Bilateral Lung Volume Reduction Surgery Research Articles

Bilateral Lung Volume Reduction Surgery

Bilateral Lung Volume Reduction Surgery

Bilateral Lung Volume Reduction Surgery for Advanced Emphysema: A Comparison of Median Sternotomy and Thoracoscopic Approaches

To compare short-term outcomes following bilateral lung volume reduction surgery performed by median sternotomy (MS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Bilateral lung volume reduction surgery was performed by MS in 80 patients and by VATS in 40. All patients underwent preoperative assessment with pulmonary function testing, arterial blood gas determination, and 6-min walk test (6MWT). Pulmonary function testing and 6MWT were repeated at 3 to 6 months postoperatively. The mean age of the VATS group was lower than that of the MS group (59.3 +/- 9.4 vs 62.4 +/- 6.9 years; p = 0.001), but there were no differences in baseline functional parameters of disease severity (FEV1, FVC, residual volume [RV], arterial PCO2, or 6MWT). All patients in both groups were extubated at the completion of surgery, but 17.5% of patients in the MS group and 2.5% in the VATS group (p = 0.02) subsequently required reintubation at some point during the postoperative course. Thirty-day operative mortality was 4.2% for the MS group and 2.5% for the VATS group (p = not significant). However, total in-hospital mortality was 13.8% for the MS group, while it remained 2.5% for the VATS group (p = 0.05). Mortality was largely confined to patients 65 years of age or older. There was no significant difference in duration of air leaks or length of hospital stay between the two groups. Functional outcomes achieved with the two techniques were similar. Specifically, there was no difference between the two groups in mean postoperative FEV1, FVC, RV, or 6MWT, or in the magnitude of change in these parameters over preoperative values. Bilateral lung volume reduction surgery performed by either MS and VATS approaches leads to similar improvements in pulmonary function and exercise tolerance. VATS is associated with a significantly lower incidence of respiratory failure and a trend toward decreased in-hospital mortality and may be the preferred technique, particularly for high-risk patients.

Lung Volume Reduction Surgery for Emphysema

This article summarizes the care of patients undergoing bilateral lung volume reduction surgery as a treatment for end-stage emphysema. Surgical removal of emphysematous tissue allows for a reconfiguration of the chest wall and diaphragm, improving pulmonary mechanics. This results in reduced air trapping and improved gas exchange. It is important for nurses caring for these patients to be knowledgeable in the postoperative care of thoracic surgical patients and to have an understanding of the pathophysiology of emphysema, the medical management, and, in particular, the relationship between dyspnea and anxiety. Strategies to assist with airway clearance, control pain, prevent and alleviate dyspnea, reduce and treat anxiety, and ensure nutrition need to be incorporated into the postoperative plan of nursing care.

Contribution of Lung and Chest Wall Mechanics Following Emphysema Resection

To determine the contributions of (1) chest wall (Pcw) and (2) lung elastic recoil pressure (PL) to (3) total elastic recoil pressure exerted by the respiratory system (Prs) in 18 patients (12 men) aged 66 +/- 6 years (mean +/- 1 SD) with severe emphysema who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic bilateral lung volume reduction surgery under paralyzed (vecuronium) general anesthesia (isoflurane). We measured preoperative and 6-week postoperative lung function studies, and intraoperative inspiratory lung conductance (GL), PL, Pcw, and Prs (cm H2O) at end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), EELV plus 0.60 +/- 0.0 L, and EELV plus 1.15 +/- 0.0 L. All values are mean +/- SEM. Preoperative vs postoperative FVC was 1.9 +/- 0.1 L vs 2.3 +/- 0.1 L (p = 0.03); FEV1 was 0.6 +/- 0.1 L vs 0.9 +/- 0.1 L (p < 0.02); total lung capacity was 7.4 +/- 0.4 L vs 5.9 +/- 0.3 L (p < 0.001); functional residual capacity was 5.7 +/- 0.4 L vs 4.4 +/- 0.2 L (p = 0.001). At EELV preoperative vs postoperative, PL was 0.0 +/- 0.3 vs 1.1 +/- 0.05 (p = 0.04), Pcw was 5.0 +/- 0.7 vs 2.4 +/- 0.9 (p = 0.02), and Prs was 5.0 +/- 0.8 vs 3.5 +/- 0.7 (p = 0.08). AT EELV plus 0.60 L, PL was 3.2 +/- 0.6 vs 6.1 +/- 0.9 (p < 0.001), Pcw was 8.8 +/- 0.8 vs 7.0 +/- 0.9 (p = 0.12), and Prs was 12.0 +/- 0.8 vs 13.1 +/- 0.7 (p = 0.80). At EELV plus 1.15 L, PL was 6.8 +/- 0.9 vs 10.3 +/- 1.1 (p < 0.001), Pcw was 13.5 +/- 1.0 vs 11.2 +/- 1.2 (p = 0.12), and Prs was 20 +/- 1.2 vs 21.5 +/- 1.0 p = 0.93). AT EELV plus 0.06 L, GL was 0.09 +/- 0.00 L/S/cm H2O vs 0.16 +/- 0.01 (p < 0.01). At EELV plus 1.15 L, GL was 0.12 +/- 0.01 vs 0.21 +/- 0.03 (p < 0.05) with similar preoperative vs postoperative GL/PL slopes. The increase in PL and decrease in Pcw following LVRS for emphysema may be responsible for the increase in spirometry and airway conductance.

Bilateral Lung Volume Reduction Surgery

A new surgical approach, bilateral lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS), offers hope for select patients with chronic pulmonary emphysema (CPE). Bilateral LVRS procedures involve excision of emphysematous alveoli, which results in a 20% to 30% reduction in the volume of each lung. The goal of LVRS is to improve the respiratory mechanics of patients with CPE by reexpanding functional lung tissue compressed by overdistended emphysematous alveoli, restoring diaphragmatic mobility, and improving the bellows function of the chest wall structures. Patients undergoing bilateral LVRS procedures experience relief from chronic dyspnea and may note improved pulmonary functions and better quality of life.

Bilateral Lung Volume Reduction Surgery for Treatment of Emphysema

Patients suffering from chronic pulmonary emphysema can benefit from a new surgical technique that offers them relief from chronic dyspnea and declining quality of life. Bilateral lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) involves an innovative surgical stapling technique for removing emphysematous lung tissue. To prevent persistent air leaks, surgeons use bovine pericardium strips to reinforce surgical staple lines created during bilateral LVRS. Perioperative nurses should understand the disease process of chronic pulmonary emphysema, bilateral LVRS techniques, and possible postoperative complications to provide quality nursing care for patients undergoing LVRS procedures.

Occurrence of subacute bacterial endocarditis in childhood: Lawson, George M., and Palmer, Robert S.: New England J. Med. 199: 1205, 1928

Hyperinflation in patients with severe COPD is associated with an increased anteroposterior (AP) rib cage diameter. We sought to determine whether bilateral lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) affects bony thorax configuration.Prospective of clinical data collection before and after LVRS.Tertiary-care university medical center.We measured multiple AP and transverse thoracic diameters, by using plain chest roentgenograms (CXRs) in 25 patients (11 men, 14 women), and thoracic CT scans in 14 patients (7 men, 7 women), preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. A subgroup of 7 patients (reference data) also had CXR thoracic diameter measurements made, using films obtained previously within a year of their presurgical evaluation. Another subgroup of 10 patients had CT scan measurements also made 12 months postoperatively.CXR dimensions were taken at the level of the manubrium sterni (M) and thoracic T7 and T11 levels. CT dimensions were taken at T4, T6, T8, and T10 levels. At each level, left (L), midsagittal (C), and right (R) AP and maximal transverse diameters were measured. The sum of the three AP diameters (Total) was used for calculations. Patients also underwent tests such as spirometry, lung volumes, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and transdiaphragmatic pressures during maximum static inspiratory efforts (Pdimax sniff) measured before and 3 months after LVRS. Patients were (mean ± SD) 58 ± 8 years old, with severe COPD and hyperinflation (FEV1, 0.68 ± 0.23 L; FVC, 2.56 ± 7.3 L; and total lung capacity[TLC], 143 ± 22% predicted). After LVRS, AP diameters were reduced at thoracic level T7 (from 24.2 ± 2.0 cm to 23.3 ± 2.2 cm, p = 0.0002), and transverse diameters were reduced at T7 (from 26.8 ± 1.9 cm to 26.4 ± 1.7 cm, p = 0.001) and T11 (from 29.9 ± 2.2 cm to 29.5 ± 2.2 cm, p = 0.03), as measured using the CXR. In contrast, thoracic diameters were similar in subjects with CXRs before LVRS and within 1 year before evaluation. CT-measured AP diameters were significantly reduced 3 months after LVRS at T6, (from 48.8 ± 6.0 cm to 46.7 ± 5.4 cm, p = 0.02), T8 (from 54.2 ± 7.0 cm to 52.3 ± 6.5 cm, p = 0.004), and T10 (from 53.8 ± 7.5 cm to 51.2 ± 8.0 cm, p = 0.001), but not at T4. These AP diameter reductions directly correlated with the postoperative reductions in TLC and residual volume, and also with the increases in Pdimax sniff and 6MWD after LVRS. The reduction in AP diameters at thoracic levels T8 and T10 seen 3 months after LVRS remained stable at 12-month follow-up, whereas those measured at T6 lost statistical significance. CT-measured transverse diameters were unchanged at all levels after LVRS.We conclude that LVRS decreases mid-to-lower AP rib cage diameter as assessed by CXR and thoracic CT. Although transverse diameters were reduced on CXR, the magnitude was small and was not confirmed with CT. After LVRS, AP diameter reductions are most likely the result of reduction in lung volume, and they are associated with improvements in diaphragm strength and exercise endurance.

A note on the continuous humming murmur heard in the supra and infraclavicular fossae and over the manubrium sterni in children: Palmer, Robert S., and White, Paul D.: New England J. Med. 199: 1297, 1928

Hyperinflation in patients with severe COPD is associated with an increased anteroposterior (AP) rib cage diameter. We sought to determine whether bilateral lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) affects bony thorax configuration.Prospective of clinical data collection before and after LVRS.Tertiary-care university medical center.We measured multiple AP and transverse thoracic diameters, by using plain chest roentgenograms (CXRs) in 25 patients (11 men, 14 women), and thoracic CT scans in 14 patients (7 men, 7 women), preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. A subgroup of 7 patients (reference data) also had CXR thoracic diameter measurements made, using films obtained previously within a year of their presurgical evaluation. Another subgroup of 10 patients had CT scan measurements also made 12 months postoperatively.CXR dimensions were taken at the level of the manubrium sterni (M) and thoracic T7 and T11 levels. CT dimensions were taken at T4, T6, T8, and T10 levels. At each level, left (L), midsagittal (C), and right (R) AP and maximal transverse diameters were measured. The sum of the three AP diameters (Total) was used for calculations. Patients also underwent tests such as spirometry, lung volumes, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and transdiaphragmatic pressures during maximum static inspiratory efforts (Pdimax sniff) measured before and 3 months after LVRS. Patients were (mean ± SD) 58 ± 8 years old, with severe COPD and hyperinflation (FEV1, 0.68 ± 0.23 L; FVC, 2.56 ± 7.3 L; and total lung capacity[TLC], 143 ± 22% predicted). After LVRS, AP diameters were reduced at thoracic level T7 (from 24.2 ± 2.0 cm to 23.3 ± 2.2 cm, p = 0.0002), and transverse diameters were reduced at T7 (from 26.8 ± 1.9 cm to 26.4 ± 1.7 cm, p = 0.001) and T11 (from 29.9 ± 2.2 cm to 29.5 ± 2.2 cm, p = 0.03), as measured using the CXR. In contrast, thoracic diameters were similar in subjects with CXRs before LVRS and within 1 year before evaluation. CT-measured AP diameters were significantly reduced 3 months after LVRS at T6, (from 48.8 ± 6.0 cm to 46.7 ± 5.4 cm, p = 0.02), T8 (from 54.2 ± 7.0 cm to 52.3 ± 6.5 cm, p = 0.004), and T10 (from 53.8 ± 7.5 cm to 51.2 ± 8.0 cm, p = 0.001), but not at T4. These AP diameter reductions directly correlated with the postoperative reductions in TLC and residual volume, and also with the increases in Pdimax sniff and 6MWD after LVRS. The reduction in AP diameters at thoracic levels T8 and T10 seen 3 months after LVRS remained stable at 12-month follow-up, whereas those measured at T6 lost statistical significance. CT-measured transverse diameters were unchanged at all levels after LVRS.We conclude that LVRS decreases mid-to-lower AP rib cage diameter as assessed by CXR and thoracic CT. Although transverse diameters were reduced on CXR, the magnitude was small and was not confirmed with CT. After LVRS, AP diameter reductions are most likely the result of reduction in lung volume, and they are associated with improvements in diaphragm strength and exercise endurance.