Benefits Of Complementary Therapies Research Articles

Ozone therapy in mitochondrial dysfunction abnormalities in major psychiatric disorders

The pathogenesis of major psychiatric disorders has been highlighted in the last decade, in addition to neurobiochemical imbalances and the presence of multisystemic mechanisms, dominated by mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammatory processes, immune imbalances, ROS (Reactive Oxygene Species) hyperactivity and endothelial dysfunction.
 This complex of multisystemic mechanisms results in incomplete therapeutic responses to therapeutic approaches based on the correction of homeostasis imbalances in biochemical systems. Partial correction of symptoms cannot balance multiple systemic dysfunctions and mitochondrial activity. In this context,there is a risk of neurodegenerative developments, which are announced by the occurrence of partial or total resistance to pharmacological therapies.
 Ozone is a factor with antioxidant, antiapoptotic action and which improves autophagy, a phenomenon that can improve mitochondrial dysfunction. The balance between the therapeutic use of ozone doses can be shaped by the concomitant administration of antioxidants.
 Psychotropic medication has a neurotoxic effect that potentiates ROS activity and the apoptotic mechanisms of neural structures, favoring brain structural alterations.
 Pathogenic patterns of major psychiatric disorders suggest possible benefits of complementary therapies with ozone oxygen therapy, which could reduce the number of adverse neurodegenerative development.

Pelatihan Tekhnik Pengurangan Rasa Nyeri Persalinan Pada Ibu Hamil Dengan Metode Terapi Komplementer Di PMB Istri Yuliani Ngaglik Sleman D.I Yogyakarta

The paradigm of midwifery services has now shifted. Midwifery care is carried out in a combination of conventional and complementary midwifery services, and has become an important part of midwifery practice (Harding & Foureur, 2009). Childbirth in the First Stage caused pain experienced by maternity. One way to reduce pain in labor with complementary therapies include aromatherapy, relaxation therapy, music therapy and massage. The benefits of complementary therapy are that it helps increase relaxation while practicing breathing which is beneficial in labor and helps calm the mother, maintain the strength of the uterus during childbirth, help with breathing, and lower blood pressure. PMB Yuliani's wife is one of the Midwife's Independent Practices in the Sleman area that provides midwifery services and baby spa. Based on data obtained by Trimester III pregnant women still do not know the technique of pain reduction with complementary therapy methods. Objective: To provide training to pregnant women about pain reduction techniques with complementary therapy. Methods: conducted with counseling, lectures and frequently asked questions and practices (complementary therapy training). Community service activities carried out with counseling and training activities for Trimester III pregnant women for 3 days (20-22 August 2019). The activity was carried out for Pregnant Women at PMB Wife Yuliani Ngaglik Sleman D.I Yogyakarta. The participants seemed very relaxed and experienced the hypnobirthing process, because this was the experience of the participants for the first time getting this training. Participants suggest holding routine therapeutic training with this complementary method because it is felt to be very useful and participants feel much calmer, relaxed and comfortable after attending complementary method therapy training.Keywords: Complementary, Pregnant Women

A study to assess the knowledge regarding benefits of complementary therapies on health status among staff nurses in NMCH, Nellore

A study to assess the knowledge regarding benefits of complementary therapies on health status among staff nurses in NMCH, Nellore

Targeted Complementary Therapies for Migraine Headaches

Clinicians are increasingly aware of the fact that a conventional approach to the treatment of both acute and chronic migraine headaches is not always enough to bring relief to patients. Fortunately, both clinicians and consumers are becoming knowledgeable about the benefits of complementary therapies to help ease the pain. This article explores emerging evidence that supports the use of targeted complementary therapies for preventing and treating migraine headaches.

Using social and complementary models of care

The benefits of complementary therapies are becoming increasingly recognized throughout the healthcare system and their role in dementia care is no exception. There are a number of methods that can be applied by healthcare assistants to help relieve symptoms and enhance failing cognition and senses while helping to develop a positive relationship with the client using the person-centred approach.

Benefits of complementary therapies

This paper examines the benefits of complementary therapies, as supported by research evidence, in patients with breast cancer. Complementary therapies are those therapies and approaches used alongside medical treatment for breast cancer to support the patient on their cancer journey. It should be added that an integrated approach to cancer care includes the best of the orthodox medical treatments and the best evidence-based, supportive complementary modalities. The benefits of complementary therapies to help with the side effects of conventional breast cancer treatment are examined in the following areas: pain and surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormonal treatments, and psychoemotional and survival issues. Potential interactions between nonprescription medicines and cancer treatments and cost-effectiveness is also touched upon. Although it is recognized in many of these areas larger and more rigorous trials must be performed, this paper hopes to give some indication of areas in which further research is warranted.

Benefits of Complementary Therapy with Insulin Aspart Versus Human Regular Insulin in Persons with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Absorption rates of the phosphate-buffered insulin analogs aspart, lispro, and glulisine prevail over that of regular human insulin. The aim of this prospective observational open-label controlled study was to compare the effects of aspart and human regular insulin resulting from their sequential long-lasting routine administration in small preprandial boluses to individuals with type 2 diabetes according to identical algorithms. Fifty-seven individuals with type 2 diabetes 64.0 +/- 1.29 (mean +/- SE) years old with diabetes' duration of 12.4 +/- 1.06 years, treated with human regular insulin for 5.2 +/- 0.44 years, and a serum C-peptide level of 1.1 +/- 0.10 nmol/L were enrolled into the study. Following two checkups performed in the course of the 364 +/- 17.9-day baseline period, human regular insulin was replaced with aspart in equivalent boluses, and two checkups in the course of 330 +/- 11.1-day sequential period were performed. The control group consisted of 17 individuals with type 2 diabetes 68.4 +/- 2.36 years old with diabetes' duration of 9.9 +/- 1.57 years, treated with insulin for 4.2 +/- 0.57 years, and a C-peptide level of 1.1 +/- 0.11 nmol/L. Data were analyzed using the statistical program SPSS version 10.1. (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). Following the switch from human regular insulin to aspart, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) decreased from 8.4 +/- 0.23% at baseline to 7.9 +/- 0.17% (P = 0.031), and thereafter to 7.5 +/- 0.20% (P < 0.001), while plasma glucose concentrations in 10-point profiles, daily insulin dose (37.1 +/- 1.39 IU/day), body mass index (BMI) (30.5 +/- 0.82 kg/m(2)), and frequency of hypo- and hyperglycemic episodes did not change (P > 0.05). Patients quote satisfaction was good. No adverse events were recorded. In the control group, no significant change of baseline HbA1c (8.4 +/- 0.54%), insulin dose (33.1 +/- 3.17 IU/day), and BMI (32.1 +/- 1.12 kg/m(2)) was found. Aspart appears to be more effective than human regular insulin for complementary insulin treatment in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Web Watch

Much has been written recently about how we might effectively promote normal childbirth. Certainly, anything that can enhance women's confidence in their bodies is vital in these days of high tech living and high tech birth. Exploring the benefits of complementary therapies is one approach especially with the increasing acceptance of these treatments in midwifery. The site chosen for review is:

Pursuit and practice of complementary therapies by cancer patients receiving conventional treatment

To determine what proportion of oncology patients receiving conventional medical treatment also use complementary treatments; to assess which complementary treatments are the most popular and to assess patients' motivation for using them; to evaluate associated advantages and risks. Postal screening questionnaire followed by semistructured interview. Two hospitals in inner London. 600 unselected oncology patients aged 18 or over who had known their diagnosis of cancer for at least three months. Prevalence and demography of use of complementary therapies; patients' motivation and expectations of complementary therapies; areas of satisfaction and dissatisfaction associated with conventional and complementary therapies. 415 (69%) patients returned the questionnaire. 16% had used complementary therapies. The most popular were healing, relaxation, visualisation, diets, homoeopathy, vitamins, herbalism, and the Bristol approach. Patients using complementary therapies tended to be younger, of higher social class, and female. Three quarters used two or more therapies. Therapies were mostly used for anticipated antitumour effect. Ill effects of diets and herb treatments were described. Satisfaction with both conventional and complementary therapies was high, although diets often caused difficulties. Patients using complementary therapies were less satisfied with conventional treatments, largely because of side effects and lack of hope of cure. Benefits of complementary therapies were mainly psychological. A sizeable percentage of patients receiving conventional treatments for cancer also use complementary therapies. Patient satisfaction with complementary therapies, other than dietary therapies, was high even without the hoped for anticancer effect. Patients reported psychological benefits such as hope and optimism.