Aims/Purpose: To report a well‐documented case of a 62‐year‐old woman presenting with VKH‐like findings as the first manifestation of neuroleukaemia.Methods: Case study.Results: A 52‐year‐old woman who had received a diagnosis of acute myeloid monoblastic leukaemia (AML) one month prior and was in remission after the induction phase presented with floaters and gradual visual loss in both eyes. Visual acuity was 20/200 and 20/25, respectively. Anterior segment exam was normal in both eyes. Funduscopy showed reduced foveal reflex. On spectral‐domain OCT, subretinal fluid was found in both eyes. Fluorescein angiography showed hypofluorescent areas compatible with multifocal serous retinal detachments and multiple hyperfluorescent dots surrounding the detached areas. Days after, the patient debuted with facial palsy and binocular diplopia due to bilateral VI cranial nerve (CN) palsy, left VII CN palsy and right complete III CN palsy. An MRI was performed with no signs of infiltration. A cerebrospinal fluid sample was drawn by lumbar puncture and its analysis denoted infiltration of AML cells with similar immunophenotype to that on initial bone marrow biopsy. Our patient presented with an atypical case of Vogt‐Koyanagi‐Harada (VKH) with multiple leakages along the periphery of the detached retinal area. This sparing of the macula should be considered a suspicious pattern, and combined with the finding of CN palsies was enough to suspect a relapse in the form of CSF infiltration, making the diagnosis of neuroleukaemia possible.Conclusions: Exudative retinal detachment can be a primary presentation of AML or denote a relapse. VKH is a diagnosis of exclusion, as one of the main criteria for its diagnosis is the absence of other systemic diseases. This becomes especially important in atypical presentations and older patients. So as not to miss life‐threatening underlying conditions, leukaemia and lymphoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of VKH.