underwent RY (n = 103) or BI (n = 71) reconstruction following distal gastrectomy from 2011 to 2018 in our database. Patients in the RY and BI groups were matched by propensity scores, and each group included 62 patients. We compared short-term surgical outcomes and clinical findings at 1 year postoperatively. Additionally, risk factors for endoscopic reflux esophagitis following distal gastrectomy were evaluated. Results Reflux esophagitis, bile reflux, and remnant gastritis were significantly less frequent in RY reconstruction than in BI reconstruction. Moreover, both BI reconstruction and preoperative hiatus hernias were independent risk factors for postoperative endoscopic reflux esophagitis. Although the incidence of postoperative surgical complications following RY and BI was similar, RY was found to cause delayed gastric emptying more frequently than BI. Conclusion RY reconstruction is a favorable procedure to prevent reflux esophagitis in older patients, particularly in those with hiatal hernia.

Per-oral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia following distal gastrectomy

The patient was a male in his 70s with a history of distal gastrectomy and Billroth-I reconstruction. He was suspected of having esophageal achalasia and was started on calcium blockers in X-2 year. The symptoms worsened, and he presented to our hospital in X year. We diagnosed esophageal achalasia (Chicago classification ver. 3.0;type I), and conducted per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). His postoperative course was uneventful with no postoperative symptoms. In cases of esophageal achalasia following distal gastrectomy, it is important to consider adhesions, mobility of the remaining stomach, and preservation of the short gastric artery and vein. Since the Heller-Dor operation can be difficult, POEM may be a reasonable alternative in these cases.

Pancreatic atrophy after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

To investigate the phenomenon of pancreatic atrophy after gastrectomy for gastric cancer, using computed tomography (CT) volumetry. The subjects of this retrospective study were 77 patients who underwent distal gastrectomy (DG) or total gastrectomy (TG) for pStage I gastric cancer in 2014. The relative pancreatic volume ratio was assessed preoperatively, and then 1 and 5years postoperatively and the results were compared between surgical procedures RESULTS: A total of 14 patients underwent TG with Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction, 24 underwent DG with Billroth-I (BI) reconstruction, and 39 underwent DG with RY reconstruction. We observed that the pancreatic volume continued to decrease over the 5years after DG or TG. Furthermore, the incidence of pancreatic atrophy 5years postoperatively was significantly greater after TG than after DG. In patients who underwent DG, a greater incidence of pancreatic atrophy was observed after RY reconstruction than after BI reconstruction, 5years postoperatively. The pancreatic volume continued to decrease after DG and TG for gastric cancer 5years after treatment. TG was associated with a significantly greater incidence of pancreatic atrophy than DG 5years postoperatively, as was RY reconstruction vs. BI reconstruction after DG.

Delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy after totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparative study of original and modified methods

Delta-shaped anastomosis (DA) has been widely accepted as a standard procedure for intracorporeal Billroth-I reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. We introduced DA in 2010 at our hospital and later developed a modified DA method in which a stapled corner of the duodenal stump was removed simultaneously with closure of an entry hole to reduce postoperative complications. The clinical data of 507 patients undergoing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with DA from October 2010 through December 2018 were retrospectively collected from our in-house database. On the basis of the reviewed data, patients were divided into two groups: the original DA group (org-DA, n = 392) and the modified DA group (mod-DA, n = 115). Surgical outcomes, postoperative nutritional parameters, and endoscopic findings 1year after surgery were compared between the two groups. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Anastomotic stricture occurred in three patients (0.8%) in the org-DA group and one patient (0.9%) in the mod-DA group (P = 0.911). Anastomotic leakage was recorded in five patients (1.3%) in the org-DA group and none of the patients (0%) in the mod-DA group (P = 0.593). One year after surgery, the change in body weight in the org-DA group/mod-DA group was - 8.1%/- 7.0% (P = 0.285), and the change in hemoglobin level was - 5.0%/- 3.9% (P = 0.012). Endoscopic examination at the 1-year follow-up in the mod-DA group showed smaller amounts of food residue (P = 0.008) as well as less residual gastritis (P < 0.001) than in the org-DA group. The modified DA method can be performed safely with a complication rate comparable with the original DA method. Furthermore, better postoperative function is expected because of its more natural anatomy and physiology resulting from the modified method.