Evidence from reproductive morphology and anatomy (excluding palynology) favors an inclusive Myrtales of 11 core families (see below) over either a much broader Myrtales, as advocated, for example, by the Englerian school (most recently Melchior, 1964) or a narrower Myrtales and accompanying Lythrales, as advocated by Novak (1961, 1972) and more recently and in a rather different manner by Briggs and Johnson (1979), who, however, withdrew their concept in this symposium (Johnson & Briggs, 1984; see also argumentation in the appendix in Schmid, 1980). Embryology provides the best evidence for a concept of core Myrtales consisting of Combretaceae, Crypteroniaceae, Lythraceae, Melastomataceae sensu lato, Myrtaceae (including Psiloxylaceae3 and Heteropyxidaceae; Schmid, 1980), Oliniaceae, Onagraceae, Penaeaceae, Punicaceae, Sonneratiaceae, and Trapaceae (familial arrangement strictly alphabetical; see also Tobe & Raven, 1983a). The following embryological traits unite core Myrtales: anthers tetrasporangiate*, with conspicuous endothecium*, glandular tapetum, simultaneous cytokinesis; ovules anatropous*, bitegmic*, crassinucellate; antipodals ephemeral or absent*; endosperm nuclear*; seeds exalbuminous*. The asterisks indicate that exceptions are known. Table 1 (pp. 834-835) lists such exceptions, which in some cases are known for only one family or even only one species, for example, the trisporangiate anther of Corynanthera flava of Myrtaceae (Green, 1979). Other embryological features such as nuclear condition of pollen at time of shedding, persistence of anther epidermis, and types of anther wall development, embryo sac, and embryogeny vary appreciably (see Table 1). Significantly, Dahlgren and Thorne (1984) and Tobe and Raven (1983a) independently arrived at a very similar complex of embryological characters unifying core Myrtales. Reproductive anatomy, that is, histology and vasculature, gives no special aid in resolving the makeup of Myrtales. Features such as bicollateral bundles (internal or intraxylary phloem) occur in peduncles, inflorescence axes, pedicels, flowers, and fruits of most myrtalean taxa (Schmid, 1972b, 1980, for Myrtaceae and Lythraceae; Schmid, unpubl. data and literature survey for other families). However, bicollateral bundles are really histological markers first described for vegetative parts of Myrtales and other orders (Cronquist, 1981; Dahlgren & Thorn, 1984; Metcalfe & Chalk, 1983; van Vliet & Baas, 1984) and then applied to their reproductive parts. The same pertains to vestured pits, which are unreported for myrtalean reproductive structures, but which occur in Lythraceae, Melastomataceae, Myrtaceae, Alzatea (Schmid, unpubl. data). In Myrtales, amphicribral bundles are common, especially in androecia and placentae (Schmid, 1972b, 1980, for Myrtaceae and Lythraceae; Schmid, unpubl. data and literature survey for other families). However, amphicribral bundles seem related to functional, nutritional factors for reasons elaborated elsewhere (Schmid, 1976, 1978). There are no unifying features of floral vasculature for Myrtales (nor for other orders), let alone Myrtaceae. An axile ovular supply (Schmid, 1972a) is most common and clearly basic; the derived transeptal ovular supply (Schmid, 1972a) occurs variously in Myrtaceae, Oliniaceae, Onagraceae, Punicaceae, and Rhynchocalyx of core Myrtales (Eyde, 1981; Schmid, 1972a, 1972b, 1980, unpubl. data and literature survey), as well as in Lecythidaceae sensu lato, Rhizophoraceae
Read full abstract