Contamination Of Beef Research Articles

Using Pathogenic Escherichia coli Type III Secreted Effectors espK and espV as Markers to Reduce the Risk of Potentially Enterohemorrhagic Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Beef

Contamination of beef by certain strains of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) called enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) can lead to outbreaks of severe disease. Therefore, accurate monitoring tests are needed to identify high risk beef products and divert them from consumers. Most EHEC testing focuses on the detection of their key virulence factors Shiga toxin (stx) and intimin (eae). However, these two factors can occur separately in lower risk nonpathogenic E. coli (STEC and enteropathogenic E. coli; EPEC) and confound testing if both are present. Accessory virulence factors like the Type III secreted effectors espK and espV may aid in increasing the specificity of EHEC testing. This work first evaluated collections of EHEC (n = 83), STEC (n = 100) and EPEC (n = 95), finding espK and/or espV in 100%, 0%, and 60% of each, respectively. Next, an inoculation study of beef trim samples (n = 118) examined the ability of including espK and espV in the monitoring test scheme to distinguish samples inoculated with EHEC from those inoculated with mixtures of STEC and EPEC (non-EHEC). Test accuracy was calculated as Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC) and found to be significantly (p < 0.05) different, increasing from 68.0% (stx/eae) to 76.8% by including espK and espV. Finally, 361 regulatory agency beef samples that had been identified as suspect for EHEC (stx+/eae+) were examined with the addition of espK and espV, and results compared to culture isolation. Culture isolation identified 42 EHEC, 82 STEC, and 67 EPEC isolates in 146 of the samples. In the case of these naturally contaminated samples, inclusion of espK and espV increased test accuracy compared to culture isolation from an AUC of 50.5% (random agreement) to 69.8% (good agreement). Results show that the inclusion of espK and espV can increase the specificity of identifying high risk EHEC contaminated beef and release beef contaminated with nonpathogenic or low risk E. coli. Further, use of espK and espV identified samples contaminated by common EHEC of serogroups O157, O26, and O103, as well as of less common serogroups O182, O177, and O5.

Geography, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Genomics of Salmonella enterica (Serotypes Newport and Anatum) from Meat in Mexico (2021-2023).

Salmonella enterica non-typhoidal is a major contributor to diarrheal diseases, with over 2600 serovars identified across diverse environments. In Mexico, serovars Newport and Anatum have shown a marked increase, especially in foodborne disease, posing a public health problem. We conducted a cross-sectional study from 2021 to 2023 using active epidemiological surveillance to assess contamination in ground beef and pork at butcher shops nationwide. It involved isolation, phenotypic antimicrobial resistance, comparative genomics, spatial distribution, antimicrobial-resistance genes, and pangenome analysis. A total of 402 non-typhoidal S. enterica strains were isolated, including 59 Newport and 50 Anatum. After curating for redundancy, 45 Newport and 32 Anatum strains remained. We found that 75% of Newport strains exhibited multidrug resistance (MDR), compared to 25% of Anatum strains. Salmonella Newport also showed a broader distribution and stronger antibiotic-resistance capacity, particularly due to genes such as mphA and ramA. Our pangenome analysis showed a predominance of cell maintenance and survival-process genes in the accessory genome of both serotypes. Considering unique genes, Salmonella Anatum and Newport showed a notorious abundance of genes with functions related to replication, recombination, and repair. The substantial rise of Anatum and Newport strains in meat samples for human consumption presents an epidemiological alert, highlighting the critical need for stringent surveillance programs to mitigate human and ecosystem health risks.

Consumer Risk Perception of Food Contamination as an Influencer to Purchase Irradiated Ground Beef, Chicken, and Leafy Greens – United States, October 2022

Foodborne illness continues to be a substantial public health concern in the United States with contaminated ground beef, chicken, and leafy greens identified as important sources of illnesses and outbreaks. These foods also have been identified by consumers as foods that are likely to carry germs that can make people sick. Food irradiation is a promising tool to enhance food safety. Despite this, there has been limited application of food irradiation in the U.S. During October 7–9, 2022, we licensed data from a Porter Novelli Public Services survey (N = 1,008) to examine consumer risk perception of contamination of ground beef, chicken, and leafy greens with pathogens, and the potential influence risk perception has on purchasing irradiated versions of these foods. Among respondents familiar with food irradiation, a higher proportion of those who believed ground beef and leafy greens were likely contaminated also indicated they were likely to consider purchasing irradiated ground beef (55.6% vs 35.4%; p = 0.0061) and leafy greens (60.8% vs 36.1%; p ≤ 0.0001) compared with those who did not; chicken was not significant (58.6% vs 45.4%; p = 0.0727). This survey demonstrated the importance of risk perception as an influencer on a consumer’s decision to purchase irradiated foods.

Assessment of hygienic-sanitary status and implementation of an integral risk management program in butcher shops from Tafí Viejo city, Tucumán, Argentina

Meat and meat products promote the growth of pathogens such as Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. In this work, an evaluation was carried out through risk quantification and microbiological analysis on ground beef and environmental surfaces in butcher shops, of Tafí Viejo city, Tucumán province. The study was carried out in three periods: period 1 (description of the health-status), period 2 (implementation of improvement actions) and period 3 (verification of success). Ground beef samples and environmental surfaces were analyzed in the previously described periods. The improvement actions in each butcher shop were implemented on the deviations detected in the first period. An increase of 35.7 % in low-risk butchers was observed. Microbial indicators in ground beef were significantly lower for total aerobic mesophilic microorganisms and Stapylococcus aureus, compared to the first period. In ground beef samples and environmental surfaces, the detection/isolation of STEC non-O157, presented a 100 % decrease in the verification period. The detection of Salmonella spp. showed a reduction of 14.3 % only on ground beef samples. This study confirms that the implementation of a risk management program in butcher shops would reduce contamination of ground beef and the environment with pathogens.

Challenge of green tea essential oil in mitigation of Candida albicans contamination in minced beef

Challenge of green tea essential oil in mitigation of Candida albicans contamination in minced beef

EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF PROCESSING BEEF, FISH AND FISH SEMI-FINISHED PRODUCTS USING THE ILU-10 ELECTRON ACCELERATOR, DEPENDING ON THE DOSIMETRIC PARAMETERS IN RELATION TO CLOSTRIDIUM SPP

This article presents the results of a study the effectiveness of radiation treatment using the ILU-10 electron accelerator in order to extend the shelf life of food products by controlling bacterial contamination (sulfite-reducing clostridium – Clostridium spp.). The ILU-10 device is designed for sterilization and disinfection of products without the use of chemicals. Clostridia spp. are an important indicator of microbiological control in the food industry. They are the cause of food spoilage, and some types of clostridium can cause massive disease of the human digestive system. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this device in reducing of Clostridium spp. with different radiation doses in the range from 3 to 9 kGr. It was found that a dose of 3 kGr is sufficient to reduce bacterial contamination of beef, fish (pike), and fish cutlets. In general, the maximum antibacterial effect was achieved at three doses.

Assessment of bacterial contamination of the beef at the Tanzania selected abattoirs

ABSTRACT The bacterial contamination of meat carcasses occurs mainly during processing and manipulation. Due to the abundance of nutrients in meat may encourage the growth of microorganisms and the animal transmission of harmful bacteria, meat is regarded as food with a high risk of contamination. A cross-sectional study was carried out in two Abbatoirs in Tanzania, Morogoro Municipality and NARCO, and bacteriological analysis was performed to determine the level of bacterial contamination in beef (chuck beef, sirloin beef and ground beef). Ninety samples from different beef were collected from three breeds (cows) (Ancole, Boran and Gogo) transferred without undue delay to the Laboratory of Food Science of Sokoine University of Agriculture, and subjected to bacteriological examination. The results specified that mean values of Total Plate Count (TPC), at the chuck beef, sirloin beef and round beef were 6.09 ± 0.20, 5.93 ± 0.18 and 5.87 ± 0.18 log cfu/g respectively. Though mean values of Salmonella Count at the previous regions were 1.30 ± 0.19, 1.35 ± 0.20 and 0.93 ± 0.18 log cfu/g, respectively, while mean values of total E.coli count were 1.07 ± 0.14, 1.10 ± 0.12 and 2.03 ± 0.15 log cfu/g, respectively, mean values of total Staphylococcal count were 4.34 ± 0.15, 3.62 ± 0.2 and 4.80 ± 0.14 log cfu/g, respectively. The breeds were not significantly different to all microbes examined. The samples concealed high counts of microorganisms.

Virulent shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O157:H7 ST11 isolated from ground beef in Brazil.

In this study, a total of 248 ground beef samples were analyzed for the presence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC). Out of these samples, only one (0.4%) tested positive for STEC. Further analysis using PCR confirmed the presence of all tested genes associated with STEC, including stx1, stx2, eae, ehx, uid, rfbO157, and fliCH7 in this isolate. Interestingly, no STEC strains were detected in the remaining 100 beef cut samples or the 100 chicken cut samples, indicating the absence of detectable STEC contamination in those specific samples. The isolated strain exhibited significant cytotoxic activity in Vero cells, indicating its ability to produce cytotoxic Shiga toxins. To further investigate the strain, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analyses were performed. The resistome analysis revealed the absence of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes, indicating a pan-susceptible phenotype. However, this strain presented chromosomal mutations in gyrA, gyrB, parC, parE, pmrA, pmrB, and folP. Plasmid analysis identified the presence of two plasmids, namely IncFIB(AP001918) and IncFII. The multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) identified the strain as belonging to sequence type (ST) 11, which is associated with E. coli O157:H7 strains. The virulome analysis confirmed the presence of several canonical virulence markers, including stx1, stx2, eae-g01-gamma, ehxA, stx1a-O157, and stx2a-O157. Overall, this study identified for the first time a rare occurrence of STEC contamination in ground beef, with the isolated strain belonging to the highly virulent O157:H7 serotype. These findings contribute to our understanding of STEC prevalence and characteristics in food samples, highlighting the importance of effective food safety measures to prevent potential health risks associated with STEC contamination.

Microbiome mapping in beef processing reveals safety-relevant variations in microbial diversity and genomic features

The microbiome of surfaces along the beef processing chain represents a critical nexus where microbial ecosystems play a pivotal role in meat quality and safety of end products. This study offers a comprehensive analysis of the microbiome along beef processing using whole metagenomics with a particular focus on antimicrobial resistance and virulence-associated genes distribution. Our findings highlighted that microbial communities change dynamically in the different steps along beef processing chain, influenced by the specific conditions of each micro-environment. Brochothrix thermosphacta, Carnobacterium maltaromaticum, Pseudomonas fragi, Psychrobacter cryohalolentis and Psychrobacter immobilis were identified as the key species that characterize beef processing environments. Carcass samples and slaughterhouse surfaces exhibited a high abundance of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), mainly belonging to aminoglycosides, β-lactams, amphenicols, sulfonamides and tetracyclines antibiotic classes, also localized on mobile elements, suggesting the possibility to be transmitted to human pathogens.We also evaluated how the initial microbial contamination of raw beef changes in response to storage conditions, showing different species prevailing according to the type of packaging employed. We identified several genes leading to the production of spoilage-associated compounds, and highlighted the different genomic potential selected by the storage conditions.Our results suggested that surfaces in beef processing environments represent a hotspot for beef contamination and evidenced that mapping the resident microbiome in these environments may help in reducing meat microbial contamination, increasing shelf-life, and finally contributing to food waste restraint.

Assessing the difference in contamination of retail meat with multidrug-resistant bacteria using for-consumer package label claims that indicate on-farm antibiotic use practices- United States, 2016-2019.

Antibiotic use in food-producing animals can select for antibiotic resistance in bacteria that can be transmitted to people through contamination of food products during meat processing. Contamination resulting in foodborne illness contributes to adverse health outcomes. Some livestock producers have implemented antibiotic use reduction strategies marketed to consumers on regulated retail meat packaging labels ("label claims"). We investigated whether retail meat label claims were associated with isolation of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs, resistant to ≥3 classes of antibiotics) from U.S. meat samples. We utilized retail meat data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) collectedduring 2016-2019 for bacterial contamination of chicken breast, ground turkey, ground beef, and pork chops. We used modified Poisson regression models to compare the prevalence of MDRO contamination among meat samples with any antibiotic restriction label claims versus those without such claims (i.e., conventionally produced). In NARMS, 62,338 meat samples were evaluated for bacterial growth from 2016-2019. Of these, 24,446 (39%) samples had label claims that indicated antibiotic use was restricted during animal production. MDROs were isolated from 2252 (4%) meat samples, of which 71% (n = 1591) were conventionally produced, and 29% (n = 661) had antibiotic restriction label claims. Compared with conventional samples, meat with antibiotic restriction label claims had a statistically lower prevalence of MDROs (adjusted prevalence ratio: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.61, 0.73). This relationship was consistent for the outcome of any bacterial growth. This repeated cross-sectional analysis of a nationally representative retail meat surveillance database in the United States supports that retail meats labeled with antibiotic restriction claims were less likely to be contaminated with MDROs compared with retail meat without such claims during 2016-2019. These findings indicate the potential for the public to become exposed to bacterial pathogens via retail meat and emphasizes a possibility that consumers could reduce their exposure to environmental reservoirs of foodborne pathogensthat are resistant to antibiotics.

Evaluation of Peracetic Acid Treatment on Beef Trimmings and Subprimals Against Salmonella and E. Coli O157:H7 Within Regulatory Retained Water Limitations

The application of antimicrobial treatments to beef trimmings prior to grinding for the reduction of microbial contamination in ground beef has increased recently. However, raw single-ingredient meat products are not permitted by Food Safety and Inspection Services (FSIS) to retain more than 0.49% water resulting from postevisceration processing. The effectiveness of antimicrobials with the limited water retention is not well documented. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of peracetic acid at varied concentrations against E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella on the surface of beef trimmings and beef subprimals that was applied at industry operating parameters within the retained water requirement. One hundred and forty-four each of beef trimmings and subprimals were used to evaluate the effect of different concentrations of peracetic acid solution on reducing E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella on surfaces of fresh beef within the FSIS requirement of ≤0.49% retained water from antimicrobial spray treatments using a conveyor system. A ten-strain cocktail mixture was inoculated on surfaces of fresh beef and subjected to water or four different concentrations of peracetic acid (130, 150, 200, and 400 ppm). Spray treatments with 130, 150, and 200 ppm peracetic acid reduced (P ≤ 0.05) E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella at least 0.2 log on surfaces of beef trimmings and subprimals. Spray treatment with 400 ppm peracetic acid resulted in approximately 0.5 and 0.3 log reduction of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella, respectively. Results indicate that all concentrations (130–400 ppm) of peracetic acid significantly reduced E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella on beef trimmings and subprimals compared to untreated controls. Thus, a range from 130 to 400 ppm of peracetic acid can be used during beef processing to improve the safety of beef trimmings and subprimals when weight gain is limited to ≤0.49% to meet regulatory requirements.

Analysis of Meat Microbial Contamination on the Beef Supply Chain in Makassar City

The source of bacterial contamination begins when the animal is slaughtered until the meat is consumed. Slaughterhouses (RPH), slaughterhouses (TPH) and traditional markets are the greatest possibility for meat to be contaminated with bacteria. The research began by taking samples of fresh beef purchased from the Makassar City Slaughterhouse (RPH), Slaughterhouse (TPH) and sales stalls in the market. The meat samples that were obtained were then tested for TPC, Escherchia coli, Salmonella sp, pH, meat color and water holding capacity at the UPT Laboratory for Quality Testing of Livestock Products at the South Sulawesi Province Animal Husbandry and Animal Health Service. It was concluded that there was e-coli microbial contamination in beef originating from RPH and TPH, salmonella showed negative results and the total plate count (TPC) was still within normal limits for microbial contamination and there was an influence of handling meat originating from RPH in the meat supply chain on meat quality of food products of animal origin.

Lactic acid bacteria and spoilage bacteria: Their interactions in Escherichia coliO157:H7 biofilms on food contact surfaces and implications for beef contamination

AbstractThis research explores the interaction between Shiga toxin‐producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O157:H7 and bacteria species commonly found in beef processing environments, specifically Carnobacterium, Lactobacillus, Comamonas, Raoultella, and Pseudomonas. The study investigated how various environmental conditions impact the formation of biofilms and the ability of O157:H7 to transfer from multispecies biofilm onto beef surfaces. For this purpose, a mixture of lactic acid bacteria (LAB), spoilage bacteria (106 CFU/mL), and E. coli O157 (103 CFU/mL) were combined as follows: LAB (T1): Carnobacterium piscicola + Lactobacillus bulgaricus + O157:H7, an spoilage bacteria (T2): Comamonas koreensis + Raoultella terrigena + O157:H7, an spoilage bacteria (T3): Pseudomonas aeruginosa + C. koreensis strain + O157:H7 and only O157:H7 as control (T4). Multispecies biofilms were developed on thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and stainless steel (SS) coupons at 10 and 25°C for 6 days, washed and stored for 6, 30, and 60 days at wet (60%–90% RH) and dry (20%–50%, RH) conditions. To evaluate O157:H7 transfer, beef cubes (3 × 3 × 1 cm) were placed on the coupons, followed by a 50‐g weight (7.35 kPa). The experiment was repeated three times in triplicate for each strain combination. Results demonstrate that biofilms formed at 10°C were generally weaker (less biomass) than those at 25°C. Regardless of temperature, more viable O157:H7 cells were transferred to beef from moist biofilms on TPU surfaces. At 25°C, T3 biofilm exhibited the lowest O157:H7 transfer to beef by 1.44 log10 CFU/cm2 (p < 0.01). At 10°C, none of the multispecies biofilm (T1–T3) affected the number of O157:H7 transfers to beef (p > 0.05). Notably, O157:H7 was not detected on food contact surfaces with 30 and 60‐day‐old dry biofilms (T1–T4). Through enrichment, E. coli O157:H7 was recovered from multispecies biofilms T1, T2, and T3. Findings from this study imply that multispecies biofilms contribute to the persistence of O157:H7 under dry conditions, regardless of temperature. These results underscore the intricate influence of multiple environmental factors—including surface type, biofilm age, humidity, temperature, and the presence of other bacterial species—on the risk of beef contamination facilitated by biofilms.

Contamination of beef and beef products by Listeria spp. and molecular characterization of L. monocytogenes in Mpumalanga, South Africa

AbstractThis study determined the prevalence, risk factors, and molecular characteristics of Listeria species detected in beef and beef products sampled in Mpumalanga province, South Africa. Four hundred beef and beef products were collected from 30 retail outlets in three districts (Bronkhorstspruit, Emalahleni, and Middelburg) within the province. Standard bacteriological and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays were used in the study. The overall prevalence of L. monocytogenes and other Listeria spp. in the samples was 8.3% (33/400) and 30% (120/400) (p < .05), respectively. For the five variables investigated, statistically significant effects were evident only for the region (p < .001) and type of product (p < .0001) for L. monocytogenes, the type of outlet (p = .011) and the type of product (p < .0001) for Listeria spp. Of the 20 types of beef and beef products tested, 15 (75%) and 17 (85%) were contaminated by L. monocytogenes and Listeria spp., respectively (p = .429). Among the four categories of products tested, the prevalence of L. monocytogenes was 7.3% (8/109), 10.6% (11/104), 7.5% (8/106), and 7.4% (6/81) for raw beef, ready‐to‐eat (RTE) products, milled beef, and offal & organs, respectively (p > .799). Among the 33 L. monocytogenes isolates, PCR genoserogroup IIa (42.4%, 1/2a‐3a) was most frequently detected. All (100%) of the isolates carried one or more of the eight virulence‐associated genes assessed, with genes inlC and inlJ detected in all the isolates. The overall prevalence of L. monocytogenes (8.3%) and the high frequency of virulent serogroups of L. monocytogenes commonly associated with human listeriosis pose a food safety risk to consumers of beef and beef‐based products contaminated by L. monocytogenes.

Salmonella Outbreaks Linked to Beef, United States, 2012–2019

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has identified nontyphoidal Salmonella as one of the top five pathogens contributing to foodborne illnesses in the United States. Beef continues to be a common source of Salmonella outbreaks, despite the implementation of interventions at slaughter and processing facilities to reduce contamination of beef. We described Salmonella outbreaks linked to beef in the United States during 2012–2019, examined trends, and identified potential targets for intervention and prevention strategies. We queried CDC’s Foodborne Disease Outbreak Surveillance System (FDOSS) for all foodborne nontyphoidal Salmonella outbreaks linked to beef as the single contaminated ingredient or implicated food, with the date of first illness onset from 2012 to 2019. Information on antimicrobial resistance (AR) for outbreak-related isolates was obtained from CDC’s National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS). We calculated the number of outbreaks, outbreak-related illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths overall, by beef processing category and Salmonella serotype. During 2012–2019, 27 Salmonella outbreaks were linked to beef consumption, resulting in 1103 illnesses, 254 hospitalizations, and two deaths. The most common category of beef implicated was nonintact raw, ground beef (12 outbreaks, 44%), followed by intact raw (six outbreaks, 22%). Ground beef was responsible for the most illnesses (800, 73%), both of the reported deaths, and was the source of the largest outbreak. AR data were available for 717 isolates from 25 (93%) outbreaks. Nine (36%) of these outbreaks had isolates resistant to one or more of the antibiotics tested by NARMS, of which eight (89%) contained multidrug-resistant isolates. Several outbreaks reported highlight challenges faced during investigations, areas where further research may be warranted, and opportunities to prevent future outbreaks along the farm-to-fork continuum.

Improving the Shelf Life and Quality of Minced Beef by Cassia Glauca Leaf Extracts during Cold Storage

Minced beef is a popular meat product due to its low price and superior nutritional value. The contamination of minced beef is a significant risk for the worldwide meat market. Both natural and synthetic preservatives are used to expand the shelf life and improve the quality properties of meat. The harmful effects of synthetic preservatives make natural preservatives more appealing. Therefore, this research was performed to study the impact of different concentrations of Cassia glauca leaf extract (CGE) on increasing the shelf life of minced beef. Seventy-two minced beef samples were divided into control, 0.25, 0.5, and 1% w/w CGE treated groups. The control and treated samples were kept at 3 ± 1 °C in the refrigerator for 15 days. Minced beef samples’ sensory, chemical, and microbiological properties were assessed every three days. The gained results showed that the CGE addition effectively decreased the microbial count and maintained the minced beef’s sensory and chemical quality. Additionally, CGE extended the shelf life of minced meat up to 15 days under the proper refrigeration condition compared to the control group, which decomposed after the sixth day of refrigeration. Our study suggested that CGE could be used as a natural preservative for refrigerated minced meat.

Coliform Contamination of Raw Beef at the Slaughterhouse and Butchery Levels in Herat City, Afghanistan

Background: Contaminated food products are responsible for causing various food borne diseases all over the world. Microbial contaminants are present in various food products, particularly raw meat. Among the most common microbial contaminants in meat and meat products are coliform bacteria. This study aimed to determine the coliform quality of raw beef with special emphasis on Escherichia coli in Herat city, Afghanistan and to compare the coliform contamination levels in the slaughterhouse and butchery levels. Materials and Methods: In this study, 150 samples of raw beef were randomly selected from butcheries and slaughterhouses of Herat city. Coliform identification was performed by standard bacteriological methods. Findings: The findings of this study revealed that coliform bacteria were detected in 70% and 75 % of beef samples from slaughterhouses and butcheries respectively. A total of 58 % of positive samples were upon the standard accepted ratio of coliforms contaminant per gram. The E. coli contamination ratio of samples in slaughterhouses and butcheries were 52% and 72% respectively. Our study demonstrates a significant difference in coliform bacteria contamination between slaughterhouse samples and butcheries. Conclusion: It was concluded that more than half of the coliform contamination in raw beef from the slaughterhouse and butcheries was exceeded the maximum limit which highlights the need to focus on effective monitoring of the slaughterhouse and butcheries in Herat city for prevention of meat borne intoxication and infection.

Evaluation Effect of Phenolic Compounds in Aqueous Extracts of Pomegranate and Olive Leaves as Antioxidant and Antibacterial in beef

The present study was aimed to know the effects of phenolic compounds were extracted from pomegranate and olive leaves which evaluated in beef. The results were showed effect plant extracts as antibacterial by agar diffusion method (Inhibition Zone Diameter) compared to antibiotics standard (cefamandol, cefixime and piperacillin) . On the other side, used Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) analysis to investigate on the meat oxidative , control treatment (C) showed exhibited the greater values of TBA, and lower TBA values were observed in pomegranate and olive leaves extract treatment combinations (POE) 3% followed by pomegranate leaves extract treatment (PE) 3% and olive leaves extract treatment (OE). Bacterial contamination in beef was determined and compared with Iraqi standard microbiological limits, the aerobic total plate bacteria in (PE) treatment lowest number followed by OE and POE compared with the control treatment in which increased of content from total aerobic bacteria.

Salmonella sp. and Escherichia coli Contamination on Beef from Slaughterhouse and Traditional Markets in Medan City

Salmonella sp and Escherichia coli are zoonotic pathogenic bacteria that can be found on beef. The presence of bacterial contamination on meat will impact the meat quality physical and in microbiological. The environment of the slaughter area is one of the factors causing Salmonella sp and Escherichia coli contamination in beef. The study aimed to determine the presence of Salmonella sp. and Escherichia coli contamination on meat from Slaughterhouses (RPH) and Medan Traditional Markets. Sampling was taken in 4 locations; RPH, and three traditional markets: Brayan, MMTC, and Central Market. Meat samples researched from October to December 2021 at Laboratorium Balai Penguji Penyidik Penyakit Balai Veteriner Regional Wilayah I. Data analysis used Paired Sample T-Test. The positive result of Salmonella spp contamination was found one a meat samples from Brayan Market. Meanwhile, Negative results of Salmonella spp contamination were found on meat samples from Slaughterhouse, MMTC Market, and Central Market. Furthermore, Escherichia coli is also found on almost all meat samples from RPH, and traditional markets.

Microbial Safety of Beef Along Beef Value Chains in the Ashaiman Municipality of Ghana.

Food from animal sources continues to be a significant food safety hazard. This study determined the microbial quality and safety of beef along beef value chains with case studies in the Ashaiman Municipality of Ghana. Raw beef samples were collected from four slaughter slabs in the Ashaiman Municipality and analyzed using standard microbiological methods to determine the quality and prevalence of specific pathogens, including Salmonella species, Listeria monocytogenes (L. monocytogenes), and Brucella species, as well as Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii), Cyclospora cayetanensis (C. cayetanensis), and Cryptosporidium parvum (C. parvum). Data regarding food safety knowledge and practices were collected and observed from stakeholders (cattle farmers, butchers, and beef retailers). Salmonella typhimurium was isolated from 7.5% (6/80) of the total raw beef samples. However, L. monocytogenes, Brucella spp., T. gondii, C. cayetanensis, and C. parvum were not isolated in this study. The mean level of microbial contamination of beef from the slaughter slabs/abattoir [5.2 Log10 colony-forming unit (CFU)/g] was not significantly different (p > 0.05) from the mean level observed at retail points (5.4 Log10 CFU/g). However, the mean coliform count of 4.3 Log10 CFU/g recorded at retail shops exceeded the permissible limits of 104 CFU/g (4 Log10 CFU/g) required by the Ghana Standards Authority for safety of meat and carcasses. Knowledge on food safety was at average level for butchers and retailers. Unhygienic practices and poor sanitary conditions at the abattoirs and retail shops observed could be the main contributing factors to microbial contamination of raw beef. Continuous education for meat handlers on issues of food safety and monitoring of slaughter activities will reduce the rate and level of contamination of beef.