Bicipital Groove Research Articles

Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Using an All-Suture Anchor

Background: The long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) has long been considered an intra-articular pain generator in the shoulder. While nonoperative treatment modalities can be acceptable for less severe presentations of LHBT pathology, surgical treatment options such as tenotomy and tenodesis remain controversial for recalcitrant cases. Open subpectoral biceps tenodesis allows for removal of all pathologic tissue from the bicipital groove, and all-suture anchor fixation utilizes a small caliber unicortical drill hole, which can potentially reduce the risk of a stress riser and iatrogenic fracture. Indications: In this study, we present a male patient with a history of left anterolateral shoulder pain worse overhead activities who has failed extensive physical therapy and other conservative measures. After extensive discussion regarding the treatment options, surgery in the form of shoulder arthroscopy, extensive debridement, rotator cuff repair, and open subpectoral biceps tenodesis was recommended and the patient had opted to proceed. For the purposes of this video, we focus on the open subpectoral biceps tenodesis portion of the procedure. Results: Open subpectoral biceps tenodesis can reduce pain with low complication and high satisfaction rates. Discussion: In this surgical technique study, we underline the importance position of the skin incision in axillary crease as well as skin tensioning when making the incision and retracting the conjoint tendon. We also highlight a locking lasso loop and double luggage tag fixation technique using a double-loaded all-suture anchor for the biceps tenodesis. We also provide technique commentary for appropriate restin tension of the LHBT. Finally, we review outcomes, postoperative management, rehabilitation protocol, and technique pearls and pitfalls. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Prevalence of Abnormal Findings in the Posterosuperior Humeral Head of Asymptomatic Collegiate Baseball Pitchers Using Ultrasonography

BackgroundThe posterosuperior humeral head contacts the glenoid during pitching. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) often detects abnormalities in the posterosuperior humeral head of baseball pitchers, ultrasonography may also be effective in identifying these abnormalities. However, studies on such abnormalities in asymptomatic players are limited. Thus, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of abnormal findings in the humeral head using ultrasonography in asymptomatic collegiate baseball pitchers. MethodsWe utilized ultrasonography to assess abnormal findings in the humeral head, defined as a break in continuity or an irregular surface around the infraspinatus insertion, in 33 college baseball pitchers (pitcher group) and 30 college students without experience in overhead sports (control group). For 11 of the 33 pitchers, computed tomography (CT)-like images were used to locate the abnormalities. The location was quantitatively identified in the axial plane using a clock system, with the bicipital groove designated as 12 o’clock, and qualitatively assessed in the sagittal plane. Shoulder internal and external rotation ranges of motion (IR and ER ROMs) and humeral retroversion were measured using an inclinometer. The prevalence of abnormalities among the four subgroups (throwing and non-throwing shoulders of the pitcher group and dominant and non-dominant shoulders of the control group) was compared using the Fisher’s exact test. A paired t-test was also performed to compare the IR and ER ROMs, as well as the humeral retroversion between each group’s throwing (dominant) and non-throwing (non-dominant) sides. ResultsThe prevalence of abnormalities was significantly higher (76%) in the throwing shoulder of the pitcher group than in the other shoulder groups (< .001). The mean position of the humeral head abnormalities in the axial plane was 8:32 ± 0:21 in the clock system, with all abnormalities located at the infraspinatus insertion on the greater tuberosity in the sagittal plane according to CT-like image analysis. While ER ROM and humeral retroversion were greater in the throwing shoulder, IR ROM was less than that in the non-throwing shoulder in the pitcher group (< .001). ConclusionUltrasonographic assessments revealed a higher prevalence of abnormalities in humeral head for asymptomatic collegiate baseball pitchers. Repetitive throwing motions may lead not only to adaptations in the ROM of the shoulder joint but also to abnormalities in the humeral head. Thus, ultrasonography may help identify asymptomatic baseball players with physiological internal impingement.

Postoperative assessment of the individualized humeral component retroversion in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty—a novel method applying CT scans without an elbow

BackgroundHumeral component retroversion (HcRV) can be customized to match native humeral retroversion (RV) during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). However, assessing postoperative individualized HcRV using computed tomography (CT) scans without an elbow can be challenging. Therefore, we developed a new method to obtain the HcRV and evaluated its reliability. MethodsA total of 106 patients underwent RTSA using a single implant, in which the humeral component was implanted based on the preoperative humeral RV (Pre_HRV) using a bilateral CT scan of the elbow. Intraoperatively, a retroversion guide with version hole at 10° intervals was used; Pre_HRV was converted to 5° increments and applied for humeral component implantation. The axis of intertubercular sulcus (ITS) was defined as the line perpendicular to the intertubercular line, and the angle between the axis of ITS and the trans-epicondylar axis was defined as the bicipital groove rotation (BGR). ITS orientation was defined as the angle between the axis of ITS and the central axis of the humeral head. Since the BGR does not change, the postoperative implanted HcRV (Post_HcRV)f is calculated as the BGR minus the value of the postoperative ITS orientation. An agreement analysis was performed between Post_HcRV and both the intraoperatively applied humeral RV (I_HRV) and Pre_HRV, as well as between the pre- and postoperative ITS orientations. The humeral component’s insertional errors were also evaluated. ResultsAll radiologic measurements exhibited excellent inter- and intra-observer reliabilities. The reliabilities between Post_HcRV and both I_HRV and Pre_HRV, as well as between pre- and postoperative ITS orientations, showed excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficients: 0.953, 0.952, and 0.873, respectively). The humeral component was inserted within 5° in 86.8% of the planned humeral RV cases. ConclusionsThe HcRV measured using the BGR and ITS orientations achieved good accuracy for restoring the planned humeral RV using a retroversion guide with the forearm axis. Therefore, this new radiological measurement method can aid orthopedic surgeons in confirming Post_HcRV on CT scans without an elbow.

Poster 131: Loop 'N' Tack Tenodesis: A Multi-Center Retrospective Case Series of Clinical and Patient Reported Outcomes of a Novel Suture Technique for Proximal Biceps Tenodesis

Objectives: Tenodesis and tenotomy of the long head of the biceps are treatment options for a wide range of pathologies without clear superior technique or site of fixation. Tenotomy may result in a cosmetic “Popeye” deformity and fatigue pain. The Loop ‘N’ Tack technique is a quick, simple, and knotless technique for tenodesis of the long head of the biceps that can be completed entirely arthroscopically. The tensionless repair allows the biceps to scar within the biceps groove, thereby reducing subsidence and formation of a “Popeye" deformity and fatigue pain in the biceps seen with tenotomy alone while eliminating the ability to overtension. The primary objective will be to retrospectively report the clinical outcomes and associated complications of patients undergoing biceps tenodesis utilizing the Loop ‘N’ Tack technique at multiple institutions from 1/1/2015 – 7/25/2021. Methods: CPT procedure codes (29827,29823, 29826) were used to identify participants in the EHR (i.e., Epic) who underwent the Loop ‘N’ Tack biceps tenodesis technique by each author at 9 separate institutions. Patient reported outcomes (PRO) including Visual Analog Scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), UCLA Shoulder Rating Scale (UCLA), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) were recorded at multiple time points throughout the patient’s preoperative and postoperative course. Scores were compared to the established minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for each PRO to assess the viability of this tenodesis technique. Additional metrics including bicipital groove pain, Popeye deformity, and need for revision surgery were also recorded. Results: 1,473 patients were initially screened who underwent the Loop ‘N’ Tack biceps tenodesis technique. 82 patients were excluded secondary to limited follow up or lack of PRO data within the EHR. The average patient age was 64.7 years old with average follow up of 8.11 months. Mean preoperative PRO scores were 5.64 (2.13), 43.31 (20.38), 15.14 (3.52), 5.81 (1.92), and 49.24 (15.06) for the VAS, SANE, UCLA, SST, and ASES scores, respectively. Postoperative PRO scores at most recent follow up respectively measured 1.05 (1.66), 89.56 (17.06), 31.50 (4.01), 10.69 (1.92), and 89.48 (13.81). MCID was reached for each PRO at the 1-2 month mark postoperatively. 36 patients (2.6%) underwent revision surgery for biceps related pathology, while 40 patients (2.9%) required revision shoulder surgery for a separate pathology. Postoperative Popeye deformity was noted in 15 patients (1.08%). Conclusions: The Loop ‘N’ Tack technique results in high rates of patient satisfaction with improvement in shoulder related patient reported outcomes, low incidence of postoperative pain, and low rates of Popeye deformity. This case series establishes the Loop ‘N’ Tack technique as a viable tenodesis approach during shoulder arthroscopy for biceps related pathology.

Automatic bicipital groove identification in arthritic humeri for preoperative planning: A Random Forest Classifier approach

The bicipital groove is an important anatomical feature of the proximal humerus that needs to be identified during surgical planning for procedures such as shoulder arthroplasty and proximal humeral fracture reconstruction. Current algorithms for automatic identification prove ineffective in arthritic humeri due to the presence of osteophytes, reducing their usefulness for total shoulder arthroplasty. Our methodology involves the use of a Random Forest Classifier (RFC) to automatically detect the bicipital groove on segmented computed tomography scans of humeri. We evaluated our model on two distinct test datasets: one comprising non-arthritic humeri and another with arthritic humeri characterized by significant osteophytes. Our model detected the bicipital groove with a mean absolute error of less than 1mm on arthritic humeri, demonstrating a significant improvement over the previous gold standard approach. Successful identification of the bicipital groove with a high degree of accuracy even in arthritic humeri was accomplished. This model is open source and included in the python package shoulder.

All-suture anchor size and drill angle influence load to failure in a porcine model of subpectoral biceps tenodesis, a biomechanical study

BackgroundTenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon is frequently performed in shoulder surgery, and all-suture anchors have become more popular as fixation methods. However, uncertainty still exists regarding the ultimate load to failure of all-suture anchors and the best insertion angle at a cortical humeral insertion point.PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics of three types of all-suture anchors frequently used for biceps tenodesis. In addition, the influence of two different insertion angles was observed in a porcine humeri model.MethodsThe ultimate load to failure and failure mode of three types of all-suture anchors (1.6 FiberTak®, 1.9 FiberTak®, 2.6 FiberTak®, Arthrex®) applicable for subpectoral biceps tenodesis were evaluated at 90° and 45° insertion angles in 12 fresh-frozen porcine humeri. The anchors were inserted equally alternated in a randomized manner at three different insertion sites along the bicipital groove, and the suture tapes were knotted around a rod for pullout testing. In total, 36 anchors were evaluated in a universal testing machine (Zwick & Roell).ResultsThe 2.6 FiberTak® shows higher ultimate loads to failure with a 90° insertion angle (944.0 N ± 169.7 N; 537.0 N ± 308.8 N) compared to the 1.9 FiberTak® (677.8 N ± 57.7 N; 426.3 N ± 167.0 N, p-value: 0.0080) and 1.6 FiberTak® (733.0 N ± 67.6 N; 450.0 N ± 155.8 N, p-value: 0.0018). All anchor types show significantly higher ultimate loads to failure and smaller standard deviations at the 90° insertion angle than at the 45° insertion angle. The major failure mode was anchor pullout. Only the 2.6 FiberTak® anchors showed suture breakage as the major failure mode when placed with a 90° insertion angle.ConclusionsAll three all-suture anchors are suitable fixation methods for subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Regarding our data, we recommend 90° as the optimum insertion angle.Clinical relevanceThe influence of anchor size and insertion angle of an all-suture anchor should be known by the surgeon for optimizing ultimate loads to failure and for achieving a secure fixation.

Use of a Krackow suture technique with PEEK barrel augmentation for subscapularis repair is stronger than use of a Mason-Allen suture technique

BackgroundIn total shoulder arthroplasty, the subscapularis tendon is routinely mobilized, by tenotomy, peel, or lesser tuberosity osteotomy, to visualize the joint and allow proper implant positioning. Careful mobilization of the subscapularis is undertaken to achieve an anatomic tension-free repair. This cadaveric study tests the biomechanical differences of 2 repair techniques of the subscapularis peel (SP) compared to the classically described technique. We hypothesize that adaptation of this SP technique using a custom-designed polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) barrel in the bicipital groove may further stabilize suture repair of the subscapularis. MethodsTwenty paired cadaveric shoulder specimens underwent SP and repair via transosseous suture fixation. The PEEK barrel used was a laboratory prototype designed for the study (Catalyst OrthoScience, Naples, FL, USA). Five specimens were repaired using a traditional Mason-Allen suture; their paired shoulders were repaired using the PEEK barrel and a Mason-Allen suture. Five specimens were repaired using the Krackow suture; their paired shoulders were repaired using the PEEK barrel and a Krackow suture. Mechanical testing was performed using a uni-axial materials testing system with primary outcome of gap displacement and secondary outcomes of maximum load to failure and method of failure. ResultsThe Krackow repair method with and without PEEK augmentation was significantly stiffer than the Mason-Allen repair method with and without PEEK augmentation (P < .001 across all groups). Adding augmentation changed the strength of the Mason-Allen repair without achieving statistical significance (P = .0925). Intergroup differences in cyclic displacement were not statistically significant. The Krackow repair methods had higher mean maximal load at failure than the Mason-Allen repairs of 534 ± 108 N and 266 ± 98 N, respectively (P < .001). Maximum load at 5 mm displacement was significantly different across groups (P = .004). Methods of failure in the Mason-Allen technique groups included knot and tendon failure, and in the Krackow technique groups included suture failure and lesser tuberosity fracture. ConclusionRepairing the subscapularis with a Krackow suture is significantly stronger than a Mason-Allen repair in stiffness as well as load to failure. The results reported here compare a Krackow suture with a more common Mason-Allen suture configuration, and demonstrate the application of PEEK augmentation to subscapularis repair techniques. This study can guide surgeon selection of an ideal subscapularis repair technique for stemmed or stemless total shoulder arthroplasty.

Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis With Interference Screw Fixation: A Technique Video

Background: Management of long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) pathology is accomplished through a biceps tenotomy or tenodesis. While both modalities provide beneficial outcomes, a biceps tenodesis may confer improved cosmesis, functional outcomes, and decreased muscle cramping postoperatively. Many procedural considerations are undertaken prior to a tenodesis, such as the surgical approach and fixation device. While similar clinical outcomes are achieved between an open subpectoral and arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis (ASPBT) with interference screw (IS) fixation, the latter technique offers a minimally invasive modality. Indications: The primary indications for an ASPBT include superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) tears, LHBT tears, biceps instability, bicipital tunnel disease, biceps pulley lesions, and biceps tenosynovitis. Contraindications to the arthroscopic approach include a distal lesion of the biceps tendon below the pectoralis major tendon (PMT). The IS may be used to create a biomechanically stiffer construct. Technique Description: With the arthroscope in the lateral portal, the distal aspect of the bicipital groove proximal to the superior border of the PMT is identified and opened. The LHBT is subsequently mobilized and released. An anterosuperolateral portal is localized with a spinal needle positioned perpendicular to the bicipital tunnel, 1.5 cm proximal to the superior border of the PMT. The biceps is then removed ex vivo and whip-stitches are sewn beginning 1 cm proximal to the myotendinous junction of the LHBT. After firmly associating the LHBT with the tip of the IS, a guidewire is placed 1.5 cm superior to the superior border of the PMT, perpendicular to the humerus, and a reamer is used to prepare a 6-, 7-, or 8-mm diameter socket. The tendon is inserted through the accessory portal into the tunnel, followed by screw fixation. Suture tails are tied with 5 alternating half hitches, each secured via an arthroscopic knot pusher. Results: ASPBT with IS fixation provides significant pain relief, improves range of motion (ROM), and enhances quality of life. Discussion: ASPBT with IS fixation provides significant improvements in patient-reported and functional outcomes and thus can be an acceptable treatment for LHBT pathology. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

The use of the bicipital groove as an intraoperative landmark for proximal humeral rotation during fracture fixation

The use of the bicipital groove as an intraoperative landmark for proximal humeral rotation during fracture fixation

Investigation of the pressure value while performing biceps tenodesis for superior capsuler reconstruction

BackgroundTo compare the histopathological results of biceps tenodesis (BT) performed with normal, low, and high pressures for superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) in rabbits with massive rotator cuff tears.Materials and methodsThirty rabbits were divided into three groups. Rabbits 1–10 underwent SCR with BT at the same pressure (Group 1), value measured in the groove; 50% lower (Group 2); 50% higher (Group 3). After the 4-week follow-up, shoulder were en-bloc excised and histopathological evaluation was performed with modified Bonar’s scale. Results were compared between the groups, statistically.ResultsExtracellular matrix were significantly lower in group 2 compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). Cellularity levels were significantly lower in group 2 compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). Group 2 had no difference between the sides (p > 0.05). Group 2 had lower vascularity levels compared to the other groups (p = 0.01).DicsussionWhen the biceps tendon was in the bicipital groove and in a more mobile state with lower pressure exposure. BT performed with a tension that creates less pressure than the biceps in the groove is more successful in SCR.

Return to Sports and Clinical Results After All-Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis Using a 2.7-mm Knotless PEEK Suture Anchor.

The long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) is a well-known source of pain in the shoulder, especially in active patients. To evaluate the outcomes and return-to-sports rate after all-arthroscopic suprapectoral tenodesis of the LHBT using a small knotless anchor. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. In this retrospective study, 27 patients-who underwent all-arthroscopic tenodesis of the LHBT using a 2.7-mm knotless polyether ether ketone anchor-were evaluated. Sports activities, the return-to-sports rate, and other sports-related parameters (eg, pain during sports, level of sports) were examined. Sports-related data, the Constant score with isometric force (at 90° of abduction in the scapular plane), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score, the visual analog scale (VAS) score for satisfaction, range of motion, and the presence of a Popeye deformity were assessed at a mean follow-up of 15.3 ± 8.7 months. The data were initially analyzed using descriptive statistics. The postoperative ASES, Constant, and SST scores were 81.61, 85.74 and 8.85, respectively. Of the 27 patients, 4 patients (14.8%) showed a Popeye deformity. Preoperatively, 25 patients (92.6%) participated regularly in some type of sports activity. All 25 patients (100.0%) were able to return to sports activities after surgery. 24 (96.0%) returned to the same level preoperatively, with 88.0% (22/25) within 6 months. Patient satisfaction with the outcome was high (VAS score: 2.15 ± 2.78). Neither bicipital groove pain nor cramping was reported. There were no signs of osteolytic bone around the anchor or a fracture of the humeral bone. Our clinical results after using a 2.7-mm knotless anchor for LHBT tenodesis as well as the return-to-sports rate were satisfying. Using an anchor this size can lower the risk of cortical bone damage and therefore the risk of fractures of the humeral head while still enabling patients to perform at a high level.

No clinical difference in outcomes between inlay and onlay arthroscopic biceps tenodesis techniques during rotator cuff repair

BackgroundBoth inlay and onlay arthroscopic biceps tenodesis (ABT) are common procedures performed during rotator cuff repair. The inlay method involves creating a bone socket in the bicipital groove to secure the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) using an interference screw. The onlay method utilizes a suture anchor to secure the LHBT on the surface of the bicipital groove. Little is known on the long-term differences in patient reported outcomes (PROs) between these two techniques. The primary purpose of this study was to compare PROs of inlay versus onlay ABT with a minimum follow-up of two years. Secondary aims were to evaluate the impact of rotator cuff tear size on outcomes and compare rates of complications between the two techniques. MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients who had an ABT during a full-thickness rotator cuff repair. Any symptom specific to the biceps were noted, including pain and cramping, Popeye deformity, or revision surgery. Complication rates were compared between groups. The VAS pain score, ASES, SANE, and VR-12 scores were compared at two years. The impact of rotator cuff tear size was analyzed by categorizing into small/medium or large/massive based on operative reports and arthroscopic images. ResultsThere were 165 patients identified (106 in the inlay group and 59 in the onlay group). No revision surgeries were performed secondary to the biceps tendon in either group. Eleven patients (10%) in the inlay group complained of biceps pain or cramping compared to 2 patients (3%) in the onlay group (p = .11). One Popeye deformity was noted in each group (p = .67). No significant differences were found between groups for VAS (p=.41), ASES functional (p = .61), ASES Index (p = .91), SANE (p = .09), VR-12 PCS (p = .77), or VR-12 MCS (p = .09). Rotator cuff tear size within the groups also did not demonstrate statistical significance. ConclusionNo clinical differences or complications were found at minimum two-year follow-up between inlay and onlay arthroscopic biceps tenodesis in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair when controlling for tear size. The clinical relevance suggests either technique is effective and can be based on surgeon preference.

Examining the Dimensions of the Bicipital Groove: A Human Cadaveric Study.

Introduction Understanding the mechanisms and risk factors associated with bicipital groove (BG) morphology is essential for optimizing patient outcomes. Despite interest in the topic of BG morphology, there remains a lack of clarity and consensus on the parameters of BG morphology due tosignificant methodological limitations in the existing research. The purpose of this study is to explore the dimensions of BG morphologywith a methodology rooted in recent research findings to better understand the human anatomy, potentially underpinning various shoulder pathologies. Methods The right shoulders of seventeen cadavers (nine male and eight female; median age of death: 88.0 years; age of death range: 66.0 - 97.0 years) were included in this cadaveric study. Dissection was done by removing the deltoid musculature and reflecting the long head of the biceps tendon to expose the BG. Measurements for BG morphology included BG width (millimeters, mm), depth (mm), and length (mm). Statistical comparisons were done between male and female measurements using the independent-samples Mann-Whitney U test due to the small sample size. Results The median width of the BG at the narrowest point was 4.3mm(mean: 4.7 ± 1.4 mm; range: 3.0 - 7.7 mm) with male cadavers having a significantly wider BG as compared to female cadavers (median: 5.0 mm versus 3.7 mm; p=0.006). The median depth of the BG was 5.1 mm (mean: 5.0 ± 0.7 mm; range: 3.8 - 6.3 mm) with no statistically significant differencebetween male and female cadavers (median: 4.8 mm versus 5.3 mm; p=0.370). The median length of the BG was 25.1 mm (mean: 25.1 ± 3.3 mm; range: 18.1 - 31.3 mm) with no statistically significant differencebetween male and female cadavers (median: 25.4 mm versus 23.9 mm; p=0.673). Conclusion The width of the BG at the narrowest point was significantly larger in male cadavers as compared to female cadavers in this study. However, there was no difference between male and female cadavers in terms of depth and length of the BG.This study contributes to the understanding of BG morphology by exploring the dimensions forwidth, depth, and length of the BG, which may contribute to biceps tendon pathology in clinical practice. Future research should focus on reducing measurement variability and exploring the possible relationship between BG morphology and biceps tendon conditions to further enhance the understanding of this complex relationship.

Anthropometric study of the bicipital groove in Kolkata based population and its clinical implication

The knowledge of the humeral morphology is an important tool in determination of the prosthetic size, its positioning and also its design. Reconstructive surgery of upper end of humerus requires measurement of intertubercular sulcus. In this descriptive and cross sectional study it was attempt to study the clinical correlation of length, depth and width of the bicipital groove with antero-posterior and transverse diameters of surgical neck of the dry humeri, for their use in the betterment of human humeral prosthesis. The study was conducted on 100 adult dry intact human humerii collected from different medical colleges of Kolkata in the department of Anatomy, Calcutta National Medical College, Kolkata. This study analysis was done in SPSS 23 Software. Independent sample-‘t’ test was used for statistical analysis. P-value &amp;#60;0.05 was considered to be significant. The difference of anthropometric dimensions of left humeral bicipital groove are more significant as compared to right. There is strong statistical correlation between length of Bicipital Groove vs Total Length of Humerus, Width of Bicipital Groove vs. Transverse Diameter at surgical neck To conclude, with minor differences from previous similar studies the present study is noteworthy in the field of prosthetic limb manufacture.

Efficacy of biceps-radial-slice magnetic resonance images for the diagnosis of biceps and pulley lesions.

Injuries to the biceps reflection pulley lead to instability of the long head of the biceps tendon. However, conventional magnetic resonance imaging has low diagnostic accuracy for long head of the biceps tendon and pulley lesions. Here, we investigated the usefulness of novel biceps-radial magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating long head of the biceps tendon and pulley lesions. Biceps-radial magnetic resonance images of 84 patients (84 shoulders) were prospectively analyzed. The biceps-radial magnetic resonance imaging protocol includes sequences acquired in radial planes perpendicular to the long head of the biceps tendon in the shoulder joint. All patients underwent shoulder arthroscopy, and the intraoperative long head of the biceps tendon and pulley lesion findings were compared to the preoperative evaluations. The diagnostic accuracies of the biceps-radial magnetic resonance images and conventional magnetic resonance images were determined. A normal long head of the biceps tendon was observed in 30 (31.6%) patients, partial tears in 43 (52.6%), and complete tears in 11 (15.8%). Normal long head of the biceps tendon stability was present in 54 (61.4%) patients, subluxation in 24 (31.6%), and dislocation in 6 (7.0%). The biceps-radial magnetic resonance (kappa coefficient: 0.94) and conventional magnetic resonance (kappa coefficient: 0.68) images accurately identified long head of the biceps tendon tears. The biceps-radial magnetic resonance images excellently agreed with the arthroscopic findings (kappa coefficient: 0.91), whereas the conventional magnetic resonance images poorly agreed (kappa coefficient: 0.17) regarding long head of the biceps tendon instability. A normal medial wall of the pulley was observed in 26 (31.0%) patients, partial tears in 30 (35.7%), and complete tears in 28 (33.3%). A normal lateral wall of the pulley was observed in 30 (35.7%) patients, partial tears in 21 (25.0%), and complete tears in 33 (39.3%). The biceps-radial magnetic resonance images excellently agreed with the arthroscopic findings (kappa coefficient: 0.89), whereas the conventional magnetic resonance images moderately agreed (kappa coefficient: 0.50) regarding medial pulley lesions. The biceps-radial magnetic resonance images excellently agreed with the arthroscopic findings (kappa coefficient: 0.95), and the conventional magnetic resonance images moderately agreed (kappa coefficient: 0.56) regarding lateral pulley lesions. Biceps-radial magnetic resonance imaging allows for tracking of the long head of the biceps tendon and pulley from the supraglenoid tuberosity to the bicipital groove in the glenohumeral joint and accurate evaluations of long head of the biceps tendon and pulley lesions.

Effectiveness of different percutaneous electrolysis protocols in the endogenous modulation of pain: A Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial

ObjectiveThis randomized clinical trial investigated if the application of percutaneous electrolysis (PE) enhances endogenous pain mechanisms (EPM) when compared with a simple needle application (acting as sham). MethodsForty-six asymptomatic subjects, aged 18–40 years, were randomized into three groups receiving a single ultrasound-guided PE intervention consisting of a needle insertion on the lateral epicondyle: sham (without electrical current), low-intensity (0.3 mA, 90s), or high-intensity (three pulses of 3 mA, 3s) PE. Widespread pressure pain thresholds (PPT), conditioned pain modulation (CPM), and temporal summation (TS) were bilaterally assessed in the lateral epicondyle, bicipital groove, transverse process of C5 and tibialis anterior muscle. Outcomes were obtained by an assessor blinded to the treatment allocation of the subjects. ResultsNo significant changes in CPM were observed in either group (omnibus ANOVA all, P > .05). A significant bilateral increase in PPT in the lateral epicondyle in the high intensity group as compared with the sham group was observed (P < .01). A significant decrease of TS in both low (P = .002) and high (P = .049) intensity groups on the right, but not on the left, tibialis anterior was also observed when compared with the sham group. ConclusionsOne session of PE is able to slightly stimulate modulatory pathways related to nociceptive gain, particularly pressure pain sensitivity and temporal summation but not conditioning pain modulation, when compared with a sham needle intervention, with changes even contralaterally. No significant differences were found between low- and high-intensity doses of percutaneous electrolysis.

Mild Biceps Tendonitis May Be Managed Nonoperatively During Shoulder Arthroscopy

The purposes of this study were to determine whether patients with mild biceps tendonitis required revision surgery after the biceps tendon was not surgically treated, while addressing concomitant pathology, and to evaluate whether preoperative groove pain affected patient-reported outcomes. Patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy between 2015 and 2018 by a single surgeon for rotator cuff pathology, debridement, and distal clavicular excision (DCE), with or without subacromial decompression (SAD), and where the biceps tendon was not surgically addressed were retrospectively identified. Inclusion criteria were mild LS (<50% hyperemic appearing biceps tendon arthroscopically), and a minimum 2-year follow-up. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of revision surgery. Secondary outcomes included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, simple shoulder test (SST), pain level, and satisfaction scores. Two sample t-tests compared postoperative patient-reported outcomes based on the presence or absence of preoperative bicipital groove tenderness. Sixty-four of 69 eligible subjects (93%) were evaluated at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. One out of 64 subjects underwent revision to perform a biceps tenodesis. Overall, patients had high patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) postoperatively. Ninety-seven percent of patients reported they would have the surgery again. The presence of preoperative bicipital groove tenderness had no effect on ASES (P= .62), SST (P= .83) scores, and postoperative pain (P= .65). Patients without bicipital groove pain had average respective ASES and SST scores of 93.70 ± 11.84 and 10.66 ± 2.47; those with bicipital groove pain averaged 92.00 ± 15.31 and 10.78 ± 1.87. There was no significant difference in overall satisfaction scores between patients with groove pain (9.42 ± 1.40) and those without (9.46 ± 1.38; P= .92). Patients with mild biceps tendonitis showed favorable outcomes with low revision rates and high patient satisfaction when the biceps tendon was not surgically addressed when the primary shoulder pathology was treated during arthroscopy, independent of preoperative groove pain. Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Correlation of the depth, medial wall and opening angle of the bicipital groove and the dimensions of long head of the biceps tendon

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the morphological measurements of bicipital groove and long head of biceps tendon and determine the effect of age and gender on these measurements. Methods: The study included 110 patients (60 females, 50 males) aged 18–50 years, who underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the left shoulder between January and December 2020. The patients had stable biceps tendons, and did not have a rotator cuff tear. The bicipital groove morphology was evaluated based on depth, opening angle, medial wall angle and the biceps tendon morphology was assessed based on thickness (anteroposterior length) and width (transverse length). Results: There was no difference between the females and males in terms of age, opening angle and medial wall angle (p&gt;.05). The bicipital groove depth was lower in the females than in the males (p&lt;.001), while the biceps tendon was thicker in the males compared to the females (p&lt;.001). There was no correlation between age and the sizes of bicipital groove and the biceps tendon. A negative correlation was observed between the bicipital groove depth and opening angle (r=-0.55), and a positive correlation between medial wall angle (r=0.51), tendon thickness (r=0.50) and tendon width (r=0.34). Bicipital groove depth had a positive correlation with tendon thickness (r=0.54) in women and tendon width in men (r=0.28). Conclusion: The morphological measurements of bicipital groove and the biceps tendon showed correlations. There were also gender differences in these morphological measurements.

The 2D and 3D MR arthrographic description of aponeurotic expansion of supraspinatus tendon and biceps tendon anomaly in a large patient cohort.

To describe the aponeurotic expansion of supraspinatus tendon (AEST) and biceps tendon abnormalities with magnetic resonance (MR) arthrographic examinations and determine their prevalence in patients, we performed a high-resolution 3D direct MR arthrography. This was a retrospective study of 700 shoulder MR arthrograms performed between May 2010 and January 2022. Extension in the coronal plane of an AEST on 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) MR arthrography was identified. Based on its morphology, the AEST on MR arthrography was divided into four subtypes: absence of tendinous thickness in the bicipital synovial surface or intra-synovial tendon-like structure in the bicipital groove, thin and flat tendinous thickness ≥1 mm of bicipital synovium, oval tendinous structure less than half the size of the adjacent biceps tendon, oval tendinous structure more than half the size of the adjacent biceps tendon, and oval tendinous structure larger than the adjacent biceps tendon. Based on its origin and termination, aponeurotic expansions can be divided into three subtypes: proximal pulley zone, middle humeral neck zone, and distal myotendinous junction zone. Association with the biceps synovium of the AEST was categorized into three types: intra-synovial, extra-synovial, and trans-synovial. An AEST in the anterior shoulder joint in 3D VIBE MR arthrography images was identified in 63 (9%) of 700 arthrograms. The most common arthrographic type of AEST was type 1-this was detected in 39 of 63 patients. The most common course type of the AEST was anteriorly midline. The most common distal insertion type was at the tenosynovial sheath of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) in the middle humeral neck zone-this was detected in 31 of 63 patients. There were only 10 MR arthrograms biceps tendon abnormality, including 4 biceps agenesis and 6 split ruptures. A 2D and high-resolution 3D MR arthrography can demonstrate the anatomical detail around the bicipital groove and facilitate the differentiation between a biceps tendon anomaly and an AEST. On high-resolution 3D MR arthrographic images, the AEST tends to be in the anterior midline and anteromedial portions of the biceps synovium with intra-synovial, extra-synovial, and trans-synovial courses and its three different insertion types.

Arthroscopic In Situ Biceps Tenodesis Using a Double Loop-and-Tack Knotless Suture Anchor

The long head biceps tendon is a common culprit of anterior shoulder pain and dysfunction that can be surgically treated with tenotomy or tenodesis. Many techniques exist for tenodesis. This article submits an arthroscopic technique using two loop-and-tack sutures and a knotless suture anchor to tenodese the long head biceps tendon in the proximal bicipital groove in situ. The advantage of this technique is that it maintains the biceps in its native position by performing tenodesis before tenotomy. Most other techniques attempt to restore native position of the biceps through approximation. The transverse humeral ligament is also released to decompress the bicipital groove. This technique can be used to treat isolated biceps pathology or combined with rotator cuff and labral procedures.