Beta-adrenoceptor Blocking Effect Research Articles

Polymorphic metabolism of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists.

Most beta-adrenoceptor blockers undergo extensive oxidative metabolism. The evidence for polymorphism of the debrisoquine type is reviewed. The AUC and half-life of metoprolol were considerably greater in poor metabolisers (PM) of debrisoquine than in extensive metabolisers (EM). Metoprolol alpha-hydroxylation is impaired and O-dealkylation must also be affected. Polymorphism in the former route has been demonstrated in a population of 143 patients to be directly related to debrisoquine phenotype. Bufuralol AUC and half-life are much higher in PM than EM subjects. Hydroxylation at the 1 and 4 positions are affected. Genetic polymorphism for 1-hydroxylation has been shown in family and population studies. Propranolol 4-hydroxylation is defective in PM subjects of debrisoquine but propranolol AUC is not related to phenotype, presumably because other major pathways are unaffected. Oxidation phenotype correlates well with intensity and duration of beta-adrenoceptor blockade after metoprolol, PM subjects requiring only once-daily dosing. However, in EM subjects twice-daily dosing is required even if slow release preparations are used, since plasma metoprolol concentrations may remain negligible 24 h after dosing. The beta-adrenoceptor blocking effects of propranolol and bufuralol are unlikely to be influenced by oxidation status. Anecdotal reports of toxicity arising in PM subjects taking metoprolol or propranolol need to be substantiated. However, vomiting after the administration of bufuralol often occurs in poor metabolisers. Metabolic interactions with drugs sharing the same enzyme system are discussed. Debrisoquine and bufuralol competitively inhibit each other's metabolism in vitro. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acute haemodynamic effects of carvedilol (BM 14190), a new combined beta-adrenoceptor blocker and precapillary vasodilating agent, in hypertensive patients

Carvedilol (BM 14190) is a new compound with combined nonselective beta-adrenoceptor blocking activity, devoid of ISA, and a precapillary vasodilating effect. Its acute haemodynamic effects were studied by invasive techniques in 10 patients given 25 mg carvedilol and noninvasively in 10 patients given 25 mg and in 10 given 50 mg orally. All had essential hypertension. In the invasive study intraarterial blood pressure was measured and cardiac output was determined by the dye-dilution method using Cardio-Green as the indicator. Peripheral haemodynamics in all 30 patients were studied in the forearm using strain gauge plethysmography. Measurements were made at rest before and repeatedly for 90 minutes after oral administration of one capsule of 25 mg or 50 mg carvedilol. Significant reductions in the systolic and diastolic blood pressures (p less than 0.05-0.001) were observed in all groups. Cardiac output showed a small, non-significant decrease from 5.81/min to 5.1 l/min. Total peripheral resistance did not change, whereas resistance in the forearm fell by 16% (p less than 0.05). These findings are different from what would have been expected acutely after administration of a pure beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent. They indicate that carvedilol possesses vasodilating activity in addition to its beta-adrenoceptor blocking effect.

Pharmacologic and physiologic considerations of adrenoceptor blockade

The beta-adrenergic receptor blocking drugs have been in use for the treatment of hypertension for almost two decades. Although the mechanism of their antihypertensive action still is not precisely known, they have become an established major class of therapy for the disease. Most agents produce an immediate reduction in heart rate and cardiac output, later followed by a reduction in pressure. The exceptions include: those agents that possess intrinsic sympathomimetic activity and produce little reduction in heart rate and, output; and labetalol, an agent that reduces pressure immediately (associated with the cardiac effects) because it possesses alphaas well as beta-adrenoceptor blocking effects. Just because a beta-blocking drug reduces cardiac output significantly, it does not follow that renal blood flow will decrease; this depends upon the number and affinity of receptors in the renal circulation. Most beta blockers (including labetalol) reduce renal vascular resistance in patients with uncomplicated hypertension. Other actions of this class of adrenoceptor blocking agents are discussed. As we learn more of the physiologic effects of adrenoceptor blocking agents, there is no doubt that we shall gain more insight into the underlying mechanisms of hypertensive diseases as well as their pharmacologic properties.

Labetalol: a review of its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical uses and adverse effects.

Labetalol is a combined alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent for oral and intravenous use in the treatment of hypertension. It is a nonselective antagonist at beta-adrenoceptors and a competitive antagonist of postsynaptic alpha 1-adrenoceptors. Labetalol is more potent at beta that at alpha 1 adrenoceptors in man; the ratio of beta-alpha antagonism is 3:1 after oral and 6.9:1 after intravenous administration. Labetalol is readily absorbed in man after oral administration, but the drug, which is lipid soluble, undergoes considerable hepatic first-pass metabolism and has an absolute bioavailability of approximately 25%. There are no active metabolites, and the elimination half-life of the drug is approximately 6 hours. Unlike conventional beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, labetalol, when given acutely, produces a decrease in peripheral vascular resistance and blood pressure with little alteration in heart rate or cardiac output. However, like conventional beta-blockers, labetalol may influence the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and respiratory function. Clinical studies have shown that the antihypertensive efficacy of labetalol is superior to placebo and to diuretic therapy and is at least comparable to that of conventional beta-blockers, methyldopa, clonidine and various adrenergic neuronal blockers. Labetalol administered alone or with a diuretic is often effective when other antihypertensive regimens have failed. Studies have shown that labetalol is effective in the treatment of essential hypertension, renal hypertension, pheochromocytoma, pregnancy hypertension and hypertensive emergencies. In addition, preliminary studies indicate that labetalol may be of value in the management of ischemic heart disease. The most troublesome side effect of labetalol therapy is posture-related dizziness. Other reported side effects of the drug include gastrointestinal disturbances, tiredness, headache, scalp tingling, skin rashes, urinary retention and impotence. Side effects related to the beta-adrenoceptor blocking effect of labetalol, including asthma, heart failure and Raynaud's phenomenon, have been reported in rare instances.

Endocrine and metabolic effects of labetalol in man.

The effects of intravenous infusion of the alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor blocking drug labetalol (100 mg over 10 min) on heart rate, blood pressure, and several endocrine and metabolic variables have been evaluated in 12 hypertensive patients (6 men and 6 women). Drug administration was associated with significant lowering of heart rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressure in comparison with a control study performed with saline infusion. Plasma glucose was significantly increased, while no changes were observed in serum-free fatty acids, insulin, C-peptide, and growth hormone levels. Serum prolactin concentration was significantly increased in the whole group, a marked rise occurred in females, while only a trend upward was observed in males. The acute lowering of blood pressure suggests a predominant activity on alpha-adrenoceptors following intravenous labetalol infusion, although the reduction in heart rate is consistent with the beta-adrenoceptor blocking effect of the drug. Although the reason for the increase in plasma glucose is not apparent, it might depend on the rise in norepinephrine levels observed after labetalol. Stimulation of prolactin release by intravenous labetalol is not easily attributable to interference with adrenergic receptors. The mechanism of this action of the drug is presently obscure, although a possible antidopaminergic activity of labetalol might be involved.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of metoprolol in patients with impaired renal function.

The pharmacokinetics of metoprolol have been studied in a group of patients with varying degrees of renal impairment and in healthy subjects after administration of 20 mg of metoprolol tartrate intravenously and 50 mg orally in a single dose and during steady-state conditions. There were no significant differences in the extent of bioavailability or rate of elimination of the drug between the 2 groups. The fraction of the oral dose systemically available during steady-state was 59 +/- 9% in the renal patients and 55 +/- 7% in the control group. Total body clearance in the patients with renal failure was 1.0 +/- 0.1 L/min and in the healthy subjects it was 0.8 +/- 0.1 L/min. The corresponding values for the elimination half-life were 4.6 +/- 1.2h and 4.1 +/- 1.0h, respectively. The beta-adrenoceptor blocking effect of metoprolol (determined as percent reduction of exercise heart rate) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups during steady-state conditions. The effect on exercise heart rate was linearly related to the log of the plasma concentration of metoprolol. The relationship was identical for the single dose and during steady-state conditions, indicating that accumulation of metabolites in patients with renal failure does not influence the beta-blocking properties of metoprolol.

The effect of impaired renal function on the plasma concentration and urinary excretion of metoprolol metabolites.

Plasma concentration and urinary excretion of total and 2 active metabolites of metoprolol have been studied in patients with varying degrees of renal impairment and in healthy subjects after intravenous and oral administration of 20 and 50 mg of 3H-metoprolol tartrate respectively. Renal clearance of total metabolites correlated directly with 51Cr-EDTA clearance (r = 0.95, p less than 0.001). A reduction of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by 70 to 80% increased the elimination half-life of total metabolites and of the active metabolite alpha-hydroxymetoprolol about 3-fold. Significant accumulation was, however, only observed in the patients with a GFR of about 5 ml/min. Even in these patients, the contribution of alpha-hydroxymetoprolol to the beta-adrenoceptor blocking effect of metoprolol will be negligible. The second active metabolite studied is eliminated via biotransformation, and the urinary excretion as well as the plasma concentration of this metabolite were extremely low in comparison with those of the parent drug.

Blunting of exercise-induced tachycardia and renin release 24 hours after a single dose of sotalol.

Sotalol significantly reduces resting and exercise-stimulated heart rate and plasma renin activity 2 hours and to a lesser degree also 24 hours after oral administration of a single 200-mg dose in healthy volunteers. Because of this 24-hour beta-adrenoceptor blocking effect, sotalol should be suitable for once-daily dosing in clinical practice.

Mode of action of beta blockers in angina pectoris.

The therapeutic effect of beta adrenoceptor blockers in angina pectoris can be ascribed to an inhibition of beta1 receptor mediated stimulation of heart rate and myocardial contractility, resulting in an improved oxygen supply-demand balance in the myocardium. When given in equipotent beta1 blocking doses, the nonselective blocker propranolol and the beta1 selective blocker metoprolol differ markedly as regards inhibition of adrenaline induced beta2 mediated vasodilatation. Only propranolol will inhibit this effect. After propranolol, adrenaline therefore elicits a haemodynamic effect pattern characterized by high peripheral vascular resistance, high arterial blood pressure, low cardiac output and increased cardiac size. In view of these findings it is suggested that a beta1 selective blocker may be a more efficient antianginal agent than a nonselective blocker in those patients in which the anginal attack is associated with a significant release of adrenaline. The clinical relevance of this hypothesis has not been tested.

Beta-adrenergic blocking activity and haemodynamic effects in man of Kö 1313, a new beta-adrenergic antagonist.

The beta-adrenergic blocking activity and haemodynamic effects of o-[2-hydroxy-3-(isopropylamino)-propoxy]-benzonitril (Ko 1313) have been studied in 22 patients. Antagonism of isoproterenol-induced tachycardia was used as a measure of the beta-adrenergic blocking activity. Ko 1313 1.0 mg had its maximum beta-adrenoceptor blocking effect 5–30 min after intravenous injection. Ko 1313 10.0 mg produced maximum betablockade 1–4 h after oral administration. 1.0 mg Ko 1313 injected intravenously had approximately the same beta-adrenergic blocking effect as 1.0 mg propranolol also given intravenously. After intravenous administration Ko 1313 was 3–4 times as potent as the same dose given orally. An intravenous dose of 2.0 mg Ko 1313 reduced the heart rate and produced insignificant fall in cardiac output. Total peripheral resistance was increased by Ko 1313.