YES, 32, 2002 YES, 32, 2002 would have been deemed 'hypocrisy'by Bunyan.His most famousworkwas written under a creative resentment against the worldly necessity of 'metaphor' to which, to the edification of millions, he was reduced in order to expound his pilgrim'sprogress.With his nostalgia for monasticism, and his Pauline sense of the limits appropriatefor female participationin worship, he is not yet ripe forfeminist appropriation. And (even after Christopher Hill) there remains doubt as to how available for mundane purposes is a tradition of 'rebellion' rooted merely in permanentopposition to theworld. LikePenelope, thisgroupof scholarskeepsalive the reputationof theirbold itineranttill a fullerreturnto the canon (wherehe surely belongs) becomes feasible. Without quarrellingwith their circumspection, or with the mainlyvery firmlyarguedinsightsthat they bringto bear, it is possibleto regret Bunyan's currentstatus(sharedwith others of the wise and good) as the 'property' of a single-authorsociety. Meanwhile, the routeis throughpatient reconstructionof context: GreavesindicatesMichael A. Mullett'sJohnBunyan inContext (Keele: Keele UniversityPress, 1996)as exemplary. N. H. Keeble sets the scene for Bunyan's 'inescapable experience of repression and persecution', followed by a meditation from John R. Nott that raises the problem, for modern readers, of 'an episode from the second part of Pilgrim's Progress', in which Mercy's delightin the torment of God's enemies seems to imply a jarring 'shift from the metaphorical to the literal' (p. 52). I am not sure Bunyan would accept the distinction, or care (any more than Dante) to pity the damned. Sharon Achinstein arguesvaliantly,yet with commendable reticence, for Bunyan's allegory as a 'practicethat can do political work'.W. R. Owens compares TheHoly City with other contemporary approaches to millennarianism. Michael Davies movingly suggestsdistinctionsbetween Bunyan'spoetic way of prayerfulimagination and the delusive 'maze' of mere theological disputation. Ken Simpson shows how the Nonconformist 'liturgy of the word was enacted each time the Spirit revealed a biblical pattern'in corporate or individuallife. T. L. Underwood charts Bunyan's attempt to keep a bible-based balance between the (to him) degrading extremes of Ranters and Quakers. PatriciaDemers gives an interestingaccount of 'Bunyan'sSisters':women nearer to him than he acknowledgedin their seeking of 'wholeness'.The collection ends with Aileen Ross's tactfulaccount of'Misogyny' in Bunyan, Melissa A. Aaron's validation of Christiana'sjourney as emblematic of 'Corporate Christianity [which] had to be represented by women'; and Susan Cook'scollageoflate-seventeenth-centuryprosefictiontexts,derivingfromBunyan, and servingto highlighta sharedpriority:never 'originalityof composition', always the recoveryof'original truth'. UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK MALCOLM HARDMAN AphraBehn'sEnglishFeminism:Wit andSatire. By DOLORS ALTABA-ARTAL. Cranbury, NJ: Susquehanna University Press; London: Associated University Presses. I999. 231 PP. ?32. Aphra Behn's recent installationin the Englishliterarycanon has produced curious critical consequences. In the past generation, she has passed in reverse order through the processes normally applied to Great Writers:at firstthe emphasis fell on theorizing her, then on establishing her historical context, and now, in Aphra Behn'sEnglishFeminism, Dolors Altaba-Artal has produced the first 'exhaustive comparison of her production with texts from the Spanish siglo de oro' (p. 9). Although previousstudieshave made valuable contributionsto the subject,AltabaArtalis the firstto deal comprehensively,exclusively, and even-handedlyboth with would have been deemed 'hypocrisy'by Bunyan.His most famousworkwas written under a creative resentment against the worldly necessity of 'metaphor' to which, to the edification of millions, he was reduced in order to expound his pilgrim'sprogress.With his nostalgia for monasticism, and his Pauline sense of the limits appropriatefor female participationin worship, he is not yet ripe forfeminist appropriation. And (even after Christopher Hill) there remains doubt as to how available for mundane purposes is a tradition of 'rebellion' rooted merely in permanentopposition to theworld. LikePenelope, thisgroupof scholarskeepsalive the reputationof theirbold itineranttill a fullerreturnto the canon (wherehe surely belongs) becomes feasible. Without quarrellingwith their circumspection, or with the mainlyvery firmlyarguedinsightsthat they bringto bear, it is possibleto regret Bunyan's currentstatus(sharedwith others of the wise and good) as the 'property' of a single-authorsociety. Meanwhile, the routeis throughpatient reconstructionof context: GreavesindicatesMichael A. Mullett'sJohnBunyan inContext (Keele: Keele UniversityPress, 1996)as exemplary. N. H. Keeble sets the scene for Bunyan's 'inescapable experience of repression and persecution', followed by a meditation from John R. Nott that raises the...