Different non‐quartic cryogenic heat capacity dependences can be unambiguously associated with the qualitatively different types of either sub‐quartic or super‐quartic regimes. The simplest way for a prompt association with one of these two alternative regimes is based on a couple of parameters controlling the straight‐line tangents to the material‐specific C(T)/T3 curves in consideration. A representative non‐Debye heat capacity formula is used for performing high‐accuracy fittings of cryogenic heat capacity data sets, including reliable determinations of the material‐specific temperature dependences of effective power function exponents. The cryogenic heat capacity dependences of the exemplary wide bandgap materials AgCl and LiI are found to show pronounced sub‐quartic behaviors, whereas germanium and silicon are seen to pertain to the regime of super‐quartic behavior. These results are in clear contrast to a hypothetical field‐theoretical model published recently by Gusev [R. Soc. Open Sci. 2019, 6, 171285], which suggested an allegedly universal low‐temperature behavior of quartic type. An unprecedented graphical distinction tool is introduced here, consisting in alternative C(T)/T4 data representations, by means of which the qualitative differences between opposite non‐quartic heat capacity behaviors for the materials under study have been visualized in rather pronounced form. A brief discussion is given of preliminary assessments of non‐quartic cryogenic heat capacity behaviors for a larger variety of III–V, II–VI, and I–VII materials.
Read full abstract