I T WOULD SEEM proper to make a statement of credentials, which will afford a base from which readers may form an opinion about remarks upon the teaching of surgery to undergraduate and graduate students. I Graduation from a voluntarily supported University’s medical school, an internship in a large county hospital, and the practice of medicine and surgery for fourteen months in an Illinois city of 22,000 inhabitants stimulated a desire for more education and training in surgery. There were no formal residency education and training programs in surgery in Chicago in 1920. However, progressive education and training in surgery was completed under the auspices of one surgeon. This program consisted of a year in a laboratory plus a small number of diagnostic preoperative duties; a year of general surgical diagnostic and preoperative responsibility, plus teaching duties in two basic science departments; a third year of surgical operative and postoperative work, which included studies of the gross and microscopic pathologic specimens, and a fourth year devoted to diagnostic and operative work in the special field of neurologic surgery. In 1920, it was unusual in the Midwest for a graduate to pursue medical education beyond commencement day, or a year of internship. Until 1919, it was possible to graduate, pass the state board examination, and practice in Illinois without having the experience of an internship. The colonial pattern of the practice of medicine prevailed generally. Physicians learned to perform surgical operations by cutting upon patients willing to mount a table and exercise the degree of patience and confidence necessary under the conditions imposed. These operators wielded their knives indiscriminately within the abdomen, pelvis, and about the periphery. It is not difficult to trace the origin of the terms, “general surgeon,” and “he does his own surgery.” In one instance in the early years of the twentieth century, a deep laceration upon the dorsum of the hand, which included a branch of the radial artery, was treated with an application of turpentine before the doctor arrived. The anesthetic consisted of a sprinkling of iodoform, which was described by the bearded doctor as he removed his highly starched detachable cuffs, as a miraculous yellow substance which prevented all pain. The operating theater was the sitting room, the table was the mother’s lap; the curved needle was picked from the bottom of the black bag and threaded with a strand of large catgut untangled from among a number of items which would do credit to the contents of the present day purses of ladies. A continuous, engaging conversation was not interrupted by the passage and tying of the suture and skillful application of a bandage. Another example was the reduction of a dislocated head of the humerus by the physician grasping the hand of the extended arm, as he sat upon the football field with the heel of his stockinged foot thrust f%-mly into the axilla. The surgical course in one medical school in 1914 to 1918 was taught to undergraduate medical students with the goal of preparing them to practice surgery, within the bounds of their own conscience and belief in the Golden Rule. A course in surgical anatomy was given in the senior year by which time it was hopefully assumed that the cadaver dissection of the freshman year, and the combined experiences of the intervening years, had prepared the student for a valuable review of the intricacies of blood vessels, nerves, and viscera. The emphasis was
Read full abstract