PDF HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒 不同经营模式对川西亚高山天然次生林林地水文效应的影响 DOI: 10.5846/stxb201503050431 作者: 作者单位: 四川省林业科学研究院,四川省林业科学研究院,四川农业大学旅游学院,四川农业大学旅游学院,四川省林业科学研究院,四川省林业科学研究院,中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与保护研究所 作者简介: 通讯作者: 中图分类号: 基金项目: 国家“十二五”科技支撑计划项目(2012BAD22B0104);四川省基本科研业务费项目(JB2015-04);林业公益性行业专项(201104109-01) Effects of different forest management regimes on woodland hydrological effects of natural secondary forests in a sub-alpine region of western Sichuan, China Author: Affiliation: Sichuan Academy of Forestry,Sichuan Academy of Forestry,,,,, Fund Project: 摘要 | 图/表 | 访问统计 | 参考文献 | 相似文献 | 引证文献 | 资源附件 | 文章评论 摘要:天然次生林是川西亚高山林区经历大规模砍伐后形成的主要森林类型之一,是我国西南林区水源涵养林的重要组成部分。以不同经营模式(抚育经营、清林+补植经营以及封育经营)的川西亚高山次生桦木林和桦木、岷江冷杉混交林为研究对象,通过样方取样法获取和分析了林地苔藓、枯落物和土壤的水文指标。结果表明,与封山育林经营相比,抚育经营下的两种林型的苔藓最大持水率均显著升高(F=8.147,P=0.010;F=15.525,P=0.006)、桦木林的蓄积量显著降低(F=4.979,P=0.022),而苔藓最大持水量变化不显著;混交林则均无显著变化。在清林+补植经营下,混交林苔藓水文效应变化不显著(F=2.280,P=0.183),而桦木林虽然苔藓最大持水率无显著变化(F=4.072,P=0.098),但蓄积量的显著降低(F=3.536,P=0.044)导致了其最大持水量的降低(F=3.782,P=0.042)。两种经营方式基本上促进了天然林的枯落物最大持水率、降低了林下枯落物蓄积量;其中抚育经营效果更显著,但两种经营方式下枯落物最大持水量变化不显著。两种经营方式下,桦木林和混交林的林下土壤容重均降低(F=10.715,P<0.01;F=5.148,P<0.05),同时桦木林土壤最大持水量增加(F=4.499,P<0.05),其中抚育经营的影响程度都更显著。从4年来的短期效应来看,两种经营方式均对天然林的林地持水能力具有促进作用,抚育经营较清林+补植经营更显著,但这仅是短期的结果,两种经营方式对于退化天然林水文以及其他生态功能恢复的长期影响还有待于进一步的观测研究。 Abstract:In the wake of the large-scale logging of its sub-alpine region, natural secondary forest is one of dominant forest types of western Sichuan, and plays an important role in water conservation in the forests of southwestern China. The moss, litter, and soil produced by different management regimes (e.g., clearing and pruning, clearing and replanting, and no disturbance) have been measured and sampled, and their hydrological effects on Betula spp. forests and mixed forests with Abies faxoniana and Betula spp. have been analyzed. The results of this study revealed that the maximal water holding rate (MWHR) of moss from clearing and pruning was significantly higher than that from no disturbance, but the cumulated mass (CM) of moss from clearing and pruning was significantly lower than that from no disturbance, and the maximal water holding capacity (MWHC) of moss was no different between forest types or between clearing and pruning mode and no disturbance mode. In Betula spp. forests managed by clearing and replanting, the MWHR and CM of moss was lower, but not significantly so, while the MWHC of moss was significantly lower than that in the undisturbed plots of the same forest type. In addition, there was no significant difference between the hydrological effects of both mixed forests with Abies faxoniana and Betula spp. Under the two regimes including active management, the MWHR of the litter and the soil water holding capacity both increased, the CM of the litter and soil bulk density decreased, but MWHC of litter was not significantly different between artificial mode and undisturbed mode. The performance of the clearing and pruning regime was more significantly better than that of clearing and replantation regime. From short-term effects for 4 years, the woodland's capacity to facilitate water conservation was increased by both the clearing and pruning regime and the clearing and replantation regime, in both Betula spp. forests and fixed forests with Abies faxoniana and Betula spp. The performance of the clearing and pruning regime was more significant than those of the other management regimes. Over the long term, the hydrological and ecological effects of different management regimes on natural secondary forests requires further investigation. 参考文献 相似文献 引证文献
Read full abstract