The results obtained by implementing the theory devel- oped in Part I are described. Attention is given to the focusing prop- erties of small-aperture lenses of gradually increasing thickness, viz, semi-angle. Instantaneous and CW field profiles of both the radial and axial field dependencies at and around the focal plane are presented. It is shown that the focus of a small aperture lens lies between the lens surface and its center of curvature and not necessarily between its cen- ter and paraxial focus. Also, the axial intensity variation shows sub- sidiary minima and maxima that ray theory fails to account for. These and other observations are made and a qualitative explanation is of- fered. Finally, the effect of a nondispersive loss on the focusing prop- erties of large-aperture small-angle lenses is investigated. HE RESULTS obtained by using the theory devel- oped in part I of this work (l) to obtain a computer simulation of the propagation of elastic waves through the components of an acoustic microscope are described. As a review, the procedure followed is to propagate the wave from the transducer to the lens aperture by finite elements and finite differences, and then use a Green's function in the liquid cell. A list of symbols used in this paper is given in (l). The theory is applied to the focusing properties of small- aperture lenses of gradually increasing thickness. The prime reason for analyzing this category is the inadequacy of other methods (see Section 111-B of (l)). A large num- ber of results are presented. These include radial and axial field variations, and instantaneous and CW field profiles. The location of the focus and the resolution there and the behavior of the field in the vicinity of the focal point are all investigated. It is concluded that the behavior of small aperture lenses is significantly different from the behavior of large aperture lenses. Finally, a section is devoted to analyzing the effect of a nondispersive loss on the focus- ing properties of large-aperture small-angle lenses. The entire package consists of two separate computer programs: the finite element and finite difference com- puter program and the Green's function program. This di- vision was found to be conducive to the efficient running of the package because there are many problems for which the finite element and finite difference computer program need only be executed once but the Green's function pro- gram many times, e.g., results are presented to show the variation of beamwidth with axial distance z. In this case, the wave must be propagated to the aperture of the lens only once, but the Green's function program must then be executed several times to obtain the radial (transverse) distribution of the field at various values of z. All the computer programs were run on a Prime 550 minicom- puter and double precision (64 bits) was used thfoughout. The package is validated by comparing the computed and analytical results for two geometries. A limiting case is then taken to show that even in this regime, the entire