Bearings In Hip Arthroplasty Research Articles

Trends in the use of dual mobility bearings in hip arthroplasty.

Dual mobility (DM) bearings are an attractive treatment option to obtain hip stability during challenging primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) cases. The purpose of this study was to analyze data submitted to the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) to characterize utilization trends of DM bearings in the USA. All primary and revision THA procedures reported to AJRR from 2012 to 2018 were analyzed. Patients of all ages were included and subdivided into DM and traditional bearing surface cohorts. Patient demographics, geographical region, hospital size, and teaching affiliation were assessed. Associations were determined by chi-squared analysis and logistic regression was performed to assess outcome variables. A total of 406,900 primary and 34,745 revision THAs were identified, of which 35,455 (8.7%) and 8,031 (23.1%) received DM implants respectively. For primary THA, DM usage increased from 6.7% in 2012 to 12.0% in 2018. Among revision THA, DM use increased from 19.5% in 2012 to 30.6% in 2018. Patients < 50 years of age had the highest rates of DM implantation in every year examined. For each year of increase in age, there was a 0.4% decrease in the rate of DM utilization (odds ratio (OR) 0.996 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.995 to 0.997); p < 0.001). Females were more likely to receive a DM implant compared to males (OR 1.077 (95% CI 1.054 to 1.100); p < 0.001). Major teaching institutions and smaller hospitals were associated with higher rates of utilization. DM articulations were used more commonly for dysplasia compared with osteoarthritis (OR 2.448 (95% CI 2.032 to 2.949); p < 0.001) during primary THA and for instability (OR 3.130 (95% CI 2.751 to 3.562) vs poly-wear; p < 0.001) in the revision setting. DM articulations showed a marked increase in utilization during the period examined. Younger patient age, female sex, and hospital characteristics such as teaching status, smaller size, and geographical location were associated with increased utilization. DM articulations were used more frequently for primary THA in patients with dysplasia and for revision THA in patients being treated for instability. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7 Supple B):27-32.

The Role of Metal-on-Metal Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing

The current role of metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings in hip arthroplasty remains controversial. The low wear offered by MoM bearings compared to metal-on-polyethylene and the possibility of a lower risk of dislocation with larger head sizes, encouraged a trend towards the re-introduction of the MoM bearing couple. However, recent evidence has shown that not all designs of the MoM bearing have been successful. The purpose of this paper is to provide an update on the use of MoM bearings and address the following issues: (1) the reintroduction of metal-on-metal bearings in total hip arthroplasty, (2) the failure of metal-on-metal bearings in stemmed total hip arthroplasty, (3) the role of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in modern orthopaedics and (4) metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty. A literature search strategy was conducted using various search terms in MEDLINE and Embase. The highest quality articles that met the inclusion criteria and best answered the topics of focus of this review were selected. Key search terms included 'metal-on-metal', 'total hip arthroplasty' and 'hip resurfacing'. The initial search retrieved 1240 articles. Twenty-two articles were selected and used in the review. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is still a suitable treatment option in specific patient populations with the appropriate implant design and surgical skill, while stemmed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty should be avoided in all patient populations. Continued follow-up of patients undergoing metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is critical in order to further understand the long-term outcomes of these patients and why certain complications tend to occur with this procedure.

A numerical model to reproduce squeaking of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Influence of design and material

BackgroundModern ceramic (CoC) bearings for hip arthroplasty (THA) have been used in younger patients who expect improved survivorship. However, audible squeaking produced by the implant is an annoying complication. Previous numerical simulations were not able to accurately reproduce in vitro and in vivo observations. Therefore, we developed a finite element model to: (1) reproduce in vitro squeaking and validate the model by comparing it with in vivo recordings, (2) determine why there are differences between in vivo and in vitro squeaking frequencies, (3) identify the stem's role in this squeaking, (4) predict which designs and materials are more likely to produce squeaking. HypothesisA CoC THA numerical model can be developed that reproduces the squeaking frequencies observed in vivo. Material and methodsNumerical methods (finite element analysis [ANSYS]) and experimental methods (using a non-lubricated simulated hip with a cementless 32mm CoC THA) were developed to reproduce squeaking. Numerical analysis was performed to identify the frequencies that cause vibrations perceived as an acoustic emission. The finite element analysis (FEA) model was enhanced by adjusting periprosthetic bone and soft tissue elements in order to reproduce the squeaking frequencies recorded in vivo. A numerical method (complex eigenvalue analysis) was used to find the acoustic frequencies of the squeaking noise. The frequencies obtained from the model and the hip simulator were compared to those recorded in vivo. ResultsThe numerical results were validated by experiments with the laboratory hip simulator. The frequencies obtained (mean 2790Hz with FEA, 2755Hz with simulator, decreasing to 1759Hz when bone and soft tissue were included in the FEA) were consistent with those of squeaking hips recorded in vivo (1521Hz). The cup and ceramic insert were the source of the vibration, but had little influence on the diffusion of the noise required to make the squeaking audible to the human ear. The FEA showed that diffusion of squeaking was due to an unstable vibration of the stem during frictional contact. The FEA predicted a higher rate of squeaking (at a lower coefficient of friction) when TZMF™ alloy is used instead of Ti6Al4V and when an anatomic press-fit stem is used instead of straight self-locking designs. DiscussionThe current FEA model is reliable; it can be used to assess various stem designs and alloys to predict the different rates of squeaking that certain stems will likely produce. Level of evidenceLevel IV in vitro study.

Analysis of a retrieved squeaking ceramic-on-ceramic hip arthroplasty bearing

Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip replacements have shown superior wear performance compared to other material couples. However, 1–10% of patients have reported squeaking with the use of ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. A ceramic-on-ceramic bearing was retrieved from a patient after 4.5 years in service secondary to squeaking. The explant was analyzed to investigate the possible factors attributing to the hip squeak utilizing acoustic analysis, visual inspection, modal analysis, random vibration analysis, and mathematical modeling. Random vibration analysis of the parts of the implant showed that boundary conditions along the metallic shell play an important role in squeal occurrence. The implant also showed the evidence of material transfer. Using the results of modal analysis, a 2-degree of freedom friction model demonstrated the influence of third body material transfer on the stability of the system to be an important factor in squeaking. The mathematical parametric analysis showed that a larger mass creates more instability, and hence more noise and vibration. Increased stiffness of the shell proved to stabilize the system for most loading conditions. Limit-cycle plots showed a definite change in the system behavior but stability was maintained through a significant increase in contact stiffness.

Do Hardened Femoral Heads Reduce Blood Metal Ion Concentrations after Hip Resurfacing?

Elevated cobalt and chromium ion concentrations have been associated with the use of metal-on-metal bearings in hip arthroplasty. The use of a differential hardness bearing may reduce metal particle release. The aim of our study was to compare circulating cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) ion levels between patients treated with a standard all 'as-cast' heat treated bearing and a differential hardness bearing. One hundred and thirty-two patients implanted with unilateral hip resurfacing arthroplasties and having had blood metal ion studies performed between one and six years after surgery were retrospectively selected. There were 73 patients in the standard all 'as cast' heat treated bearing group (group 1) and 59 in the differential hardness bearing group (group 2). Clinical and quality of life scores were comparable between groups. The median Co in group 1 was 1.01 µg/L and 1.23 µg/L in group 2 (p = 0.0566). The median Cr in group 1 was 1.60 µg/L and 1.34 µg/L in group 2 (p = 0.0505). Compared with conventional heat-treated CoCr bearings, differential hardness metal-on metal bearings do not confirm in vivo the hopes of a substantial reduction in circulating metal ions concentrations suggested by in vitro wear studies.

Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in hip arthroplasty

This systematic review of the literature summarises the clinical experience with ceramic-on-ceramic hip bearings over the past 40 years and discusses the concerns that exist in relation to the bearing combination. Loosening, fracture, liner chipping on insertion, liner canting and dissociation, edge-loading and squeaking have all been reported, and the relationship between these issues and implant design and surgical technique is investigated. New design concepts are introduced and analysed with respect to previous clinical experience.

Update from the 2012 AAOS Annual Meeting: Selected Papers on Metal-on-Metal Bearings in Hip Arthroplasty

Update from the 2012 AAOS Annual Meeting: Selected Papers on Metal-on-Metal Bearings in Hip Arthroplasty

A Survey on the Prevalence of Pseudotumors with Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing in Canadian Academic Centers

Metal-on-metal bearings for hip arthroplasty have been in clinical use for over twenty years with excellent clinical results reported worldwide. A small percentage (<1%) of patients have developed an inflammatory response, and a more severe inflammatory response termed pseudotumor has been more recently reported. The primary purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of pseudotumor following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in Canadian academic centers.Nine of the fourteen centers that perform metal-on-metal hip resurfacings were surveyed. The number of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasties performed at each center was determined, as was the number of patients who presented with a pseudotumor and subsequently required revision hip surgery between 2002 and December 2008.At the nine centers, 3432 hip resurfacing arthroplasties were performed; 76.9% of the patients were male, the mean age was 51.2 years (range, sixteen to eighty-three years), and the mean body-mass index was 28.1 (range, 17 to 55). The mean length of follow-up was 3.4 years (range, two to nine years). A pseudotumor developed after four of the 3432 arthroplasties, for a prevalence of 0.10%.Although pseudotumors remain a concern after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing, the prevalence at short to midterm follow-up is very low in this multicenter survey. Continued close monitoring is required to determine what clinical factors are involved with the uncommon pseudotumor formation.

Inflammatory Pseudotumor Complicating Metal-On-Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty

Inflammatory masses or cysts occurring in the pelvis, thigh, and gluteal regions, often mimicking infection, occasionally arise after total hip arthroplasty procedures. Inflammatory pseudotumors comprise a subgroup of these lesions. Pseudotumors have been associated with pain, rashes, instability, neuropathy, and premature loosening of prosthetic components, often leading to early and difficult revision surgery. The association between such pseudotumors and metal-on-metal bearings has led to questions regarding the performance of these bearings in hip arthroplasty. We present a case of pseudotumor requiring revision surgery, which occurred uniquely around a metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearing.

Early Failure of Metal-on-Metal Artificial Disc Prostheses Associated with Lymphocytic Reaction

Report of four collected cases. The purpose of this report is to describe the presentation, diagnostic workup, treatment, and pathologic findings in four cases of lymphocytic reaction in patients receiving a metal-on-metal total disc replacement (TDR). Metal-on-metal designs in hip arthroplasty have gained popularity because of decreased volumetric wear rates and theoretically increased implant longevity. Systemic metal ions produced have not been associated with adverse clinical sequelae, although there have been reports of local soft-tissue reactions leading to early prosthetic failure. Histologic evaluation in these cases suggested a cell-mediated delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction. Metal-on-metal bearings have also emerged in lumbar and cervical TDR. This report is on four patients, from three centers, who underwent TDR, using a metal-on-metal implant, and later presented with symptoms that were determined to be due to lymphocytic reaction. Details of their symptoms, diagnostic work-up, treatment, and outcomes were compiled. All four patients initially had a good surgical outcome, followed by the onset and worsening of axial pain, and/or radicular symptoms months later. All patients had imaging findings of a mass lesion with neurologic impingement. All three of the lumbar patients underwent a decompressive posterior procedure before the eventual device removal and fusion. Intraoperatively, in all the lumbar cases, a thick, yellowish, avascular soft-tissue mass was found to be responsible for an epidural-mass effect on the thecal sac. In the cervical case, there was a gray-tinged soft-tissue response around the implant, suggestive of metallosis. Independent laboratory analysis confirmed a lymphocytic reaction to the implant. Three of the patients had a good outcome after the explant and revision surgery. The remaining patient continued to have residual symptoms related to the neural compression caused by the mass. In this group of patients from three centers, a metal-on-metal TDR resulted in a lymphocytic reaction causing subsequent failure of the surgery. This phenomenon has previously been recognized with metal bearings in hip arthroplasty. Surgeons using metal-on-metal TDRs should be aware of this possible occurrence.

A proposed mechanism for squeaking of ceramic-on-ceramic hips

Ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) bearings for hip arthroplasty have shown low wear rates and low biological reactivity of wear particles. However, a clinical complication receiving increased attention is the phenomenon of squeaking in COC hips and its importance in terms of clinical performance of the bearings. The recent literature presents a wide spectrum of factors claimed to be the cause of squeaking of ceramic hips, and a clear determination of the factors leading to squeaking has been elusive. The current study documents that the ceramic ball-in-socket bearing couple alone, without any metal devices incorporated, can be made to vibrate at an audible frequency when articulated. Consideration of the geometry of current generation ceramic-on-ceramic hip bearings leads to an hypothesis of a rolling/sliding mechanism causing vibration and squeaking. The derived relationship appears to accurately model the frequencies of the noise from hip bearings. Laboratory tests using accelerometers support the predicted relationship between bearing friction and femoral head motion, providing evidence that the proposed roll/slide mechanism reflects the type of motion that occurs during flexion of a modern COC hip device.

S-34 Clinical Outcomes of Metal–Polyurethane Bearings in Hip Arthroplasty

S-34 Clinical Outcomes of Metal–Polyurethane Bearings in Hip Arthroplasty

Renal Clearance of Cobalt in Relation to the Use of Metal-on-Metal Bearings in Hip Arthroplasty

A concern regarding the use of metal-on-metal bearings in hip arthroplasty has been that the high levels of metal ions that are released overwhelm the renal threshold for metal excretion, leading to systemic buildup of metals. The purpose of this investigation was to determine if the physiological renal capacity for cobalt clearance and cobalt concentrating efficiency is overwhelmed by the elevation in metal ion levels seen in patients with metal-on-metal-bearing hip devices. Concurrent specimens of urine and plasma were obtained from a group of 461 patients (346 men and 115 women) at various intervals after either a unilateral (296) or a bilateral (130) metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty or preoperatively (thirty-five patients; the control specimens). Metal ion analyses were performed with high-resolution inductively coupled mass spectrometry. Renal efficiency was measured as the ratio of urine cobalt concentration to plasma cobalt concentration. Cobalt clearance was calculated by dividing the urine cobalt output in twenty-four hours by the plasma cobalt concentration. Dividing the quotient by 1440 adjusts it to clearance per minute. The median renal efficiency was found to be 0.9 in the analysis of the preoperative specimens, indicating that there was renal conservation of cobalt. In patients with metal-on-metal bearings, the median renal efficiency was 3.2, indicating that, as a result of cobalt excretion, the cobalt concentration in urine was threefold higher than the concentration in plasma. Linear regression analysis showed that renal efficiency progressively increased at a rate of 9% for every microg/24 hr increase in cobalt release. Cobalt clearance showed a similar trend, increasing from 1.3 mL/min in the preoperative group to 3.7 mL/min in the follow-up group. In the follow-up group, renal cobalt clearance progressively increased from 1.9 to 7.1 mL/min with increasing daily cobalt output, which indicates that with increasing in vivo metal ion release there was a progressive increase in the rate at which the kidneys cleared the plasma of cobalt. In subjects with no prosthetic device, the kidneys tend to conserve cobalt in the body. We found that, in patients with a metal-on-metal hip prosthesis, there is a progressive increase in cobalt clearance with increasing in vivo wear at the levels of cobalt release expected in patients with an array of metal-on-metal-bearing total joint arthroplasties. We found no threshold beyond which renal capacity to excrete these ions is overwhelmed.

Hydroxyapatite Ceramic Hip Survey Alumina on Alumina Bearings

To reduce osteolysis and loosening, alumina bearings in hip arthroplasty have been used in Sunderland since 1991. This consecutive series demonstrates the results which have been most rewarding. However, ceramic implant fractures have been encountered but these probably represent less than meticulous operative technique. The results are published and the complications discussed together with advice to reduce the incidence of implant failure.

Levels of metal ions after small- and large-diameter metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty

Metal-on-metal (MOM) bearings for hip arthroplasty are increasing in popularity. Concern remains, however, regarding the potential toxicological effects of the metal ions which these bearings release. The serum levels of cobalt and chromium in 22 patients who had undergone MOM resurfacing arthroplasty were compared with a matched group of 22 patients who had undergone 28 mm MOM total hip arthroplasty (THA). At a median of 16 months (7 to 56) after resurfacing arthroplasty, we found the median serum levels of cobalt and chromium to be 38 nmol/l (14 to 44) and 53 nmol/l (23 to 165) respectively. These were significantly greater than the levels after 28 mm MOM THA which were 22 nmol/l (15 to 87, p = 0.021) and 19 nmol/l (2 to 58, p < 0.001) respectively. Since the upper limit for normal patients without implants is typically 5 nmol/l, both groups had significantly raised levels of metal ions. MOM bearings of large diameter, however, result in a greater systemic exposure of cobalt and chromium ions than bearings of small diameter. This may be of relevance for potential long-term side-effects. It is not known to what extent this difference is due to corrosion of the surfaces of the component or of the wear particles produced.

Metal on Metal Bearings in Hip Arthroplasty

Periprosthetic osteolysis caused by wear debris released from the bearing surface of polyethylene components is the major problem in contemporary hip arthroplasty. Several types of metal on metal prostheses were developed in the 1960s, but by the mid 1970s they were completely displaced by polyethylene bearings. There have been several generations of all metal components with significant variation in design, tolerances, and bearing surface quality. A number of these hips have survived for more than 25 years because of low wear rates and minimal osteolysis. Identification of the characteristics that contributed to long term function is important. The historical development and clinical results of metal on metal hip arthroplasties are presented. Factors that led to the abandonment of the metal on metal bearings are related to: (1) the early success of the Charnley prosthesis; (2) the frictional torque issue; (3) carcinogenesis concerns; (4) metal sensitivity concerns; (5) high infection rates; and (6) increased strain rates in periprosthetic bone and fatigue fractures of the acetabular floor. The accumulated experience to date enables one to evaluate all the factors with a different perspective and makes the use of newer metal on metal bearings a viable option in younger patients.