BACKGROUND Implementation guides and toolkits have become a common tool developed to facilitate implementation of evidence-based infection prevention and control practices. Unlike published professional guidelines and formal literature reviews, the methods used to develop these guides and toolkits are not detailed in these documents. Although some guidance is available for the design of these documents, little is known about the methodology used in their development and subsequent evaluation of implementation effectiveness. METHODS An implementation pilot of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing in nonICU settings was conducted between October 2015 to September 2018 in four VA facilities across the U.S. Toolkit development was a deliverable desirable by the funding agency to facilitate translation of this evidence-based practice into real-world settings. A human factors engineering framework was applied to direct toolkit development for this infection prevention and control evidence-based practice of CHG bathing treatments to reduce multidrug-resistant HAIs. We conducted nine end-user evaluations to ensure acceptability and usability of the toolkit; evaluations were performed using an 11-question survey of a modified version of the System Usability Scale (SUS). RESULTS We had a 67% response rate on the SUS survey. The use of a human factors engineering framework resulted in high acceptability and usability ratings with a score of 83.75, compared to an average score of 68. The toolkit, “Chlorhexidine Bathing Treatment: A Toolkit to Guide Implementation” will be available online in 2019. CONCLUSIONS Implementation guides and toolkits are commonly developed by, and for, infection preventionists to facilitate translation of evidence into practice. We provide an exemplar using a human-centric framework for consideration to future guide and toolkit development. Detailing methodologies used during toolkit development may enhance standardization, usability, ongoing evaluation of effectiveness, and future refinement