Purpose: Clinically evident acute (or recent) hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and liver injury is uncommon, in contrast to chronic HCV infection and associated liver disease. However, the clinical and laboratory features of overt recent HCV infection are not dissimilar to other etiologies of acute hepatitis, i.e. fatigue, anorexia, pale stools and dark urine; serum aminotransferase concentrations are typically elevated significantly. Therefore, because clinically overt acute HCV infection is uncommon and alternative diagnoses demand consideration, e.g. autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), liver biopsy may be undertaken. A recent report drew attention to the spectrum of observed histologic abnormalities, such as those concerning for large bile duct occlusion. Methods: We describe five patients with what we believe was clinically evident acute HCV infection and liver injury, all of whom required and underwent liver biopsy on clinical grounds. Results: Five adult patients (two men; median age 41 years [range 19–47]) presented for further evaluation of acute severe liver injury, either without (two patients) or with symptoms – malaise, anorexia, nausea, abdominal pain, pale stools and dark urine. The means of recent HCV exposure was as follows: sexual (two), intranasal (two), and intravenous (one). Pertinent data are contained in the table. Alternative causes of acute severe liver injury (viral, autoimmune, drug-induced, metabolic and alcoholic) were excluded as far as possible by history-taking and laboratory testing. However, because liver injury was so marked, and in three patients alternative or additional explanations existed (Wilson's disease, AIH) liver biopsy was undertaken. Unlike classic descriptions of morphologic changes in acute viral hepatitis, namely lobular hepatocyte swelling/ballooning and acidophil necrosis, pigment-laden macrophages, and/or canalicular cholestasis (all five biopsies revealed these changes), two of the biopsy specimens demonstrated portal tract expansion by edema, with many neutrophils and evidence of bile duct injury. Chronic inflammation was minimal. This raised concern for a primary biliary process, e.g. large duct obstruction. Furthermore, one of these two specimens revealed numerous portal eosinophils concerning for drug reaction. Conclusion: All five patients had laboratory evidence of acute severe liver injury. Symptomatic patients had lower serum albumin, but higher total serum bilirubin and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) concentrations than those without symptoms. Moreover, this difference distinguished those patients with histological changes concerning for an underlying biliary process from those who did not in two of three cases. Timing between infection and liver biopsy might explain these differences.Table