Bilateral Reconstruction Research Articles

Abstract P2-15-02: Omentum-Lipoaspirate Free-Flap Breast Reconstruction in Women with BMI <25

Abstract The Omental Fat-Augmented Free-flap (O-FAFF) is being offered at our institution as an alternative method of breast reconstruction. This novel free-flap construct is ideal for underweight and normal weight women who lack abdominal or other donor tissue, desire to avoid donor site morbidity and/or are averse to implant-based reconstruction. We analyze omentum, mastectomy and final construct weights in women with BMI < 25 kg/m2 who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomies and O-FAFF reconstruction. Methods Operative technical features of women undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomies with immediate O-FAFF breast reconstruction over a 34 month period are included. Steps of the operative procedure are as follows: laparascopic omentectomy, liposuction and unilateral or bilateral mastectomy is performed. An acellular dermal matrix (ADM) shell is fashioned around a tissue expander. This mold is filled with the omentum and then engrafted with lipoaspirate followed by microsurgical anastomoses of gastroepiploic artery and vein to internal mammary artery and vein. Weight of biological construct is compared to native breast weight. Results 26 women with average BMI 21.2 kg/m2 underwent unilateral (15) or bilateral (11) nipple-sparing mastectomies and O-FAFF reconstruction. Average omentum weight for 37 breasts was 149 gm (82- 262) and average mastectomy weighed 212.4 gm (85 – 396). The ratio of engrafted fat to omentum weight was 0.73 for unilateral versus 0.91 for bilateral cases. The ratio of omentum-fat graft construct to mastectomy weight was 1.24 for unilateral and 0.96 for bilateral cases. Conclusion O-FAFF is a novel procedure for autologous tissue breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy in underweight and normal weight women. Comparable weight replacement for extirpated native breast is achieved. Citation Format: Irene L. Wapnir, Monica M. Dua, Yulia Zak, Dung Nguyen. Omentum-Lipoaspirate Free-Flap Breast Reconstruction in Women with BMI <25 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-15-02.

Bulging after DIEP Breast Reconstruction: New Insights Concerning Rectus Diastasis and Medial Perforator Harvest.

A retrospective analysis of 159 patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction between 2014 and 2021 in the University Medical Center Utrecht was conducted. Outcomes measured were preoperative rectus diastasis, flap weight, laterality of flap harvest (unilateral or bilateral), timing of the harvest (immediate or delayed), number of perforators harvested (single or multiple), and location of the harvested perforator (medial, lateral, or both). In 159 patients, 244 DIEP flaps were performed, 16 of these donor-sites (6.6%) developed a clinically evident abdominal bulge. When preoperative rectus abdominis diastasis was found (n = 97), postoperative bulging occurred significantly more often (P < 0.01). Patients in whom the medial perforator artery was harvested for reconstruction (n = 114) showed less abdominal bulging than patients in whom the lateral (n = 92) was harvested (P = 0.02). Using single versus multiple perforators for the DIEP flap, bilateral versus unilateral reconstruction or timing of the operation showed no significant difference in outcome of bulging (P = 1.00, P = 0.78, P = 0.59, respectively). The incidence of bulging in our study cohort is comparable to the literature. Harvesting the medial perforator artery for the DIEP flap showed less abdominal bulging than using the lateral perforator artery in a DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Also, preoperative rectus diastasis was found to be an important risk factor for the occurrence of bulging.

Operative Time Is an Independent Predictor of Postoperative Outcomes in Bilateral DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Multivariate Analysis of 1000 Flaps

Introduction: Skin-to-skin operative time (OT) as a risk factor for adverse postoperative outcomes in microvascular breast reconstruction has not been thoroughly investigated. This study evaluates OT’s impact on length of stay (LOS), overall morbidity, individual complications, and unplanned reoperation (UR) in Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator (DIEP) flaps, with a primary objective of identifying a clinically relevant time of decreased odds. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent bilateral DIEP flaps from 2010-2021 by two senior surgeons with standardized surgical and postoperative protocols were retrospectively reviewed. 1000 flaps (500 patients) were analyzed with extensive multivariate regression equations to adjust for potential confounders, including intraoperative complexity. The odds of postoperative complication, extended LOS (eLOS, defined as ≥5 days) were compared across OT per hour and OT intervals. Results: After risk-adjustment, each hour of OT increased morbidity by 19%, UR by 8.7%, and LOS by 6.5 hours (all p<0.001). For eLOS, procedures ≤5 hours had 9.5 times lower odds than ≥5 hours (p=0.050), 5-7 hours had comparable odds (p=0.540), and 7-9 hours had 5.5 times lower odds than procedures ≥ 9 hours (p<0.001). Lastly, a multivariate linear regression showed that LOS can be calculated from OT: LOS (days) =1.527 + 0.272 x OT (hours) (R2=0.308; p<0.001). Conclusion: Operative time (per hour) independently predicts morbidity, UR and LOS in DIEP flaps. Furthermore, 5 hours and 9 hours are critical cutoffs for eLOS. These findings emphasize the benefits of decreasing OT through efficiency models, such as process analysis, team-based intraoperative protocols, and co-surgery model.

Tertiary Autologous Breast Reconstruction After Implant-Based Reconstruction: Safety and Patient-Related Outcomes

Silicone breast implants are popularly used for breast reconstruction. As more patients receive long-term silicone breast implants, the number of replacement operations will also increase, and some patients prefer to change from silicone breast implantation to tertiary autologous reconstruction. We evaluated the safety of tertiary reconstruction and assessed patient views regarding the two reconstruction methods. We retrospectively analyzed patient backgrounds, surgical characteristics, and silicone breast implantation retention periods until tertiary reconstruction. We designed an original questionnaire to assess patient opinion regarding silicone breast implantation and tertiary reconstruction. Twenty-three patients (24 breasts) with decisive factors of patient-initiated elective surgery (n=16), contralateral breast cancer occurrence (n=5), or late-onset infection (n=2) underwent tertiary reconstruction. The median time from silicone breast implantation to tertiary reconstruction was significantly shorter in patients with metachronous cancer (47 months) than that in those undergoing elective surgery (92 months). Complications included partial flap loss (n=1), seroma (n=6), hematoma (n=5), and infection (n=1). Total necrosis did not occur. Twenty-one patients responded to the questionnaire. The satisfaction score was significantly higher for abdominal flaps than for silicone breast implants. When presented with the option to select the initial reconstruction method again, 13 of 21 respondents chose silicone breast implantation. Tertiary reconstruction is beneficial because it reduces clinical symptoms and cosmetic complaints and is recommended as a bilateral reconstruction method, especially for patients with metachronous breast cancer. However, silicone breast implants, which are minimally invasive and associated with shorter hospital stays, were simultaneously found to be sufficiently attractive to patients.

Streamlining and Consistency in Surgery: Lean Six Sigma to Improve Operating Room Efficiency.

Improving perioperative efficiency helps reduce unnecessary surgical expenditure, increase operating room throughput, improve patient safety, and enhance staff and patient satisfaction. Lean Six Sigma (LSS) is a quality improvement model that has been successfully applied to eliminate inefficiencies in the business sector but has not yet been widely adopted in medicine. This study investigates the adaptation of LSS to improve operative efficiency for plastic surgery procedures. The authors followed the define, measure, analyze, improve, and control phases to implement LSS. The key outcome measures gathered were operative times, including the cut-to-close time, and the total time the patient spent in the operating room. The study included a total of 181 patients who underwent immediate bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction between January of 2016 and December of 2019. The LSS interventions were associated with a decrease in total operative time from 636.36 minutes to 530.35 minutes, and a decrease in the time between incision to closure from 555.16 minutes to 458.85 minutes for a bilateral mastectomy with immediate deep inferior epigastric artery flap breast reconstruction. This study demonstrates that LSS is useful to improve perioperative efficiency during complex plastic surgery procedures. The workflow of the procedure was improved by determining the optimal spatial positioning and distinct roles for each surgeon and preparing surgeon-specific surgical trays. Two process maps were developed to visualize the positioning of the surgeons during each stage of the procedure and depict the parallel workflow that helped improve intraoperative efficiency.

Total mandible and bilateral TMJ reconstruction combining a customized jaw implant with a free fibular flap: a case report and literature review

BackgroundThe need for whole mandibular bone reconstruction and bilateral joint replacement is fortunately rare, but it is an extremely challenging topic in maxillofacial surgery, due to its functional implications. CAD-CAM techniques development has opened new broad horizons in the surgical planning of complex maxillofacial reconstructions, in terms of accuracy, predictability, and functional cosmetic results. The review of the literature has revealed a small number of scientific reports on total mandibulectomy including the condyles, with only eleven cases from 1980. Most of the works describe reconstructions secondary to dysplastic or inflammatory diseases affecting the lower jaw. The aim of this work, reporting a rare case of massive fibrous dysplasia of the whole mandible, is to share our experience in the management of extended mandibular and bilateral joint reconstruction, using porous titanium patient-specific implants.Case presentationThe authors present a 20-year-old male patient suffering from massive bone fibrous dysplasia of the mandible. The mandibular body and both the rami and the condylar processes had been involved, causing severe functional impairment, tooth loss, and facial deformation. The young patient, after repeated ineffective conservative surgical treatments, has required a biarticular mandibular replacement. Using virtual surgical planning (VSP) software, the authors, in collaboration with medical engineers, have created a custom-made original titanium porous mandibular implant, suspended from a bilateral artificial temporomandibular joint. The mandibular titanium implant body has been specifically designed to support soft tissues and to fix, in the alveolar region, a free fibular bone graft, for delayed dental implant prosthetic rehabilitation.ConclusionThe surgical and technical details, as well as the new trends in mandibular reconstructions using porous titanium implants, are reported, and discussed, reviewing literature reports on this topic. Satisfactory functional and cosmetic restorative results have been obtained, and no major complications have occurred. The patient, currently in the 18th month clinical and radiological follow-up, has recently completed the functional restoration program by an implant-supported full-arch dental prosthesis.

Using Virtual Reality for Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Preoperative Planning.

This prospective case series feasibility study was conducted in two tertiary medical centers. Participants were women slated to undergo free transverse rectus abdominis muscle, unilateral or bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator flap immediate breast reconstruction. Based on a routine CTA, a 3D VR model was generated. Before each procedure, the surgeons examined the CTA and then the VR model. Any new information provided by the VR imaging was submitted to a radiologist for confirmation before surgery. Following each procedure, the surgeons completed a questionnaire comparing the two methods. Thirty women between 34 and 68 years of age were included in the study; except for one, all breast reconstructions were successful. The surgeons ranked VR higher than CTA in terms of better anatomical understanding and operative anatomical findings. In 72.4% of cases, VR models were rated having maximum similarity to reality, with no significant difference between the type of perforator anatomical course or complexity. In more than 70% of the cases, VR was considered to have contributed to determining the surgical approach. In four cases, VR imaging modified the surgical strategy, without any complications. VR imaging was well-accepted by the surgeons who commented on its importance and ease compared with the standard CTA presentation. Further studies are needed to determine whether VR should become an integral part of preoperative deep inferior epigastric perforator surgery planning.

DIEP flap in breast reconstruction: A morbidity study of bilateral versus unilateral reconstruction

The Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap is a modality in breast reconstruction of choice. Despite its well-documented benefits and complications, a lack of evidence remains with regards to the risks of performing a bilateral versus a unilateral reconstruction. As such, we sought to compare the rates of adverse outcomes in the perioperative and postoperative periods associated with a unilateral versus a bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction. A retrospective cohort study of 178 consecutive patients undergoing unilateral versus. bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction was performed at our tertiary care center over a 3-year period. Data on demographics, operative time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and surgical re-exploration, were extracted for both groups. Statistical analysis was performed on a per-flap basis. A total of 157 unilateral and 42 bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps were identified. The rate of intra-operative complications was 12.1% for unilateral versus. 4.8% for bilateral flaps (P=0.26). Total post-operative complications rates were 30.6% for unilateral versus 54.7% for bilateral flaps (P=0.003). Surgical re-exploration was performed in 12.7% of unilateral and 11.9% of bilateral cases (P=0.88). The rate of total flap loss was similar between types of reconstruction, occurring in 2.5% of unilateral vs. 2.4% of bilateral flaps (P=1). This study demonstrates the rate of complications per flap is significantly higher in bilateral versus unilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Bilateral DIEP breast reconstruction should be decided on a case-by-case basis. Prognostic/Risk Study, Level II.

Preserving choice in breast cancer treatment: A different perspective on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy is the removal of both breasts when only one is affected by cancer. Rates of this controversial cancer treatment have been increasing since the late 1990s, even among women who do not have the kind of family history or known genetic mutation that would put them at high-risk for another breast cancer. Citing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy's lack of oncologic benefit and increased risk of surgical complications, the American Society of Breast Surgeons discourages contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for average-risk women with unilateral cancer, as does most of the medical literature on this topic. Within this literature, desire for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy is often painted as the product of an emotional overreaction to a cancer diagnosis and misunderstanding of breast cancer risk. Drawing on the personal experience of a breast cancer survivor, as well as relevant medical literature on breast cancer screening and surgery, this article offers a different perspective on the ongoing popularity of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, one that focuses on practical experiences and logical deliberations about those experiences. Specifically, it calls attention to two features of the contralateral prophylactic mastectomy decision-making situation that have been inadequately covered in the medical literature: (1) the way that breast cancer screening after a breast cancer diagnosis can become a kind of radiological overtreatment, even for "average-risk" women; and (2) how desire for bodily symmetry after breast cancer, which can best be achieved through bilateral reconstruction or no reconstruction, drives interest in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. The goal of this article is not to suggest that all women who want contralateral prophylactic mastectomy should have the surgery. In some cases, it is not advisable. But many "average-risk" women with unilateral cancer have good reasons for wanting contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, and we believe their right to choose it should be protected.

Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy: cross-sectional incision and implants in mixed plane

A Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica é o órgão oficial de divulgação da Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica (SBCP), tem como objetivo registrar a produção científica em Cirurgia Plástica, fomentar o estudo, aperfeiçoamento e atualização dos profissionais da especialidade.

Management of large post-crossover inguinal lymphocele

A 73-year-old man with a history of peripheral arterial disease and previous bilateral common femoral artery reconstruction presented with left foot critical limb-threatening ischaemia and underwent right to left femoro-profunda crossover grafting. Postoperatively, he developed a left groin lymph leak that initially dried up but later re-presented as a very large lymphocele. Initial attempts with aspiration on three occasions and then surgical drainage with sac excision and ligation of long saphenous lymphatics did not lead to resolution. Subsequently, a hybrid approach using percutaneous lymphangiography and drainage, sclerotherapy (bleomycin, then absolute alcohol) and eventual identification and ligation of the afferent lymphatic channel resulted in resolution of the lymphocele without untoward side effects, sepsis or compromise of the revascularisation.

Refabrication of an implant-retained obturator using the denture duplication technique in a bilateral maxillectomy patient with a free fibula osteocutaneous flap.

We aimed to introduce a simple method for refabrication of an implant-retained obturator using the denture duplication technique while retaining the custom abutments for a patient who underwent bilateral maxillectomy and reconstruction with a free fibula osteocutaneous flap. We have proposed this technique to facilitate the impression-making procedure for this extensive maxillary defect and to avoid lengthy and complicated laboratory procedures. A custom tray was developed by duplicating the fitting surface of an old obturator using silicone putty. The tray was used for a bite-pressure impression wherein both definitive impression and jaw relation were obtained simultaneously, reducing the time required for the placement of a new obturator. We used the denture duplication technique to refabricate an implant-retained obturator while retaining the custom abutments. Decreased chairside time, fewer visits, the use of easily available materials, and uncomplicated laboratory procedures make this technique more economical and acceptable for patients. Using this approach, the patient was able to use the old prosthesis until the delivery of the new prosthesis. The replacement obturator that was developed using this method maintained an acceptable level of oral function.

A Novel Fat-Augmented Omentum-Based Construct for Unilateral and Bilateral Free-Flap Breast Reconstruction in Underweight and Normal Weight Women Receiving Nipple or Skin-Sparing Mastectomies.

Autologous tissue has proven advantages, however it is often not an option for women of low or normal body mass index (BMI). Omentum has been used sparingly, typically as a pedicled flap to correct breast deformities, but is considered suboptimal for full breast reconstruction. We developed a new construct, the omental fat-augmented free flap (O-FAFF) as an alternative for breast reconstruction. O-FAFF involves laparoscopic omentum harvesting, creation of an acellular dermal matrix shell for its encasement, and lipoinjection to augment volume. The gastroepiploic vessels are microsurgically anastomosed to internal mammary vessels. Tissue and O-FAFF construct weights as well as outcomes are reported. Thirty-four consecutive women (50 breasts) received O-FAFF breast reconstruction after 18 unilateral and 16 bilateral mastectomies (10 non-nipple-sparing, 40 nipple-sparing). Thirty-seven were immediate and 13 were revisions of previous breast reconstructions. Patient mean age was 48.2 (range 23-73) years and mean BMI was 22.3 (range 17.6-32.4) kg/m2. Mean follow-up was 14.8 (range 3-33) months. The median weight of the omentum was 161.7g (range 81-852, interquartile range [IQR] 102) and the mean ratio of fat to omentum weight was 0.73 (range 0.22-1.38) and 1.97 (range 0.24-3.8) for unilateral and bilateral cases, respectively. Postoperative pain scores and oral morphine equivalent consumption were more favorable for the O-FAFF group compared with controls (p<0.001). Follow-up breast MRI demonstrated intact perfusion and no fat necrosis. The O-FAFF is ideally suited for women of lower BMI and could dramatically increase the number of women who are candidates for autologous breast reconstruction.

Impact of implant-based breast reconstruction on bra fit

Comfortable and well-fitting bras are necessary for good quality of life but hard to find for women who undergo reconstruction after breast cancer treatment. This study aimed to provide data to inform bra designs for breast cancer survivors. We measured anatomical distances used in bra design on 3D clinical photographs of patients who underwent unilateral and bilateral implant-based reconstruction to quantify changes after reconstruction relative to the measured values before the person underwent surgery. We performed additional assessments of symmetry before surgery and after reconstruction, and we used regression analyses to identify associations between the measurements and patient characteristics, such as BMI. Overall, almost all measurements changed significantly in implant-based reconstructed breasts relative to native breasts. We highlight several aspects of ergonomic bra design that will be impacted by the changes in anatomical distances. Practitioner summary: Implant-based breast reconstruction surgery changes the breast so that off-the-rack bras are inadequate. This study provides designers with measurement data from women who underwent implant-based reconstruction to inform bra designs for this population. The key factor designers need to account for is the semi-spherical shape of the reconstructed breast.

Left Internal Mammary Vein Size and Its Impact on Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction.

Abdominal-based FFBRs were retrospectively reviewed. Venous coupler size was considered a proxy for IMV diameter. Outcomes of three patient cohorts (all, unilateral, and bilateral reconstructions) were analyzed with univariate and multivariate analysis. Our cohort consisted of 582 patients who underwent 874 abdominal-based FFBR, with a similar number of unilateral (n = 290) and bilateral (n = 292), and right (n = 424) and left (n = 450) reconstructions. Mean follow-up was over 4-years. For all reconstructions, the left IMV (2.7 ± 0.4 mm) was smaller than the right (3.0 ± 0.4 mm) (P < 0.0001). Complication rates between left- and right-sided FFBR were similar, but with a trend toward increased fat necrosis on the left (n = 17, 3.8% versus n = 8, 1.9%). Further subgroup analysis showed significantly higher fat necrosis in unilateral left-sided FFBR (n = 12 versus n = 2, P = 0.02), with left-sided FFBR being an independent risk factor for fat necrosis on multivariate analysis. The left-side IMV is significantly smaller than the right IMV. In bilateral reconstructions, the smaller size of the left IMV did not result in a greater risk of complications; however, in unilateral FFBR, fat necrosis was significantly higher on the left side.

Operative Time Predicts Postoperative Outcomes in Bilateral DIEP Flap Reconstruction: Multivariate 1000 Flap Analysis.

Patients who underwent bilateral DIEP flaps from 2010 to 2021 by two senior surgeons (N.T.H. and S.S.T.) with standardized surgical and postoperative protocols were retrospectively reviewed. One thousand flaps (500 patients) were analyzed with extensive multivariate regression equations to adjust for potential confounders, including intraoperative complexity. The odds of postoperative complication, extended LOS (eLOS, defined as ≥5 days) were compared across OT per hour and OT intervals. After risk-adjustment, each hour of OT increased morbidity by 19%, UR by 8.7%, and LOS by 6.5 hours (all P < 0.001). For eLOS, procedures ≤5 hours had 9.5 times lower odds than ≥5 hours (P = 0.050), 5-7 hours had comparable odds (P = 0.540), and 7-9 hours had 5.5 times lower odds than procedures ≥ 9 hours (P < 0.001). Last, a multivariate linear regression showed that LOS can be calculated from OT: LOS (days) =1.527 + 0.272 × OT (hours) (R2 = 0.308; P < 0.001). OT (per hour) independently predicts morbidity, UR and LOS in DIEP flaps. Furthermore, 5 and 9 hours are critical cutoffs for eLOS. These findings emphasize the benefits of decreasing OT through efficiency models, such as process analysis, team-based intraoperative protocols, and co-surgery model.

Direct-to-Implant, Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: Geometric Breast Measurements and Changes at 2-Year Follow-Up.

Prepectoral breast reconstruction has recently experienced a resurgence in popularity. However, in direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction, there is no opportunity for capsular modifications before final implant insertion. Implant pocket and breast shape are thus maintained, initially, solely by the mastectomy skin flaps, and eventually, by attachments of the periprosthetic capsule. The present study aims to quantify changes in breast geometric measurements over time following DTI prepectoral breast reconstruction. A retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent bilateral prepectoral DTI reconstruction performed by a single surgeon from June of 2016 to January of 2018. Patients followed for more than 2 years were included. Yearly standardized frontal photographs were analyzed, and nipple-to-midline, sternal notch-to-nipple, and midclavicle-to-lower pole measurements were obtained. Patient demographics, operative details, and complications were documented. A total of 72 breasts (38 women) undergoing direct-to-implant, prepectoral breast reconstruction were included in the final analysis. Acellular dermal matrix was used in 56 breasts only (78.9%) for anterior coverage. The average change in nipple-to-midline distance after 2 years decreased by 0.41 cm (range, -2.00 to 2.97 cm), sternal notch-to-nipple distance decreased by 0.62 cm (range, -4.98 to 5.4 cm), and midclavicle-to-lower pole distance decreased 0.10 cm superiorly (range, -6.07 to 3.6 cm). In breasts that underwent postmastectomy radiation therapy, the average changes were -0.08, -0.43, and -0.56 cm, respectively. No patient in this cohort had severe malposition requiring further surgery. The present study provides insight into geometric breast measurements following prepectoral breast reconstruction at 2-year follow-up. The minimal breast shape changes observed demonstrate the feasibility of prepectoral DTI reconstruction with or without the use of acellular dermal matrix. Therapeutic, IV.

27. The bipedicled, bilateral Scapula and lateral arm free flap in subtotal facial reconstruction

Bilateral subtotal facial reconstruction represents the pinnacle of complexity for the reconstructive surgeon. Combinations of free flaps allow the planning and execution of surgery to optimise patient function.

Keller Funnel Efficacy in "No Touch" Breast Augmentation and Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane database, and Google Scholar was performed between 2005 and 2021. All clinical-based, retrospective and prospective studies utilizing the Keller funnel method for breast implant insertion were selected. Six studies were identified for evaluation: five were retrospective cohorts and one was a prospective trial. No randomized controlled trials were found. Outcomes reported included lower rates of capsular contracture (RR, 0.42; P = 0.0006; 95% CI, 0.25-0.69), shorter incision lengths (35.5 ± 2.1 mm), less insertion time (mean = 6 seconds), and decreased complications, and one paper reported ultimately greater patient satisfaction with outcomes (BREAST-Q Score: 92%). This review suggests that the Keller funnel is a useful method for no-touch breast augmentation and reconstruction surgery. The Keller funnel reduces subsequent capsular contracture rate, surgical time, and incision length and allows for easier insertion. However, our findings support recommendation of a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial with larger population size and follow-up intervals.

A retrospective review of submuscular implant-based breast reconstruction: The influence of dermal matrix (ADM) on complications and aesthetic outcomes.

The use of acellular dermal matrix changed the breast reconstruction algorithm facilitating implant coverage and direct to implant technique. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the ADM surgical complications, breast aesthetics, and patient satisfaction. In a tertiary hospital, patients that underwent implant-based breast reconstructions during a three-year period had their charts retrospectively reviewed, received post-operative BreastQ, and had their post-operative photos evaluated by a three-member panel using a multi-parameter breast specific scale (scored 1-5). The complication information was analysed per reconstructed breast while the analysis of aesthetic and patient-reported outcomes was done per patient. A total of 501 patients (990 breasts) were evaluated. In the complication analysis group, 20.3% of the breasts had ADM. Overall complications and major complications were more frequent in the ADM group. During the first 30 postoperative days the most frequent complications were: skin necrosis/delayed wound healing and haematoma, after 30 days was infection, and complications after 1 year being less than 1%. On the outcome analysis group, ADM was used in 21.5% patients, 44% had post-operative photos, and 29% answered the BreastQ. Factors associated with higher appearance score were bilateral reconstruction, prophylactic surgery, and nipple presence. ADM demonstrated no difference in satisfaction with breasts. In implant-based breast reconstructions ADM has been shown to increase rate of complications. The use of acellular dermal matrix did not influence the overall appearance or the patient-reported outcome. A good aesthetic outcome is positively influenced by bilateral reconstructions with preservation of the nipple.