Baseline Viral Load Research Articles

Probiotic Effect on SARS‐CoV2 Immunity Is Associated to Type‐1 Interferons: A Post‐Hoc Analysis of a Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Trial

Objectives and HypothesisGut microbiota has been reported to protect from lung viral infection in animal models by stimulating type‐I interferon signaling. Type‐I interferons can have direct antiviral activity while also stimulating antibody‐producing B cells. Antibodies against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV2) have been correlated to faster infection clearance and protection against reinfection. A specific 4‐strain probiotic combination (Pediococcus acidilactici CECT7483 plus Lactoplantibacillus plantarum CECT7484, CECT7485 and CECT30292) was recently studied in a randomized, quadruple‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial in 300 SARS‐CoV2‐infected, symptomatic ambulatory patients (NCT04517422). Study subjects did not receive corticosteroids or antivirals. Compared to placebo, probiotic intervention (2x109cfu/day for 30 days) achieved faster symptom clearance and increased SARS‐CoV2‐specific immunoglobulins M and G (IgM and IgG). We hypothesize these effects could be related to increased type‐I interferon signaling.MethodsA random subset of 70 subjects (35 probiotic and 35 placebo) was selected out of the 300 participants in the clinical study. Stored serum samples collected on day 0 (baseline), 15 and 30 (end of intervention) were analyzed for interferon‐alpha 2a (IFNa) and interferon‐beta 1a (IFNb) using enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. Demographic data, baseline viral load, symptom duration and SARS‐CoV2‐specific IgM and IgG serum titers were retrieved from patient case report forms. Differences between probiotic and placebo were compared using Mann‐Whitney or Chi‐squared tests, as appropriate. Correlations between type‐I interferons and other variables were assessed by Spearman correlation. All procedures on study subjects had been approved by the Internal Review Board of Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea (Mexico City) and adhered to Helsinki Declaration.Summary of ResultsIn the selected subset of patients, study groups were comparable at baseline (all p>0.10, Table 1). Probiotic treatment was associated to a larger increase of IFNa on day 30 (p=0.007) and of IFNb on days 15 and 30 (both p<0.001), compared to placebo (Figure 1). Similarly, SARS‐CoV2‐specific IgM and IgG were higher on days 15 and 30 (all p<0.001) and duration of fever, cough, headache and myalgia were shorter (all p<0.05) in probiotic compared to placebo. Increase in IFNb across the study correlated to increase in SARS‐CoV2‐specific IgM (rho=0.55, p<0.001) and IgG (rho=0.61, p<0.001), and inversely correlated to duration of cough (rho=‐0.26, p=0.033) and fever (rho=‐0.24, p=0.042). Conversely, increase in IFNa correlated to increase in SARS‐CoV2‐specific IgM (rho=0.33, p=0.005) only. Neither increase in IFNa nor IFNb correlated to age, number of metabolic comorbidities or days from onset of symptoms.ConclusionCompared to placebo, oral administration of a specific 4‐strain probiotic combination resulted in significant increase in type‐I interferons in serum, especially IFNb, correlating to higher SARS‐CoV2‐specific IgM and IgG antibodies and faster clearance of some symptoms.

Four Weeks Treatment with Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir + Ribavirin-A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Enhancing treatment uptake for hepatitis C to achieve the elimination goals set by the World Health Organization could be achieved by reducing the treatment duration. The aim of this study was to compare the sustained virological response at week 12 (SVR12) after four weeks of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) + ribavirin compared to eight weeks of GLE/PIB and to estimate predictors for SVR12 with four weeks of treatment through a multicenter open label randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized 2:1 (4 weeks:8 weeks) and stratified by genotype 3 and were treatment naïve of all genotypes and without significant liver fibrosis. A total of 27 patients were analyzed for predictors for SVR12, including 15 from the first pilot phase of the study. In the ‘modified intention to treat’ group, 100% (7/7) achieved cure after eight weeks and for patients treated for four weeks the SVR12 was 58.3% (7/12). However, patients with a baseline viral load <2 mill IU/mL had 93% SVR12. The study closed prematurely due to the low number of included patients due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our results suggest that viral load should be taken into account when considering trials of short course treatment.

Factors associated with human immunodeficiency virus-1 low-level viremia and its impact on virological and immunological outcomes: A retrospective cohort study in Beijing, China.

We evaluated the impact of low-level viremia (LLV) on virological failure and immune reconstitution among people living with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) treated with different antiretroviral regimens in Beijing, China. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1-positive adults who were registered at an infectious disease hospital in Beijing between January 1, 2005 and January 1, 2020 were administered antiretroviral therapy (ART) and whose viral load and CD4 counts were monitored were included in this retrospective cohort study. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with LLV in patients on different ART regimens. Cox proportional hazard model was employed to analyze the virological suppression and immune reconstitution cumulative probability in patients with LLV during follow-up. A total of 10124 HIV-1-infected participants was included. LLV occurred in 723 (8.2%), 204 (10.9%), 133 (8.6%), and 53 (14.4%) patients on first-line ART, second-line ART, third-line ART, and simplified regimens, respectively. Virological failure occurred in 514 (5.8%), 289 (15.5%), 86 (5.5%), and 34 (9.2%) patients on first-line ART, second-line ART, third-line ART, and simplified regimens, respectively. Earlier enrollment, lower baseline CD4 count, and higher baseline viral load were risk factors associated with LLV. LLV was related to increased hazards of virological failure compared to viral suppression of ≤50copies/ml for those on first-line ART. The risk of virological failure and poor immune reconstitution increases when LLV occurs. Targeted viral load and CD4 count monitoring are recommended for people living with HIV-1 with LLV to improve health-related outcomes.

Vaccination Against SARS-CoV-2 Is Associated With a Lower Viral Load and Likelihood of Systemic Symptoms.

BackgroundData conflict on whether vaccination decreases severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load. The objective of this analysis was to compare baseline viral load and symptoms between vaccinated and unvaccinated adults enrolled in a randomized trial of outpatient coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment.MethodsBaseline data from the first 433 sequential participants enrolling into the COVID-OUT trial were analyzed. Adults aged 30–85 with a body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2 were eligible within 3 days of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test and <7 days of symptoms. Log10 polymerase chain reaction viral loads were normalized to human RNase P by vaccination status, by time from vaccination, and by symptoms.ResultsTwo hundred seventy-four participants with known vaccination status contributed optional nasal swabs for viral load measurement: median age, 46 years; median (interquartile range) BMI 31.2 (27.4–36.4) kg/m2. Overall, 159 (58%) were women, and 217 (80%) were White. The mean relative log10 viral load for those vaccinated <6 months from the date of enrollment was 0.11 (95% CI, –0.48 to 0.71), which was significantly lower than the unvaccinated group (P = .01). Those vaccinated ≥6 months before enrollment did not differ from the unvaccinated with respect to viral load (mean, 0.99; 95% CI, –0.41 to 2.40; P = .85). The vaccinated group had fewer moderate/severe symptoms of subjective fever, chills, myalgias, nausea, and diarrhea (all P < .05).ConclusionsThese data suggest that vaccination within 6 months of infection is associated with a lower viral load, and vaccination was associated with a lower likelihood of having systemic symptoms.

Antiretroviral Therapy Efficacy Post-Bariatric Weight Loss Surgery: A Case Series of Persons Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus

PurposeHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–related mortality has decreased secondary to advances in antiretroviral therapy (ART), and the incidence of obesity in this population is increasing. Bariatric surgery is an effective method of weight loss, though changes in the gastrointestinal tract may affect ART absorption and virologic suppression. Existing data are limited to case reports studying outdated therapeutic regimens; studies evaluating modern ART regimens are needed. The objective of this study was to determine if undergoing bariatric surgery impacts HIV virologic failure rate at 12 months post-surgery and to characterize the failure population.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective case series included adults with virologically suppressed HIV on ART who underwent roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) surgery between 2000 and 2019 (n=20) at one of three medical centers within one academic medical system. The primary outcome was proportion of patients with ART failure at 12 months post-surgery. Select additional data collected included CD4+ count, metabolic parameters, postoperative complications, and medication non-adherence.ResultsA total of 18 patients were included in this analysis. Seventeen of 18 patients (94%) maintained virologic suppression within 12 months post-surgery. There were no significant changes in CD4+ counts before and after surgery. The one failure was an African American woman who underwent sleeve gastrectomy surgery. This patient’s baseline viral load was undetectable and CD4+ count was 263 cells/mm3.ConclusionUndergoing bariatric surgery did not increase virologic failure rate in a small cohort of persons living with HIV, and ART non-adherence was associated with virologic failure.Graphical abstract

Associations of HIV and Depression with Incident Diabetes Mellitus: Veterans Aging Cohort Study.

Persons with HIV (PWH) are at increasingly higher risk for metabolic complications, including diabetes mellitus (DM). Additionally, depression is highly prevalent among PWH and has been associated with increased risk for DM in the general population. However, the association of HIV and depression with incident DM has not been well established. Using the Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS), we selected adults with and without HIV who did not have DM at baseline. Prevalent depression was defined as having a Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score of ≥10. Incident DM was identified using validated Kelly's criteria. Basic clinical and demographic characteristics were collected, and cox proportional hazards regression models were run to test the association between depression and incident DM stratified by HIV serostatus. A total of 5,722 participants were analyzed, 2,886 (53%) had HIV and 1,124 (20%) had depression at baseline. 1,235 (22%) participants developed incident DM during follow-up, with 26% of HIV-negative participants developing DM compared to 17% of participants with HIV. Depression was significantly associated with increased risk of incident DM among HIV-negative participants (adjusted HR [aHR] = 1.31; p-value 0.003), but not among participants with HIV (aHR 1.09; p-value 0.44). However, among participants with HIV with baseline viral load < 500 copies/mL, we noted a stronger association between depression and incident DM. Incident DM in the VACS cohort is significantly higher for HIV-negative participants compared to veterans with HIV. A significant association between depression and incident DM was noted among HIV-negative participants but not among those with HIV.

Predictors of Viral Non-Suppression among Patients Living with HIV under Dolutegravir in Bunia, Democratic Republic of Congo: A Prospective Cohort Study.

The Democratic Republic of the Congo adopted the integrase inhibitor dolutegravir (DTG) as part of its preferred first-line HIV treatment regimen in 2019. This study aimed to identify predictors of viral non-suppression among HIV-infected patients under a DTG-based regimen in the context of ongoing armed conflict since 2017 in the city of Bunia in the DRC. We conducted a cohort study of 468 patients living with HIV under DTG in all health facilities in Bunia. We calculated the proportion of participants with an HIV RNA of below 50 copies per milliliter. About three in four patients (72.8%) in this cohort had a viral load (VL) of <50 copies/mL after 6–12 months. After controlling for the effect of other covariates, the likelihood of having non-suppression remained significantly lower among the 25–34 age group and self-reported naïve patients with a baseline VL of ≥50 copies/mL. The likelihood of having non-suppression remained significantly higher among those who were at advanced stages of the disease, those with abnormal serum creatinine, those with high baseline HIV viremia over 1000 copies/mL, and the Sudanese ethnic group compared to the reference groups. This study suggests that we should better evaluate adherence, especially among adolescents and economically vulnerable populations, such as the Sudanese ethnic group in the city of Bunia. This suggests that an awareness of the potential effects of DTG and tenofovir is important for providers who take care of HIV-positive patients using antiretroviral therapy (ART), especially those with abnormal serum creatinine levels before starting treatment.

Clinical Relevance of Absolute BK Polyoma Viral Load Kinetics in Patients With Biopsy Proven BK Polyomavirus Associated Nephropathy.

Introduction: The absolute BK viral load is an important diagnostic surrogate for BK polyomavirus associated nephropathy (PyVAN) after renal transplant (KTX) and serial assessment of BK viremia is recommended. However, there is no data indicating which particular viral load change, i.e., absolute vs. relative viral load changes (copies/ml; percentage of the preceding viremia) is associated with worse renal graft outcomes.Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study of 91 biopsy proven PyVAN, we analyzed the interplay of exposure time, absolute and relative viral load kinetics, baseline risk, and treatment strategies as risk factors for graft loss after 2 years using a multivariable Poisson-model.Results: We compared two major treatment strategies: standardized immunosuppression (IS) reduction (n = 53) and leflunomide (n = 30). The median viral load at the index biopsy was 2.15E+04 copies/ml (interquartile range [IQR] 1.70E+03–1.77E+05) and median peak viremia was 3.6E+04 copies/ml (IQR 2.7E+03–3.3E+05). Treatment strategies and IS-levels were not related to graft loss. After correction for baseline viral load and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), absolute viral load decrease/unit remained an independent risk factor for graft loss [incidence rate ratios [IRR] = 0.77, (95% CI 0.61–0.96), p = 0.02].Conclusion: This study provides evidence for the prognostic importance of absolute BK viremia kinetics as a dynamic parameter indicating short-term graft survival independently of other established risk factors.

Dolutegravir plus lamivudine versus efavirenz\xa0plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and lamivudine in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection

BackgroundConcerns regarding potential toxicity and drug-drug interactions during long-term treatment with three-drug active antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens have been attracting increasing attention. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) plus lamivudine (3TC) in ART-naive adults in China.MethodsThis prospective observational cohort study enrolled HIV-naive inpatients treated with DTG + 3TC (2DR arm) or efavirenz (EFV) plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and 3TC (3DR arm). There were no limits on baseline viral load. Inflammatory biomarkers were also investigated in the 2DR arm.ResultsBetween September 2019 and January 2020, 27 patients treated with DTG + 3TC and 28 patients treated with EFV + TDF + 3TC were enrolled in the study. At week 12, the proportion of patients with viral loads < 50 copies/mL in the 2DR arm was 81.5% (22/27) compared with 53.6% (15/28) in the 3DR arm (p < 0.01). At week 24, the proportion of patients with viral loads < 50 copies/mL in the 2DR arm was 100% (26/26) compared with 83.3% (20/24) in the 3DR arm (p < 0.05). Mean changes in CD4 cell counts from baseline at week 12 were 125.46 cells/µL in the 2DR arm and 41.20 cells/µL in the 3DR arm (p < 0.05). Mean changes in CD4 cell counts from baseline at week 24 were 209.68 cells/µL in the 2DR arm and 73.28 cells/µL in the 3DR arm (p < 0.05).ConclusionsDTG + 3TC achieved virologic suppression more rapidly than EFV + TDF + 3TC after 12 and 24 weeks. DTG + 3TC could represent an optimal regimen for advanced patients.Clinical Trial Registration ChiCTR1900027640 (22/November/2019).

HIV: how to manage low-level viraemia in people living with HIV.

BackgroundPeople living with HIV (PLWH) and receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) have a goal of achieving and maintaining viral suppression; however, low-level viraemia (LLV) (HIV-RNA viral load levels of 50–999 copies/mL) persists in certain patients despite consistent medication adherence, lack of drug interactions and no genotypic resistance. This is a narrative review of the growing evidence of LLV in PLWH to determine risk factors and ART management strategies and to discuss the implications of LLV on the development of future virological failure.MethodsA systematic, comprehensive literature search was completed in the English language using PubMed, Google Scholar and bibliography review to gather information about LLV in PLWH between July 2014 and June 2021. The following keywords were used as search terms: “low-level viremia”, “HIV”, “viral blip”, “intensification”, “genotyping”, “adherence” and “resistance.”ResultsOf 66 studies examined, 39 were analysed and included in this review. All trials included were published between 2014 and 2021. Eleven studies assessed risk factors for LLV. Identified risk factors were low CD4+ T cell nadir counts at baseline, higher baseline viral load measurements, medication non-adherence, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor use and others. Three studies assessed genotyping and concluded that the interpretation of both historical RNA genotype resistance testing and current proviral DNA genotype resistance testing in patients with LLV is appropriate. Seven studies were evaluated and determined that modifying or intensifying ART regimens resulted in decreased incidence of virological failure.ConclusionThis compilation of reviewed data gives a framework for the management of PLWH with LLV. Currently, there are no clear or definitive treatment directions for LLV provided in guidelines. Complicating this topic further is the unclear and varying definitions of LLV. Future research is needed on this topic but patients presenting with LLV should have their medication adherence assessed, drug interactions checked and ART intensified, where appropriate.

Three regimens for re-treatment failure of Sofosbuvir-based therapy for chronic hepatitis-C genotype-4: a cohort study.

ABSTRACTDespite the high sustained virologic response (SVR) rates of direct-acting antiviral (DAAs) therapy, a small number of patients does not eradicate the virus, and these patients represent a challenge. This study aims to compare the outcomes of three second-line regimens for DAAs-experienced patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). This prospective observational study was conducted at the Damanhur Viral Hepatitis Center from January 2017 to February 2020. We included patients with CHC who did not achieve SVR after the complete course of Sofosbuvir/Daclatasvir±Ribavirin (SOF/DAC±RBV). The primary endpoint was SVR-12 after re-treatment. This study included 360 patients (with a mean age of 51.53±11.38 years). Approximately 51.1% of the patients were males, and 65.5% had liver cirrhosis. All patients of group 1 (45 patients) received SOF/VEL/VOX over 12-weeks; SVR-12 was achieved in 44 patients (97.8%). Group 2 (28 patients) received SOF/DAC/RBV over 24-weeks; (one patient was lost during follow-ups and one patient discontinued treatment due to hepatic decompensation). SVR-12 was achieved in 25 patients (96.2%). Group 3 (287 patients) received SOF/Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/RBV) over 12-weeks. Eight patients were lost during follow-ups, and one patient discontinued treatment due to grade 4 adverse events. SVR-12 was achieved in 276 patients (99.3%). There was no difference between the groups regarding their age, gender distribution, baseline viral load or comorbidities. Adverse events (thrombocytopenia, anemia, hyperbilirubinaemia and prolonged INR) were significantly higher in group 3, while group 1 did not experience any. The three studied retreatment regimens can be used for DAAs treatment-experienced patients considering availability. The SOF/VEL/VOX combination had the least adverse events.

Molnupiravir for Oral Treatment of Covid-19 in Nonhospitalized Patients

BackgroundNew treatments are needed to reduce the risk of progression of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). Molnupiravir is an oral, small-molecule antiviral prodrug that is active against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).MethodsWe conducted a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with molnupiravir started within 5 days after the onset of signs or symptoms in nonhospitalized, unvaccinated adults with mild-to-moderate, laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 and at least one risk factor for severe Covid-19 illness. Participants in the trial were randomly assigned to receive 800 mg of molnupiravir or placebo twice daily for 5 days. The primary efficacy end point was the incidence hospitalization or death at day 29; the incidence of adverse events was the primary safety end point. A planned interim analysis was performed when 50% of 1550 participants (target enrollment) had been followed through day 29.ResultsA total of 1433 participants underwent randomization; 716 were assigned to receive molnupiravir and 717 to receive placebo. With the exception of an imbalance in sex, baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. The superiority of molnupiravir was demonstrated at the interim analysis; the risk of hospitalization for any cause or death through day 29 was lower with molnupiravir (28 of 385 participants [7.3%]) than with placebo (53 of 377 [14.1%]) (difference, −6.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], −11.3 to −2.4; P=0.001). In the analysis of all participants who had undergone randomization, the percentage of participants who were hospitalized or died through day 29 was lower in the molnupiravir group than in the placebo group (6.8% [48 of 709] vs. 9.7% [68 of 699]; difference, −3.0 percentage points; 95% CI, −5.9 to −0.1). Results of subgroup analyses were largely consistent with these overall results; in some subgroups, such as patients with evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, those with low baseline viral load, and those with diabetes, the point estimate for the difference favored placebo. One death was reported in the molnupiravir group and 9 were reported in the placebo group through day 29. Adverse events were reported in 216 of 710 participants (30.4%) in the molnupiravir group and 231 of 701 (33.0%) in the placebo group.ConclusionsEarly treatment with molnupiravir reduced the risk of hospitalization or death in at-risk, unvaccinated adults with Covid-19. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme; MOVe-OUT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04575597.)

The Impact of IL28B Gene Polymorphisms on Drug Responses

The Impact of IL28B Gene Polymorphisms on Drug Responses

75. High Rates of Virologic Suppression with DTG/3TC in Newly Diagnosed Adults with HIV-1 Infection and Baseline Viral Load &amp;gt;500,000 c/mL: 48-Week Subgroup Analysis of the STAT Study

BackgroundThe primary analysis of the STAT study demonstrated the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of using DTG/3TC as a first-line regimen in a test-and-treat setting through 24 weeks, with therapy adjustments for baseline resistance or hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection. Here we present secondary analyses through Week 48 of virologic outcomes in participants by baseline viral load (VL). MethodsSTAT is a single-arm study of treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 infection who initiated DTG/3TC ≤ 14 days after HIV-1 diagnosis without availability of screening/baseline laboratory results. If baseline testing indicated DTG or 3TC resistance, HBV co-infection, or creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, then antiretroviral therapy (ART) was potentially adjusted and participants remained on study. Efficacy analyses included proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL regardless of ART regimen at Week 48, among all participants (ITT-E missing = failure analysis) and among participants with available HIV-1 RNA data at Week 48 (observed analysis). ResultsOf 131 enrolled, DTG/3TC treatment was adjusted in 10 participants, and of those with available data (n=7), all (100%) achieved HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Week 48. At Week 48, 82% (107/131) of all participants (Figure 1) and 97% (107/110) of those with available data (Figure 2) achieved HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL. Of participants with baseline VL ≥ 500,000 c/mL, 89% (17/19) achieved HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Week 48; the remaining 2 withdrew from study. Of participants with baseline VL ≥ 1,000,000 c/mL, 90% (9/10) achieved HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Week 48 (Table); the remaining participant withdrew consent. Of the 17 participants with baseline VL ≥ 500,000 c/mL with available data through Week 48, 76% (13/17) achieved virologic suppression by Week 24. One participant with baseline VL ≥ 500,000 c/mL switched from DTG/3TC before the Week 48 assessment. Of the 9 participants with baseline VL ≥ 1,000,000 c/mL with available data through Week 48, most participants (8/9; 89%) were suppressed by Week 24.Figure 1. Virologic outcomes at Week 48, overall and by baseline VL and CD4+ cell count: ITT-E missing = failure analysis. Figure 2. Virologic outcomes at Week 48, overall and by baseline VL and CD4+ cell count: observed analysis. Table. Viral Load by Study Visit Among Participants with Baseline HIV-1 RNA ≥1,000,000 c/mL ConclusionThese data provide evidence for the efficacy and feasibility of using DTG/3TC as a first-line regimen in a test-and-treat setting, including among participants with very high baseline VL.Disclosures Charlotte-Paige M. Rolle, MD MPH, Gilead Sciences (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker’s Bureau)Janssen Infectious Disease (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member)ViiV Healthcare (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker's Bureau) Tulika Singh, MD MS AAHIVS, Gilead (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member)ViiV (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker's Bureau) Moti Ramgopal, MD FIDSA, Abbvie (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker's Bureau)Gilead (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker's Bureau)Janssen (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support, Speaker's Bureau)Merck (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)ViiV (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker's Bureau) Dushyantha Jayaweera, MD, mrcog(uk), face, Gilead (Research Grant or Support)Janssen (Research Grant or Support)viiv (Research Grant or Support) Peter Leone, MD, viiv healthcare (Employee) Jessica Matthews, BS, ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Michael Cupo, Ph.D., GlaxoSmithKline (Employee) Mark Underwood, PhD, GlaxoSmithKline (Shareholder)ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Kostas Angelis, PhD, GSK (Employee, Shareholder) Brian Wynne, MD, ViiV Healthcare (Employee, Shareholder, I have shares in GSK, the part owner of ViiV) Deanna Merrill, PharmD, MBA, AAHIVP, GlaxoSmithKline (Shareholder)ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Christopher T. Nguyen, MD, ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Jean A. van Wyk, MB,ChB, GlaxoSmithKline (Shareholder)ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Andrew Zolopa, MD, GlaxoSmithKline (Shareholder)ViiV Healthcare (Employee)

546. Therapeutic Effect of Regdanvimab in Patients with Mild to Moderate COVID-19: Day 28 Results from a Multicentre, Randomised, Controlled Pivotal Trial

BackgroundRegdanvimab is a monoclonal antibody with activity against SARS-CoV-2. A Phase 2/3 study with two parts is currently ongoing and data up to Day 28 of Part 1 is available while the data from 1315 patients enrolled in Part 2 are expected in June 2021.MethodsThis phase 2/3, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, double-blind study with 2 parts is aimed to assess the therapeutic efficacy of regdanvimab in outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19, not requiring supplemental oxygen therapy. Patients aged >18 with the onset of symptoms within 7 days were eligible to be enrolled.ResultsIn Part 1, 307 patients (101, 103, and 103 patients in the regdanvimab 40 mg/kg, regdanvimab 80 mg/kg, and placebo groups, respectively) were confirmed to have COIVD-19 by RT-qPCR at Day 1 (or Day 2). Regdanvimab significantly reduced the proportion of patients who required hospitalization or supplemental oxygen therapy compared to placebo (8.7% in the placebo vs. 4.0% in the regdanvimab 40 mg/kg). The difference in events rate was even larger in patients who met the high-risk criteria and confirmed a 66.1% reduction in patients receiving regdanvimab 40 mg/kg (Table 1). The median time to clinical recovery was shortened by 2.9 days (7.18 days for regdanvimab 40 mg/kg and 10.03 days for placebo; high-risk). Also, greater reductions from baseline viral load were shown in regdanvimab groups (Figure 1). The safety results confirmed that the regdanvimab was safe and well-tolerated. Occurrence of adverse events (Table 2) and results of other safety assessments were generally comparable among the 3 groups. The overall rate of infusion-related reaction was low and no serious adverse events or deaths were reported. The anti-drug antibody positive rate was low in the regdanvimab groups (1.4% in regdanvimab vs. 4.5% in placebo), and no antibody-dependent enhancement was reported. ConclusionResults from the first part of the study indicate that regdanvimab may lower the rate of hospitalisation or requirement of oxygen supplementation, with the greatest benefit noted in patients at high-risk of progressing to severe COVID-19. The second part of the study remains ongoing and blinded. Therefore, results for the primary endpoint are forthcoming and will be presented at IDWeek.Disclosures Michael G. Ison, MD, MS, Celltrion, Inc. (Consultant) Jin Yong Kim, MD, MPH, Celltrion, Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Oana Sandulescu, MD, PhD, Algernon Pharmaceuticals (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Atea Pharmaceuticals (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Celltrion, Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Diffusion Pharmaceuticals (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Liliana-Lucia Preotescu, MD, PhD, Celltrion, Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Norma Erendira Rivera Martinez, MD, Celltrion, Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Marta Dobryanska, MD, Celltrion, Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Victoria Birlutiu, Assoc. Prof. M.D. Ph.D., Celltrion, Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania & Hasso Plattner Foundation (Research Grant or Support) Egidia Gabriela Miftode, MD, PhD, Celltrion, Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Natalia Gaibu, MD, Celltrion, Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Olga Adriana Caliman-Sturdza, MD, PhD, Celltrion, Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania (Research Grant or Support) Simin-Aysel Florescu, MD, PhD, Celltrion, Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Anca Streinu-Cercel, MD, PhD, Assoc.Prof. Infectious diseases, Algernon Pharmaceuticals (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Atea Pharmaceuticals (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Celltrion, Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Diffusion Pharmaceuticals (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Sang Joon Lee, n/a, Celltrion, Inc. (Employee) Sung Hyun Kim, n/a, Celltrion, Inc. (Employee) Il Sung Chang, n/a, Celltrion, Inc. (Employee) Yun Ju Bae, n/a, Celltrion, Inc. (Employee) Jee Hye Suh, n/a, Celltrion, Inc. (Employee) Mi Rim Kim, n/a, Celltrion, Inc. (Employee) Da Re Chung, n/a, Celltrion, Inc. (Employee) Sun Jung Kim, n/a, Celltrion, Inc. (Employee) Seul Gi Lee, n/a, Celltrion, Inc. (Employee) Ga Hee Park, n/a, Celltrion, Inc. (Employee) Joong Sik Eom, MD, PhD, Celltrion, Inc. (Consultant)

873. A Retrospective Cohort Study on Treatment Outcomes of Patients on Third-Line Therapy at the HIV Advanced Treatment Centre, University Teaching Hospital, Zambia

BackgroundIn Zambia, third-line regimens consist of a switch to darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) and/or raltegravir (RAL) and/or etravirine (ETV), and as of 2017, dolutegravir (DTG), from a failing second-line therapy.5 We assessed virologic suppression (HIV viral load (VL) ≤1000 copies/ml per Zambian national guidelines), immunological response, and patterns of HIV drug resistance mutation among patients on third-line ART at the University Teaching Hospital (UTH) in Lusaka, Zambia.MethodsA retrospective evaluation of adults ≥18 years old on third-line ART regimens at UTH between January 2012 to June 30, 2020 was conducted. Patients were referred for second-line virologic failure defined as HIV RNA VL > 1000 copies/mL on two consecutive measurements after 6 months on second-line ART.5 We assessed virologic suppression VL ≤1000 copies/ml, CD4, mutations, and third-line regimens of this cohort. Patients were excluded if they were on third-line ART < 6 months or received RAL and/or ETV and/or DTG before starting third-line ART. ResultsA total of 539 patients were included; 231 males (42.9%) and 308 (57.1%) females. The mean age of third-line initiation was 29.8 years; mean time from ART initiation to third-line initiation was 9.9 years. Out of 25 combination 349 (64.7%) received DTG, 272 (50.5%) DRV/r, 85(15.8%) ETR, and 49 (9.1%) RAL. There were 215 (39.9%) genotypes; common mutations were to zidovudine (80%), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) (78%), and protease inhibitors (PIs) (41%). Patients with at least one viral load and CD4 upon third-line initiation was 296 (54.9%) and 350 (64.9%), respectively. Among patients with sufficient data (21%, n=115), VL suppression increased from 44 (38%) patients at baseline to 53 (46%) at next available follow-up; with mean baseline VL and follow-up VL of log10 3.60 and 3.33, respectively. The immunologic response revealed 49 (56.3%) had CD4 increase with mean increase of 61.1 cells/mm3. (See Table 1.) ConclusionWe found moderate improvements in VL suppression and immunologic response. Nearly all third-line patients had genotypic resistance to first-line NNRTI and nearly half to second-line PI regimens. Quality improvement measures are needed to improve viral load timing following ART changes to better assess regimen efficacy.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Determinants of Virological Failure Among HIV-Infected Children on First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy in West Gojjam Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia.

BackgroundViral load monitoring is a golden indicator for diagnosing treatment failure in patients with HIV. HIV-infected children are considered a priority group for routine viral load monitoring. Globally, the World Health Organization recommends 95% of HIV patients have viral suppression. Factors leading to virological failure are not well understood and studied. This study aimed to determine virological failure among HIV-infected children on first-line antiretroviral therapy in the West Gojjam Zone, Amhara region. Ethiopia.MethodsAn institutional-based unmatched case–control study was carried out from October 1 to October 15, 2020, among HIV-infected children on first-line antiretroviral therapy. The study included 94 cases and 276 controls, with a total sample size of 370 out of 378 HIV-infected children. A structured English version checklist was used to collect data through chart review. The data were entered using Epi-data 4.2 and exported into SPSS version 20 for analysis. Descriptive statistics were conducted to summarize the sample characteristics. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to describe each explanatory variable’s association with the outcome variable. A bivariate analysis with a p-value < 0.25 was selected for multivariate analysis. Adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals was conducted, and p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsNon-disclosure (AOR = 4.26; 95% CI: 2.09, 8.70), baseline viral load >1000 copies/mL (AOR = 10.82; 95% CI: 5.4, 21.67), recent poor adherence (AOR, 6.05, 95% CI, 1.70, 21.55) and missed clinical appointments (AOR = 8.03; 95% CI: 3.88, 16.65) were factors independently associated with virological failure.ConclusionDisclosure of HIV status of patients early, according to their age and adherence to counseling, should be emphasized. Efforts should be strengthened to trace back for missed clinical appointments and strictly follow-up with antiretroviral (ARV) medication for a baseline viral load >1000 copies/mL that helps to boost immunity and suppress viral replication.

Virological evolution of patients with HIV infection that start antiretroviral therapy with a very high baseline viral load

The degree of viral suppression in HIV patients who start antiretroviral therapy (ART) with very high viral loads (CV) is unknown. To know the percentage of viral suppression in HIV patients who start ART with CV ≥ 500,000 copies/mL at 96 weeks. Retrospective study. Patients who started ART with a CV ≥ 500,000 copies/mL between 2008 and 2018 were included, stratifying on the basis of a logarithmic scale. The percentage of viral suppression and the variables associated with this outcome were determined. 221 patients were included. The median age and CV were 43 years and 6.0 log, respectively, with the majority (37%) being in stage C3 at the start of ART. 48.8 and 87.7% of the patients achieved viral suppression at one year and two years of follow-up, respectively. It was observed that the older the immunosuppression, and the higher CV, the longer the time to achieve undetectability. Virological failure was only demonstrated in three patients. Patients with HIV infection who start ART with very high CVs take longer to achieve viral suppression, which is proportional to the magnitude of this and the degree of immunosuppression, without this entailing a greater risk of virological failure.

Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Dolutegravir/Abacavir/Lamivudine in Antiretroviral-Naive Adults (SYMTRI): A Multicenter Randomized Open-Label Study (PReEC/RIS-57).

BackgroundDarunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) is the reference for combination therapy based on protease inhibitors due to its efficacy, tolerability, and convenience. Head-to-head randomized comparisons between D/C/F/TAF and combination therapy based on integrase inhibitors in antiretroviral-naive patients are lacking.MethodsAdult (>18 years old) human immunodeficiency virus-infected antiretroviral-naive patients (HLA-B∗5701 negative and hepatitis B virus negative), with viral load (VL) ≥500 c/mL, were centrally randomized to initiate D/C/F/TAF or dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC/ABC) after stratifying by VL and CD4 count. Clinical and analytical assessments were performed at weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, and 48. The primary endpoint was VL <50 c/mL at week 48 in the intention-to-treat (ITT)-exposed population (US Food and Drug Administration snapshot analysis, 10% noninferiority margin).ResultsBetween September 2018 and 2019, 316 patients were randomized and 306 patients were included in the ITT-exposed analysis (151 D/C/F/TAF and 155 DTG/3TC/ABC). Almost all (94%) participants were male and their median age was 35 years. Forty percent had a baseline VL >100 000 copies/mL, and 13% had <200 CD4 cells/μL. Median weight was 73 kg and median body mass index was 24 kg/m2. At 48 weeks, 79% (D/C/F/TAF) versus 82% (DTG/3TC/ABC) had VL <50 c/mL (difference, −2.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], −11.3 to 6.6). Eight percent versus four percent experienced virologic failure but no resistance-associated mutations emerged. Four percent versus six percent had drug discontinuation due to adverse events. In the per-protocol analysis, 94% versus 96% of patients had VL <50 c/mL (difference, −2%; 95% CI, −8.1 to 3.5). There were no differences in CD4 cell count or weight changes.ConclusionsWe could not demonstrate the noninferiority of D/C/F/TAF relative to DTG/ABC/3TC as initial antiretroviral therapy, although both regimens were similarly well tolerated.

Immunological and Virological Outcomes among Treatment Experienced HIV-Infected Patients on Dolutegravir Regimen in Tanzania

Introduction The integrase inhibitor dolutegravir (DTG) has recently replaced the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (efavirenz and nevirapine) in several Sub-Saharan African countries, including Tanzania. Since this change, there is scarce data on the current treatment outcomes focusing on treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients switched to DTG based regimens in Tanzania. Objectives This study aimed to investigate immunological and virological outcomes among treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients who were switched to DTG based regimen in Tanzania. Results We enrolled 397 patients, majority (65%) were female patients with mean age of 42.7 (95% CI; 40.7 – 44.7) years. The mean baseline CD4+ cell count was 457.1 (95% CI; 426.6 – 489.8) cells/mm3 with 8.3% of patients with CD4+ cell count <200 cells/mm3. The mean baseline viral load (VL) was 169.8 (95% CI; 128.8 – 223.9) copies/ml, whereby 20.6% had VL ≥ 1000 copies/ml. After the use of a new fixed dose combination of Tenofovir (TDF) 300 mg + Lamivudine (3TC) 300 mg + DTG 50 mg (TLD) for at least 24 weeks, the overall rate of virological suppression (<50 copies/ml) was 89.9% (95%CI 86.7% - 92.7%). The significant predictors of virological failure were overall duration on ART use (p = 0.004), duration on TDF + 3TC, and Efavirenz (EFV) (TLE) (p = 0.007), and baseline VL (p < 0.001). Conclusion TLD regimen has provided favorable preliminary results among patients who previously used TLE in HIV/AIDS treatment by showing good virological and immunological outcomes. The long-term treatment outcomes require further investigation.