Behavioral Health Clinicians Research Articles

Universal Suicide Risk Screening in Pediatric Neurologic, Developmental, and Behavioral Clinics.

Suicidal thoughts and behaviors in youth have been increasing over the last 30 years, resulting in recommendations to screen for suicide risk. Our aim was to evaluate suicide risk screenings in children during outpatient care at a specialty care facility for those with neurologic, developmental, and behavioral disorders (NDBDs). This cross-sectional, retrospective study utilized suicide screening data from the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions tool administered to children attending initial outpatient visits at medical, behavioral health, or autism specialty clinics serving individuals with NDBDs. Primary outcomes included whether screening occurred or was declined, and if it yielded elevated risk for suicide. Predictive factors were examined. In total, 15,462 children aged 8 to 17 (38.4% female; 47.7% White, 26.0% Black; 21.0% Medicaid) were offered screening as part of routine care. Overall, 10,970 children underwent screening; 4492 (29.1%) declined. The probability of declined screenings was greater if children were younger, male, attended a medical clinic appointment and were offered the screening prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. The overall rate of positive screening was 10.3%. Children as young as age 8 screened positive in all settings. Positive screening rates in medical, behavioral health, and autism specialty clinics were 7.9%, 12.2%, and 12.7%, respectively. Screenings were more likely to be positive for children who were older, female, self-reported rather than caregiver-reported, and occurring within a behavioral health or autism specialty clinic. Suicide risk was identified in children across all pediatric programs, indicating strong support for universal suicide screening of children and youth in pediatric settings.

Telehealth Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Suicide Prevention

Suicide rates continue to increase in the US. Evidence-based treatments for suicide risk exist, but their effectiveness when delivered via telehealth remains unknown. To test the efficacy of brief cognitive behavioral therapy (BCBT) for reducing suicide attempts and suicidal ideation among high-risk adults when delivered via telehealth. This 2-group parallel randomized clinical trial comparing BCBT with present-centered therapy (PCT) was conducted from April 2021 to September 2023 with 1-year follow-up at an outpatient psychiatry and behavioral health clinic located in the midwestern US. Participants reporting suicidal ideation during the past week and/or suicidal behavior during the past month were recruited from clinic waiting lists, inpatient service, intermediate care, research match, and direct referrals from clinicians. A total of 768 participants were invited to participate, 112 were assessed for eligibility, and 98 were eligible and randomly assigned to a treatment condition. Data analysis was from April to September 2024. Participants received either BCBT, an evidence-based suicide-focused treatment that teaches emotion regulation and reappraisal skills, or PCT, a goal-oriented treatment that helps participants identify adaptive responses to stressors. Participants were randomized using a computerized stratified randomization algorithm with 2 strata (sex and history of suicide attempts). The primary outcome was suicide attempts as measured by the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview-Revised. The secondary outcome was severity of suicidal ideation as measured by the Scale for Suicide Ideation. Participants included 96 adults (mean [SD] age, 31.8 [12.6] years; 64 female [66.7%] and 32 male [33.3%]), with 51 receiving BCBT and 45 receiving PCT. Of all participants, 85 (88.5%) completed at least 1 session. From baseline to 12 months, 12 participants receiving PCT (estimated percentage, 35.6%) made 56 suicide attempts and 11 participants receiving BCBT (estimated percentage, 30.0%) made 36 suicide attempts. Participants randomized to BCBT made significantly fewer suicide attempts than participants randomized to PCT (mean [range], 0.70 [0.00-8.00] attempts per participant vs 1.40 [0.00-10.00] per participant) and had a 41% reduced risk for suicide attempts (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.96; P = .03). Severity of suicidal ideation significantly decreased in both treatments (F4,330 = 50.1; P < .001) but did not differ between groups (F4,330 = 0.2; P = .91). The findings of this randomized clinical trial suggest that BCBT delivered via video telehealth is effective for reducing suicide attempts among adults with recent suicidal thoughts and/or behaviors. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04844294.

Demographic variation in preferred sources for suicide prevention and mental health crisis services among U.S. adults

IntroductionRecent federal policy initiatives (e.g., 988 Lifeline, Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics) aim to increase access to mental health crisis services. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and correlates of U.S. adults reporting being “very likely” to reach out to different sources if they/a loved one were experiencing suicidality or a mental health crisis. MethodsA nationally representative Ipsos KnowledgePanel survey of 5,058 U.S. adults (response rate = 55.0 %) in English and Spanish was conducted in June 2023. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the reported likelihood of reaching out to five different sources of support in a crisis, controlling for past 30-day psychological distress and demographic characteristics. ResultsOne-in-four respondents (27.8 %; 95 % CI = 26.5 %, 29.0 %) were very likely to reach out to a crisis line and 33.6 % (95 % CI = 32.3 %, 34.9 %) were very likely to reach out to a mental health professional. A friend/family member was the most frequently identified source of support (44.7 %; 95 % CI = 43.4 %, 46.1 %). After adjustment, people of younger ages, male gender, and identifying as Republican had significantly lower odds of reporting being very likely to reach out to a crisis line and mental health professional. Black and Hispanic respondents had significantly higher odds of reporting being very likely to reach out to a crisis line and someone in their religious network than non-Hispanic Whites. ConclusionsMost U.S. adults report not being very likely to reach out to a crisis line or mental health professional if experiencing suicidality/crisis, although variation across demographic groups exists.

Cluster randomized trial of a team communication training implementation strategy for depression screening in a pediatric healthcare system: a study protocol

BackgroundPediatric depression is a global concern that has fueled efforts for enhanced detection and treatment engagement. As one example, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommends depression screening for adolescents ages 12–18 years. While many health systems have implemented components of depression screening protocols, there is limited evidence of effective follow-up for pediatric depression. A key barrier is timely team communication and coordination across clinicians and staff within and across service areas for prompt service linkage. However, team effectiveness interventions have been shown to improve team processes and outcomes and can be applied in healthcare settings.MethodsThis project aims to refine and test a team communication training implementation strategy to improve implementation of an existing pediatric depression screening protocol in a large pediatric healthcare system. The team will be defined as part of the study but is expected to include medical assistants, nurses, physicians, and behavioral health clinicians within and across departments. The implementation strategy will target team mechanisms at the team-level (i.e., intra-organizational alignment and implementation climate) and team member-level (i.e., communication, coordination, psychological safety, and shared cognition). First, the project will use mixed methods to refine the team training strategy to fit the organizational context and workflows. Next, a hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness pilot trial will assess the initial effectiveness of the team communication training (implementation strategy) paired with the current universal depression screening protocol (clinical intervention) on implementation outcomes (i.e., feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, workflow efficiency) and clinical/services outcomes (increased frequency of needed screening and reduced time to service linkage). Finally, the study will assess mechanisms at the team and team member levels that may affect implementation outcomes.DiscussionTeam communication training is hypothesized to lead to improved, efficient, and effective decision-making to increase the compliance with depression screening and timely service linkage. Findings are expected to yield better understanding and examples of how to optimize team communication to improve efficiency and effectiveness in the pediatric depression screening-to-treatment cascade. This should also culminate in improved implementation outcomes including patient engagement critical to address the youth mental health crisis.Trial registrationNCT06527196.Trial Sponsor: University of California San Diego.

Engaging primary care patients at risk for suicide in mental health treatment: user insights to inform implementation strategy design

BackgroundGiven that the majority of suicide decedents visit primary care in the year preceding death, primary care has been identified as a key setting in which to engage patients at risk for suicide in mental health services. The objective of this research was to identify barriers and facilitators to engagement in mental health services among primary care patients at risk for suicide to inform the development of strategies to increase engagement.MethodsSeventy-four semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with primary care patients (n = 20), primary care (n = 18) and behavioral health (n = 12) clinicians, mental health intake coordinators (n = 4), and health system and clinic leaders (n = 20). Patients who had been referred for mental health services from primary care and reported an elevated score (≥ 1) on item 9 on the Patient Health Questionnaire at the time of referral were eligible to participate. Eligible clinicians and leaders were employed in a primary care or behavioral health setting in a single large health system with an integrated mental health program. Interviews typically lasted 30–60 min, were completed over video conference or phone, and were coded by members of the research team using a rapid qualitative analysis procedure.ResultsParticipants were primarily female (64.9%), white (70.3%) and non-Hispanic/Latine (91.9%). The most identified barriers to mental health care engagement were waitlists, capacity limits, insurance, patient characteristics, communication, collaboration, and/or difficulties surrounding travel. The most commonly cited facilitators of engagement included telehealth, integrated care models, reminders, case management support, psychoeducation, motivational enhancement, and scheduling flexibility. Concrete suggestions for improving engagement in mental health services included increasing communication between providers, streamlining referral and intake processes, providing reminders and follow ups, and advocacy for increased reimbursement for suicide risk assessment.ConclusionsResults underscore the myriad barriers patients at risk for suicide encounter when attempting to engage in mental health care in a primary care setting. Facilitators of engagement and suggestions for improving connections to care were also identified, which can inform the design of implementation strategies to improve engagement in mental health services among primary care patients at risk for suicide.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05021224 (Registered August 19, 2021).

Assessing the use of unstructured electronic health record data to identify exposure to firearm violence.

Research on firearm violence is largely limited to people who experienced acute bodily trauma and death which is readily gathered from Inpatient and Emergency Department settings and mortality data. Exposures to firearm violence, such as witnessing firearm violence or losing a loved one to firearm violence, are not routinely collected in health care. As a result, the true public health burden of firearm violence is underestimated. Clinical notes from electronic health records (EHRs) are a promising source of data that may expand our understanding of the impact of firearm violence on health. Pilot work was conducted on a sample of clinical notes to assess how firearm terms present in unstructured clinical notes as part of a larger initiative to develop a natural language processing (NLP) model to identify firearm exposure and injury in ambulatory care data. We used EHR data from 2012 to 2022 from a large multistate network of primary care and behavioral health clinics. A text string search of broad, gun-only, and shooting terms was applied to 9,598 patients with either/both an ICD-10 or an OCHIN-developed structured data field indicating exposure to firearm violence. A sample of clinical notes from 90 patients was reviewed to ascertain the meaning of terms. Among the 90 clinical patient notes, 13 (14%) notes reflect documentation of exposure to firearm violence or injury from firearms. Results from this study identified refinements that should be considered for NLP text classification. Unstructured clinical notes from primary and behavioral health clinics have potential to expand understanding of firearm violence.

Proportion of US Counties and Population Served by Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics

Proportion of US Counties and Population Served by Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics

Feasibility of a primary care-based program for supporting youth following traumatic events: First Approach Skills Training for Trauma (FAST-T)

BackgroundIntegrated primary care (IPC) offers an opportunity to identify and support youth impacted by trauma. Trauma interventions with strong evidence exist but require adaptation for IPC. The First Approach Skills Training for Trauma (FAST-T) program was developed as a scalable, flexible, brief, stepped-care, cognitive-behavioral approach to supporting trauma-affected youth and families. ObjectiveThis paper describes program development and implementation of FAST-T in real-world IPC settings. All FAST-T resources, including modular child, teen and caregiver workbooks, handouts, training videos, and clinical guides/scripts are provided via hyperlink. Participants and SettingEight behavioral health clinicians (BHCs) from across Washington State were trained in FAST-T and provided de-identified treatment delivery and outcome data from all patients enrolled in FAST-T over three months. MethodsPosttraumatic stress symptom change and clinician-rated improvement were collected, as were data on treatment components used, number of sessions, and discharge disposition. Clinicians reported on acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility and other implementation outcomes. ResultsAcceptability, appropriateness and feasibility were rated by BHCs as favorable with good evidence of uptake in routine care at six months post-training. Nineteen youth received FAST-T and while the sample was underpowered to evaluate clinical outcomes, those with repeat measures of posttraumatic stress showed significant improvement. BHC ratings indicated most patients improved and none worsened during FAST-T. Conclusions: Findings offer preliminary support for addressing childhood trauma impact with flexible, brief programming within IPC.

Real-Time Exposure to Negative News Media and Suicidal Ideation Intensity Among LGBTQ+ Young Adults

With a recent surge in anti-lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer (LGBTQ+) policies and associated news and media coverage, there is a need to study the association of LGBTQ+ focused news or media exposure and short-term changes in suicidal ideation (SI) among LGBTQ+ youth. To examine within-person direct and indirect associations between exposure to general and LGBTQ+ negative news or media and SI intensity through expectations of rejection. This intensive longitudinal cohort study used a smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) protocol wherein participants responded to EMAs 3 times per day for 28 consecutive days. Young adults aged 18 to 24 years who self-identified as LGBTQ+, resided in Tennessee, and had past-year SI and at least mild depression (defined as a score ≥5 on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9) were eligible for inclusion. Participants were recruited through social media advertisements, LGBTQ+ community organizations, and mental and behavioral health clinics. Participants were recruited between March 30, 2023, and August 23, 2023, and data analyses were conducted from August 28, 2023, through April 20, 2024. At each EMA, participants reported on recent exposure to negative news or media. A 3-level categorical exposure variable denoted (1) no news or media exposure (reference); (2) exposure to general negative news or media; and (3) exposure to LGBTQ+ negative news or media. Each EMA also assessed expectations of rejection due to LGBTQ+ identity on a scale of 0 (not at all) through 10 (very much). Three primary outcomes assessed current (ie, "right now") intensity of active SI, passive SI, and self-harm ideation, each measured on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very strong). Multilevel modeling approaches were used to account for the hierarchical structure of EMA data, with assessments (level 1) nested within people (level 2). Linear mixed models and multilevel mediation models were used to examine within-person associations between exposure to negative news or media and the 3 primary outcomes, as well as the mediating role of expectations of rejection. Of 31 total participants, 22 were assigned female sex at birth (71%), and 16 (52%) self-identified as transgender or gender diverse. The median (IQR) participant age was 21 (18-22) years, and a total of 2189 EMAs were completed, with a median (range) compliance of 90.5% (41.7%-100%). At the within-person level, recent exposure to LGBTQ+ negative news or media was significantly associated with increased active SI (estimate [b], 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04-0.25; P = .009), passive SI (b, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.04-0.41; P = .02), and self-harm ideation (b, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.23; P = .02). No statistically significant associations were detected for exposure to general negative news or media. In multilevel mediation models, heightened expectations of rejection explained some of the total effect of exposure to LGBTQ+ negative news or media on active SI (23%) and passive SI (37%). This intensive longitudinal cohort study found that SI intensity modestly increased in the hours immediately following exposure to LGBTQ+ negative news or media among LGBTQ+ young adults. These findings have timely implications for research and intervention, particularly within sociopolitical and geographic contexts where news or media coverage about LGBTQ+ topics is intensified.

Interdisciplinary pain program participants with high catastrophizing scores improve function utilizing enriched therapeutic encounters and integrative health techniques: a retrospective study.

Pain catastrophizing describes helplessness, rumination, and magnification of a pain experience. High pain catastrophizing is an independent risk factor for disability, pain severity, inadequate treatment response, chronicity, and opioid misuse. Interdisciplinary pain programs (IPPs) are beneficial and cost-effective for individuals with chronic pain, but their functional impact on individuals with high pain catastrophizing is not well established. The emerging field of placebo studies suggests that patient-provider relationships, positive treatment expectations, and sociobiologically informed care trigger physiological responses that may enhance therapeutic interventions. In this retrospective observational cohort study, we compared admission and discharge data for 428 adults with high-impact chronic pain (mean 8.5 years) who completed the Spaulding-Medford Functional Restoration Program (FRP). The interdisciplinary FRP team of physiatrists, behavioral health clinicians, physical therapists, and occupational therapists specializes in evidenced-based conventional rehabilitation, integrative health, and pain psychoeducation via enriched therapeutic encounters, fostering collaboration, validation, trust, self-efficacy, and positive expectations. Clinical outcome measures included the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) assessing functional performance (COPM-PS) and satisfaction with function (COPM-SS), the Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). FRP participants with clinically elevated catastrophizing at baseline (PCS ≥30, mean PCS 39) achieved statistically significant improvements in function (mean delta -2.09, CHI2 = 15.56, p < 0.001), satisfaction with function (COPM-SS mean delta -2.50, CHI2 = 7.42, p = 0.007), pain (NRS mean delta 2.7), mood (PHQ-9 mean delta 1.87, p = 0.002), and catastrophizing (PCS mean delta 4.16, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed racial disparities in pain scores, and exploratory analysis showed a trend toward reducing opiate consumption. Despite the known association of adverse outcomes with high catastrophizing, FRP participation was associated with increased productive engagement, reduced pain, reduced maladaptive thought processes, and improved mood. Although causation and efficacy cannot be established from a retrospective design, this is the first study to identify functional improvement in patients with high-impact chronic pain and clinically relevant high pain catastrophizing who participate in an IPP combining conventional and complementary rehabilitation with psychoeducation. These enriched therapeutic encounters may enhance the treatment process by promoting trust, empathy, collaboration, and beneficial reframing of patients' experiences, expectations, and goals.

Patient perspectives on primary care behavioral health integration in an urban mental health professional shortage area: Benefits, facilitators, and barriers.

While studies have described the benefits of integrating behavioral health (BH) into primary care (PC), few have examined patients' perspectives, especially in large, urban health systems. In 2015, the University of Chicago Medicine launched the Primary Care Behavioral Health Integration Program, located in a mental health professional shortage area. In 2021, semistructured interviews were conducted with adult patients who had discussed their depression symptoms with their primary care clinician (PCC). Participants were asked about their experiences of being screened for depression, discussing BH, and being referred to behavioral health clinicians (BHCs). Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis and constant comparison, and they were conducted until theme saturation was achieved. Fifteen participants were interviewed, the majority of whom were women and African American/Black, with an average age of 52. Participants expressed that PC-BH integration helps patients recognize BH problems and navigate the BH care system, emphasizes the connection between physical and mental health, and eases conversations through familiar setting and established trust. Patients enumerated barriers to integration, including barriers to BH care in the PC setting, barriers to BH conversations with PCCs/BHCs, and barriers to referrals to psychiatry/external therapy. Patients highlighted facilitators of integration, including trust with their PCC, collaboration between PCCs and BHCs, and population-level screening. These perspectives affirm the core strength of PC-BH integration: making BH more accessible and destigmatizing, especially for underserved communities. They also emphasize the importance of collaboration between PCCs and BHCs, shared identities, and actively involving patients in program design and quality improvement interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Caring in Crisis: The Impact of Systemic Failures and Patient Loss on Behavioral Health Clinicians

Caring in Crisis: The Impact of Systemic Failures and Patient Loss on Behavioral Health Clinicians

Characterizing Crisis Services Offered by Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics: Results From a National Survey.

The authors aimed to examine how certified community behavioral health clinics (CCBHCs) fulfill crisis service requirements and whether clinics added crisis services after becoming a CCBHC. National survey data on CCBHC crisis services were paired with data on clinic features and the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of the counties within a CCBHC service area. The dependent variables were whether CCBHCs provided the three categories of CCBHC crisis services (i.e., crisis call lines, mobile crisis response, and crisis stabilization) directly or through another organization and whether these services were added after becoming a CCBHC. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed with data about clinics and the counties they served. In total, 449 CCBHCs were surveyed in the summer of 2022, with a response rate of 56%. The final sample comprised 247 clinics. The number of CCBHC employees per 1,000 people within a CCBHC service area was significantly and positively associated with clinics providing some crisis services directly (mobile crisis response: adjusted OR [AOR]=1.46, 95% CI=1.08-1.98; crisis stabilization services: AOR=1.60, 95% CI=1.17-2.19). Compared with clinics that did not receive a CCBHC Medicaid bundled payment, clinics that received this payment had higher odds of adding mobile crisis response (AOR=2.52, 95% CI=1.28-4.97) and crisis stabilization services (AOR=3.19, 95% CI=1.51-6.72) after becoming a CCBHC. CCBHC initiatives, particularly CCBHC Medicaid bundled payments, may provide opportunities to increase the availability of behavioral health crisis services, but the sufficiency of this increase for meeting crisis care needs remains unknown.

Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Demonstration Impact on Health Care Utilization Among Non-Medicaid Patients with Severe Mental Illnesses.

In 2017, the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic (CCBHC) demonstration was implemented in New York State to redesign care delivery and financing for behavioral health services. Although CCBHC primarily targeted Medicaid patients, it was hypothesized that the clinic-level benefits of CCBHC were expected to impact even non-Medicaid patients treated in CCBHCs. To test this hypothesis, this study conducted a health insurance claims data analysis of non-Medicaid (ie, commercial and Medicare) patients with severe mental illnesses, comparing a cohort of CCBHC-treated patients with a propensity score-matched comparison cohort of patients treated by non-CCBHC clinics on rates of mental health service utilization, hospitalization, and emergency department (ED) visits. The data suggested CCBHC was associated with more than 10% increase in outpatient mental health service utilization by the patients' second year of CCBHC exposure, accompanied by similarly significant reductions in the rates of all-cause ED visits and non-psychiatric hospitalization. These findings suggest that for behavioral health clinics that serve a sufficiently large population of Medicaid, the impact of innovative clinical redesign attributable to CCBHC is likely to extend to all patients treated by them.

Development and implementation of a self-directed violence prevention training program for correctional behavioral health providers: a clinical trial study protocol

BackgroundSelf-directed violence (SDV) comprises both suicide and self-injury and represents a pressing problem among incarcerated persons. Negative impacts of SDV in correctional settings also extend to behavioral health clinicians (BHCs) (e.g., job turnover). Correctional SDV risk assessment and management standards include staff training as part of the comprehensive approach. The Core Competency Model for Corrections (CCM-C) is a novel, evidence-informed training program for BHCs covering both clinician self-management and clinical care skills.MethodsThis pilot trial is a type 3 hybrid implementation–effectiveness approach. It will employ a wait-list control sequential cross-over design. Participants (N = 50–100) will be BHCs employed by the North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections. Following stratification for years of clinical experience, BHCs will be randomly assigned to (1) a training group that receives CCM-C immediately and (2) a wait-list control receiving CCM-C approximately 6 weeks later. Electronically administrated survey evaluation will occur across baseline and two follow-up (i.e., 2 weeks after each training session) time points.DiscussionThe primary outcome is feasibility assessed through collaboration with a Corrections Advisory Panel and feedback from BHCs. Secondary effectiveness outcomes that will be evaluated over time include SDV-related knowledge, attitudes, stigma, and intent to use training content. We will examine a tertiary outcome, namely compassion fatigue. Clinical trial limitations and impacts are discussed.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT06359574. This study was registered on 04/05/2024.

Development of Autoimmune Diseases Among Children With Pediatric Acute-Onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome

Epidemiologic studies indicate a high rate of autoimmune conditions among patients with obsessive-complusive disorder and other psychiatric conditions. Furthering the understanding of the inflammatory diatheses of psychiatric conditions may open doors to new treatment paradigms for psychiatric disorders. To evaluate whether pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome (PANS) is associated with an inflammatory diathesis by assessing signs of immune activation and vasculopathy during a psychiatric symptom exacerbation (flare), estimating the risk of developing arthritis and other autoimmune diseases, and characterizing subtypes of arthritis. This retrospective cohort study used longitudinal clinical data on 193 consecutive patients with PANS followed up within the Stanford Immune Behavioral Health Clinic from September 1, 2012, to December 31, 2021. Medical records were reviewed, and a predefined set of immune markers that were measured during a flare and the features and imaging findings of arthritis and other autoimmune diseases were collected. Immune activation markers included (1) autoimmunity signs (antinuclear antibody, antihistone antibody, antithyroglobulin antibody, C1q binding assay, and complement levels [C3 and C4]); (2) immune dysregulation or inflammation signs (leukopenia, thrombocytosis, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate); and (3) vasculopathy signs (livedo reticularis, periungual redness and swelling, abnormally prominent onychodermal band, palatal petechiae, high von Willebrand factor antigen, and high d-dimer). Last, the cumulative risk of developing arthritis and autoimmune diseases was estimated using product limit (Kaplan-Meier) survival probability. The study included data from 193 children (112 boys [58.0%]) who had PANS at a mean (SD) age of 7.5 (3.5) years. They were followed up for a mean (SD) of 4.0 (2.1) years. Among those tested for immune activation markers, 54.2% (97 of 179) had nonspecific markers of autoimmunity, 12.0% (22 of 184) had nonspecific signs of immune dysregulation or inflammation, and 35.8% (69 of 193) had signs of vasculopathy. By 14 years of age, the estimated cumulative incidence of arthritis was 28.3% (95% CI, 20.8%-36.3%), and the estimated cumulative incidence of another autoimmune disease was 7.5% (95% CI, 4.0%-12.4%). Novel findings in the subgroup with arthritis include joint capsule thickening (55.0% [22 of 40]), distal interphalangeal joint tenderness (81.8% [45 of 55]), and spinous process tenderness (80.0% [44 of 55]). Among the 55 patients with arthritis, the most common subtypes of arthritis included enthesitis-related arthritis (37 [67.3%]), spondyloarthritis (27 [49.1%]), and psoriatic arthritis (10 [18.2%]). This study found that patients with PANS show signs of immune activation and vasculopathy during psychiatric symptom flares and have an increased risk of developing arthritis and other autoimmune diseases compared with the general pediatric population. The most common arthritis subtype was enthesitis-related arthritis. These findings suggest that PANS may be part of a multisystem inflammatory condition rather than an isolated psychiatric or neuroinflammatory disorder.

Behavioral Health Workforce Distribution in Socially Disadvantaged Communities.

This study sought to understand the geographic distribution of three behavioral health clinician (BHC) types in disadvantaged communities in the U.S. across a standardized index of area disadvantage. CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System's data were used to identify BHC practice addresses. Addresses were geocoded and mapped to census block groups across Area Disadvantage Index (ADI) scores. Differences in the proportion of BHCs per 100k people in a block group by ADI, clinician type, and rurality were compared. Zero-inflated negative binomial models assessed associations between ADI score with any amount, and expected count, of BHC type in a block group. The sample included 836,780 BHCs (51.5% counselors, 34.5% social workers, 14.0% psychologists). Results indicated there were fewer BHCs in areas of high disadvantage with 351 BHCs in the lowest need versus 267 BHCs in highest need areas, per 100k people. BHCtype was differently associated with the rate of clinicians per 100k by ADI and block groups that were both rural and high ADI had the least BHCs located. Findings suggest the maldistribution of BHCs by ADI underscores how some BHCs may be better positioned to meet the needs of vulnerable communities. Increasing access to behavioral health care requires a workforce equitably positioned in high-need areas. Reforms to payment and practice regulations may support BHCs to deliver services in socially disadvantaged neighborhoods.

When Interruption Becomes Innovation: How Integrated Behavioral Health in Primary Care Adapted During COVID-19.

Integrated behavioral health (IBH) delivered in primary care is critical to addressing the growing behavioral health crisis in the United States. COVID-19 prompted changes to the core components of IBH, causing the model to shift. The specifics of how IBH teams adapted and what these adaptations mean for the future of IBH teams in primary care are uncertain. We conducted individual interviews with IBH team members using a semistructured interview guide. A purposive convenience sample consisted of primary care clinicians (N=20) from nine states. We used qualitative thematic analysis to code and generate themes. Four themes emerged: (a) permanent changes to the physical structure of the team; (b) increased reliance on technology for team communication; (c) shift in team collaboration, often occurring asynchronously; and (d) telehealth embraced for IBH. COVID-19 interrupted the originally designed IBH model of team-based care. Changes to the physical proximity of team members disrupted all other components of IBH, requiring adapted workflows, communication via digital channels, virtual team building, asynchronous care coordination, and remote service delivery. Long-term evaluation of these innovations is needed to examine whether shifts in core components impact model efficacy. Training family medicine, primary care, and behavioral health clinicians for these adapted models of IBH will be needed.

Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Services for Clients With Co-occurring Disorders: A Latent Class Approach.

Certified community behavioral health clinics (CCBHCs) are designed to provide comprehensive care for individuals with co-occurring mental and substance use disorders. The authors classified outpatient mental health treatment facilities on the basis of provision of services for clients with co-occurring disorders and assessed whether CCBHCs differed from other outpatient mental health facilities in services provided. The authors used latent class analysis to identify distinct services for clients with co-occurring disorders in 5,692 outpatient mental health facilities in the 2021 National Substance Use and Mental Health Services Survey. Nine indicators were included: treatment for clients with substance or alcohol use disorder co-occurring with serious mental illness or serious emotional disturbance, specialized programs or groups for such clients, medication-assisted treatment (MAT) for alcohol use disorder, MAT for opioid use disorder, detoxification, individual counseling, group counseling, case management, and 12-step groups. A multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate whether CCBHCs were associated with any identified classes after analyses controlled for facility characteristics. A four-class solution provided a model with the best fit, comprising comprehensive services (23.4%), case management services (17.7%), counseling and self-help services (58.6%), and professional services (4.3%). Regressing class membership on facility type and covariates, the authors found that compared with community mental health clinics (CMHCs), CCBHCs were more likely to belong to the comprehensive services class than to the case management services, counseling and self-help services, and professional services classes. CCBHCs were more likely than other outpatient programs to offer comprehensive care, and CCBHC status of a CMHC facilitated enhanced service provisions.

Feasibility of a 2-Part Substance Use Screener Self-Administered by Patients on Paper: Observational Study.

Measurement-based care in behavioral health uses patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to screen for mental health symptoms and substance use and to assess symptom change over time. While PROMs are increasingly being integrated into electronic health record systems and administered electronically, paper-based PROMs continue to be used. It is unclear if it is feasible to administer a PROM on paper when the PROM was initially developed for electronic administration. This study aimed to examine the feasibility of patient self-administration of a 2-part substance use screener-the Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription medications, and other Substances (TAPS)-on paper. This screener was originally developed for electronic administration. It begins with a limited number of questions and branches to either skip or reflex to additional questions based on an individual's responses. In this study, the TAPS was adapted for paper use due to barriers to electronic administration within an urgent care behavioral health clinic at an urban health safety net hospital. From August 2021 to March 2022, research staff collected deidentified paper TAPS responses and tracked TAPS completion rates and adherence to questionnaire instructions. A retrospective chart review was subsequently conducted to obtain demographic information for the patients who presented to the clinic between August 2021 and March 2022. Since the initial information collected from TAPS responses was deidentified, demographic information was not linked to the individual TAPS screeners that were tracked by research staff. A total of 507 new patients were seen in the clinic with a mean age of 38.7 (SD 16.6) years. In all, 258 (50.9%) patients were male. They were predominantly Black (n=212, 41.8%), White (n=152, 30%), and non-Hispanic or non-Latino (n=403, 79.5%). Most of the patients were publicly insured (n=411, 81.1%). Among these 507 patients, 313 (61.7%) completed the TAPS screener. Of these 313 patients, 76 (24.3%) adhered to the instructions and 237 (75.7%) did not follow the instructions correctly. Of the 237 respondents who did not follow the instructions correctly, 166 (70%) answered more questions and 71 (30%) answered fewer questions than required in TAPS part 2. Among the 237 patients who did not adhere to questionnaire instructions, 44 (18.6%) responded in a way that contradicted their response in part 1 of the screener and ultimately affected their overall TAPS score. It was challenging for patients to adhere to questionnaire instructions when completing a substance use screener on paper that was originally developed for electronic use. When selecting PROMs for measurement-based care, it is important to consider the structure of the questionnaire and how the PROM will be administered to determine if additional support for PROM self-administration needs to be implemented.