Political science has developed impressively in recent decades, but the diversity of topics dealt with tends to overpower unity. The purpose of this paper is to formulate a pattern or 'field' of politics that emphasizes unity more than diversity and to do so not with new but with existing terms, both classical and modern. It is in this sense that the approach is of a terminological nature, and it is useful for the study of both government and international politics. The paper starts with a look at the Greek city state known as polis. Not only does the name of our discipline derive from that institution but it also stands for basic notions of politics, including the concept of public authority. David Easton uses the term when defining politics as the authoritative allocation of values. It is indeed of fundamental importance and intimately associated with terms like sovereignty, res publica, and governance, which together constitute the terminological core of the field proposed. That is not all, however. Because truly political terms have also a structural dimension it is important to distinguish between vertical and lateral authority structures, accompanied by authority dividing and authority sharing. The four structural dimensions, together with the core terminology, complete the pattern suggested. To illustrate the field's relevance the article discusses a number of concepts commonly used by political scientists - terms like separation of power, democracy, federalism, and authoritarianism or international terms like national independence, international organizations, interdependence, and supranationality. Needless to emphasize that in all these cases, the four dimensions combine in different ways, not only with each other but also with terms often used and indirectly related to the core. Diversity continues to exist but is accompanied by some degree of integrated unity.