Bevacizumab-containing Therapy Research Articles

Genetic markers of bevacizumab-induced hypertension

There are currently no validated biomarkers predicting bevacizumab treatment outcome or toxicity. We combined biomarker data from six phase III trials of bevacizumab to assess whether genetic variation in vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) pathway or hypertension-related genes are associated with bevacizumab-induced hypertension. Germline DNA was available from 1,631 patients receiving bevacizumab-containing therapy for advanced solid tumors. Overall, 194 white patients had grade 1-4 bevacizumab-induced hypertension. In total, 236 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in VEGF-A, VEGF-A receptors (FLT1 and KDR), and other genes were selected using a SNP tagging approach and genotyped. A logistic regression on individual patient data was performed after adjustment for cancer type and five other covariates. Ten SNPs were associated with bevacizumab-induced hypertension (P ≤ 0.05), but none surpassed the threshold adjusted for multiple testing (P < 0.0002). The most significant VEGF-A pathway SNP was rs1680695 in EGLN3 [allelic odds ratio (OR) 1.50 [95 % confidence interval (Cl) 1.09-2.07], P = 0.012]. Two additional SNPs, rs4444903 in EGF and rs2305949 in KDR, were associated with hypertension (allelic OR 1.57 [95 % CI 1.17-2.11], P = 0.0025; allelic OR 0.62 [95 % CI 0.42-0.93], P = 0.020, respectively) and closely linked to nearby functional variants. Consistent with previous reports, rs11064560 in WNK1 was also associated with bevacizumab-induced hypertension (OR 1.41 [95 % CI 1.04-1.92], P = 0.028). The genes described in this large genetic analysis using pooled datasets warrant further functional investigation regarding their role in mediating bevacizumab-induced hypertension.

Abstract P6-06-40: Analysis of outcome according to risk factors in the randomized phase III TURANDOT trial evaluating first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy for HER2-negative locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/mBC)

Abstract Background: The randomized phase III TURANDOT trial compared first-line bevacizumab (BEV) + paclitaxel (PAC) vs BEV + capecitabine (CAP) in HER2-negative LR/mBC [Lang, Lancet Oncol 2013]. At the prespecified interim analysis there was no detectable difference in overall survival (OS; primary endpoint) between treatment groups, but the secondary endpoints of progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) favored BEV-PAC. We sought to identify patient populations defined by risk factors that may be most appropriately treated with one or other of the regimens. Methods: Patients with HER2-negative LR/mBC who had received no prior chemotherapy for LR/mBC were randomized to either BEV-PAC (BEV 10 mg/kg d1 &amp; 15 + PAC 90 mg/m2 d1, 8, &amp; 15 q4w) or BEV-CAP (BEV 15 mg/kg d1 + CAP 1000 mg/m2 bid d1-14 q3w). The study population was categorized into three cohorts: triple-negative (TNBC), high-risk hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and low-risk HR+. High-risk and low-risk HR+ were defined, respectively, as having ≥2 vs ≤1 of the following four risk factors: disease-free interval ≤24 months; visceral metastases; prior (neo)adjuvant anthracycline and/or taxane; ≥3 metastatic sites. Results: Baseline characteristics, efficacy, and safety by treatment arm are summarized below for the three cohorts. Although PFS results in all cohorts favored BEV-PAC, interim OS results showed a trend in favor of BEV-PAC in TNBC patients and in favor of BEV-CAP in low-risk HR+ patients. Grade ≥3 adverse events were less common with BEV-CAP than BEV-PAC in all three cohorts. TNBCHigh-risk HR+Low-risk HR+ BEV-PAC (n = 63)BEV-CAP (n = 67)BEV-PAC (n = 146)BEV-CAP (n = 162)BEV-PAC (n = 75)BEV-CAP (n = 50)Median age, years545658576161ECOG PS 0,%756068666366PFS Events, n (%)50 (79)54 (81)93 (64)125 (77)33 (44)35 (70)Median, months (95% CI)9.0 (7.8-10.7)5.6 (4.9-8.0)11.1 (10.4-13.4)8.3 (7.1-10.7)14.4 (10.4-20.5)11.5 (8.1-16.3)HR (95% CI)a1.37 (0.93-2.02)1.29 (0.98-1.69)1.39 (0.86-2.25)OS Events, n (%)28 (44)34 (51)50 (34)52 (32)18 (24)11 (22)1-year OS rate,%786380828590HR (95% CI)a1.33 (0.80-2.19)0.97 (0.66-1.43)0.80 (0.38-1.69)Grade ≥3 AEs,%634261516148aBEV-CAP vs BEV-PAC Conclusion: The simple risk factor index is prognostic for both PFS and OS and may be used to guide treatment choice when selecting BEV-containing therapy, balancing outcome with safety profile and patient preference. Final analysis of OS is expected in 2014. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P6-06-40.

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy continued beyond first progression in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy: ML18147 study KRAS subgroup findings

BackgroundML18147 evaluated continued bevacizumab with second-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) progressing after the standard first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy. Patients and methodsEvaluating outcomes according to tumor Kirsten rat sarcoma virus oncogene (KRAS) status was an exploratory analysis. KRAS data were collected from local laboratories (using their established methods) and/or from a central laboratory (mutation-specific Scorpion amplification-refractory mutation system). No adjustment was made for multiplicity; analyses were not powered to detect statistically significant differences. ResultsOf 820 patients, 616 (75%) had unambiguous KRAS data; 316 (51%) had KRAS wild-type tumors and 300 (49%) had mutant KRAS tumors. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.4 months for bevacizumab plus chemotherapy and 4.5 months for chemotherapy [P < 0.0001; HR = 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49–0.77] for wild-type KRAS and 5.5 and 4.1 months, respectively (P = 0.0027; HR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.56–0.89) for mutant KRAS. The median overall survival (OS) was 15.4 and 11.1 months, respectively (P = 0.0052; HR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53–0.90) for wild-type KRAS and 10.4 versus 10.0 months, respectively (P = 0.4969; HR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.71–1.18) for mutant KRAS. In both analyses, no treatment interaction by KRAS status was observed (PFS, P = 0.4436; OS, P = 0.1266). ConclusionsBevacizumab beyond first progression represents an option for patients with mCRC treated with bevacizumab plus standard first-line chemotherapy, independent of KRAS status.

Adjuvant bevacizumab-containing therapy in triple-negative breast cancer (BEATRICE): primary results of a randomised, phase 3 trial

The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy improves progression-free survival in metastatic breast cancer and pathological complete response rates in the neoadjuvant setting. Micrometastases are dependent on angiogenesis, suggesting that patients might benefit from anti-angiogenic strategies in the adjuvant setting. We therefore assessed the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting for women with triple-negative breast cancer. For this open-label, randomised phase 3 trial we recruited patients with centrally confirmed triple-negative operable primary invasive breast cancer from 360 sites in 37 countries. We randomly allocated patients aged 18 years or older (1:1 with block randomisation; stratified by nodal status, chemotherapy [with an anthracycline, taxane, or both], hormone receptor status [negative vs low], and type of surgery) to receive a minimum of four cycles of chemotherapy either alone or with bevacizumab (equivalent of 5 mg/kg every week for 1 year). The primary endpoint was invasive disease-free survival (IDFS). Efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat population, safety analyses were done on all patients who received at least one dose of study drug, and plasma biomarker analyses were done on all treated patients consenting to biomarker analyses and providing a measurable baseline plasma sample. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00528567. Between Dec 3, 2007, and March 8, 2010, we randomly assigned 1290 patients to receive chemotherapy alone and 1301 to receive bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. Most patients received anthracycline-containing therapy; 1638 (63%) of the 2591 patients had node-negative disease. At the time of analysis of IDFS, median follow-up was 31·5 months (IQR 25·6-36·8) in the chemotherapy-alone group and 32·0 months (27·5-36·9) in the bevacizumab group. At the time of the primary analysis, IDFS events had been reported in 205 patients (16%) in the chemotherapy-alone group and in 188 patients (14%) in the bevacizumab group (hazard ratio [HR] in stratified log-rank analysis 0·87, 95% CI 0·72-1·07; p=0·18). 3-year IDFS was 82·7% (95% CI 80·5-85·0) with chemotherapy alone and 83·7% (81·4-86·0) with bevacizumab and chemotherapy. After 200 deaths, no difference in overall survival was noted between the groups (HR 0·84, 95% CI 0·64-1·12; p=0·23). Exploratory biomarker assessment suggests that patients with high pre-treatment plasma VEGFR-2 might benefit from the addition of bevacizumab (Cox interaction test p=0·029). Use of bevacizumab versus chemotherapy alone was associated with increased incidences of grade 3 or worse hypertension (154 patients [12%] vs eight patients [1%]), severe cardiac events occurring at any point during the 18-month safety reporting period (19 [1%] vs two [<0·5%]), and treatment discontinuation (bevacizumab, chemotherapy, or both; 256 [20%] vs 30 [2%]); we recorded no increase in fatal adverse events with bevacizumab (four [<0·5%] vs three [<0·5%]). Bevacizumab cannot be recommended as adjuvant treatment in unselected patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Further follow-up is needed to assess the potential effect of bevacizumab on overall survival.

P53 Mutations in Advanced Cancers: Clinical Characteristics, Outcomes, and Correlation between Progression-Free Survival and Bevacizumab-Containing Therapy

Mutations in the p53 gene are amongst the most frequent aberrations seen in human cancer. Our objective was to characterize the clinical characteristics associated with p53 mutation in patients with advanced cancer. We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the clinical features and response to standard systemic therapy of 145 patients with documented tumor p53 mutational status (mutant-type [mtp53] vs. wild-type [wtp53]) referred to the Clinical Center for Targeted Therapy. Sixty-six (45.5%) patients had mtp53. Mutations in p53 occurred more frequently in older patients (p= 0.015) and in Caucasians (p=0.024). The incidence of liver metastases was 69.2% vs. 43%, p=0.002 in mtp53 and wtp53, respectively. PTEN loss by immunohistochemistry was found more frequently in mtp53-bearing tumors compared to wtp53 (33.3% vs. 10%, p=0.007). The best progression-free survival (PFS) on standard systemic therapy was significantly longer with bevacizumab-containing regimens as compared to non-bevacizumab containing regimen in patients with mtp53 (median 11.0 [95% CI 5.9-16.0], n=22 vs. 4.0 months [95% CI 3.6-5.7], n=35, p<0.0001) but not those with wtp53 (median 5.0 [95% CI 2.0-7.6] vs. 6.0 [95% CI 4.0-7.5] months, p=0.318. The median overall survival from diagnosis in patients with mtp53 and wtp53 was 7.4 [95% CI 6.3-9.8] vs. 11.8 [95% CI 2.9-21.5] years, respectively (p=0.365). Patients with mtp53 tumors were older at diagnosis, had more incidence of liver metastasis, and more frequent PTEN loss. The best PFS on standard systemic therapy was significantly longer with bevacizumab-containing regimens in patients with mutant p53 tumors but not in those with wtp53.

AVEREL: A Randomized Phase III Trial Evaluating Bevacizumab in Combination With Docetaxel and Trastuzumab As First-Line Therapy for HER2-Positive Locally Recurrent/Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE The AVEREL trial [A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Combination With Herceptin (Trastuzumab)/Docetaxel in Patients With HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer] evaluated first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with measurable/evaluable HER2-positive LR/MBC who had not received trastuzumab or chemotherapy for LR/MBC were stratified by prior adjuvant trastuzumab, prior (neo)adjuvant taxane, hormone receptor status, and measurable disease and were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) plus trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg either with bevacizumab 15 mg/kg or without bevacizumab, all administered every 3 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Additional end points included overall survival, response rate (RR), safety, quality of life, and translational research. Results Baseline characteristics of the 424 patients were balanced between treatment arms. Most patients had visceral metastases, 43% had a disease-free interval less than 12 months, and 85% had measurable disease. Median follow-up was 26 months. The hazard ratio for investigator-assessed PFS was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.02; P = .0775; median PFS, 13.7 v 16.5 months in the non-bevacizumab and bevacizumab arms, respectively; PFS events in 72%). The Independent Review Committee-assessed PFS hazard ratio was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.94; P = .0162; median PFS, 13.9 v 16.8 months, respectively; PFS events in 53%). The RR was 70% versus 74%, respectively (P = .3492). Grade ≥ 3 febrile neutropenia and hypertension were more common with bevacizumab-containing therapy. High baseline plasma vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) concentrations were associated with greater bevacizumab benefit (not statistically significant). CONCLUSION Combining bevacizumab with docetaxel and trastuzumab did not significantly improve investigator-assessed PFS. The potential predictive value of plasma VEGF-A is consistent with findings in HER2-negative LR/MBC, warranting prospective evaluation.

Abstract S6-5: Primary results of BEATRICE, a randomized phase III trial evaluating adjuvant bevacizumab-containing therapy in triple-negative breast cancer

Abstract Background: Bevacizumab (BEV), an anti-VEGF antibody, significantly enhanced progression-free survival in metastatic breast cancer (BC) (E2100, AVADO, RIBBON-1, RIBBON-2) and pathologic complete response rates in the neoadjuvant setting (GeparQuinto, NSABP B-40) when combined with chemotherapy (CT). The dependence of micro-metastases on angiogenesis [Holmgren 1995] suggests that patients might benefit from anti-angiogenic strategies applied in the adjuvant setting. The BEATRICE trial was designed to test this hypothesis in patients with triple-negative BC, who have a poor prognosis and lack targeted options for treatment. Methods: In this open-label randomized multinational phase III trial, patients with centrally confirmed triple-negative operable primary invasive BC (pT1a-pT3) were randomized 1:1 after definitive surgery to receive ≥4 cycles of either CT alone or the same CT + 1 year of BEV 5 mg/kg/wk equivalent. CT was anthracycline [anth] and/or taxane-based. Patients were stratified by nodal status (0 vs 1–3 vs ≥4 involved nodes), CT backbone (anth vs anth + taxane vs taxane), hormone receptor status (negative vs low), and surgery (breast-conserving vs mastectomy). The primary objective is to compare invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) [Hudis 2007] with adjuvant CT ± 1 year of BEV. Secondary outcome measures are overall survival (OS), breast cancer-free interval, disease-free survival (DFS), distant DFS, and safety (NCI CTCAE v3.0). The sample size was calculated to provide 80% power for a HR=0.75 at α=0.05 assuming 5-year IDFS of 72.0% with CT vs 78.2% with CT + BEV with 388 events. BEATRICE also includes evaluation of potential predictive and prognostic biomarkers. Results: Between Dec 2007 and Mar 2010, 2591 patients were randomized. At data cut-off (Feb 29, 2012), median follow-up was 32 months. The mean CT exposure was balanced between treatment arms. Median BEV duration was 11.7 months. BEV was associated with an increased incidence of grade ≥3 congestive heart failure/left ventricular dysfunction (3% vs &amp;lt;1% with CT), grade ≥3 hypertension (12% vs &amp;lt;1%), and treatment discontinuation (BEV and/or CT: 20% vs 2%) but no increase in the risk of fatal adverse events (0.3% vs 0.2%). No new safety signals were observed. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant improvement in IDFS with the addition of 1 year's BEV to adjuvant CT for triple-negative BC. Further follow-up is required to assess the impact of BEV on OS. The safety profile was consistent with previous reports in metastatic BC with a low incidence of fatal adverse events. Protocol-specified biomarker analyses are ongoing. Updated OS results are expected in 2013. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr S6-5.

Chemotherapy with bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective review of 181 Japanese patients

There has so far been little information on the clinical effect of bevacizumab against colorectal cancer in Japan. Hence, this study was conducted to retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab in clinical practice. A total of 181 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) received bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy at 18 hospitals in Kumamoto prefecture, Japan. We surveyed the medical records of all patients regarding the patient characteristics, objective tumor responses, and adverse events. We analyzed their overall survival and the survival benefit when continuing the administration of bevacizumab beyond disease progression (progressive disease; PD) in patients who received bevacizumab-containing 1st line therapy. The response rate (RR) in all lines of therapy was 42 %. The 1st line patients showed significantly better survival in comparison to the patients who received further lines of treatment (P = 0.005). There were no significant differences in survival between the group with post-PD treatment with bevacizumab and the group with post-PD treatment without bevacizumab (P = 0.13). The most common grade 3 or greater adverse event associated with bevacizumab was hypertension (12.2 %). Especially, a high incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) perforation was shown in this study (4.4 %) and most of the patients with GI perforation had some risk factors for this complication. Although the survival benefit of bevacizumab in Japanese patients with mCRC was similar to that observed in previous clinical trials, this study showed a high incidence of GI perforation in comparison to previous studies. Therefore, the careful selection of patients with few risk factors for this complication is likely to lead to a greater benefit from bevacizumab treatment.

Survival Outcomes of Bevacizumab Beyond Progression in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated in US Community Oncology

Bevacizumab prolongs OS when added to first- or second-line chemotherapy for mCRC. This retrospective analysis evaluated the association between the continued use of BBP and survival outcomes in mCRC patients treated in a community oncology setting. Data were derived from the US Oncology iKnowMed electronic medical record system. Patients with mCRC who received first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy between July 1, 2006 and June 30, 2009, were dichotomized into 2 second-line treatment cohorts: those receiving BBP and No-BBP. Clinical outcomes, including OS and postprogression OS (ppOS; time from start of second-line therapy to any-cause death), were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the effects of patient and treatment characteristics on survival outcomes, adjusting for covariates. Overall, 573 patients met the inclusion criteria for analysis-BBP (n = 267) and No-BBP (n = 306). Median OS and ppOS were longer in the BBP cohort (27.9 and 14.6 months, respectively) compared with the No-BBP cohort (21.4 and 10.1 months). According to multivariate analyses, BBP was associated with longer OS (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61-0.95) and ppOS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60-0.93) after adjusting for potential confounders. In the community oncology setting, BBP treatment was correlated with prolonged OS and ppOS in patients with mCRC. These results provide insight into real-world patterns of care and resultant bevacizumab use in this patient population.

Treatment with bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

e14083 Background: This study was designed to prospectively evaluate the safety and toxicity of bevacizumab in mCRC patients (pts) with mCRC pts in routine clinical practice as well as selection of pts. Methods: Baseline characteristics, pre-specified bevacizumab-related adverse events, and efficacy data were collected from 273 mCRC pts who started bevacizumab-containing therapy between January 2008 and August 2010. Results: The data from 273 pts (median age 62) were included in the evaluation. The ECOG performance status (PS) at baseline was 0 in 60%, 1 in 37% and 2 in 3% of pts. Eighty pts (29%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, and 84 (31%) received chemotherapy ± bevacizumab or cetuximab for prior treatment of metastatic disease. Majority of the 273 pts received irinotecan-based chemotherapy (65%). Complete response (CR) was reported in 7%, partial response (PR) in 31% and stable disease (SD) in 36% of the first-line treated pts. In pts previously treated for metastatic disease CR, PR and SD were 6%, 24% and 45%, respectively. In the first-line pts median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.8 - 12.0), while median overall survival (OS) was 24.3 months (95% CI, 21.4 – 30.3). PFS was 10, 9 and 8.7 months and OS was 16.7, 13.5 and 12.8 months in pts previously treated for metastatic disease with chemotherapy, chemotherapy + cetuximab or chemotherapy + bevacizumab, respectively. Two-year survival rate was 51% in the first-line pts and 32%, 14% and 38% in pts previously treated for metastatic disease with chemotherapy, chemotherapy + cetuximab and chemotherapy + bevacizumab, respectively. Metastasectomy was performed in 39 (15.5%) of the pts. One hundred and nine pts received bevacizumab with subsequent chemotherapy and CR, PR and SD were 1%, 9% and 30%. Overall rates of bevacizumab-related grade 1-2/3-4 adverse events were: proteinuria 38/9 %, hypertension 16/3 %, thromboembolic events 1/5 %, infection 2/3 %, bleeding 2/1 % and fistula 0/1 %. Conclusions: The authors concluded that bevacizumab-containing therapy and use of bevacizumab for long period of time demonstrated efficacy and good tolerability when used as a first-, second- and third-line treatment in routine clinical practice.

First-Line Bevacizumab-Containing Therapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Analysis of 585 Patients Treated in the ATHENA Study

Background: The prognosis for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is poor and treatment options are limited. Bevacizumab improves the efficacy of standard first-line therapy in locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/mBC). The benefit of bevacizumab seen in patients with TNBC appears similar to that observed in the overall population. We conducted an exploratory analysis of patients with TNBC treated in the single-arm routine oncology practice ATHENA study. Methods: Patients with previously untreated LR/mBC received standard first-line chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks or 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks, until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/physician decision). Results: Of 2,264 patients treated in ATHENA, 585 (26%) had TNBC. Most patients received single-agent taxane with bevacizumab. In the TNBC subgroup, the overall response rate was 49%, including complete responses in 10%; only 16% had primary resistant disease. Median time to progression was 7.2 months (95% CI 6.6–7.8) and median overall survival was 18.3 months (95% CI 16.4–19.7). The 1-year overall survival rate was 60%. The safety profile in TNBC was consistent with results in the overall population. Conclusion: This exploratory subgroup analysis suggests that first-line chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab is an active regimen in patients with metastatic TNBC.

Second-line bevacizumab-containing therapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer: subgroup analysis of the RIBBON-2 trial

Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) typically have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. To determine the impact of combining bevacizumab with second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic TNBC, we performed an exploratory subgroup analysis of the randomized phase 3 RIBBON-2 trial. RIBBON-2 enrolled patients with metastatic breast cancer that had progressed on first-line non-bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy. After selection of chemotherapy (taxane, gemcitabine, capecitabine, or vinorelbine), patients were randomized 2:1 to receive chemotherapy with either bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks or 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Of 684 patients treated in RIBBON-2, 159 (23%) had TNBC. Baseline characteristics were reasonably balanced in the two treatment groups. The majority received taxane chemotherapy. The hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.494 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33-0.74; P = 0.0006]. Median PFS was 6.0 months with bevacizumab-chemotherapy versus 2.7 months with chemotherapy alone. Median OS was 17.9 versus 12.6 months, respectively (HR 0.624, 95% CI 0.39-1.007; P = 0.0534). ORR was 41 versus 18%, respectively (P = 0.0078). The safety profile was consistent with the overall study population and previous phase 3 trials of bevacizumab. Patients with metastatic TNBC derived significant PFS and response benefits from the combination of bevacizumab with second-line chemotherapy. Despite the small sample size and immature data, there was a trend toward improved OS.

Bilateral pneumothorax after bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy in fibrosarcoma.

Bevacizumab-containing therapies can improve outcomes in patients with sarcoma. Bevacizumab had several notable adverse effects including bowel perforation but bilateral pneumothorax had never been reported in the available English literature. We reported a 23-year-old male with poorly differentiated fibrosarcoma who had spontaneous bilateral spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) after the third cycle of bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy. His bilateral pneumothorax resolved after closed drainage of pleural cavity with a small caliber catheter. The mechanism of pneumothorax developed after bevacizumab therapy was not clear. In patients who had chest discomfort after bevacizumab-containing therapy, pneumothorax should never be overlooked as one of the differential diagnoses.

First-line bevacizumab-containing therapy for breast cancer: results in patients aged ≥70 years treated in the ATHENA study

There are limited data on treatment outcomes in the growing population of elderly patients with locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/mBC). To gain information on first-line bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in the elderly, we analyzed data from the ATHENA trial in routine oncology practice. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative LR/mBC received first-line bevacizumab with standard chemotherapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or physician/patient decision. We carried out a subgroup analysis of safety and efficacy in patients aged≥70 years. Possible correlations between tolerability and baseline comorbidities or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status were explored. Bevacizumab was combined with single-agent paclitaxel in 46% of older patients. Only hypertension and proteinuria were more common in older than in younger patients (grade≥3 hypertension: 6.9% versus 4.2%, respectively; grade≥3 proteinuria: 4.0% versus 1.5%, respectively). Grade≥3 arterial/venous thromboembolism occurred in 2.9% versus 3.3%, respectively. Further analysis revealed no relationship between baseline presence and severity of hypertension and risk of developing hypertension during bevacizumab-containing therapy. Median time to progression was 10.4 months in patients aged≥70 years. These findings suggest that bevacizumab-containing therapy is tolerable and active in patients aged≥70 years. Hypertension was more common than in younger patients but was manageable. We find no evidence precluding the use of bevacizumab in older patients, including those with hypertension, although age may influence chemotherapy choice.

Final overall survival results and effect of prolonged (≥1 year) first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy for metastatic breast cancer in the ATHENA trial

The ATHENA study expanded on the safety and efficacy data derived from first-line trials of bevacizumab combined with standard chemotherapy for locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/mBC). In ATHENA, 2,264 patients received first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy in routine oncology practice. Overall survival (OS) data are now mature; additional analyses from this large data set can provide insights into treatment duration and the effect of prolonged bevacizumab exposure, where data are currently limited. Patients with HER2-negative LR/mBC received first-line bevacizumab with standard chemotherapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or physician/patient decision. We performed subgroup analyses on data from patients treated for ≥12 months and those who continued single-agent bevacizumab after stopping chemotherapy. After median follow-up of 20.1 months, median OS was 25.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.0-26.3 months) in the entire population. Median OS was 30.0 months (95% CI 28.5-32.7 months) in 1,205 patients who continued bevacizumab after discontinuation of chemotherapy and 18.4 months (95% CI 17.2-19.7 months) in 1,058 patients who discontinued bevacizumab before or at the same time as stopping chemotherapy. Bevacizumab treatment was continued for ≥12 months in 473 patients (21%). In most, bevacizumab was administered as monotherapy for extended periods after stopping chemotherapy. In the subgroup of patients treated for ≥12 months, the median time to onset of grade 3-5 adverse events was 5.0 months. There was no evidence that first onset of adverse events of special interest, except for proteinuria, was more common in later than earlier cycles. No relationship was detected between development of hypertension and OS. Findings from these analyses suggest that patients with LR/mBC can receive bevacizumab for prolonged periods without major toxicity or progression of disease. In the absence of progression, continuation of single-agent bevacizumab appears to be a reasonable approach, with minimal toxicity and the possibility of long-term disease control.

First-line bevacizumab in combination with weekly paclitaxel for metastatic breast cancer: efficacy and safety results from a large, open-label, single-arm Japanese study

Despite extensive evaluation of first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy in randomized trials in locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/mBC), data from Japanese populations are limited. We conducted a phase II study exclusively in Japanese patients to evaluate bevacizumab combined with weekly paclitaxel. Patients with HER2-negative measurable LR/mBC who had received no prior chemotherapy for LR/mBC received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg, days 1 and 15, in combination with paclitaxel 90 mg/m(2), days 1, 8, and 15, repeated every 4 weeks, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/physician decision. Co-primary endpoints of this single-arm open-label phase II study were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. A total of 120 patients (median age 55 years) received study therapy. At the time of data cut-off, the median duration of therapy was 11.1 months (range 0.5-24.7 months). Median PFS was 12.9 months (95% CI: 11.1-18.2) according to Independent Review Committee assessment and 14.9 months by investigator assessment. Median PFS was 9.6 months in the subgroup of 38 patients with triple-negative LR/mBC. The overall response rate was 74% (95% CI: 64.5-81.2%). Median overall survival (OS) was 35.8 months (95% CI: 26.4-not estimated) and the 1-year OS rate was 88.9% (95% CI: 83.2-94.6). The regimen was well tolerated and the safety profile was generally consistent with previous reports of bevacizumab-paclitaxel combination therapy. Grade 3 hypertension was reported in 17% of patients. Grade 4 hypertension, grade 3/4 proteinuria, and gastrointestinal perforation were absent. There were no new bevacizumab safety signals. In 50 patients (42%), treatment was continued for ≥ 1 year. The high activity of first-line bevacizumab in combination with weekly paclitaxel observed in our study confirms the results of the E2100 trial. Our results suggest that the activity and tolerability of first-line bevacizumab-containing regimens demonstrated in E2100 can be reproduced in Japanese populations.

Prospective analysis of the impact of VEGF‐A gene polymorphisms on the pharmacodynamics of bevacizumab‐based therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients

• Functional polymorphisms on the VEGF-A gene, known to be linked to cancer risk or to VEGF-A plasma concentrations, have been identified. So far, limited knowledge has been published on the relationships between toxicity/efficacy of bevacizumab-based therapy and VEGF-A polymorphisms (tumoral DNA). We therefore prospectively tested the impact of these five gene polymorphisms (blood DNA) on the pharmacodynamics of bevacizumab-based treatment administered in metastatic breast cancer patients. • Present data obtained from a prospective study suggest a role for VEGF-A 936C > T polymorphism as a potential predictor of time to progression in breast cancer patients receiving bevacizumab-containing therapy. Also, the VEGF-A-634G > C polymorphism was linked to bevacizumab-related toxicity. AIMS To test prospectively the impact of VEGF-A gene polymorphisms on the pharmacodynamics of bevacizumab-chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. As part of the single-arm MO19391 trial, 137 women with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer receiving first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy were analysed. Patients received bevacizumab associated (76%) or not (24%) with taxane-based chemotherapy. Clinical evaluation included clinical response, time to progression (TTP) and a toxicity score corresponding to the sum of each maximum observed toxicity grade (hypertension, haemorrhage, arterial and venous thrombo-embolism). Functional VEGF-A polymorphisms at position -2578 C > A, -1498 T > C, -1154 G > A, -634 G > C and 936 C > T were analysed by PCR-RFLP (blood DNA). Overall response rate (complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)) was 61%. Median TTP was 11 months. None of the VEGF-A polymorphisms was significantly linked to clinical response. Analysis of the 936C > T polymorphism revealed that the 96 patients homozygous for the 936C allele exhibited a marked tendency for a shorter TTP (median 9.7 months) than the 32 patients bearing the 936T allele (median 11.5 months, P= 0.022) of which 30 were CT and two were homozygous TT. Other polymorphisms did not influence TTP. VEGF-A-634 G > C was significantly related to the toxicity score with 39%, 49% and 81% of patients with score >1 in GG, GC and CC patients, respectively (P= 0.01). The role for VEGF-A 936C > T polymorphism as a potential marker of TTP in breast cancer patients receiving bevacizumab-containing therapy concords with the known impact of VEGF-A 936C > T polymorphism on VEGF-A expression.

Pneumothorax After Bevacizumab-containing Chemotherapy: A Case Report

Bevacizumab added to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy can improve outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Bevacizumab had several notable adverse effects including bowel perforation but pneumothorax had never been reported in the available English literature. We reported a 45-year-old male with lung metastases from colorectal cancer who had spontaneous pneumothorax after the second cycle of bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy. His pneumothorax resolved after tube thoracostomy with a small caliber catheter. The mechanism of pneumothorax developed after bevacizumab therapy was not clear as bowel perforation but tumor necrosis with ruptured parietal pleura might be the cause. In patients who had chest discomfort after bevacizumab-containing therapy, pneumothorax should never be overlooked as one of the differential diagnoses.

Identification of serum angiopoietin-2 as a biomarker for clinical outcome of colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab-containing therapy

Background:The combination of chemotherapy with the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody bevacizumab is a standard of care in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). However, biomarkers predicting outcome of bevacizumab-containing treatment are lacking. As angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) is a key regulator of vascular remodelling in concert with VEGF, we investigated its role as a biomarker in metastatic CRC.Methods:Serum Ang-2 levels were measured in 33 healthy volunteers and 90 patients with CRC. Of these, 34 had metastatic disease and received bevacizumab-containing therapy. To determine the tissue of origin of Ang-2, quantitative real-time PCR was performed on microdissected cryosections of human CRC and in a murine xenograft model of CRC using species-specific amplification.Results:Ang-2 originated from the stromal compartment of CRC tissues. Serum Ang-2 levels were significantly elevated in patients with metastatic CRC compared with healthy controls. Amongst patients receiving bevacizumab-containing treatment, low pre-therapeutic serum Ang-2 levels were associated with a significant better response rate (82 vs 31% P<0.01), a prolonged median progression-free survival (14.1 vs 8.5 months; P<0.01) and a reduction of 91% in the hazard of death (P<0.05).Conclusion:Serum Ang-2 is a candidate biomarker for outcome of patients with metastatic CRC treated with bevacizumab-containing therapy, and it should be further validated to customise combined chemotherapeutic and anti-angiogenic treatment.

Emerging clinical principles on the use of bevacizumab for the treatment of malignant gliomas

Despite advances in adjuvant therapy, the prognosis for most patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) is poor, and almost all HGGs have a likelihood of disease recurrence. HGGs are highly vascularized tumors with elevated expression levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), an important mediator of angiogenesis. A compelling biologic rationale, a pressing need for improved therapeutics and positive results from studies of bevacizumab in other tumor types, led to the evaluation of bevacizumab in the treatment of HGG. It was demonstrated previously that bevacizumab, which is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets VEGF, improved outcomes when combined with chemotherapy (most commonly irinotecan) in patients with recurrent HGG; and, on the basis of an improved objective response rate in 2 prospective phase 2 studies, bevacizumab was granted accelerated approval by the US Food and Drug Administration as a single agent in patients with previously treated glioblastoma (GB). Bevacizumab-containing therapy has been associated with manageable, class-specific toxicity; however, severe treatment-related adverse events are observed in a minority of patients. Preliminary data on bevacizumab-based therapy in recurrent anaplastic gliomas, in the frontline treatment of GB, and in additional patient populations are also encouraging. With the goal of addressing unanswered questions regarding the optimal use of bevacizumab, the objective of the current review was to provide a summary of the clinical efficacy and safety data on bevacizumab in patients with HGG, the practical issues surrounding the administration of bevacizumab, and ongoing investigations of bevacizumab in additional brain tumor treatment settings.