Oil spills have many adverse effects on the marine environment. Bilge oil spills occur frequently in the sea as a result of maritime accidents or illegal discharge. It is difficult to unambiguously identify the specific sources of such spills because bilge oil contains a mixture of fuel oil and lubricant. In this study, bilge oils with different fuel oil/lubricant ratios were prepared and analyzed using a modified version of the CEN/TR methodology (European Committee for Standardization, 2012). As the lubricant content of bilge oil increased, the intensity of the C20–C24 group, which is the commonly-used normalization compound group for fuel oil in the percentage weathering (PW) plot, also changed. Therefore, the mean area of the C15–C18 group, which was affected by the lubricant content, was used instead. Although heavy fuel oil is usually normalized to a hopane, bilge oil with a high lubricant content cannot be analyzed based on a mass spectrometry (MS)–PW plot; thus, heavy fuel oil-based bilge oil was normalized to a phytane in this study. Although hopanes and styrenes are unsuitable comparison compounds for heavy fuel oil-based bilge oil analysis, for light fuel oil-based bilge oil, hopanes and steranes could be applied as diagnostic ratio comparisons when the lubricant peak was clearly detected in the chromatograms of the spilled and suspected oil samples. By applying the CEN/TR methodology according to this approach, the similarities between spilled and suspected oil samples were more easily revealed. In addition, the field applicability of the proposed method was tested for four actual oil spills.
Read full abstract