Comparing probabilistic linguistic term sets (PLTSs) is quite essential in solving PLTS-expressed multi-attribute group decision-making problems (PLTS-MAGDM). Researchers have designed various comparison measures to obtain the rank of PLTSs. However, most of the existing PLTS comparison measures need additional tedious adjustments before conducting a specific computation. Besides, these measures do not adequately consider the effects of the semantics of the basic linguistic term set and the probabilistic distributions. This paper proposes a new preference degree for g-granularity probabilistic term sets (g-GPLTSs) to overcome the two shortcomings simultaneously by integrating the effect from basic linguistic terms and probabilistic distributions without any adjustment. Moreover, the g-GPLTS preference degree also shows the extended adaptability for comparing PLTSs with unbalanced semantics. Based on the newly proposed preference degree, we construct a useful min-conflict model to solve PLTS-MAGDM with a large number of experts expressing the three-way primary grading. Finally, an illustrative example concerning software supplier selections, followed by the comparative analysis, is presented to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.