Use Of Beta-blockers Research Articles

Investigating synergy between beta-blockers and transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: preliminary data from a propensity matched analysis

PurposeFavorable clinical outcomes have been reported with the adjunct use of beta-blockers in cancer treatment, hypothetically secondary to their anti-angiogenic/anti-proliferative effects. Hereby, we investigate whether there is synergy between beta-blockers and TACE in the treatment of HCC. Methods36 HCC patients on beta-blockers (mean dose of 48 mg daily) at the time of first-line treatment with TACE at our institution were retrospectively identified out of a cohort of 221 patients between 2008 and 2019. Using propensity scoring, a matched cohort of 36 patients not exposed to beta-blockers was generated based on age, gender, ethnicity, etiology of liver disease, BCLC, child Pugh score, PS/ECOG, cirrhosis, largest mass treated, type of TACE and treated liver segments. Tumor response was assessed at 1st and 2nd post-TACE imaging timepoints (1.4 and 4.1 months on average respectively). Variables were compared using chi-square test and Student's t-test. Kaplan-Meier transplant-free survival plots were generated using IBM® SPSS® software. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate survival predictors. A p values < 0.05 was considered significant. ResultsComparing the control and beta-blocker cohorts, there were no differences in baseline characteristics, post-TACE imaging timepoints, tumor response or transplant free survival (p > 0.05). Tumor size was found to be a predictor of survival when the two cohorts were combined (p = 0.03). ConclusionTransplant-free survival and HCC response to first-line TACE treatment were similar in the control and beta-blocker groups. Large tumor sizes were associated with higher mortality in combined analysis of the cohorts.

Efficacy of different medications in the treatment of gynaecological tumours: a clinical meta-analysis.

A gynaecological tumour is one of the world's leading causes of death for women globally. Among women, cancer is the 8th most common cause of death. Since there are no such programmes, the majority of women who are diagnosed with the condition are either in advanced stages or do not respond well to current treatments. Even if patients react to the treatments, they still risk having the cancer return, at which point any further medical intervention is met with resistance. For this study, we selected the systemic reviews and articles that have the use of different medications used for the treatment of gynaecological tumours. Regarding metformin use, this study found a positive relationship between higher survival and metformin use. Five of the studies that examined the use of statins revealed a link between statin use and higher overall and/or progression-free survival rates. Individuals on lipophilic and hydrophilic statins would do better. Research evaluating beta-blocker use during neoadjuvant treatment revealed a time-varying effect, with improved survival seen across all users early in the follow-up period. However, only non-selective beta-blocker users demonstrated a correlation with higher survival after five years. One study found that the benefits of aspirin use were significant, but the advantage for continuous users (both before and after diagnosis) was minimal. Conclusions on the association between gynaecological tumour survival and NA-NSAIDs, metformin, beta-blockers, and aspirin cannot be drawn due to insufficient evidence. However, the vast majority of statin studies have demonstrated that users had higher rates of survival. Bias, however, bias may affect the results of the studies.

Characteristics and outcomes of heart failure in Japan: A hospital-based administrative database analysis.

Epidemiological and outcome studies on patients in Japan with heart failure (HF) categorized by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are currently limited. The aim of this non-interventional database study was to provide further information on these patients. Administrative claims data and electronic medical records from hospitals participating in the Voluntary Hospitals in Japan (VHJ) organization were used. Patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of HF between 1 April 2017 and 30 March 2020 were categorized by baseline LVEF on echocardiogram: HF with reduced EF (HFrEF, LVEF <40%); HF with preserved EF (HFpEF, LVEF ≥50%); and HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF, 40% to <50% LVEF). Patients were evaluated for baseline characteristics, pre-admission diagnosis, prescription drugs, length of hospitalization, HF treatment cost, overall cost of hospitalization, and in-hospital prescription. An exploratory analysis compared post-hospitalization mortality and re-hospitalization rates. In total, 10646 hospitalized patients from 17 VHJ hospitals were enrolled. Of these, 7212 were included in the analysis set and categorized into HFpEF (3183, 44.1%), HFmrEF (1280, 17.7%), and HFrEF (2749, 38.1%) groups based on baseline LVEF. Beta-blocker use increased during hospitalization, with a mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 23.3% (22.3-24.3) of patients receiving these agents before admission versus 69.4% (68.3-70.5) at discharge. Administration of diuretics, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) showed a similar trend. Differences in treatments were observed between HF categories at discharge, with a higher proportion (95% CI) of ACE inhibitor use in the HFrEF group (40.6% [38.7-42.4]) versus HFmrEF (27.5% [25.1-30.0]) and HFpEF (20.6% [19.2-22.1]) groups (P<0.0001), and more ARB use in the HFmrEF and HFpEF groups (32.5% [29.9-35.1] and 31.2% [29.6-32.9], respectively) versus HFrEF (25.1% [23.5-26.8]; P<0.0001). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) length of hospitalization was 22.2 (23.3) days, and the median (interquartile range) was 17 (11-25) days. Estimated average cost of HF treatment per patient during index hospitalization was 300090 yen with HFrEF treatment costing the most. Average total healthcare expenditure during hospitalization was 1225650 yen per index hospitalization per patient, with HFrEF also the most expensive. During a mean (SD) observation period of 324 (304) days, ~21% of patients in each group required re-hospitalization for HF, and 625 patients (8.7%) died. The proportion of patients in each HF category was largely consistent with existing data. Discharge medications indicated high prescription of guideline-directed therapy. This study provides real-world data on patients with HF in Japan that can help inform future clinical decision-making.

Abstract 17: First-Line Beta Blocker Use Among &gt;3.1 Million Veterans Initiating Hypertension Treatment, 2000-2022

Introduction: It is unknown how often beta blockers (BB) are used first line for high blood pressure (BP) treatment among patients without compelling indications, despite US BP guidelines not recommending this practice since 2014. Research Question: How many start, and what factors influence, first line BB use among patients without compelling indications? Methods: Serial cross-sectional study of outpatients newly diagnosed and initiating treatment in the Veterans Health Administration, 1/1/2000–12/31/2022. We removed prevalent users, categorized drugs by class, and presented compelling indication status by initial BB use (mono- or combination therapy). Among those without compelling indications (ie, aortic aneurysm/disease, angina, atrial fibrillation/tachyarrhythmia, chronic liver disease/cirrhosis, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization), multivariable Poisson regression estimated factors associated with BB use. Results: Of 3138304 Veterans (mean age 61 years, 94% male, 65% Non-Hispanic White), 774821 (25%) initiated a BB, of which the proportion without compelling indications decreased over time from 91% to 81%; the proportion with compelling indications increased from 9% to 19% (Panel A). Specific BBs used changed over time (Panel B). Among those without compelling indications, BB initiation was more likely with increasing age, females, current smokers, alcohol abuse, aspirin or statin use, each additional antihypertensive prescribed, each pre-index hospitalization, and urban setting (Panel C). Conclusions: Most Veterans using BB first line for high BP do not have compelling indications. Interventions are needed to align real world treatments with guidelines.

Effects of beta-blockers on quality of life and well-being in patients with myocardial infarction and preserved left ventricular function-a prespecified substudy from REDUCE-AMI.

In the Randomized Evaluation of Decreased Usage of Beta-Blockers after Acute Myocardial Infarction (REDUCE-AMI) study, long-term beta-blocker use in patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction demonstrated no effect on death or cardiovascular outcomes. The aim of this prespecified substudy was to investigate effects of beta-blockers on self-reported quality of life and well-being. From this parallel-group, open-label, registry-based randomized clinical trial, EQ-5D, and World Health Organization well-being index-5 (WHO-5) questionnaires were obtained at 6-10 weeks and 11-13 months after AMI in 4080 and 806 patients, respectively. We report results from intention-to-treat and on-treatment analyses for the overall population and relevant subgroups using Wilcoxon rank sum test and adjusted ordinal regression analyses. Of the 4080 individuals reporting EQ-5D (median age 64 years, 22% female), 2023 were randomized to beta-blockers. The main outcome, median EQ-5D index score, was 0.94 [interquartile range (IQR) 0.88, 0.97] in the beta-blocker group, and 0.94 (IQR 0.88, 0.97) in the no-beta-blocker group 6-10 weeks after AMI, OR 1.00 [95% CI 0.89-1.13; P>0.9]. After 11-13 months, results remained unchanged. Findings were robust in on-treatment analyses and across relevant subgroups. Secondary outcomes, EQ-VAS and WHO-5 index score, confirmed these results. Among patients after AMI with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, self-reported quality of life and well-being was not significantly different in individuals randomized to routine long-term beta-blocker therapy as compared to individuals with no beta-blocker use. These results appear consistent regardless of adherence to randomized treatment and across subgroups which emphasizes the need for a careful individual risk-benefit evaluation prior to initiation of beta-blocker treatment.

Diastolic Stress Echocardiography in Patients With Hypertrophy Cardiomyopathy: Association With Exercise Capacity

Diastolic dysfunction plays a major role in precipitating congestive heart failure (CHF) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients. In many such patients, symptoms are unmasked only during exercise, as left ventricular (LV) filling pressure is normal at rest but increase with exercise. We sought to establish if abnormal post-exercise diastolic parameters are associated with reduced exercise capacity in patients with HCM. We examined 590 asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic HCM patients (54±14 years, 57% men, body mass index 30±6 kg/m2, 84% on betablockers) with HCM by two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography at rest and following maximal treadmill exercise echocardiography (TSE). A complete echocardiogram (including LV ejection fraction, LV thickness, LV outflow tract [LVOT] gradient, degree of mitral regurgitation [MR]) was recorded. Diastolic parameters (septal and lateral [e’] velocities of the mitral annulus, peak early [E] and late [A] mitral inflow velocity, E/A ratio, E/e’, right ventricular systolic pressure [RVSP] and left atrial volume index [LAVI]) were recorded at rest and post-TSE. Exercise functional capacity was recorded and divided into <85% or >85% of age-gender predicted metabolic equivalents (AGP-METs). Following maximal exercise, 32% patients had at least moderate MR, mean LVOT gradient was 61±59 mmHg, E/A ratio was 1.2± 1.0, average E/e’ ratio 12.9±1.0 and peak RVSP was 36±15 mm Hg. Only 42% patients achieved >85% of AGP-METs; mean Mets were 7±3. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, higher body mass index (odds ratio [OR] 1.05), betablocker use (OR 2.58), higher LAVI (OR 1.02), higher peak-stress LVOTG (OR 1.06), peak-stress E/e’ (OR 1.04) and higher RVSP (OR 1.03) were independently associated with <85% AGP-METs achieved (all p<0.05). In conclusion, in asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic patients with HCM undergoing TSE, there is a significant and independent association between abnormal diastolic response to exercise and reduced exercise capacity in HCM. Incorporating diastolic parameters during stress echocardiography could provide incremental diagnostic utility in deciphering the exact etiology of dyspnea in such patients.

P144 PHENOTYPIC CHARACTERISATION OF HEART FAILURE WITH PRESERVED EJECTION FRACTION ACCORDING TO BODY MASS INDEX: SUBANALYSIS OF THE ARGENTINE ARFEY-PRESER REGISTRY

Background: Nutritional status, characterised by body mass index (BMI), may influence therapeutic decisions in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The objectives of this study were to identify clinical and echocardiographic characteristics associated with nutritional status and to analyse therapeutic strategies in HFpEF patients in Argentina. Materials and Methods: This prospective, multicentre observational registry enrolled outpatients or those discharged from hospitals, with prior informed consent. The study spanned from December 2022 to February 2024. Inclusion criteria were: 1) presence of current signs and symptoms, LVEF ≥50%, 2) structural heart disease with LVH, LAE, or average E/e’ ≥15 on Doppler, 3) elevated natriuretic peptides: sinus rhythm: NTproBNP &gt;125 pg/ml or BNP &gt;35 pg/ml; Atrial fibrillation/flutter: NTproBNP &gt;375 pg/ml or BNP &gt;105 pg/ml; and 5) commitment to 6-month and 1-year follow-ups. Exclusion criteria comprised: 1) acute coronary syndrome, 2) coronary artery bypass grafting, or valve replacement within the preceding 3 months, 3) confirmed infiltrative or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, severe valvular disease, 4) severe illness with &lt;1-year prognosis, and chronic renal failure on permanent dialysis. Results: A total of 449 patients were enrolled, with 440 having available BMI data for this analysis. Patient enrolment was consistent across centres and nationwide. BMI analysis revealed 0.7% undernutrition, 16.6% normal weight, 32% overweight, and 50.7% obesity. In Figure1 showed the analysis of clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and HF severity variables according to BMI. Significant differences were found in treatment, with lower use of RAS inhibitors and beta-blockers in non-normal weight patients compared to those with overweight and obesity. Conclusions: For a similar HFpEF severity profile, the phenotype according to BMI suggests different clinical characteristics. Underweight/normal weight patients were older, with more LAE and pulmonary hypertension, and fewer risk factors. Obesity was present in half of the cases, characterised by younger patients with a high burden of cardiovascular risk factors. This impacts the use of certain heart failure medications.

Beta-blocker use and outcomes in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction.

In the absence of randomized trial evidence, we performed a large observational analysis of the association between beta-blocker (BB) use and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and mildly reduced (HFmrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We pooled individual patient data from four large HFmrEF/HFpEF trials (I-Preserve, TOPCAT, PARAGON-HF, and DELIVER). The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. Among the 16 951 patients included, the mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 56.8%, and 13 400 (79.1%) had HFpEF (LVEF ≥50%). Overall, 12 812 patients (75.6%) received a BB. The median bisoprolol-equivalent dose of BB was 5.0 (Q1-Q3: 2.5-5.0) mg with BB continuation rates of 93.1% at 2 years (in survivors). The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the primary outcome did not differ between BB users and non-users (HR 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.05), but the adjusted HR was lower in BB users than non-users (0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.88), and this association was maintained across LVEF (pinteraction = 0.88). In subgroup analyses, the adjusted risk of the primary outcome was similar in BB users and non-users with or without a history of myocardial infarction, hypertension, or a baseline heart rate <70 bpm. By contrast, a better outcome with BB use was seen in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to those without atrial fibrillation (pintreraction = 0.02). In this observational analysis of non-randomized BB treatment, there was no suggestion that BB use was associated with worse HF outcomes in HFmrEF/HFpEF, even after extensive adjustment for other prognostic variables.

Cholinesterase Inhibitor Initiation Does Not Increase the Risk of Fall-Related Injury in Older Adults Treated With Beta-Blockers: A Self-Controlled Case Series Design.

Prescribing cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) concurrently with beta-blockers might cause syncope that increases the risk of fall-related injuries (FRIs). This self-controlled case series study assesses the risk of FRIs associated with initiating ChEIs while receiving beta-blockers among Medicare fee-for-service-insured nursing home (NH) residents in the United States. We identified individuals at their first dispensing of a beta-blocker between 2016 and 2019 after at least 45 days of long-stay NH residency. Individuals were followed from the first day of beta-blocker use until beta-blocker discontinuation, Medicare disenrollment, death, or study end. ChEI initiation was classified as the first 60 days of new ChEI dispensing after 45 days of no ChEI exposure. FRIs were assessed during beta-blocker use periods, and age-adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) for ChEI-initiation days versus other days were calculated using conditional Poisson regression models. Analyses were weighted for event-dependent observation periods due to the high risk of mortality after an FRI in this population. Subgroup analyses were conducted for several key time-fixed variables, including sex, age, ChEI type, ChEI dose, beta-blocker selectivity, and beta-blocker dose. The FRI risk after ChEI initiation was not elevated among 837 residents who experienced an FRI while using beta-blockers (IRR=0.90 [95%CLs 0.71, 1.15]). Analyses of ChEI initiation in several subgroups yielded similar results. There was no substantial difference in FRI risk when initiating ChEIs among older NH residents receiving beta-blocker therapy versus periods without ChEI initiation, suggesting that there is no clinically significant pharmacodynamic drug-drug interaction between beta-blockers and ChEIs.

Heart failure treatment in the last years of life: A nationwide study of 364 000 individuals.

In patients with heart failure, treatment patterns in the last years of life have not been assessed at large scale. We aimed to assess whether heart failure treatment patterns up to 5 years prior to death changed over time. In a cohort study covering the whole Swedish population, we assessed all heart failure patients who died between 1 July 2007 and 31 December 2020 for evidence-based treatments. The proportion on the respective treatment at the time of death was examined by year of death using binomial regression. Looking back in time, treatment discontinuation rates were estimated using Poisson regression on time-split data. Combining these models, the proportion on each medication was estimated up to 5 years prior to death. A total of 364 480 patients died with heart failure during the study period. Half were women, and the median (interquartile range) age at death was 86 (79-90). The use of all heart failure treatments decreased gradually closer to death, but the discontinuation rate of beta blockers decreased over time, resulting in an increasing proportion of patients on treatment at the time of death. In patients with heart failure, a changing pattern of medical treatment during the last years of life was observed, most notably with an increasing use of beta blockers. This may in part be due to a changing pattern of comorbidities over time, with an increase in e.g. hypertension and atrial fibrillation, but a decline in ischaemic heart disease.

Pooled analysis of the three trials of the TRIUMF series: efficacy of a triple fixed combination of antihypertensive drugs in the practice of physicians of different specialties in Ukraine

Study objectives – to compare the data obtained in the TRIUMF (antihyperTensive theRapy in UkraIne – BP optiMization in Focus) trials, in particular, TRIUMF-1, TRIUMF-2, TRIUMF-3, to determine possible patterns and significant factors affecting BP control in patients taking 2 or more antihypertensive drugs and switching to the original single pill combination (SPC) of perindopril arginine/indapamide/amlodipine.Materials and Methods. For the pooled analysis, data on 5960 patients obtained from the three trials of the TRIUMF series were selected. All the studies were multicenter prospective trials conducted at different times in Ukraine with the involvement of general practitioners (TR-1), cardiologists (TR-2), and family practitioners (TR-3). According to the inclusion criteria, patients over 18 years of age with hypertension and a history of taking 2 or 3 antihypertensive drugs for at least 1 month whose BP remained above 140/90 mm Hg could be included in the study. The drug of choice for further therapy was Triplixam (Servier, France) – a single pill combination (SPC) of perindopril arginine, amlodipine and indapamide. Each patient was observed for 3 months. Patients visited physicians in 1–2 weeks, 2 months after the start of the study and the corresponding therapy adjustment. The adherence rate was assessed before and after 2 months. The use of beta-blockers (BBs) in the treatment of the cohort of patients with hypertension was analyzed separately. The final analysis included a comparison of the data obtained in the TRIUMF trial series.Results and Discussion. The use of a SPC of perindopril arginine/indapamide/amlodipine allowed to achieve the target BP levels (140/90 or less) after 2 months of therapy in 84 % of patients with a history of taking a combination therapy (2 drugs – 65 %, 3 drugs – 35 %). One of the important criteria for choosing the dose of a triple SPC is the baseline BP values. The higher the degree of hypertension, the higher the dose prescribed by physicians. The minimum dose of the SPC of perindopril arginine, indapamide and amlodipine (5/1.25/5 mg) was prescribed for stage 1 hypertension in 62 %, stage 2 hypertension in 38 %, and stage 3 hypertension in 15 % of patients; the maximum dose (10/2.5/10 mg) was prescribed for stage 1 hypertension in 9 %, stage 2 hypertension in 15 %, and stage 3 hypertension in 43 % of patients included in the study (p&lt;0.05). Therapy with the triple SPC of perindopril arginine, indapamide and amlodipine was well tolerated: adverse events were observed in 0.63 % (TR-1), 1 % (TR-3) and 1.86 % (TR-2) of cases, which was largely due to the previous use of two (65 %) or three (35 %) antihypertensive drugs comprising the SPC by the study patients. Beta-blockers (n=2012) were prescribed due to the presence of a comorbidity (coronary heart disease, angina pectoris – 33.5 %, heart failure – 28.3 %) rather than due to lowered BP. The combination of perindopril arginine/indapamide/amlodipine with BB was well tolerated and 83.9 % of patients achieved BP ≤ 140/90 mm Hg, while 9.36 % achieved ≤ 130/80 mm Hg after 2 months of treatment. There was a significant improvement in the adherence to treatment (TR-2, TR-3) in the majority of patients (75 and 70 %), due to high antihypertensive efficacy, convenience of pill’s administration (one pill instead of three) and good tolerability of the original SPC.Conclusions. Regular medical supervision (cardiologists, family practitioners, general practitioners), high antihypertensive efficacy of the SPC (84 % of patients reached the target BP levels after 2 months of therapy ), convenience of pill’s administration (one pill instead of three), high adherence to treatment confirmed in TR-2 and TR-3 in most patients, and good tolerability of the original SPC of perindopril arginine, indapamide and amlodipine led to a significant improvement in the effectiveness of treatment of patients with hypertension.

J-shaped relationship between serum creatinine and mortality in Korean patients with acute heart failure.

Cachexia and sarcopenia are common among heart failure (HF) patients and are linked to poor outcomes. As serum creatinine levels are influenced by both renal function and muscle mass, our study aimed to investigate the relationship between serum creatinine levels and mortality in acute HF patients. We enrolled 5198 consecutive acute HF patients from the Korea Acute Heart Failure (KorAHF) registry, excluding those on renal replacement therapy. Patients were categorized into five groups based on their discharge serum creatinine levels: low (< 0.6mg/dL), reference (0.6-0.89mg/dL), upper normal (0.9-1.19mg/dL), high (1.2-1.49mg/dL), and very high (≥ 1.5mg/dL). The primary endpoint was post-discharge all-cause mortality. The mean creatinine level was 1.20 ± 0.88mg/dL. Notably, 335 (6.4%) patients had serum creatinine levels < 0.6mg/dL. These patients were younger (mean age, 67years) and more likely to have a low BMI (< 18.5kg/m2) compared to the reference group (15.3% vs. 6.4%). Over a median follow-up of 975days, 1743 (34.8%) patients died. We observed a J-shaped relationship between serum creatinine levels and mortality, with both low and high levels associated with increased mortality. After adjusting for covariates, including age, sex, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, malignancy, atrial fibrillation on electrocardiography, levels of C-reactive protein, sodium, hemoglobin, albumin, brain natriuretic peptide, de novo heart failure, use of beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, patients with serum creatinine levels < 0.6mg/dL had a 33% higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.66) compared to those with levels of 0.6-0.89mg/dL. However, BUN, which is not affected by muscle metabolism, exhibited a linear relationship with mortality. Among acute HF patients, there exists a J-shaped relationship between discharge serum creatinine levels and mortality, highlighting the increased mortality risk in individuals with very low serum creatinine levels.

Prevalence of heart failure and trends in its pharmacological treatment between 2000 and 2017 among very old people

PurposeThe aim of this study was to describe a population of very old people with heart failure (HF), to analyse the use of cardiovascular drugs over time, and to explore factors influencing cardiovascular drug treatment for this group.MethodsAll participants with information regarding HF diagnosis were selected from the Umeå 85+/Gerontological Regional Database (GERDA). The people in GERDA are all ≥85 years old. Trained investigators performed structured interviews and assessments. Information regarding medications and diagnoses was obtained from the participants and from medical records. Medical diagnoses were reviewed and confirmed by an experienced geriatrician.ResultsIn this very old population, the prevalence of HF was 29.6% among women and 30.7% among men. Between 2000 and 2017, there was an increase in the use of renin-angiotensin (RAS) inhibitors (odds ratio [OR] 1.107, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.072–1.144) and beta-blockers (BBs) (OR 1.123, 95% CI 1.086–1.161) among persons with HF, whereas the prevalence of loop diuretics (OR 0.899, 95% CI 0.868–0.931) and digitalis (OR 0.864, 95% CI 0.828–0.901) decreased (p < 0.001 for all drug classes). Higher age was associated with lower use of RAS inhibitors and BBs.ConclusionIn this HF population, the use of evidence-based medications for HF increased over time. This may be a sign of better awareness among prescribers regarding the under-prescribing of guidelines-recommended treatment to old people. Higher age associated with a lower prevalence of RAS inhibitors and BBs. This might indicate that further improvement is possible but could also represent a more cautious prescribing among frail very old individuals.

Systemic and cerebro-cardiac biomarkers following traumatic brain injury: an interim analysis of randomized controlled clinical trial of early administration of beta blockers

This is an interim analysis of the Beta-blocker (Propranolol) use in traumatic brain injury (TBI) based on the high-sensitive troponin status (BBTBBT) study. The BBTBBT is an ongoing double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial with a target sample size of 771 patients with TBI. We sought, after attaining 50% of the sample size, to explore the impact of early administration of beta-blockers (BBs) on the adrenergic surge, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and the TBI biomarkers linked to the status of high-sensitivity troponin T (HsTnT). Patients were stratified based on the severity of TBI using the Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and HsTnT status (positive vs negative) before randomization. Patients with positive HsTnT (non-randomized) received propranolol (Group-1; n = 110), and those with negative test were randomized to receive propranolol (Group-2; n = 129) or placebo (Group-3; n = 111). Propranolol was administered within 24 h of injury for 6 days, guided by the heart rate (> 60 bpm), systolic blood pressure (≥ 100 mmHg), or mean arterial pressure (> 70 mmHg). Luminex and ELISA-based immunoassays were used to quantify the serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-18), TBI biomarkers [S100B, Neuron-Specific Enolase (NSE), and epinephrine]. Three hundred and fifty patients with comparable age (mean 34.8 ± 9.9 years) and gender were enrolled in the interim analysis. Group 1 had significantly higher baseline levels of IL-6, IL-1B, S100B, lactate, and base deficit than the randomized groups (p = 0.001). Group 1 showed a significant temporal reduction in serum IL-6, IL-1β, epinephrine, and NSE levels from baseline to 48 h post-injury (p = 0.001). Patients with severe head injuries had higher baseline levels of IL-6, IL-1B, S100B, and HsTnT than mild and moderate TBI (p = 0.01). HsTnT levels significantly correlated with the Injury Severity Score (ISS) (r = 0.275, p = 0.001), GCS (r = − 0.125, p = 0.02), and serum S100B (r = 0.205, p = 0.001). Early Propranolol administration showed a significant reduction in cytokine levels and TBI biomarkers from baseline to 48 h post-injury, particularly among patients with positive HsTnT, indicating the potential role in modulating inflammation post-TBI.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04508244. It was registered first on 11/08/2020. Recruitment started on 29 December 2020 and is ongoing. The study was partly presented at the 23rd European Congress of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ECTES), April 28–30, 2024, in Estoril, Lisbon, Portugal.

Does atenolol use during pregnancy cause small for gestational age neonates? A meta-analysis.

Atenolol is a commonly used beta bloscker in non-pregnant women. Many providers are hesitant in prescribing atenolol in pregnancy because of a possible association with poor fetal growth. We aimed to assess the association between atenolol and the occurrence of small for gestational age neonates compared to other beta blockers, as described in the existing literature. We used the meta-analytic method to generate a forest plot for risk ratios (RR) of small for gestational age in patients who used atenolol vs. other beta blockers. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic. Two studies were included, with a resultant RR of 1.94 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.60; 2.35]. A study by Duan etal. in 2018 noted the following rate of small for gestational age for each beta blocker use: 112/638 atenolol, 590/3,357 labetalol, 35/324 metoprolol, and 50/489 propranolol. A study by Tanaka etal. in 2016 noted the following rate of small for gestational age: 8/22 for propranolol, 2/12 for metoprolol, 2/6 for atenolol, 0/5 for bisoprolol. Heterogeneity (I2) was 0 %. Our results suggested an elevated risk of small for gestational age associated with atenolol use in comparison to other beta blockers, specifically labetalol, propranolol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol.

Predicting factors for omitting beta-blockers in patients with tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy after successful catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Tachycardia induces a reduction in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), which is defined as tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (TIC). Conversion to and maintenance of sinus rhythm by catheter ablation can improve LVEF in patients with TIC due to atrial fibrillation (AF). Beta-blockers are mandatory for the treatment of heart failure with reduced LVEF(HFrEF), but the necessity of beta-blockers in TIC patients even after catheter ablation remains unclear. We examined the effect of beta-blockers on cardiac function in TIC patients after catheter ablation. We retrospectively analyzed 124 patients with a history of heart failure and an LVEF of ≤ 50% who underwent catheter ablation for AF. TIC was defined as a ≥ 10% improvement in the baseline LVEF and an improvement to an LVEF of ≥ 50% at 6months after ablation. Patients with other cardiomyopathy diagnosed before the ablation were excluded. LVEF was significantly increased with the reductions of the left ventricular and left atrial volumes at the 6-month follow-up in all 80 patients with TIC. No beta-blockers were prescribed during the post-ablation follow-up in 21 patients with TIC. The absolute values of and changes in the echocardiographic parameters between before and after ablation were not significantly different between patients with and without beta-blockers after the ablation. A simple score using the history of hospitalization for heart failure and use of beta-blockers or diuretics prior to ablation was useful in identifying TIC patients who did not need prescription of beta-blockers after catheter ablation. LVEF similarly improved in both patients with and without prescription of beta-blockers after the ablation. Beta-blockers may not need to be prescribed after successful catheter ablation for AF in LVEF of ≤ 50% patients without other cause of cardiomyopathy diagnosed before the ablation, a history of hospitalization for heart failure and prescription of beta-blockers and diuretics before the ablation.

Prevalence and Associated Factors of Osteoporosis Among People With Hypertension in Alahsa, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Introduction Osteoporosis (OP) and hypertension (HTN) are prevalent conditions impacting elderly health. This study aimed to explore the prevalence and factors associated with OP among people with HTN in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia (2023). Material and method A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted. Adults aged 50-79 diagnosed with HTN were recruited from those referred for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans using a systematic random sampling method. The participants' electronic health records were reviewed and all participants were interviewed using a structured questionnaire to collect data not available in the electronic health records related to demographics, medical history, and lifestyle factors. Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression were used to assess the associations between OP and clinical parameters. Results A total of 255 participants were recruited, with 115 (45.1%) having normal bone density, 97 (38%) having osteopenia, and 43 (16.9%) having OP. Females 167 (65.5%) were higher than males 88 (34.5%). The average age of all the respondents was 66.2 ± 7.96 years, and their average body mass index (BMI) was 22.2 ± 15.1. The age in years (mean ± SD) of participants with OP 68.04 ± 7.60 was higher compared to normal 64.9 ± 7.46 (p-value = 0.03). Factors that appear to increase the risk of OP in multivariable logistic regression analysis with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) include increased age (OR: 1.17, CI: 0.9-1.2, p-value = 0.048), and parathyroid gland disorder comorbidity (OR: 15.1, CI: 0.7-32, p-value = 0.03), while some factors that reduce the risk of developing OP include increased BMI (OR: 0.9, CI: 0.91-1.03, p-value = 0.03), literate individuals (OR: 0.1, CI: 0.01-1.4, p-value = 0.046), and taking beta-blockers (BB) treatment (OR: 0.23, CI: 0.01-1.3, p-value = 0.02) reduced odds of developing OP according to results. Conclusion The OP is notably present among people with HTN, especially older people, and parathyroid gland disorders. Higher BMI levels, along with the use of BB, help to decrease it. Additionally, any level of education above illiteracy is associated with a lower prevalence of OP, suggesting that education may have a protective effect against OP in HTN patients. We recommend further research on OP risk factors in HTN Saudi patients. Future research should focus on assessing the impact of educational levels and socioeconomic factors on OP prevalence and investigating the association between specific comorbidities (e.g., diabetes mellitus (DM) and parathyroid gland disorders) and OP risk in HTN individuals. Collaborate with public health authorities and organizations to integrate OP screening into routine HTN patient care protocols.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction and left heart filling pressures in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have a high prevalence of diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which in turn leads to an increased risk of hospitalization and death. However, the factors of risk and their relative importance in leading to higher left ventricular filling pressures are still disputed. We sought to clarify the associations of a wide range of invasive and non-invasive risk factors with cardiac filling pressures in high-risk T2D patients. Patients with T2D at high risk of cardiovascular events were prospectively enrolled in this study. Participants were thoroughly phenotyped including right heart catheterization at rest and during exercise, echocardiography, urinary excretion of albumin (UACR), and quantification of their myocardial blood flow rate (MFR) using cardiac 82Rb-PET/CT. Of the 37 patients included in the study, 22 (59%) patients met invasive criteria for HFpEF. Only 2 out of 39 variables emerged as independent factors associated with left ventricular filling pressure as assessed by pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) at rest; history of hypertension (coefficient: 2.6mmHg [0.3; 5.0], P=0.030) and MFR (P=0.026). We found a significant inverse association between MFR and PCWP with a coefficient of -2.3mmHg (-4.3; -0.3) in PCWP per integer change of MFR. The MFR ranged from 1.18 to 3.68 in our study, which corresponds to a difference in PCWP of approximately 6mmHg between patients with the lowest compared to the highest MFR. During exercise, only 2 variables emerged as borderline independent factors associated with PCWP: myocardial flow reserve (coefficient: -4.4 [-9.6; 0.8], P=0.091) and beta-blockers use (coefficient: 6.1 [-0.1; 12.4], P=0.053). In patients with type 2 diabetes without known HFpEF but risk factors for cardiovascular disease, myocardial blood flow rate was independently associated with PCWP at rest across the range from normal to abnormal left heart filling pressures. A clinically significant difference of 6mmHg in PWCP was attributable to differences in MFR in patients with the lowest compared with the highest MFR values. This suggests that strategies than attenuate microvascular dysfunction could slow progression of increased left ventricular left heart filling pressures in patients at increased risk.

Effect of beta-blockade on mortality in patients with cardiac amyloidosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The efficacy of beta-blockers in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is unclear, and concerns persist that neurohormonal blockade could worsen symptoms of heart failure. We aimed to assess whether beta-blocker therapy is associated with improved survival in patients with CA. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the impact of beta-blocker therapy on mortality in patients with CA. A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed in August 2023. Data were extracted from observational studies and synthesized with pooling and random effects meta-analysis. Thirteen studies including 4215 patients with CA were incorporated in this review (3688 transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), 502 light chain amyloid cardiomyopathy (AL-CM), 25 not specified; age 74.8±5.5years, 76% male). Over half of the cohort (52%) received beta-blockers and the rate of beta-blocker withdrawal was 28%. All-cause mortality was 33% (range: 13-51%) after a median follow-up ranging from 13 to 36months. There was an inverse association between the pooled risk of mortality and the use of beta-blocker therapy at any time point (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29-0.80, I2=83%, P=0.005, seven studies). There was no association between mortality and beta-blocker use (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.29-1.47, I2=88%, P=0.30) in the three studies that only included patients with ATTR-CM. The three studies that included patients with both ATTR-CM and AL demonstrated an association of beta-blocker use with reduced mortality (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.29-0.63, I2=4%, P<0.001). The only study that solely included 53 patients with AL-CM, demonstrated improved survival among the 53% who were able to tolerate beta-blocker therapy (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08-0.79, P=0.02). The absence of information on staging of CA is an important limitation of this study. Treatment with beta-blockers may be associated with a survival benefit in patients with CA, but these findings are subject to selection and survivor biases. Definitive prospective randomized trials of conventional heart failure therapies are needed in CA.

Evidence-based data support strategies for the prevention of Hymenoptera venom anaphylaxis.

This review aims to identify phenotypes at-risk of Hymenoptera venom-induced anaphylaxis (HVA), focusing on different perspectives (epidemiological, clinical, and therapeutic) in order to adapt future preventive strategies. HVA remains one of the leading causes of anaphylaxis, with a broad pattern of symptoms. Although most cases occur outside healthcare settings, data indicate a high emergency admission rate due to insect stings. Mortality is often underestimated because of the lack of witnesses and difficulties in recognizing the signs and the culprit. Targeting risk factors could be a clue to improve these statistics and the prognosis of the disease.Potential risk factors for severe HVA in the European population are basal serum tryptase (BST) above 8 μg, mast cell disorders, the absence of skin symptoms, and cardiovascular conditions requiring the use of beta blockers and ACE inhibitors. Identifying these criteria, mainly based on clinical patterns, helps to develop personalized strategies for management and prevention. With a personalized medicine approach, phenotypes must be characterized to adapt to the management of patients suffering from Hymenoptera venom anaphylaxis (HVA), including venom immunotherapy (VIT). In this systematic review, all articles mentioned systemic reactions with heterogeneous severity degrees. Half of those reported grade III-IV systemic reactions (Ring and Messmer). HVA clinical patterns could be worsened by one Hymenoptera sting, a patient's history with mast cell disorders, or cardiovascular diseases. VIT failure was attributed to bee venom extract and monotherapy in two-thirds of publications. Findings stress the difficulty of having uniform epidemiological data on HVA and the lack of financial support in some world regions to support appropriate management of these conditions. Although observing a heterogeneity of data, we were able to identify potential risk factors, in particular for the severe cases. We believe our work will support allergists and health professionals to implement improved personalized management of patients suffering from severe HVA.