Bearings In Total Hip Arthroplasty Research Articles

Dual-Mobility Articulations in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Mid-Term Outcomes From the American Joint Replacement Registry

BackgroundIn recent years, there has been an increased utilization of dual-mobility (DM) implants in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) to mitigate the risk of postoperative hip instability. This study aimed to present mid-term outcomes of DM bearings in primary THA using data from the American Joint Replacement Registry. MethodsScreening was conducted on patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent primary THA between 2012 and 2018. Patients were categorized into three groups: (1) DM articulation, (2) ≤ 32-mm femoral head, and (3) ≥ 36-mm femoral head. Multivariable statistical modeling was employed to analyze patient and hospital characteristics, minimizing potential confounding variables and identifying independent associations with revision. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to assess all-cause revision and revision specifically for instability. A total of 207,526 primary THAs were identified. Among them, 13,896 (6.7%) utilized DM articulation, 60,358 (29.1%) had a femoral head size of ≤ 32 mm, and 133,272 (64.2%) had a femoral head size of ≥ 36 mm. ResultsAt the 8-year follow-up, the all-cause revision rate was higher in the DM group (3.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1 to 4.1) compared to the ≤ 32-mm (2.6%, 95% CI 2.5 to 2.8) and ≥ 36-mm (2.7%, 95% CI 2.5 to 2.9) groups. However, the revision rate for instability was comparable among the DM (0.4%, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.5), ≤ 32 mm (0.5%, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.5), and ≥ 36 mm (0.3%, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.4) groups at 8-year follow-up. ConclusionsThe utilization of DM was associated with higher overall revision rates. However, no significant differences in rates of revision for instability were observed among any of the bearing surface groups. These findings may be attributed to surgeons selectively utilizing DM articulations in higher-risk patients.

May the 4th be with you: mixed-methods best-evidence synthesis on 4th-generation alumina-zirconia ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty.

To assess utility, benefits, and risks of 4th-generation alumina-zirconia ceramic pairings in elective total hip arthroplasty (THA). A comprehensive mixed-methods best-evidence synthesis using data from systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective cohort studies, as well as joint replacement registries, was conducted to estimate overall revision and survival rates, periprosthetic infection, bearing fractures, and noise phenomena with 4th-generation alumina-zirconia ceramic versus other tribological couplings in elective THA. The systematic review part across multiple databases was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023418076), and individual study data were extracted for statistical re-analysis. Twenty overlapping systematic reviews, 7, 17, and 8 references from RCTs, cohort studies, and joint replacement registries form the basis of this work. According to current best evidence, it is (i) 15-33 times more likely that 4th-generation alumina-zirconia pairings avoid a revision for infection than causing a revision for audible noise, (ii) 38-85 times more likely that 4th-generation alumina-zirconia pairings avoid a revision for infection than causing a revision for ceramic head fractures, and (iii) three to six times more likely that 4th-generation alumina-zirconia pairings avoid a revision for infection than cause a revision for ceramic liner fractures. Fourth-generation alumina-zirconia pairings in THA show a favorable benefit-risk ratio, with rare compound-specific adverse events and complications significantly outbalanced by long-term advantages, such as a markedly lower incidence of revision for infection.

Excellent Results of Large-Diameter Ceramic-On-Ceramic Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty at Minimum Ten-Year Follow-Up

BackgroundThis study reports the minimum 10 years results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed using a monoblock acetabular component with a large-diameter head ceramic-on-ceramic bearing. MethodsOf the 276 THAs included in this study, there were eleven deaths and 27 patients lost to follow up (11%) during the follow-up, leaving 237 (85%) hips available for review at a mean of 10.5 years (range, 10 to 12) postoperatively. Reoperations, implant revisions, adverse events, clinical outcomes, radiographic evaluation, and whole blood metal ion levels were assessed at the last follow-up. ResultsAfter a minimum of 10 years, implant survivorship was 98.7%. There were 3 revisions (1.3%): one for insufficient acetabular cup primary fixation, one traumatic periprosthetic acetabular fracture, and one probable deep chronic infection. No dislocation or ceramic implant fracture was observed. The mean University of California at Los Angeles activity score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, and Forgotten Joint Score were 5.6 (2 to 10), 90.1 (9 to 100), and 79.2 (4 to 100), respectively. All patients (100%) were satisfied or very satisfied. Since implantation, 43% of patients reported hearing a squeaking noise from the prosthesis. But all patients who reported squeaking were satisfied with the surgery. The mean titanium level was 2.2 μg/L (1.1 to 5.6). No progressive radiolucent lines, osteolysis, or implant loosening signs were observed at the last radiographic evaluation. ConclusionsA large-diameter head ceramic-on-ceramic THA provides outstanding long-term (minimum 10 years) implant survivorship with unrestricted activity while avoiding implant impingement, liner fracture, and hip instability. Functional outcomes, satisfaction, and joint perception were excellent. Although the incidence of squeaking was high, it did not affect patient satisfaction or function. The systemic titanium levels were low, related to unavoidable passive corrosion of implant surfaces, and did not reveal any indirect signs of trunnionosis.

Dual mobility in primary total hip arthroplasty: A temptation from the devil or a blessing from above.

Dual mobility (DM) bearings have gained significant attention in the field of total hip arthroplasty (THA) as a valid treatment option in cases of revision for instability after THA whereas its use in primary THA is still a matter of debate. This manuscript explores the pathology, incidence, diagnosis, treatment options, prognosis, ongoing studies in the literature, and future perspectives related to the use of DM bearings employed in primary THA. DM bearings are primarily designed to address one of the major concerns in THA: Instability of the prosthetic hip. Instability is both for the surgeon and the patient a devastating postoperative complication, leading to significant pain and subsequent apprehension by the patient and may require revision surgeries. The use of DM implants poses the worry of wear-related complications, such as accelerated polyethylene wear and osteolysis, which also pose challenges to long-term implant survival. This technique has seen a steady rise in recent years, with multiple studies reporting favorable outcomes. The incidence of their utilization varies among institutions and surgeons, reflecting differing preferences and patient populations. The diagnosis of instability and wear-related complications in THA often involves clinical assessment, imaging modalities such as X-rays, computed tomography scans, and sometimes advanced imaging techniques like magnetic resonance imaging. DM bearings can be considered as an option when patients present neurologic pathologies such as Parkinson's disease or recurrent dislocations after THA. DM bearings provide an additional articulation point within the implant, facilitating a greater range of motion and inherent stability. This design allows for reduced risk of dislocation and improved functional outcomes. Various implant manufacturers offer different designs and sizes of DM bearings to suit individual patient needs. Current literature suggests that the use of DM bearings in primary THA has demonstrated promising outcomes in terms of enhanced stability, reduced dislocation rates, and improved patient satisfaction. However, long-term studies with larger patient cohorts are necessary to establish the durability and longevity of these implants. Several ongoing studies are investigating the role of DM bearings in primary THA. These studies focus on evaluating long-term implant survivorship, assessing wear patterns, analyzing patient-reported outcomes, and comparing the effectiveness of DM bearings with traditional THA designs. The future of DM bearings in primary THA holds potential for further advancements. Research efforts are aimed at refining implant materials, optimizing designs, and studying the influence of surgical techniques on implant performance. Additionally, continued investigation into the long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of DM bearings will play a crucial role in shaping their future use. While further research is warranted, the current evidence supports their potential as a beneficial solution in improving surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Ceramic-on-Metal Bearing in Total Hip Arthroplasty—Was It So Bad? A Narrative Review and a Critical Analysis of the Literature

Hip replacement has significantly improved the quality of life of patients with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis. Various bearings have been developed over the years. Each of these has advantages and disadvantages. On the one hand, Metal-on-Metal (MoM) has been associated with a high level of wear and metal ion release of chromium (Cr) and cobalt (Co). On the other hand, Ceramic-on-Ceramic (CoC) bearings, known to have a wear rate close to zero, have been associated with an increased risk of squeaking and component fracture. Ceramic-on-Metal (CoM), a hybrid hard-on-hard bearing, was proposed to overcome the CoC and MoM limits. Preliminary clinical and radiographical results have been described as favourable. Due to the failure of MoM and the increased risk of ion release and metal toxicity, CoM was withdrawn from the market without causing significant clinical complications. Data from the literature showed that CoM bearings are reliable and safe at medium- and long-term follow-up, if correctly implanted. In this narrative review, we analysed the real risks and benefits associated with the implantation of CoM bearings.

Long Cephalomedullary Nails Can Be a Cheap and Effective Interval Revision Prosthesis in Infected Hip Replacements That Require Proximal Femoral Replacement: A Small Case Series.

Hip prosthetic joint infection management is complex and expensive, especially in severe bone loss.Reducing the price of interval prosthesis when performing staged revision could minimize costs without compromising outcomes. We present 2 similar techniques developed independently that use an antibiotic-coated cephalomedullary nail with a total hip arthroplasty bearing (head and cemented acetabular component) attached to it as an interval proximal femoral replacement prosthesis. Using this technique, the femoral implant cost was reduced up to 10-fold. All patients have recovered well with resolution of infection and functional recovery similar to patients undergoing proximal femoral replacement. In one case, the lag screw (femoral neck) fractured at 5 months prompting the second-stage revision. This complication should be considered when deciding the timing of second-stage revisions in these cases.

Mid-Term Outcomes of Modular Dual Mobility Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty

AbstractModular dual mobility (MDM) prostheses in which a cobalt–chromium liner is inserted into a titanium acetabular shell have the potential for corrosion. This has raised concern. While these constructs have been shown to effectively reduce the risk of dislocation in revision and high-risk primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), previous studies have been limited by the length of follow-up. The purpose of the study is to review the mid-term clinical outcomes of MDM implants with a minimum of 5-year follow-up. A retrospective, observational study was conducted on all consecutive patients who underwent THA with a MDM implant from June 2011 and March 2017 at an urban, tertiary academic medical center. Descriptive statistics were used to describe baseline patient characteristics. Primary endpoints included revision rates, dislocations rates, and implant component survivorship. Implant survival was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. A total of 92 cases (61 primary, 31 revision) underwent THA with a MDM implant at an average follow-up of 6.90 ± 1.48 years (range: 5.01–10.53 years). The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 58.20 ± 11.85 years. Six patients were revised (6.5%, 6/92), two for periprosthetic joint infection (2.2%, 2/92), one due to aseptic loosening (1.1%, 1/92), one due to periprosthetic fracture (1.1%, 1/92), and the remaining two for metallosis (2.2%, 2/92). Kaplan–Meier survivorship analysis showed a 93.5% survival rate for all-cause revisions and 98.9% survival for acetabular component revision. MDM components reliably decrease the risk of dislocation after THA. However, the occurrence of two revisions due to metallosis demonstrates the necessity for continued surveillance in this cohort. Larger trials with long-term follow-up may be required to further elucidate the long-term outcomes and performance of these bearings.

Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings in Total Joint Arthroplasty. Part 3

Summary. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) currently provides durable long-term outcomes, but osteolysis secondary to polyethylene wear debris remains a fundamental cause of aseptic loosening and revision. Conventional polyethylene failed to provide a suitable bearing for young active patients requiring joint replacement because of the significant demands they place on such bearings. Strategies to reduce friction and wear debris lead to the development of ceramic bearings in THA. The next decade is unlikely to see a paradigm shift in the materials used for THA. Instead, the challenges will be aimed at improving surgical technique in terms of component orientation to improve reproducibility and achieve superior patient outcomes. The optimum bearing surface is one with very low wear rates, a low coefficient of friction, scratch resistance, and is biologically inert. It is also one that can safely accommodate larger femoral head sizes to minimize dislocation rates without damaging the taper junction. Such a material already exists with modern ceramic bearings.

Outcomes of Ceramic-On-Ceramic Bearing Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up Study

BackgroundAlthough the fourth generation of ceramics has demonstrated excellent clinical results 5 to 6 years postoperatively, concerns over ceramic fracture and squeaking persist and longer-term follow-up (minimum 10 years) studies are warranted. Our study aimed to evaluate the minimum 10-year clinical outcomes and bearing-specific complications of ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasties. MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated all patients who underwent primary delta CoC total hip arthroplasty in our institution between January 2004 and February 2013. Demographics, surgical techniques, complications, patient-reported outcomes, and radiographic outcomes were collected and analyzed. For continuous variables, the comparison between groups was conducted using a one-way analysis of variance. Of all 235 patients included in the study, 70.5% were women (190 hips). The mean follow-up period was 12 years (range, 10 to 18). The femoral head sizes of 28- mm, 32 mm, and 36 mm were used in 50, 26, and 197 cases, respectively. Mean acetabular inclination and anteversion angles were 39.2 ± 7.1° and 14.9 ± 3.5°. ResultsThere were 5 hips revised at a mean 4.6 years (range, 0.1 to 7.1). One revision was squeaking-related. Squeaking was also reported by 8 other patients, but did not require revision. Other reasons for revision were early infection in 2 cases, stem loosening in 1 case, and stem fracture in 2 cases. The survival analysis for any causes for revision as an endpoint was 96.7% (95% confidence interval 0.313%-2.57%). ConclusionWe report excellent mean 12-year follow-up results regarding the complications and survivorship of the fourth generation CoC bearings.

Less groin pain with dual-mobility bearings versus fixed bearings in total hip arthroplasty.

The relationship between implant type, dual mobility (DM) or fixed bearing (FB), and postoperative groin pain remains unexplored. We examined the incidence of groin pain in DM implants and compare this to a cohort of FB THA patients. From 2006 to 2018, a single surgeon performed 875 DM THA and 856 FB THA procedures with 2.8-year and 3.1-year follow-up, respectively. Each patient received a questionnaire postoperatively and was asked if they had any groin pain (yes/no). Secondary measurements were implant characteristics such as head size, head offset, cup size, and cup-to-head ratio. Additional PROMs that were collected included: Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, Pain visual analogue scale (Pain VAS), and range of motion (ROM). The incidence of groin pain was 2.3% in the DM THA cohort and 6.3% in the FB THA group (p < 0.001). Also, low head offset (⩽0 mm) had a significant odds ratio (1.61) for groin pain in both cohorts. There was no significant difference in terms of revision rate between the cohorts (2.5% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.39) at the latest follow up. This study demonstrated a lower incidence of groin pain (2.3%) in patients with a DM bearing compared to a FB (6.3%) and a greater risk of groin pain with low head offset (<0 mm). As such, surgeons should try to recreate offset of the hip compared to the contralateral side to avoid groin pain.

POLYIMIDE (MP-1) AS A BEARING IN TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: RESULTS OF THE FIRST 100 CASES

Polyimide (MP-1, MMATech, Haifa, Israel), is a high performance aerospace thermoplastic used for its lubricity, stability, inertness and radiation resistance. A wear resistant thin robust bearing is needed for total hip arthroplasty (THR).After independent laboratory testing, in 2006, the author used the material as a bearing in two Reflection (Smith and Nephew, USA) hip surgeries. The first, a revision for polyethylene wear, survives with no evidence of wear, noise, new osteolysis or complications related to the MP-1 bearing after 16 yrs. The second donated his asymptomatic MP-1 hip at 6.5yrs for post-mortem examination. There were no osteoclasts, cellular reaction bland in contrast to that of polyethylene.In 2013 a clinical study with ethical committee approval was started using a Biolox Delta (Ceramtec, Germany) head against a polyimide liner in 97 patients. MMATech sold all liners, irradiated: steam 52:45. Sixteen were re-machined in New Zealand. Acetabular shells were Delta PF (LIMA, Italy). The liner locked by taper.The cohort consisted of 46:51 M:F, and ages 43 to 85, mean 65. Ten received cemented stems. For contralateral surgery, a ceramic or polyethylene liner was used. Initial patients were lower demand, later, more active patients, mountain-biking and running.All patients have on-going follow up, including MP-1 liner revision cases. There has been no measurable wear, or osteolysis around the acetabular components using weight-bearing radiographs. Squeaking within the first 6 weeks was noted in 39 number of cases and subtle increase in palpable friction, (passive rotation at 50 degrees flexion), but then disappeared. There were 6 revisions, four of which were related to cementless Stemsys implants (Evolutis, Italy) fixed distally with proximal linear lucencies in Gruen zones 1 and 7, and 2 and 6. No shells were revised and MP-1 liners were routinely changed to ceramic or polyethylene. The liners showed no head contact at the apex, with highly polished contact areas.There were no deep or superficial infections, but one traumatic anterior dislocation at 7 years associated with 5 mm subsidence of a non-collared stem.The initial squeaking and increased friction was due to the engineering of the liner / shell composite as implanted, not allowing adequate clearance for fluid film lubrication and contributed to by shell distortion during impaction. The revised bearings were “equatorial” rather than polar, and with lack of wear or creep this never fully resolved. Where the clearance was better, function was normal. The “slow” utilization was due to my ongoing concern with clearances not being correct. The revision of 4 Stemsys stems, tribology issues may have contributed, but non “MP-1” / Stemsys combinations outside this study have shown the same response, thought to be due to de-bonding of the hydroxyapatite coating.With correct engineering and clearances, a 3.6 mm thick MP-1 bearing, a surface Ra&lt;0.5, steam sterilized, shows no appreciable wear, and with confidence, can be used as a high performance THR bearing.

Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Ceramic-On-Ceramic Articulations: Analysis of a Single-Center Series of 1,083 Hips at a Minimum of 10-Year Follow-Up

BackgroundThere are limited long-term results of using ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings in total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a large number of patient cohorts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the minimum 10-year clinical and radiological outcomes and survivorship in a single surgeon series of CoC-THA. MethodsAmong the 1,039 patients (1,391 hips) who underwent primary THA at our institution between 2008 and 2011, 49 patients (69 hips) experienced paralysis or death, and 194 patients (239 hips, 19%) were lost to follow-up. The remaining 796 patients (1,083 hips) were assessed at a mean of 11 years (range, 10 to 13 years) using the modified Harris hip score (mHHS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and a questionnaire on articular noises. Survival analysis was used to estimate the survivorship. Radiological evaluation was performed on 869 hips at the final follow-up. ResultsSurvivorship at 11 years was 98.3% for revision or aseptic loosening, and 98.2% for reoperation. At the final follow-up, the mean mHHS and WOMAC scores were 93 (range, 12 to 100) and 14.4 (range, 3 to 66), respectively. There were 131 (12%) hips that experienced squeaking, but no patient required revision. No fracture of the ceramic was observed. Radiological evaluation at the final follow-up revealed that 3 (0.3%) hips exhibited loosening, 2 (0.2%) had femoral osteolysis, 81(9.3%) acquired radiolucencies, and 35 (4%) showed heterotopic ossification. ConclusionThis CoC bearing for THA had a high survivorship and excellent functional outcomes for at least 10 years.

Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings in Total Joint Arthroplasty. Part 2

Summary. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) currently provides durable long-term outcomes, but osteolysis secondary to polyethylene wear debris remains a fundamental cause of aseptic loosening and revision. Conventional polyethylene failed to provide a suitable bearing for young active patients requiring joint replacement because of the significant demands they place on such bearings. Strategies to reduce friction and wear debris lead to the development of ceramic bearings in THA. The next decade is unlikely to see a paradigm shift in the materials used for THA. Instead, the challenges will be dedicated to improve surgical technique in terms of component orientation to improve reproducibility and achieve superior patient outcomes. The optimum bearing surface is one with very low wear rates, a low coefficient of friction, scratch resistance, and is biologically inert. It is also one that can safely accommodate larger femoral head sizes to minimize dislocation rates without damaging the taper junction. Such a material already exists with modern ceramic bearings.

Third and fourth generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years

BackgroundCeramic on Ceramic bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) afford a low friction coefficient, low wear rates and extreme hardness. Significant complications include hip squeak, ceramic fracture and poor polyethylene performance in revision procedures due to imbedding of abrasive microscopic ceramic fragments. We report on the results of this bearing at a minimum of 10 years. MethodsA single-centre retrospective review of 449 THAs was performed. Primary outcome measures included aseptic revision and all-cause revision rates at a minimum of 10 years post operatively. Evaluation of functionality was performed with WOMAC and SF-36 scores which were performed pre-operatively and at intervals of 6 months, one year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years post operatively. ResultsThere was a 6.2% (n = 28) all-cause and 5.3% (n = 24) aseptic revision rate for ceramic on ceramic total hip arthroplasty at minimum of 10 years with a mean time to revision 4.8 years (range 2 months–11.6 years). Notably, there were 2 revisions for ceramic head fracture, one for ceramic liner fracture, 3 for aseptic loosening and 3 revisions for squeaking. Pain of unknown origin was the most common reason for revision. There was an improvement in postoperative WOMAC scores from a mean of 59.8 (range 15–95) pre-operatively to a mean of 15.6 (range 0–78) at 10 years. ConclusionThis study showed good functional outcomes but high revision rates for CoC THA at a minimum of 10 years. Our rates of ceramic fracture were consistent with other studies.

To what extent could the acetabular liner thickness be reduced yet remaining tribologically acceptable in metal‐on‐vitamin E‐diffused crosslinked polyethylene hip arthroplasty?

The aim of the present study was to evaluate how much reduction in acetabular liner thickness could be tribologically acceptable in metal-on-vitamin-E diffused highly crosslinked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (Vit-E XLPE) bearings for total hip arthroplasty. We tested thick- (10.3 mm), moderate- (6.3 mm), and thin- (4.3 mm) Vit-E XLPE liners coupled with 28-mm cobalt-chromium femoral heads on a hip simulator to 5 million cycles, and peak contact stress was predicted based on mathematical modeling. Wear damage was also evaluated in terms of surface topology and morphology. Wear simulation demonstrated that the 2-4 mm thickness reduction (6.3 → 4.3 mm and 10.3 → 6.3 mm) did not significantly affect the wear rate for Vit-E XLPE liner, whereas 6-mm reduction (10.3 → 4.3 mm) significantly increased liner wear (by 309%) and head roughness (by 415%). This effect was attributed to a contact stress increase (by 24-41%). However, the wear rates for all thicknesses tested were much lower than those previously reported for thicker non-crosslinked materials. The original crystalline morphology was maintained in all liners after wear. Our results suggest that the 2-4 mm thickness reduction may be tribologically acceptable in Vit-E XLPE liners. However, more severe and longer term simulations are necessary to determine a minimum acceptable thickness.

Dual-mobility constructs versus large femoral head bearings in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Both dual-mobility (DM) constructs and large femoral head bearings (⩾36 mm) reduce dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). There is limited research comparing DM with large bearings. A systematic review of published literature was performed including studies that compared DM with large femoral head bearings in primary or revision THA according to PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome was revision surgery for dislocation. The secondary outcome was all-cause revision surgery. Other complications were recorded. 2 authors independently selected studies, performed data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Treatment effects were assessed using odds ratios and data were pooled using a fixed-effect model, where appropriate. 9 studies, all retrospective, met the final inclusion criteria. 2722 patients received DM and 9,789 large femoral head bearings. The difference in the odds of revision surgery for dislocation (OR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45-1.01; p = 0.06) and aseptic loosening are unclear (OR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.36-1.05; p = 0.07); including important benefits and no difference. There was a benefit favouring DM for the risk of all-cause revision (OR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.86; p = 0.001), revision for fracture (OR 0.49; 95% CI, 0.29-0.81; p = 0.005) and dislocation not requiring revision (OR 0.29; 95% CI, 0.14-0.57; p < 0.001). The estimate in the difference in the odds of revision surgery for infection was imprecise (OR 0.78; 95% CI, 05.1-1.20; p = 0.26). This study provides evidence that there may be clinically relevant benefits of DM constructs over large femoral head bearings. Prospective randomised studies are warranted given these findings.

Fourth-Generation Ceramic-on-Ceramic THA in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.

ObjectiveTo report the long‐term outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with fourth‐generation ceramic‐on‐ceramic (CoC) bearing in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).MethodsWe retrospectively identified 180 primary THAs performed in 110 patients with AS, including 100 (90.9%) men and 10 women (9.1%), from 2009 to 2011.The mean age of the patients at surgery was 33 years (range, 16 to 65 years). Cementless prostheses with fourth‐generation CoC bearings were used in all patients. Survivorship of the implants and postoperative complications were calculated. Functional improvement was assessed by the hip flexion‐extension range of motion (ROM) and Harris hip score (HHS). A special noise assessment questionnaire was performed at the last follow‐up. The cumulative incidence of noise was calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Clinical characteristics and functional outcomes were compared in the hips with noise to those without noise.ResultsThe mean follow‐up was 11 years (range, 10 to 12 years), and survivorship of the implants was 99.4% at the most recent follow‐up. The complications included dislocation (one hip, 0.6%), periprosthetic joint infection (one hip, 0.6%), mild to moderate pain (five hips, 2.8%), heterotopic ossification (12 hips, 6.7%), and noise (52 hips, 28.9%). The flexion‐extension ROM improved significantly with a median from 10° (range, 0 ~ 130°) to 100° (30 ~ 130°) after THA (p < 0.001), and the HHS increased significantly from 41 ± 20 to 90 ± 8 (p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of noise at 0.5, 5, and 10 years was 6.1% (95% CI, 2.6 ~ 9.6), 16.7% (95% CI, 11.2 ~ 22.1), and 28.9% (95% CI, 22.2 ~ 35.5), respectively, and that of squeaking at 0.5, 5, and 10 years was 4.4% (95% CI, 1.4 ~ 7.4), 13.3% (95% CI, 8.4 ~ 18.3), and 23.9% (95% CI, 17.6 ~ 30.1), respectively. None of the patients with noise generation in the hip reported it affecting daily activities or causing dissatisfaction. No differences in age, sex, BMI, disease duration, bilateral THA, the frequency of bony ankylosis, the proportion of using a 36‐mm‐diameter femoral head, pre/postoperative flexion‐extension ROM, or pre/postoperative HHS were found between hips with noise and those without noise (p > 0.05).ConclusionTHAs with fourth‐generation CoC bearings exhibit excellent long‐term survival and clinical outcomes in patients with AS, with a very low dislocation rate. The incidence of noise associated with CoC bearings in THA performed in patients increases over time, but it does not affect postoperative hip function or daily activities.

Liner dissociation in a large-diameter ceramic-bearing acetabular component: a report of five cases

BackgroundCeramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings for total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been offering very favorable results and survivorship since their introduction. In order to increase range of movement (ROM) and decrease dislocation rates, some manufacturers have introduced larger diameter head (LDH) CoC bearings. This has been achieved with the use of preassembled cup designs, in which the ceramic liner is already fitted into the metal backing and implanted as a monoblock component by the surgeon. In this report we present data from a series of 5 patients with ceramic liner dissociation from a monoblock cup.Case presentationAll cases were overweight men with acetabular components of 56 or 58 mm. After a mean of 5.5 (range, 3.5-6.7) years, all patients reported sudden pain and audible noise when performing activities of daily living. Liner displacement was suspected on plain radiographs and confirmed by Ct-scan. Pneumarthrosis was present in all cases. Taper modular junction wear and corrosion signs were observed in the four revised patients.ConclusionAlthough one of our case is still treated conservatively, implant revision is probably inevitable. Further LDH CoC implant design should take in consideration this potential complication by avoiding bearing diameters over 40mm and/or improving locking mechanism or by providing a real monoblock acetabular implant.

Long-Term Results of Delta Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BackgroundCeramic-on-ceramic (COC) bearings in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have long been considered the coupling with the lowest overall wear. However, concerns about complications such as ceramic breakage and noise, combined with the improved performance of polyethylene, have limited its use in the United States. This postapproval follow-up reports long-term (10 years) results of Delta COC in THA patients primarily enrolled in an Investigational Device Exemption study.MethodsPatients received Delta COC THA in a prospective multicenter study with either 28-mm (N = 105 hips in 104 patients) or 36-mm (N = 81) articulations. Annual clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed for years 5 to 10, and study patients were asked about hip noises and reproducibility.ResultsThere have been 4 additional reports of noise in 4 patients (COC 28, n = 3; COC 36, n = 1). The cumulative incidence rate for squeaking or noise at 10 years is 5.9% for COC 28 and 13.5% for COC 36. There have been 2 additional reports of dislocation in 2 patients (COC 28, n = 1; COC 36, n = 1). The cumulative incidence rate for dislocation at 10 years is 3.7% for COC 28 and 3.5% for COC 36. At 10 years, there were greater than 40 hips available for follow-up. At mean 10-year follow-up, there were a total of 3 ceramic liner fractures, but none since the previous report. There were no revisions in the 28-mm cohort, and 2 revisions in the 36-mm cohort (1 for recurrent dislocation and 1 for pain and noise). Overall Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 95.96% at 10.5 years (28 mm: 97.68% at 10.2 years; 36 mm: 94.11% at 10.4 years.)ConclusionsAt 10-year follow-up, we report excellent results in regard to survivorship, with one patient revised for pain with associated squeaking.

National Trends in Total Hip Arthroplasty Bearing Surface Usage in Extremely Young Patients Between 2006 and 2016.

BackgroundLong-term implant durability is a key concern when considering total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young patients. The ideal bearing surface used in these patients remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to analyze trends in THA bearing surface use from 2006 to 2016 using a large, pediatric national database.MethodsThis was a retrospective review from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2016, using the Kids’ Inpatient Database. International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision and 10th revision codes were used to identify patients who underwent THA and create cohorts based on bearing surfaces: metal-on-metal, metal-on-polyethylene, ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP), and ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC). Annual utilization of each bearing surface and associated patient and hospital demographics were analyzed.ResultsA total of 1004 THAs were identified during the 11-year study period. The annual number of THAs performed increased by 169% from 2006 to 2016. The mean patient age was 17.1 years. The most prevalent bearing surface used in 2006 was CoC (37.3%), metal-on-metal (31.8%) in 2009, and CoP in 2012 and 2016 (50.6% and 64.8%, respectively). From 2006 to 2016, utilization of CoP increased from 5.0% to 64.8%, representing a 1196% increase over the study period.ConclusionsThe number of THAs performed in pediatric patients is increasing significantly. Although CoC was previously the most commonly used bearing surface in this patient population, CoP is currently the most common. Further investigation is needed to determine whether bearing longevity and clinical outcomes with CoP are superior to other bearing surfaces.