Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Research Articles

Revascularización quirúrgica utilizando dos arterias torácicas internas en Sudamérica

La derivación de la arteria coronaria utilizando la arteria torácica interna bilateral se ha relacionado con beneficios de supervivencia en pacientes con enfermedad arterial coronaria, pero los datos no son concluyentes. En Sudamérica, varios centros reportaron su propia experiencia con buenos resultados en supervivencia, mínimos eventos cardiovasculares postoperatorios y un bajo grado de infección mediastínica, sin embargo, el número de casos es bajo y la ausencia de publicaciones en varios países es preocupante. Revisamos las principales publicaciones sobre el injerto de arteria torácica interna bilateral en nuestra región, evaluando cuánto hemos avanzado en la cirugía coronaria.

Bilateral internal thoracic artery versus single internal thoracic artery plus radial artery: A double meta-analytic approach

ObjectivesWe explored the current evidence on the best second conduit in coronary surgery carrying out a double meta-analysis of propensity score matched or adjusted studies comparing bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) versus single internal thoracic artery plus radial artery. MethodsPubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched for propensity score matched or adjusted studies comparing BITA versus single internal thoracic artery plus radial artery. The end point was long-term mortality. Two statistical approaches were used: the generic inverse variance method and the pooled meta-analysis of Kaplan–Meier-derived individual patient data. ResultsTwelve matched populations comparing 6450 patients with BITA versus 9428 patients with single internal thoracic artery plus radial artery were included in our meta-analysis. The generic inverse variance method showed a statistically significant survival benefit of the BITA group (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.95; P = .04). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years of the BITA group were 97.0%, 91.3%, 80.0%, and 68.0%, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years of the single internal thoracic artery plus radial artery group were 97.3%, 91.5%, 79.9%, and 63.9%, respectively. The Kaplan–Meier-derived individual patient data meta-analysis applied to very long follow-up time data, showed that BITA provided a survival benefit after 10 years from surgery (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.94; P = .01). No differences in terms of survival between the 2 groups were detected when the analysis was focused on the first 10 years of follow-up (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.91-1.09; P = .93). ConclusionsThe present meta-analysis suggests that double internal thoracic artery may provide, compared with single internal thoracic artery plus radial artery, a statistically significant survival advantage after 10 years of follow-up, but not before. Video Abstract [Display omitted]

Hybrid single staged treatment of coronary arteries and aorto-iliac obstruction disease: a case report

BackgroundIf the internal thoracic artery is a collateral circulation to the lower extremities, careful consideration should be given to its use when coronary artery bypass grafting is required. We report a case of CABG with bilateral common iliac artery lesions and collateral circulation from the bilateral ITAs on the peripheral side.Case presentationA 58-year-old man was admitted to our department with claudication and dyspnea upon exertion. He was diagnosed with right common iliac artery obstruction and 90% stenosis of the left common iliac artery. Coronary angiography revealed three-vessel disease with 50% stenosis of the left main trunk. The bilateral ITA showed a rich collateral flow to the lower extremities. Hybrid single staged repair with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the left iliac lesion was performed, followed by off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and femoro-femoral crossover bypass. Postoperative angiography revealed that all grafts were patent. The postoperative course was uneventful, except that the patient’s creatinine kinase level increased to 7177 U/L on postoperative day 1.ConclusionTo treat coronary artery disease with peripheral artery disease, especially those with iliac artery occlusion lesions with collateral circulation from the ITA, not only graft selection but also the treatment strategies for peripheral lesions are considered extremely important. Hybrid single staged coronary and lower limb artery revascularization could be safely achieved by multidisciplinary team strategies.

Impact of transit-time flow measurement on early postoperative outcomes in total arterial coronary revascularization with internal thoracic arteries: a propensity score analysis on 910 patients.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of transit-time flow measurement (TTFM) on early postoperative outcomes in total arterial coronary revascularization. A single-centre retrospective analysis was conducted on 910 patients undergoing isolated total arterial coronary artery bypass grafting with internal thoracic arteries (ITAs) at our institution, between January 2017 and February 2020. Complete arterial revascularization with bilateral ITAs with a Y-configuration, or single ITA, was planned for all patients. According to the surgeon preference, TTFM was assessed in 430 patients (TTFM group). They were compared with 480 patients without TTFM assessment (no TTFM group). Primary end point was the occurrence of in-hospital major cardiac adverse events (MACE). A propensity score analysis with an inverse probability weighting approach was performed to control for selection bias. TTFM was associated with longer cardiopulmonary bypass times (76.0 [62.0; 91.2] vs 79.0 [65.0; 94.0] min, P = 0.042). Six (1.4%) patients in the TTFM group versus no patient in the no TTFM group underwent intraoperative graft revision because of unsatisfying flow values (P = 0.011). MACE were significantly lower in the TTFM group (14, 3.3%) than in the no TTFM group (33, 6.9%, P = 0.014). At crude regression, TTFM was protective against MACE occurrence (odds ratios 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.85, P = 0.016). Inverse probability weighting adjustment did not significantly displace P-values and odds ratios for MACE occurrence in the TTFM group 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.69, P < 0.001. Even if associated with longer cardiopulmonary bypass times, intraoperative graft flow measurement with TTFM reduces MACE occurrence and it should be recommended for graft evaluation in arterial coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery As A Composite Arterial Grafts Used In Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery As A Composite Arterial Grafts Used In Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein as Third Conduit in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: a Ten-Year Literature Review.

Coronary artery bypass grafting is the gold standard strategy for obtaining complete coronary revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. The recent AHA and EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization recommend total arterial revascularization, especially in younger patients, whenever possible. However, the use of saphenous vein grafts in association with single or bilateral internal thoracic artery (SITA, BITA) instead of arterial grafts (radial arteries, right gastroepiploic artery and inferior epigastric artery) is widespread. We analyzed literature from the last ten years (January 2010 to December 2020) looking for evidence in favour of the use of a radial artery compared to a saphenous vein in association with BITA. We identified nine studies (4 Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses and 6 large cohort observational studies with propensity score-matching) that compared arterial with saphenous grafts as third conduit. The main finding of the review is the higher rate of freedom from any cardiac adverse event in the population which reached Total Arterial myocardial Revascularization (TAR). A probable reason for the limited application of TAR as a strategy is the shortage of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). (www.actabiomedica.it)

Risk Factors for Deep Sternal Wound Infection after Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: a Case-Control Study.

IntroductionThe objective of this study was to identify risk factors for deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) after off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting surgery.MethodsA total of 8,442 patients undergoing OPCAB from April 1, 2009 to December 31, 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 956 were eventually enrolled on this study based on our exclusion criteria. All subjects were divided into two groups: group 1 (n=63) - DSWI; group 2 (n=893) - without DSWI. Patients were excluded if they had one of the following: acute coronary syndrome, conversion to OPCAB grafting surgery, redo procedure, concomitant cardiac surgery procedures.ResultsThe prevalence of body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m2 (7.9% vs. 1.9%, respectively; P=0.01), lower extremity atherosclerotic artery disease (23.8% vs. 7.2%, respectively; P=0.001) and use of bilateral internal thoracic artery (19.5% vs. 2.5%, respectively; P=0.008) was significantly higher in patients with DSWI. The incidence of morbidities, including reoperation for bleeding (26.4% vs. 2.1%, respectively; P<0.001), stroke (4.8% vs. 0.8%, respectively; P=0.02), acute renal failure (7.9% vs. 0.8%, respectively; P=0.001), delirium (7.9% vs. 1.7%, respectively; P=0.008) and blood transfusion (30.6% vs. 9.8%, respectively; P<0.001) was significantly higher in patients with DSWI.ConclusionsA BMI of >40 kg/m2, lower extremity artery disease, use of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) graft, postoperative stroke, sepsis, reoperation due to postoperative complications and blood product requirement significantly increased the risk of sternal infection after OPCAB.

Is There a Protective Effect of Sequential Grafting in Coronary Bypass Surgery Using Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery?

From 1989 to 2014, 1644 patients underwent BITA surgery without any additional arterial graft. The revascularization of the left side was optimized with a sequential ITA graft in 824 patients. The revascularization of the right side was performed with an associated vein graft in 599 patients. Propensity score was calculated by logistic regression model and patients were matched 1 to 1 leading to two groups of 334 matched patients. The primary end point was overall mortality from any cause.

Bilateral internal thoracic artery coronary grafting: risks and benefits in elderly patients.

Whether bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting benefits elderly patients in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains unclear since they tend to have a limited life expectancy and severe comorbidities. We aim to evaluate the outcomes of BITA vs. single internal thoracic artery (SITA) grafting in elderly patients. A meta-analysis was performed by database searching until May 2021. Studies comparing BITA and SITA grafting among elderly patients were included. One randomized controlled trial, nine propensity score matching, and six unmatched studies were identified, with a total of 18146 patients (7422 received BITA grafting and 10724 received SITA grafting). Compared with SITA grafting, BITA grafting had a higher risk of deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) [odds ratio: 1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22-2.28], and this risk could not be significantly reduced by the skeletonization technique. Meanwhile, BITA grafting was associated with a higher long-term survival [hazard ratio: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.77-0.90], except for the octogenarian subgroup. Reconstructed Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed 4-year, 8-year, and 12-year overall survival rates of 85.5%, 66.7%, and 45.3%, respectively, in the BITA group and 79.3%, 58.6%, and 34.9%, respectively, in the SITA group. No significant difference was observed in early mortality, perioperative myocardial infarction, perioperative cerebral vascular accidents, or re-exploration for bleeding. Compared with SITA grafting, BITA grafting could provide a long-term survival benefit for elderly patients, although this benefit remained uncertain in octogenarians. Meanwhile, elderly patients who received BITA were associated with a higher risk of DSWI and such a risk could not be eliminated by the skeletonization technique.

Association between sternal wound complications and 10-year mortality following coronary artery bypass grafting

ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between sternal wound complications (SWC) and long-term mortality in the Arterial Revascularization Trial. MethodsParticipants in the Arterial Revascularization Trial were stratified according to the occurrence of postoperative SWC. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at long-term follow-up. The secondary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events. ResultsThree thousand one hundred two patients were included in the analysis; the median follow-up was 10 years. 115 patients (3.7%) had postoperative SWC: 85 (73.9%) deep sternal wound infections and 30 (26.1%) sterile SWC that required sternal reconstruction. Independent predictors of SWC included diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 2.77; 95% CI, 1.79-4.30; P < .001), female sex (OR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.71-4.38; P < .001), prior stroke (OR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.12-5.98; P = .03), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.60-3.71; P < .001), and use of bilateral internal thoracic artery (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.12-2.59; P = .01). Postoperative SWC was significantly associated with long-term mortality. The Kaplan-Meier survival estimate was 91.3% at 5 years and 79.4% at 10 years in patients without SWC, and 86.1% and 64.3% in patients with SWC (log rank P < .001). The rate of major adverse cardiovascular events was also higher among patients who had SWC (n = 51 [44.3%] vs 758 [25.4%]; P < .001). Using multivariable analysis, the occurrence of SWC was independently associated with long-term mortality (hazard ratio, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.30-2.54; P < .001). ConclusionsIn the Arterial Revascularization Trial, postoperative SWC although uncommon were significantly associated with long-term mortality.

Bilateral internal thoracic artery use in two-vessel disease does not increase the perioperative risk—A propensity score matched analysis

BackgroundBilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA) are uncommonly used in the every-day practice due to safety concerns and technical challenges with Y-grafts. We hypothesized that in-situ BITA use during coronary artery by-pass grafting (CABG) for two vessel disease is equally safe to standard strategy with left internal thoracic artery-left anterior descending artery revascularization and venous graft to other target vessels.MethodsA propensity score matched analysis was used to compare elective on-pump CABG patients who received in-situ BITA (BITA-group), versus left internal thoracic artery graft to the left anterior descending artery plus vein (SITA-group). Primary end points were 30-days all-cause-mortality, major adverse cardiac events and incidents and deep sternal wound infections.ResultsA total of 50 matched pairs (c-statistics 0.769) were selected from patients operated on between January 2015 and April 2020 using BITA (n = 50) and SITA (n = 2170). There were no inter-group differences in demographics and basic clinical characteristics. The total operation time was longer in the BITA-group (4.0 vs 3.6 hours; p = 0.004). The rate of complete revascularization was similar, as was median aortic cross-clamp time, median extracorporeal circulation time, rate of re-explorations for bleeding, deep sternal wound infections or length of stay. One patient died in BITA group, 3 days after surgery, from a non-cardiac cause. After 36 months, the survival rate was 98% for BITA-group and 96% for controls (log-rank, p = 0.577).ConclusionsIn-situ use of BITA during coronary revascularization for two-vessel disease is as safe and effective, as use of single ITA and vein graft. In-situ strategy abolishes allows to avoid the technically demanding composite graft configuration.

Science, Medicine, and the Anesthesiologist

Science, Medicine, and the Anesthesiologist

Additional survival benefit of bilateral in situ internal thoracic artery grafting with composite radial artery graft in total arterial off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

ObjectiveThis study aimed to elucidate whether the use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITAs) confers additional survival benefits compared with a single internal thoracic artery (SITA) in total arterial grafting with the radial artery. MethodsBetween 2002 and 2016, 617 patients underwent a bilateral in situ internal thoracic artery grafting with the radial artery as a composite I-graft (BITA-I group) and 516 patients underwent single in situ internal thoracic artery grafting with the radial artery as a composite Y-graft (SITA-Y group). All anastomoses were performed without cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic manipulation. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust covariates and compared the outcomes between the 2 groups. Subanalysis was also performed to evaluate the effects of the BITA-I group on survival according to the covariates using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. ResultsPropensity score matching yielded 348 well-matched pairs. Early postoperative outcomes were similar in the 2 groups. The BITA-I group showed significantly better survival than the SITA-Y group (79.3% vs 70.2% at 10 years, P = .015). The subanalysis revealed a significantly better survival in the BITA-I group among overall patients (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.93). There was a significant positive effect on survival in the BITA-I group among patients without comorbidities or those aged <77 years. ConclusionsBITA grafting with the radial artery provides better long-term survival than SITA grafting with the radial artery, which is enhanced among patients aged <77 years with minimum comorbidities.

Robotic Total Endoscopic Coronary Bypass in 570 Patients: Impact of Anastomotic Technique in Two Eras

BackgroundIn coronary artery bypass grafting, including robotic off-pump totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB), the anastomotic technique is the most critical part of the procedure. We reviewed results in 570 patients over a 7-year period and compared outcomes between two eras based on predominant anastomotic technique: connectors vs running suture. MethodsBetween July 2013 and December 2020, 570 patients underwent off-pump TECAB: group 1 consisting of 378 patients, from July 2013 to August 2018, using predominantly the C-Port Flex A distal anastomotic stapler (Aesculap); and group 2 consisting of 192 patients, from September 2018 to December 2020, using predominantly a sutured technique (7-0 Pronova; Johnson & Johnson). Retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes was performed. ResultsOff-pump TECAB was completed in 98.8% (563 of 570 patients) with an observed/expected mortality of 0.6% (6 of 570 patients). The anastomotic device was used in 89% of 626 grafts in group 1 and only 11% of 305 grafts in group 2 (P = .001). There were no differences in multivessel TECAB (57% vs 53%; P = .331) or bilateral internal thoracic artery use (50% vs 43%; P = .127) in group 1 vs group 2, respectively. Operative time was shorter in group 1 (242 ± 84 vs 273 ± 88 minutes; P < .001). Early clinical outcomes were similar between groups, except for hospital stay, which was longer in group 1 (2.9 vs 2.3 days; P < .001). Graft patency was similar (98% vs 95%; P = .295) in group 1 vs group 2, respectively. ConclusionsChanging the predominant approach from stapled anastomosis to a sutured technique during robotic TECAB resulted in longer operative times. Both approaches led to excellent outcomes, including graft patency. The shorter operative times conferred by using staplers may flatten the learning curve and facilitate broader adoption of TECAB.

Saphenous Vein vs Arterial Graft to the Right System in Left-Sided Arterial Revascularization

BackgroundTo investigate clinical outcomes of various arterial grafts (AGs) vs saphenous vein grafts (VGs) to the right coronary system in patients who received left-sided bilateral internal thoracic artery revascularization. MethodsWe compared short- and long-term outcomes of all the patients operated in our center during 1996-2011, who received left-sided bilateral internal thoracic artery (left anterior descending and left circumflex) grafting and either a VG or an AG to the right coronary system. ResultsOf 1691 patients, 983 received a VG and 708 received an AG to the right coronary system: 387 gastroepiploic arteries and 321 internal thoracic artery grafts. The median follow-up was 15.7 ± 0.32 years. For the VG and AG groups, early mortality (1.6% for VG and 1.3% for AG, P = .55) and other early adverse outcomes did not differ. Long-term (up to 20 years) survival was similar (34.1% ± 3.4% for VG vs 36.0% ±2% for AG, P = .86). In multivariable analysis, VG to the right coronary artery was not found to be a predictor of inferior survival (hazard ratio: 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.836-1.194, P = .99). Comparing 2 propensity-matched groups of 349 pairs with a VG or an AG, and accounting for the severity of the right coronary lesion, did not demonstrate differences in early outcome or late survival between the groups. ConclusionsEarly outcomes and long-term survival were comparable among patients who received left-sided bilateral internal thoracic artery revascularization, between various graft types to the right coronary system.

Superiority of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in long-term survival after coronary artery bypass through the lenses of a bedside risk score

ObjectiveRisk algorithms for the prediction of long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) do not include the use of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting among the independent predictors. We sought to reveal the superiority of BITA grafting in the long-term outcome through the lenses of an existing bedside risk score (BRS). MethodsThis study analyzed data from 5,666 consecutive patients undergoing isolated (n = 4,715 – BITA = 2,792) and combined (n = 951 – BITA = 246) CABG. The mean follow-up period was 10.3 years (interquartile range, 9.9 years). All the predictors of an existing BRS were available for analysis (age, body mass index, ejection fraction, unstable hemodynamic state, left main disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease, congestive heart failure, malignant ventricular arrhythmia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, and previous heart surgery). Furthermore, a modified BRS was constructed taking into account the use of BITA grafting and combined CABG. ResultsThe good discriminatory ability and satisfactory calibration of the BRS was confirmed in the isolated CABG subgroup. The modified BRS showed improved discriminatory ability and similar calibration. It showed a time-varying coefficient, and accordingly, we calculated the adjusted survival predictions up to 20 years after isolated and combined CABG with or without BITA grafting. Patients with BITA grafting in the low-risk quartile showed 68.4% and 65.5% predicted survival rates at 20 years in the isolated and combined CABG subgroups, respectively, versus the survival rates of 56.4% and 52.8% observed among patients without BITA grafting. ConclusionThe modified BRS is a useful simplified algorithm for clinicians in choosing treatment intervention for severe isolated or combined coronary artery disease. We clearly demonstrated the superiority of BITA grafting in long-term survival throughout the entire range of the modified BRS.

Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting Improves Survival for Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Diabetes.

In patients with severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction requiring coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the association between diabetic status and outcomes after surgery, as well as with survival benefit following bilateral internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafting, remain largely unknown. Patients (n=188; mean [±SD] age 67±9 years) with LV ejection fraction ≤40% who underwent isolated initial CABG were classified into non-diabetic (n=64), non-insulin-dependent diabetic (NIDM; n=74), and insulin-dependent diabetic (IDM; n=50) groups. During follow-up (mean [±SD] 68±47 months), the 5-year survival rate was 84% and 65% among non-diabetic and diabetic patients, respectively (P=0.034). After adjusting for all covariates, both NIDM and IDM were associated with increased mortality, with hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-3.7; P=0.049) and 2.4 (95% CI 1.2-4.8; P=0.016), respectively. Among non-diabetic patients, there was no difference in the 5-year survival rate between single and bilateral ITA grafting (86% vs. 80%, respectively; P=0.95), whereas bilateral ITA grafting increased survival among diabetic patients (57% vs. 81%; P=0.004). Multivariate analysis revealed that bilateral ITA was significantly associated with a decreased risk of mortality (HR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1-0.8; P=0.024). NIDM and IDM were significantly associated with worse long-term clinical outcome after CABG for severe LV dysfunction. Bilateral ITA grafting has the potential to improve survival in diabetic patients with severe LV dysfunction.

Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting in Hemodialysis Patients.

We compared postoperative outcomes in hemodialysis (HD) patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for multivessel disease using either bilateral or single skeletonized internal thoracic artery.Methods and Results:Among 1,486 patients who underwent isolated CABG between 2002 and 2020, 145 HD patients were retrospectively analyzed. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, there were no significant differences in the preoperative characteristics. No significant differences in 30-day mortality (P=0.551) or postoperative deep sternal wound infection (P=0.778) were observed. However, the bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting group had a lower postoperative stroke rate (0% vs. 4.0%, P=0.019). No significant differences in freedom from all-cause death (P=0.760) and cardiac death (P=0.863) were found. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting was not associated with all-cause death (P=0.246) or cardiac death (P=0.435). Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in HD patients did not improve mid-term outcomes, but it was also not associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Use of the bilateral internal thoracic artery may be an important option in patients with limited conduits to prevent postoperative complications.

Right Internal Thoracic Artery Patency Is Affected More by Target Choice Than Conduit Configuration

BackgroundAlthough coronary artery bypass grafting using bilateral internal thoracic arteries (ITA) maximizes long-term survival, knowledge of the effect of different right ITA (RITA) inflow configurations on graft patency is limited. We have compared RITA occlusion among these configurations and identified its risk factors while adjusting for outflow coronary target location. MethodsFrom January 1972 to January 2016, of 7092 patients undergoing bilateral ITA grafting at a single center, 1331 received one ITA to the left anterior descending coronary artery and had one or more evaluable postoperative coronary angiograms: 835 (63%) in situ, 496 free RITA grafts (311 [63%] originating from aorta; 98 [20%] left ITA [LITA], 76 [15%] saphenous vein graft, 11 [2%] radial graft). RITA occlusion reported on 1983 angiograms performed a median of 5.8 years later was estimated using nonlinear mixed-effects longitudinal modeling. ResultsRITA patency was 90% at 1 year, 87% at 5 years, and 86% at 10 and 15 years. At 15 years, in situ RITA patency was 91% and free RITA patency from aorta was 91%, LITA 89%, and saphenous vein graft 77%. After adjusting for coronary target location and degree of stenosis, occlusion was similar in free RITAs from aorta (P = .15), LITA (P = .4), saphenous vein grafts (P = .13), and in situ RITAs. However, RITAs grafted to the left anterior descending coronary artery had fewer occlusions (P < .001), with patency similar to LITAs. ConclusionsAmong patients with bilateral ITA grafting requiring interval coronary angiography, long-term RITA patency was high and independent of its inflow configuration. Therefore, priority should be a RITA configuration optimizing its reach to important coronary targets, including the left anterior descending coronary artery.

Risks and Outcomes of Reoperative Cardiac Surgery in Patients With Patent Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafts

BackgroundReoperative cardiac surgery in patients with patent bilateral internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafts is technically challenging. MethodsFrom 2008 to 2017, of 7640 patients undergoing reoperative cardiac surgery, 116 (1.5%) had patent bilateral ITA grafts, including 28 with a right ITA crossing the midline. Mean age was 70 ± 9.6 years, and 111 patients (96%) were men. Reoperations included isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 11), isolated valve (n = 55), valve + coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 26), and other procedures (n = 24). Clinical details, intraoperative management, and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. ResultsAortic cannulation was central in 64 patients (56%) and through the femoral or axillary artery in 50 (44%). Four patients (3.4%) had planned transection and reattachment of ITAs crossing the midline, and 4 (3.4%) had ITA injuries, all right ITAs, 3 crossing the midline; 3 were repaired with an interposition vein graft, and 1 was managed by translocating the right ITA as a Y-graft off another graft. Patent ITAs were managed by atraumatic occlusion during aortic clamping in 90 patients (78%) and by systemic cooling without ITA occlusion in 19. There were 6 operative deaths, all due to low cardiac output syndrome (5.2%); 4 strokes (3.4%); and 5 cases of new postoperative dialysis (4.3%). ConclusionsRisk of injury to bilateral ITA grafts during reoperation is high, and right ITAs crossing the midline present a particular risk of injury and should inform planning for primary coronary artery bypass grafting. Risk of low cardiac output syndrome underscores the challenge of ensuring adequate myocardial protection.