Biliary Variations Research Articles

Hepatic Hilar and Sectorial Vascular and Biliary Anatomy in Right Graft Adult Live Liver Donor Transplantation

Introduction The aim of this study was to analyze vascular and biliary variants at the hilar and sectorial level in right graft adult living donor liver transplantation. Methods From January 2003 to June 2007, 139 consecutive live liver donors underwent three-dimensional computed tomography (3-D CT) reconstructions and virtual 3-D liver partitioning. We evaluated the portal (PV), arterial (HA), and biliary (BD) anatomy. Results The hilar and sectorial biliary/vascular anatomy was predominantly normal (70%–85% and 67%–78%, respectively). BD and HA showed an equal incidence (30%) of hilar anomalies. BD and PV had a nearly identical incidence of sectorial abnormalities (64.7% and 66.2%, respectively). The most frequent “single” anomaly was seen centrally in HA (21%) and distally in BD (18%). A “double” anomaly involved BD/HA (7.2%) in the hilum, and HA/PV and BD/PV (6.5% each) sectorially. A “triple” anomaly involving all systems was found at the hilum in 1.4% of cases, and at the sectorial level in 9.4% of instances. Simultanous central and distal abnormalities were rare. In this study, 13.7% of all donor candidates showed normal hilar and sectorial anatomy involving all 3 systems. A simultaneous central and distal “triple” abnormality was not encountered. A combination of “triple” hilar anomaly with “triple” sectorial normality was observed in 2 cases (1.4%). A central “triple” normality associated with a distal “triple” abnormality occurred in 7 livers (5%). Conclusions Our data showed a variety of “horizontal” (hilar or sectorial) and “vertical” (hilar and sectorial) vascular and biliary branching patterns, providing comprehensive assistance for surgical decision-making prior to right graft hepatectomy.

Vascular and Biliary Variants in the Liver: Implications for Liver Surgery

Accurate preoperative assessment of the hepatic vascular and biliary anatomy is essential to ensure safe and successful hepatic surgery. Such surgical procedures range from the more complex, like tumor resection and partial hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation, to others performed more routinely, like laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Modern noninvasive diagnostic imaging techniques, such as multidetector computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging performed with liver-specific contrast agents with biliary excretion, have replaced conventional angiography and endoscopic cholangiography for evaluation of the hepatic vascular and biliary anatomy. These techniques help determine the best hepatectomy plane and help identify patients in whom additional surgical steps will be required. Preoperative knowledge of hepatic vascular and biliary anatomic variants is mandatory for surgical planning and to help reduce postoperative complications. Multidetector CT and MR imaging, with the added value of image postprocessing, allow accurate identification of areas at risk for venous congestion or devascularization. This information may influence surgical planning with regard to the extent of hepatic resection or the need for vascular reconstruction.

Managing injuries of hepatic duct confluence variants after major hepatobiliary surgery: An algorithmic approach

To investigate injuries of anatomy variants of hepatic duct confluence during hepatobiliary surgery and their impact on morbidity and mortality of these procedures. An algorithmic approach for the management of these injuries is proposed. During a 6-year period 234 patients who had undergone major hepatobiliary surgery were retrospectively reviewed in order to study postoperative bile leakage. Diagnostic workup included endoscopic and magnetic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (E/MRCP), scintigraphy and fistulography. Thirty (12.8%) patients who developed postoperative bile leaks were identified. Endoscopic stenting and percutaneous drainage were successful in 23 patients with bile leaks from the liver cut surface. In the rest seven patients with injuries of hepatic duct confluence, biliary variations were recognized and a stepwise therapeutic approach was considered. Conservative management was successful only in 2 patients. Volume of the liver remnant and functional liver reserve as well as local sepsis were used as criteria for either resection of the corresponding liver segment or construction of a biliary-enteric anastomosis. Two deaths occurred in this group of patients with hepatic duct confluence variants (mortality rate 28.5%). Management of major biliary fistulae that are disconnected from the mainstream of the biliary tree and related to injury of variants of the hepatic duct confluence is extremely challenging. These patients have a grave prognosis and an early surgical procedure has to be considered.

Aplicaciones clínicas de la colangiopancreatografía por resonancia magnética

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is the most important diagnostic alternative that has been developed in recent years for the evaluation of the biliary and pancreatic ducts. The advantages of this technique are: it does not use contrast media or ionizing radiation; it is noninvasive and complication free; and, the examination is relatively short (approximately 20 to 30 minutes). MRCP has high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing biliary dilatation and for determining the site and cause of stenosis. Its diagnostic precision for biliary and pancreatic stones is similar to that of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). MRCP has replaced ERCP in biliary and pancreatic anatomic variants. In unsuccessful ERCP, MRCP is nearly the only diagnostic modality for the evaluation of the biliary tract. Other applications include primary sclerosing cholangitis, stenosis after liver transplantation, and the evaluation of bilioenteric anastomoses. This article reviews the clinical applications of MRCP in the evaluation of biliopancreatic diseases.

Laparoscopic biliary tract injury: what are the limits of prevention?

At the joint meeting of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) and the American Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Association in April 2005, the program committee convened a forum on the subject of biliary injuries that occur during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. More than 300 surgeons attended this forum, and the discussion was lively, indicating that this topic still is important to practicing surgeons. The editors of Surgical Endoscopy have agreed to publish the papers from this forum in this issue of the journal [1, 2, 5, 6, 8]. There are two articles on the prevention of biliary injuries during cholecystectomy and there are three papers on methods for diagnosing, evaluating, and treating the problem once it has occurred. The editors are to be commended for agreeing to print these proceedings because, they are written by experts in the field and are very informative to all surgeons who treat patients with biliary tract disease. The questions are (1) How safe can we make laparoscopic cholecystectomy? and (2) How much can we reduce the rate of bile duct injury? The answer to both questions is that laparoscopic cholecystectomy should certainly be as safe as open cholecystectomy, with a comparable or lower incidence of biliary injury. In this commentary, I review the highlights of the presentations at the symposium and present my observations on the issue of biliary injury. Cholecystectomy for gallstone disease is one of the most common procedures performed by general surgeons in North America. The introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the early 1990s stands out as one of the most significant new developments in the practice of surgery for the past three decades. Not only did it dramatically change the management for one of the most common surgical conditions—cholelithiasis; it also ushered in the new era of minimally invasive or laparoscopic surgery, which has been successfully applied to many other intraabdominal and thoracic disorders. This new procedure was quickly accepted and adopted by patients, referring doctors, and industry. The benefits of the laparoscopic approach were readily apparent and included a shorter hospital stay, a shorter recovery period, decreased postoperative pain, and a quicker return to normal activity. Unfortunately, along the way, it became apparent that an increase in the rate of biliary tract injuries was associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In the 1990s, several groups reported that the incidence of bile duct injuries had risen from 0.1% to 0.3% for open cholecystectomy to 0.4% to 0.6% for the laparoscopic approach, which was a doubling of the incidence [3, 4, 7, 11]. Initially, these data were viewed as a reflection of the learning curve for this procedure. However, over the next two decades, the results did not change. Injuries to the bile duct continue to occur although the current generation of surgeons grew up in the laparoscopic era. Any improvement or reduction in the incidence and frequency of biliary tract injuries during cholecystectomy will come about only as a result of specific instruction and attention to anatomic detail. Continuing education programs for surgeons in practice and good teaching for our residents in training with continued emphasis on proper technique and precautions are key components. The price to pay for the complications of a biliary tract injury is indeed considerable. The morbidity of these complications is reflected in additional procedures and operations, cholangitis, intraabdominal infection, biliary cirrhosis, and, in extreme cases, endstage liver disease and death. Dr. Traverso opened the aforementioned forum with a presentation on the routine use of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) as a valuable tool for lowering the risk of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. He emphasized the diverse pattern of the biliary anatomy and the importance of recognizing biliary anomalies and variations. For him, routine IOC is key to identifying Correspondence to: G. M. Larson Editorial

3.0- Versus 1.5-T MR Cholangiography: A Pilot Study

The purpose of our study was to evaluate quantitative and qualitative image quality of MR cholangiography at a field strength of 3.0 T compared with the standard field strength of 1.5 T. A standardized MR cholangiography sequence protocol was used for 15 healthy male volunteers (mean age +/- SD, 32.4 +/- 4.3 years) who underwent both 1.5- and 3.0-T MRI within 2 hr in an alternating fashion. Dedicated circular polarized torso coils (1.5 and 3.0 T) were used. The sequence protocol included breath-hold single-slice rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (slice thickness, 50 mm; orientation, coronal and +/- 20 degrees oblique coronal); breath-hold multislice HASTE (slice thickness, 3 mm; coronal only); and a non-breath-hold, respiratory-triggered 3D turbo spin-echo (TSE) T2-weighted sequence (slice thickness, 1 mm; 60 slices per slab; coronal only). Maximum intensity projections were generated from each multislice data set. Bile duct (common bile duct, right posterior segmental branch, and left hepatic duct) to periductal tissue contrast-to-noise ratios were compared at 1.5 and 3.0 T. Qualitative image analysis was performed by three independent reviewers. Qualitative analysis included delineation of the extra- and intrahepatic biliary anatomy, with specific attention given to the presence (or absence) of cystic or intrahepatic ductal variants, using a 4-point confidence scale. Statistical analysis consisted of the paired Student's t test and the signed rank test. Contrast-to-noise ratios between the bile duct and the periductal tissue were higher at 3.0 T in all three locations (common bile duct, right posterior segmental branch, and left hepatic duct). In each magnet class, the 3D TSE sequence offered the best contrast-to-noise ratio and qualitative analysis. Superiority of the 3D TSE sequence was statistically significant in all analyses. Five of the 15 volunteers had intrahepatic biliary variants that were detected with a higher level of confidence (p < 0.01) on the 3.0-T system than on the 1.5-T system. Compared with MR cholangiography at 1.5 T, MR cholangiography at 3.0 T offers improved contrast-to-noise ratio and a higher level of confidence for depicting intrahepatic variants.

Safety of donor right hepatectomy for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation

The purpose of this study was to ascertain the usefulness of preoperative evaluations of donors by computed tomography (CT) volumetry and CT cholangiography for prevention of unexpected liver failure and biliary complications after donor right hepatectomy for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation. Fifty-two donors who underwent right hepatectomy without the middle hepatic vein were enrolled in this study. The values of graft weight (GW) were significantly correlated with those of estimated graft volume (GV; P < 0.0001). GW was predicted by the following formula: GW = 155.25 + 0.658 x GV; r(2) = 0.489. CT cholangiography revealed anatomical variants of biliary structure in one-third of the donors and also clearly showed one or two small biliary branches from the caudate lobe to the right hepatic ducts or the confluence in 58% of the donors. Biliary leakage, which was treated by conservative therapy, occurred in only one donor (1.9%). No donors received homologous blood transfusion. Hyperbilirubinemia (serum total bilirubin >5 mg/dl) occurred in 5.8% of the donors during their early postoperative periods. Precise evaluations of liver remnant volume by CT volumetry and biliary variation by CT cholangiography are essential for performing safe donor hepatectomy, preventing hepatic insufficiency and minimizing the risk of biliary tract complications.

Adult-to-adult right lobe living donor liver transplantation: Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with standard T2-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography for evaluation of donor biliary anatomy

To compare the value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) and standard T2-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) in the evaluation process as adult-to-adult right lobe living donor liver transplantation (LDLTx) demands a successful outcome, and exact knowledge of the biliary tree is implicated to avoid biliary complications, postoperatively. After starting the LDLTx program, 18 liver transplant candidates were selected for LDLTx by a stepwise evaluation process. ERC and standard T2-weighted MRC were performed to evaluate the biliary system of the donor liver. The anatomical findings of ERC and MRC mapping were compared using the Ohkubo classification. ERC allowed mapping of the whole biliary system in 15/15 (100%) cases, including 14/15 (93.3%) with biliary variants while routine MRC was only accurate in 2/13 (15.4%) cases. MRC was limited in depicting the biliary system proximal of the hepatic bifurcation. Postoperative biliary complications occurred in 2 donors and 8 recipients. Biliary complications were associated with Ohkubo type C, E or G in 6/8 recipients, and 2/3 recipients with biliary leak received a graft with multiple (>=2) bile ducts. Pretransplant ERC is safe and superior over standard MRC for detection of biliary variations that occur with a high frequency. However, precise knowledge of biliary variants did not reduce the incidence of postoperative biliary complications.

Types and Frequencies of Biliary Tract Variations Associated with a Major Portal Venous Anomaly: Analysis with Multi–Detector Row CT Cholangiography

To retrospectively determine whether major portal venous variation was more frequently associated with biliary variants, with consideration of the types and frequencies of biliary tract variations in the right and left liver lobes. Before undergoing computed tomographic (CT) cholangiography, patients gave informed consent. The retrospective research protocol was approved, and informed consent was waived by the ethics committee. Forty-four patients aged 29-80 years who underwent multi-detector row CT cholangiography had a major portal vein variation in which the main portal vein diverged into the common trunk of the left portal vein and right anterior sectorial portal vein. One hundred fifty-eight consecutive patients aged 26-89 years who did not have this variation served as the control group. Three radiologists retrospectively evaluated the confluence pattern of the bile duct, the relationship between this pattern and the portal vein, and the major branching pattern of the portal vein. Pearson chi2 and Fisher exact tests were performed to identify significant differences between the two patient groups. The classic hilar confluence pattern, where the right posterior sectorial duct connects supraportally with the right anterior sectorial duct, was less frequent in the patients with the portal vein variation than in the control subjects (32% vs 73%, P < .05). The following biliary tract variations were identified more frequently in the variation group than in the control group (P < .05): right posterior sectorial duct joining left hepatic duct with a supraportal course (34% vs 12%), right posterior sectorial duct joining right anterior sectorial duct with an infraportal course (13% vs 4%), right posterior sectorial duct following an infraportal course (23% vs 8%), and left lateral segmental ducts caudal to the umbilical portion of the portal vein (14% vs 3%). The right hepatic duct, which receives all biliary ducts from the right lobe, was significantly less frequently developed in the variation group (46% vs 79%, P < .05). In addition, retroportal bile ducts were seen in four patients with the portal vein variation (P < .05). Bile duct configurations in patients with portal vein variation were significantly different from those in control subjects.

Preoperative MRI of Potential Living-Donor-Related Liver Transplantation Using a Single Dose of Gadobenate Dimeglumine

This article evaluates the feasibility of single-dose gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI as both an angiographic and biliary contrast medium for making a preoperative evaluation of the donor candidates for a living-donor-related liver transplantation. Eleven right hepatic lobe donors underwent MRI examinations using T1- and T2-weighted imaging and T2-weighted MR cholangiography (MRC). The MR angiography (MRA) and contrast-enhanced (CE) T1-weighted MRC images then were obtained after injecting a single dose of gadobenate dimeglumine. One radiologist and one surgeon prospectively reviewed all the MRI examinations for hepatic vascular and biliary abnormalities and compared them with the surgical findings and intraoperative cholangiograms. In addition, two blinded reviewers evaluated the two sets of MRC (T2-weighted MRC set and T2-weighted MRC plus CE-T1-weighted MRC set) retrospectively and recorded the anatomic types of the hilar biliary branching pattern along with their confidence in the interpretation. Prospective analysis detected the following vascular variants: hepatic arterial variation in two patients, portal venous variation in one, and a significantly large accessory hepatic vein (> 5 mm) in one. Biliary variants also were identified in two patients. All the MRI findings on the vascular and biliary anatomy were corroborated intraoperatively. Retrospective analysis showed that the mean diagnostic confidence in the combined set was significantly higher than that of the T2-weighted MRC alone by both reviewers (p < 0.05). Obtaining both MRA and CE-T1-weighted MRC is feasible using a single dose of gadobenate dimeglumine. Therefore, gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI might play a role as a preoperative imaging technique for the vascular and biliary evaluation of potential living donors.

“All‐in‐one” imaging protocols for the evaluation of potential living liver donors: Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and multidetector computed tomography

In order to compare the performance of "all-in-one" magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and "all-in-one" multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in the preharvest evaluation 25 potential living donors underwent both MRI and MDCT. MRI was performed on a high-performance 1.5-T scanner, computed tomography (CT) on a 4-row multidetector-scanner. Both scan protocols included angiography of the arterial and venous hepatic systems. CT additionally included infusion of a biliary contrast agent. Data analysis was performed by 4 reviewers, based on source images, multiplanar reformats, and three-dimensional (3D) postprocessing. Determination of image quality was based on a 4-point image quality rating (IQR) scale, ranging from 1 = nondiagnostic to 4 = excellent. Preoperative and intraoperative (n = 13) findings were correlated. Magnetic resonance (MR) examinations were generally well tolerated. Within the CT scan, 2 candidates presented moderate adverse reaction to the biliary contrast agent. MRI and CT showed the same benign parenchymal lesions (IQR MR: 3.7; IQR CT: 3.4). Determination of liver volumes was easier based on CT (IQR MR: 3.3; IQR CT: 3.6). Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) revealed 10 variants of the arterial liver supply (IQR: 3.0) and computed tomographic angiography (CTA) revealed 13 variants (IQR: 3.5). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) identified 4 biliary variants (IQR: 1.3) and CT cholangiography identified 17 (IQR: 3.5). MRI and CT each showed 4 hepatic and portal venous variants (IQR MR: 3.4, CT: 2.8). CT and MR findings correlated well with intraoperative findings. In conclusion, both techniques proved to be efficient to evaluate potential living liver donors' anatomy in a single diagnostic step. The main advantage of CT lies in the ability to accurately assess the biliary anatomy.

Right hemiliver transplants from living donors: report of 10 cases

IntroductionA right lobe living related liver transplantation (LRLT) was performed for the first time in Italy on March 16, 2001 at our institution. MethodsAll donors underwent celiac and mesenteric axis angiography. Computed tomography scan to determinate the liver size and anatomical vascular variation, cholangio–magnetic resonance imaging, intraoperative cholangiography, and ultrasonography. All recipients were status 2B on the waiting list for cadaveric liver transplants. The surgical procedures were carried out by grafting segments 5, 6, 7, and 8 of the donor liver. ResultsOf the donors, all are alive; 4 had uneventful postoperative courses, 3 had moderate right pleural effusions; 3 had bilious drainage that resolved spontaneously: and 1 had a biliary leak and a pulmonary embolism. Of the recipients, 8 are alive with well-functioning grafts. One recipient has undergone retransplantation due to an arterial thrombosis and another recipient developed a stricture of the biliary anastomosis. Two recipients died: one because of pulmonary hemorrage in Rendu-Osler syndrome, the other as a consequence of overwhelming systemic aspergillosis. ConclusionsOur experience suggests that few anatomical vascular and biliary variations are considered contraindications for right lobe LRLT. This challenging surgical procedure seems effective for well-selected recipients of United Network for Organ Sharing II B status. Appropriate recipient selection is crucial as we face a living donor.

1033 Right lobe liver donors: association between hepatic arterial, portal venous, and biliary anatomic variants

1033 Right lobe liver donors: association between hepatic arterial, portal venous, and biliary anatomic variants

Anatomical variations and surgical strategies in right lobe living donor liver transplantation: lessons from 120 cases.

Anatomical variations in right liver lobe are common. However, clinical implications and surgical management of these variations in living donor liver transplantation have not been analyzed systematically. Surgical anatomy of vascular and biliary structures in 120 right lobe grafts were reevaluated by reviewing the results of preoperative (computerized tomography and Doppler ultrasonography) and intraoperative (cholangiography) imaging as well as surgical findings. The data were analyzed in relation to surgical management of anatomical variations. The incidence of variants leading to multiple portal vein anastomoses was 7.5%. The incidence of dual right hepatic veins was 0.8%; 30% of the grafts had significant accessory hepatic veins (>5 mm) and 13.9% of these were multiple. All of them were successfully reconstructed with technical modifications including venoplasty and venous grafts, except for two cases with multiple intraparenchymal portal vein branches to the anterior segment. The incidence of dual hepatic arteries was 1.7%, but only one of them was reconstructed without negative sequelae. The incidence of variants potentially leading to multiple bile duct anastomoses was 35.0%, and eventually 39.2% of the grafts had multiple orifices. With a variety of techniques including ductoplasty, hepaticohepaticostomy, and biliary stent, total incidence of leakage and stenosis was 10.8% and 9.2%, respectively. Although ductoplasty, internal stent or no stenting, seemed to be associated with increased risk of complications, anatomical variants, multiple bile ducts, and duct-to-duct reconstruction did not bear a significant risk. Anatomical variations of vascular and biliary structures in right lobe grafts are common. However, most can be managed safely with technical modifications. Only cases with intraparenchymal origin of the anterior portal vein(s) may form a relative contraindication, especially when combined with similar biliary variants. Otherwise, intraoperative assessment of biliary anatomy was enough for successful management. Detailed and precise assessment of vascular and biliary anatomy is vital for appropriate surgical management.

Multidetector computed tomographic cholangiography in the evaluation of potential living liver donors.

Lacking awareness of biliary variations causes complications in adult living donor liver transplantation. The study was performed to determine the diagnostic value of preoperative multidetector computed tomographic cholangiography (MDCT-CA). MDCT-CA after the intravenous administration of meglumine iodipamide was performed in 12 potential liver donors. MDCT angiography was added to depict the topographic relationship between biliary and vascular structures. MDCT findings were correlated with intraoperative findings (n=7). MDCT-CA was diagnostic in all 12 patients. Nine patients revealed variants in biliary anatomy: drainage from liver segment four into right hepatic duct (n=4), additional segmental ducts draining into common (n=4) or left hepatic duct (n=2), and trifurcation at the upper confluence (n=1). Biliary vascular topography was variable and well depicted. Intraoperative assessment confirmed the preoperative findings. Variations in biliary anatomy appear to be the rule rather than the exception. MDCT-CA represents a noninvasive means for accurately assessing biliary morphology.

Canal cystique accessoire découvert par cholangiographie peropératoire au cours d’une cholécystectomie

The study aim was to report a rare biliary variation detected with an intraoperative cholangiography during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. After the ligation of the cystic duct, the gallbladder was opacified via an accessory cystic duct flowing into a branch of the right hepatic duct. This accessory cystic duct was clipped and the postoperative course was uneventful.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a non-invasive imaging method for examining the biliary and pancreatic ducts. The technique uses heavily T2-weighted imaging, which produces high signal from bile and other static fluids by virtue of their long T2 time, while suppressing background signal. Fast scanning techniques, particularly half-Fourier fast spin-echo techniques, are continuing to improve image resolution and allow scans within short breath-holds, reducing the effects of respiratory movement. The MRCP method has reached a level of resolution and reliability where it may well largely replace diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the near future. A review of MRCP techniques and imaging findings is presented with emphasis on half-Fourier imaging, with reference to potential clinical indications and limitations. Use of MRCP shows a high sensitivity and specificity for detection of biliary dilatation, calculi, strictures and anatomical variants. Experience with MR imaging of the pancreatic duct is less extensively described in the literature, but pancreatic duct dilatation, calculi and anatomy can now be reliably detected. However, as experience with MRCP increases, some sources of errors and limitations are becoming apparent, with image artefacts, and gas, blood or sludge within ducts potentially mimicking stones or strictures.

Donor biliary variations: an overlooked problem?

Documented causes of biliary complications following orthotopic liver transplantation have been related to technical imperfections or insufficient arterial supply. Although anatomical variations of the extrahepatic biliary system are not infrequent, neither their incidence, surgical management nor possible association with complications have been reported in liver transplantation. At our institution, the global incidence of biliary complications following 357 consecutive liver transplants performed in 324 patients over a 2‐yr period was 15.4% (55/357). Anomalous donor extrahepatic ducts were verified in 10 cases (2.8%) and they were recognized intraoperatively, prior to biliary reconstruction, in 7 cases. Technical complications occurred in 1 of these 7 and in 3 other cases where the anomalous ducts were not identified until later in the postoperative period when serious clinical problems ensued. We herein present a description of these 10 cases, with reference to the techniques employed to manage the anatomical anomalies and to treat complications. As in any hepatobiliary procedure, awareness of possible variations of the extrahepatic biliary system, intraoperative identification of the anomalous ducts and appropriate tailoring of the surgical technique are advisable in order to avoid serious postoperative complications in liver transplantation.

Low inserti on of hepatic segmental duct VII–VIII is an important cause of major biliary injury or misdiagnosis

The importance of variant anatomy is only mentioned generally in most articles in this era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We report a series of 14 patients in whom a seemingly low insertion of hepatic segmental duct VII-VIII was clinically important. The patients were managed at Duke University Medical Center. Two intraoperative videotapes of injury were reviewed. Three categories of patients were identified: 6 patients who had injury in association with another major injury to the biliary system, 7 patients who had an isolated VII-VIII system injury, and 1 patient with a Klatskin tumor in whom the unobstructed variant duct was stented. After appropriate evaluation, all patients were successfully treated. Several lawsuits resulted, even when the injury was seemingly minor. Symptoms developed in all patients who filed lawsuits, but none in those who did not. Appreciation of the VII-VIII biliary variant can lead to avoidance of injury or to a successful repair. The injury can easily occur despite "normal" cholangiography. Successful clinical outcome does not necessarily correlate with freedom from lawsuits.

Rare bile duct anomalies

Anomalies of the biliary ductal system are not uncommon, and are of variable clinical significance. A case is reported of an extremely unusual variation, with the cystic duct entering the left hepatic duct. Preoperative delineation of the anomaly in this patient by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography assisted in the subsequent performance of a safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Awareness of potential biliary variations is one factor in avoidance of ductal injuries during laparoscopic surgery.