Bias In Non-randomized Studies Research Articles

Nonpharmaceutical Interventions and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in School-Age Preterm Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review

Abstract Objective: To systematically review nonpharmaceutical interventions aiming to enhance neurodevelopment in preterm children and adolescents (aged 4–18 years). Method: A systematic review of the literature was conducted for all studies published up to May 1, 2022, across Medline, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases. Studies were evaluated for inclusion by 2 independent reviewers using predetermined inclusion criteria. The Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) tools were used to assess bias in the selected studies. Results: Of the 1778 articles identified, 23 were included. Quality assessment revealed moderate bias in 52.2%, low bias in 21.7%, and serious bias in 26.1%. The selected studies comprised 60.9% randomized controlled trials and 21.7% pre- versus postdesigns. Interventions included Cogmed Working Memory Training® (43.5%), BrainGame Brian (13%), physiotherapy (13%), and others (30.4%). Qualitative analysis showed the limited impact of interventions on neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm children aged 4–18 years. Conclusion: Despite recent efforts to use more rigorous methodologies, current research on school-age interventions for preterm neurodevelopment exhibits methodological limitations. There is a pressing need for well-designed, large-scale clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of nonpharmaceutical interventions in this vulnerable population.

The Efficacy of Probiotics Supplementation on the Quality of Life of Patients with Gastrointestinal Disease: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.

Patients with gastrointestinal (GI) disorders might benefit from probiotic supplementation to resolve their bowel symptoms and enhance their quality of life (QoL). This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of oral probiotic supplementation on improving QoL. Relevant studies were systematically searched in online databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, ProQuest, and Google Scholar up to September 2022 using relevant keywords. Studies that were conducted on GI patients and presented QoL outcomes were included. The Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Intervention tool were used to assess the risk of bias. Of the 4,555 results found in the systematic search of databases, only 36 studies were eligible for evaluation. According to this systematic review, 24 studies reported improvements, whereas 12 studies reported no improvements on QoL in GI patients supplemented with probiotics. We found that probiotics may improve the QoL of patients with GI diseases and related metabolic complications. Therefore, probiotics can be a useful supportive treatment strategy in these patients.

Contemporary use of 3D printed jigs and guides for osteotomies around the knee: a systematic review

Background. With improved accessibility of imaging and additive manufacturing, custom targeting guides and jigs are now widely accepted across many areas of orthopaedics. During orthopedic surgery, patient-specific guides assist in the accurate drilling and cutting of bone in conjunction with meticulous pre-operative planning. Given their increased uptake, it is important to define the lessons learned from recent clinical experience, and to document the reported benefits when using this technology intra-operatively. The aim of this review is to evaluate the potential benefits of patient-specific guides for osteotomies about the knee, and to clarify what evidence currently exists to support their use. Methods. A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was performed for studies investigating the use of intra-operative patient-specific guides for realignment osteotomies about the knee. Randomised controlled trials, non-randomised studies, observational studies, case series, and case reports, as well as in vitro studies, were included. Screening was conducted with the Covidence software, and risk of bias was assessed with the Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Results. A total of 38 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria: 21 of these included patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for high tibial osteotomy, 6 with distal femoral osteotomy, 4 — for combined tibial/femoral rotational corrective osteotomies, 4 — in double-level osteotomies, and 6 — for intra-articular osteotomies. The main outcomes reported were accuracy of surgical correction, typically with reference to pre-operative plans, and execution accuracy based on radiographic measurements. Other common outcomes were operative time, intra-operative fluoroscopy, and operative costs. Many studies were observational in nature, with no control groups available for suitable comparison. Conclusions. For corrective osteotomies about the knee, the literature suggests PSI has very strong potential to improve accuracy in achieving pre-operative targets. This was reported for both opening and closing wedge osteotomies of the femur, and for high tibial osteotomy. Some contradictory results have been reported for high tibial osteotomy, based on limited evidence from small studies that in many instances lacked controls for comparative analysis. Additional controlled trials are necessary to confirm the benefits of PSI for osteotomies about the knee, considering it has not yet been conclusively validated. The literature currently available indicates PSI can improve the accuracy of corrective osteotomies about the knee.

Managing the work stress of inpatient nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review of organizational interventions

BackgroundDuring the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, inpatient nurses faced various work stressors. Little is known about organizational interventions that can mitigate the negative consequences of pandemic-related stressors.ObjectiveThe aim was to provide a synopsis of the literature concerning the types and outcomes of organizational interventions performed during the COVID-19 pandemic that directly (re)organized the work structures of inpatient nurses to address pandemic-related work stressors or to increase nurses’ ability to cope.MethodsWithin this preregistered systematic literature review, we searched four databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, CINAHL) and two preprint databases (MedRxiv, PsyArXiv) for interventional studies of organizational interventions published between 01/2020 and 03/2023 (k = 990 records). We included 12 primary studies after title-abstract and full-text screening. A synthesis of results without meta-analysis was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials – version 2 (RoB-2) and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool.ResultsAll interventions were implemented in hospitals. The reasons given for implementation included pandemic-related work stressors such as a high workload, understaffing, and a lack of medical resources. To respond to the various work stressors, half of the studies took a multilevel approach combining organizational and person-oriented interventions (k = 6). Most studies (k = 8) took a secondary prevention approach, focusing on the organization of rest breaks (k = 5). With respect to outcomes, the studies examined nurse-related stress and resilience, turnover intention, job satisfaction, and other factors. Risk-of-bias analyses revealed that conclusions about the effectiveness of the interventions are limited due to confounding factors and self-selection.ConclusionsThe identified interventions provide a basis for future research to draw conclusions on the effectiveness of organizational interventions during pandemics. The promotion of adequate work breaks could be useful if the work stressors associated with strain and negative consequences cannot be changed directly. However, the same stressors (e.g., high workload) can hinder nurses from participating in offered interventions. This emphasizes the importance of directly addressing inpatient nurses’ work stressors.RegistrationProspero-ID CRD42023364807 (March 2023).

Impact of patient's sex on groin hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Groin hernia repair (GHR) is a performed procedure worldwide, with approximately 20million surgeries carried out each year. Despite being less common in females, there is a lack of research on how sex influences the outcomes of GHR. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess how patient sex impacts results in GHR. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched for studies up to October 2023 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The studies included focused on sex outcomes for both robotic and open GHR procedures. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted using the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies - Of Interventionstool. Our statistical analysis was performed using the metafor package in RStudio. After screening a total of 3917 articles, we identified 29 studies that met our criteria, comprising a total of 1,236,694 patients. Among them, 98,641 (7.98%) patients were females. Our findings showed that females had higher rates of hernia recurrence (RR 1.28), chronic pain (RR 1.52), and surgical site infections (SSIs) (RR 1.46) compared to males. Females showed a lower tendency to undergo minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with a relative risk of 0.82 (95% CI 0.69-0.97; p=0.02). Females tend to face higher rates of complications after GHR such as an elevated risk of chronic pain, recurrence, and surgical site infections (SSI). Moreover, they undergo fewer MIS options compared to males. These results underscore the importance of research to enhance outcomes for women undergoing GHR.

The Battle of Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies for Obesity: Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Versus Endoscopically Inserted Intragastric Balloon—A Pairwise Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies and a Call for Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) represents the latest primary endoscopic intervention for managing obesity. Both ESG and intragastric balloons (IGBs) have demonstrated effectiveness and safety for weight loss. However, there is a paucity of high-quality evidence supporting the superiority of one over the other, and no pairwise meta-analysis of comparative studies has been published to date. Our aim was to conduct a pairwise meta-analysis of comparative studies directly comparing ESG and IGB. Methods: We systematically conducted a literature search on PubMed and Google Scholar following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Our search used specific search terms. The Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) Tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Data were analyzed using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4.1 software with a random-effects model. The statistical method used was the Mantel-Haenszel method. For dichotomous data, the effect size was represented using odds ratio (OR), while mean difference (MD) was utilized as the effect size for continuous data. Results: After screening 967 records, a total of 9 studies met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis (5302 patients). The quality assessment categorized 5 studies as having a moderate risk of bias, while 3 studies were classified as having a low risk of bias. Sufficient information was not available for one study to ascertain its overall quality. A statistically significant increase in total weight loss percentage (TWL%) at 1 and 6 months was observed with ESG compared with IGB. In addition, a statistically insignificant decrease in the incidence of adverse events and readmissions was observed with ESG. Furthermore, a statistically significant decrease in the incidence of reintervention was observed with ESG. Conclusions: While this study suggests a higher TWL% associated with ESG compared with IGB, drawing definitive conclusions is challenging due to limitations identified during a comprehensive quality assessment of the available literature. We advocate for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) directly comparing the newer IGB (with a 12-mo placement duration) with ESG. However, this study consistently reveals higher rates of early reintervention (re-endoscopy) within the IGB group, primarily necessitated by the removal or adjustment of the IGB due to intolerance. Given the additional intervention required at 6 or 12 months to remove the temporarily placed IGB, this trend may imply that IGB is less economically viable than ESG. Cost-effectiveness analyses comparing ESG and IGB are warranted to provide valuable scientific insights.

Comparing the effectiveness and safety of videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in the paediatric emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Endotracheal intubation is an uncommon procedure for children in the emergency department but can be technically difficult and cause significant adverse effects. Videolaryngoscopy (VL) offers improved first-pass success rates over direct laryngoscopy (DL) for both adults and children undergoing elective surgery. This systematic review was designed to evaluate current evidence regarding how the effectiveness and safety of VL compares to DL for intubation of children in emergency departments. Four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and Web of Science) were searched on 11th May 2023 for studies comparing first-pass success of VL and DL for children undergoing intubation in the emergency department. Studies including adult patients or where intubation occurred outside of the emergency department were excluded. Quality assessment of included studies was carried out using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Meta-analysis was undertaken for first-pass success and adverse event rate. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria representing 5,586 intubations. All included studies were observational. Significantly greater first-pass success rate was demonstrated with VL compared to DL (OR 1.64, 95% CI [1.21-2.21], p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in risk of adverse events between VL and DL (OR 0.79, 95% CI [0.52-1.20], p = 0.27). The overall risk of bias was moderate to serious for all included studies. VL can offer improved first-pass success rates over DL for children intubated in the emergency department. However, the quality of current evidence is low and further randomised studies are required to clarify which patient groups may benefit most from use of VL. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=415039, Identifier CRD42023415039.

Neonatal and maternal outcomes of mRNA versus Non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To compare the effectiveness and safety of non-mRNA versus mRNA COVID-19 vaccines on pregnant women and their newborns in a systematic review with meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central in May 2023. The search strategy yielded 4451 results, 16 studies were fully reviewed. We selected case-control studies analysing non-mRNA versus mRNA vaccines. Data collection and analysis: we assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Standardised mean differences were pooled using random-effect models. We identified 8 prospective and retrospective studies with a total of 32,153 patients. Non-mRNA vaccines were associated with a higher incidence of fever (OR 2.67; 95% CI 2.08-3.43; p<0.001), and a lower incidence of fetal or neonatal death (OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.08-0.33; p<0.001). In subgroup analyses, the Jansen vaccine (Ad26.COV2.S) was found to have a higher rate of premature labor/delivery (OR 4.48; 95% CI 1.45-13.83; p=0.009) and missed/spontaneous abortion (OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.09-3.30; p=0.02), as compared with the Pfizer (BNT162b2) vaccine. non-mRNA vaccines are associated with a lower incidence of fetal or neonatal death among pregnant women who receive a Covid19 vaccine, although at an increased rate of pyrexia compared with mRNA vaccines. Other studies are required for better assessment. CRD42023421814.

Resective epilepsy surgery and its impact on depression in adults: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and implications for future research

BackgroundHow epilepsy surgery influences the bidirectional relationship of epilepsy and depression remains poorly defined.MethodFor a better understanding of this question, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk ratio...

Opioid consumption following foot and ankle surgery: a systematic review

Objective: Systematically review studies characterizing postoperative opioid consumption in patients submitted to foot and anklesurgery to identify trends in opioid consumption among regions of procedures (forefoot, midfoot, hindfoot/ankle) and ultimatelycreate prescribing guidelines that treat patient’s pain adequately while limiting leftover pills. Methods: A systematic review was performed following the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Retrospective and prospective observational cohort studies that reported mean opioid consumption following foot and ankle surgery were included, as well as data from our institution that fit the review’s parameters. Studies that did not report this data or reported patients receiving alternative surgical techniques were excluded. The risk of bias in non-randomized studies – of exposure (ROBINS-E) tool and the Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) criteria were used to assess bias and study quality, respectively. Results: Three hundred ninety-five articles were identified, and six studies, including our institution’s, met inclusion criteria. Reported data from 2,445 patients were synthesized to show opioid consumption overall, by region of surgery, and by invasiveness of procedure. Four of five studies found significantly higher opioid use postoperatively in patients submitted to hindfoot/ankle surgery, and two of five studies found significantly higher consumption among those submitted to bony foot and ankle surgery. Conclusion: Prescribing physicians must approach foot and ankle patients on a case-by-case basis to ensure adequate pain management while mitigating excess opioid risk. For prescriptions of 5 mg oxycodone pills, we recommend 15-, 20-, and 25-pill prescriptions for patients submitted to forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot/ankle surgery. Level of Evidence I; Systematic review.

Functional and radiological sinonasal outcomes of CFTR modulators for sinus disease in cystic fibrosis: A meta-analysis.

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators improve pulmonary outcomes in cystic fibrosis (CF) by stabilizing the CFTR protein on respiratory epithelial surfaces. To determine the efficacy of CFTR modulators on sinonasal outcomes in patients with CF, we performed a meta-analysis of clinical trials to date that include functional and radiographic evidence of sinus disease. English full-text articles were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Two reviewers screened articles and a third reviewer resolved disagreements. Articles were included if they reported functional or radiological sinonasal outcomes in patients with CF before and after CFTR modulator therapies. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed, and the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions tool was used for quality assessment. The generic inverse variance method with random effects model was used for meta-analysis. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and mean difference (MD) were used as effect measurements. Seven prospective and two retrospective studies representing 248 patients were included in this analysis. There was a significant improvement in sinonasal outcome test-22 scores on elexacaftor‒tezacaftor‒ivacaftor (MD=12.80, [95% confidence interval, CI: 10.46‒15.13], p<0.001, n=222), with no heterogeneity detected (I2=0%, p=0.820). There was also a significant improvement in Lund‒Mackay scores (SMD=1.25, [95% CI: 0.58‒1.91], p<0.001, n=88), with heterogeneity detected (I2=67%, p=0.030). CFTR modulators improve functional and radiologic sinonasal outcomes. Given the utility of CFTR modulators, the treatment paradigm for CF-related chronic rhinosinusitis promises to evolve.

Association between different levels of suppressed viral load and the risk of sexual transmission of HIV among serodiscordant couples on antiretroviral therapy: a protocol for a two-step systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

IntroductionHIV is a major global public health issue. The risk of sexual transmission of HIV in serodiscordant couples when the partner living with HIV maintains a suppressed viral load of...

Prevention and care of adult enterostomy with high output: a scoping review protocol

IntroductionThe purpose of this protocol is to investigate the risk factors, critical evaluation contents and preventive measures of high-output enterostomy.Methods and analysisThis scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute...

Robot-assisted internal fixation of calcaneal fractures versus conventional open reduction internal fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted (RA) percutaneous hollow screw fixation with traditional open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for the treatment of calcaneal fractures through a systematic review and meta-analysis. An extensive search was conducted in the following databases-PubMed, CNKI, Embase, and the Cochrane Library-to gather research on patients with calcaneal fractures published up to July 2024. This search focuses on studies comparing the effectiveness of robot-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation versus ORIF. We will include studies published in both English and Chinese. Our screening process adhered strictly to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, emphasizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. The ROBINS-I tool was utilized to evaluate the risk of bias in non-randomized studies. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4.1. The final analysis incorporated six retrospective cohort studies comprising 247 patients-122 treated with robotic-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation and 125 with conventional open reduction and internal fixation. The findings indicated that patients undergoing robotic-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation experienced advantages over those receiving conventional treatment in terms of reduced hospital stay, lower estimated blood loss, and higher AOFAS scores at both 3 and 6months. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two methods concerning operative time, fracture healing duration, or the frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopies. Robotic-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation is a safe and viable treatment approach for patients with calcaneal fractures. When compared to ORIF methods, this robotic-assisted technique demonstrated significant benefits, including reduced hospital stay, lower estimated blood loss, and improved AOFAS scores at both 3 and 6months.

Initial management of pediatric Gustilo–Anderson type I upper limb open fractures: Are antibiotics enough?

Purpose: The British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma-4 includes pediatric Gustilo–Anderson type I upper limb open fractures and recommends surgical debridement as the preferred method of treatment. The reported incidence of fracture-related infection is low in patients with this injury pattern and the evidence supporting debridement is therefore weak. The aim of this systematic review is to compare infection rates between non-operative management and operative debridement in children with Gustilo I upper limb fractures who did not require surgical fixation. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eligibility criteria included patients &lt;18 years with Gustilo–Anderson type I upper limb fractures managed with either antibiotics alone or with operative debridement. Patients in whom the fracture was stabilized were excluded, and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies—of Interventions tool was used to evaluate bias. Results: Eleven, predominantly retrospective studies were identified, involving 537 patients with fractures including 466 forearm, 70 wrist, and one humerus. A non-operative management strategy was used in 293 patients with one superficial infection (0.3%). Operative debridement was used in 244 patients with one superficial infection (0.4%). Conclusion: The optimal management of Gustilo–Anderson type I pediatric upper limb fractures is unclear. Based on the current evidence base, surgical debridement does not appear to reduce the rate of infection. The decision to manage these injuries aggressively should therefore be individualized to consider patient age, mechanism, and clinical extent of injury. Level of evidence: level II.

Inheritance patterns of lower urinary tract symptoms in adults: a systematic review.

To compile and evaluate the heritability and inheritance patterns of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in adult cohorts. Searches of five databases (PubMed, Embase, APA PsycInfo, Global Health, and OVID Medline) commenced on 6 July 2024, resulting in 736 articles retrieved after deduplication. Studies evaluating heritability patterns, gene frequencies, and familial aggregation of symptoms were included for review. Screening and predefined eligibility criteria produced 34 studies for final review. A descriptive analysis of synthesised data was performed, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool and the Johanna Briggs Institute checklist were used to evaluate these studies. Ten of the 34 studies (29%) described general LUTS, 14 (41%) described symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement (BPE), nine (26%) described urinary incontinence (UI; urge UI [UUI], stress UI [SUI] and mixed UI [MUI]), four (12%) described nocturia alone, two (6%) described overactive bladder (OAB), and four (13%) described other specific symptoms (frequency, postvoid residual urine volume). BPE symptoms, UI (MUI and UUI), nocturia alone, and frequency alone were associated with genetic predisposition, whilst OAB and SUI had more modest inheritance. The pathogenetic and pharmacological mechanisms fundamental to LUTS manifestation are highly heterogeneous. Further work is required to evaluate the inheritance patterns of LUTS more extensively.

The efficacy of intravitreal anti-VEGF for radiation maculopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is the primary approach for managing radiation maculopathy. However, a noticeable gap exists in meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy specifically in the context of radiation maculopathy. We conducted a review of comparative studies on anti-VEGF treatment up to October 2023. References were sourced from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool assessed the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), while the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool evaluated non-RCTs. Thirteen articles originating from eleven trials involving 2,525 eyes of 2408 patients were included. Four trials with 2226 eyes examined the effect of preventive anti-VEGF. Four trials with 189 eyes assessed the effect of anti-VEGF for preexisting maculopathy, and three trials with 110 eyes compared different anti-VEGF treatment modalities. In the preventive anti-VEGF treatment meta-analysis over a 24-month follow-up, the anti-VEGF group exhibited significantly fewer cases of radiation maculopathy (OR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.66, P= .0003, I2 =45%). For the meta-analysis of anti-VEGF treatment for pre-existing radiation maculopathy over a 6-month follow-up, the anti-VEGF group showed improved visual acuity (SMD: -1.13, 95% CI: -1.69 to -0.56, P < .0000, I2 = 47%) and decreased central macular thickness (SMD: -0.59, 95% CI: -1.13 to -0.05, P = 0.03, I2 = 62%). Prophylactic anti-VEGF effectively prevents radiation maculopathy and is also beneficial in treating pre-existing radiation maculopathy. Intensive treatment initially provides early benefits, but the efficacy diminishes after transitioning to a treat-and-extend regimen.

The effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of polyetheretherketone posts: a systematic review protocol

Abstract* Background Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is widely used in the biomedical field due to its outstanding biological and mechanical properties. Originally employed as a temporary abutment in implantology, recent research has expanded its indications for more definitive applications, such as frameworks and dental post and core. This shift requires a thorough assessment of PEEK’s adhesion and mechanical characteristics. However, PEEK’s inert properties and intricate chemistry create difficulties in surface treatment, resulting in reduced surface energy and inadequate adhesion. Inducing specific physical and chemical changes aims to overcome these challenges and enhance adhesion for PEEK. Despite its numerous clinical trials, standardized protocols remain lacking. This systematic review aims to assess the impact of surface treatments on the bonding performance of PEEK posts. Methods A detailed search of the literature will be conducted across several databases including PubMed, Scopus and clinical trial registries. Additional databases such as Cochrane Central, EMBASE, Web of Science and EBSCO will also be included. The search strategy will target controlled randomized studies and non-randomized clinical trials evaluating the impact of surface treatments on PEEK post adhesion strength. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) will be used to assess bias in non-randomized studies, while the Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROB II) tool will be employed for evaluating randomized controlled trials. Data extraction will focus on study design, treatment methods, outcomes and results. This systematic review protocol will adhere to the guidelines for systematic reviews outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Discussion The discussion will explore the implications of findings on clinical practice, highlighting the importance of enhancing PEEK’s bioactivity and surface energy to improve bonding efficacy in dental procedures. Moreover, it will suggest areas for future research to advance dental materials science, aiming to optimize the utilization of PEEK in dental applications Systematic review registration PROSPERO: CRD42024529783 (Registered on 08/04/2024).

Comparative evaluation of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus dynamic hip screw for stable intertrochanteric femoral fractures: A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes

In this study, a meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) as the treatment of stable intertrochanteric femoral fractures (AO type 31-A1). The comparison was focused on perioperative outcomes, Harris hip scores (HHSs), and major orthopedic complications. PubMed, Cochrane, ProQuest, and ScienceDirect were searched for studies comparing PFNA and DHS for stable intertrochanteric femoral fractures. The authors conducted separate screenings to determine eligible studies for this meta-analysis. The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Trials 2 and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies–of Interventions-I. All outcomes were analyzed using Review Manager software version 5.4 and presented as forest plots. Ten studies were included in this analysis (three randomized controlled trials and seven observational studies) with 1149 patients. For the intraoperative parameters, PFNA had shorter mean operative time (mean difference [MD] −18.63, 95% interval [CI] [−27.92–−9.34], P &lt; 0.0001) and led to less intraoperative blood loss (MD −88.84, 95% CI [−158.03–−19.65], P = 0.01). No significant differences in HHSs and complications were found between PFNA and DHS, and leg length discrepancy (risk ratio 0.40, 95% CI [0.17–0.92], P &lt; 0.03) favoring PFNA. Overall, these two surgical methods have no meaningful differences in long-term functional outcomes and complications. The PFNA may be more beneficial in the perioperative aspect, including shorter surgical duration and lesser blood loss due to its minimally invasive nature.

Perioperative non-pharmaceutical therapies for insomnia in cancer survivors: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol

IntroductionThe presence of perioperative insomnia is common but yet often overlooked among cancer survivors. Non-pharmaceutical therapies have shown promise in treating cancer-related insomnia during the perioperative period; however, the existing...