Base Flipping Research Articles

Kinetic mechanism of damage site recognition and uracil flipping by Escherichia coli uracil DNA glycosylase.

The DNA repair enzyme uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) catalyzes hydrolytic cleavage of the N-glycosidic bond of premutagenic uracil residues in DNA by flipping the uracil base from the DNA helix. The mechanism of base flipping and the role this step plays in site-specific DNA binding and catalysis by enzymes are largely unknown. The thermodynamics and kinetics of DNA binding and uracil flipping by UDG have been studied in the absence of glycosidic bond cleavage using substrate analogues containing the 2'-alpha and 2'-beta fluorine isomers of 2'-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (Ubeta, Ualpha) positioned adjacent to a fluorescent nucleotide reporter group 2-aminopurine (2-AP). Activity measurements show that DNA containing a Ubeta or Ualpha nucleotide is a 10(7)-fold slower substrate for UDG (t1/2 approximately 20 h), which allows measurements of DNA binding and base flipping in the absence of glycosidic bond cleavage. When UDG binds these analogues, but not other DNA molecules, a 4-8-fold 2-AP fluorescence enhancement is observed, as expected for a decrease in 2-AP base stacking resulting from enzymatic flipping of the adjacent uracil. Thermodynamic measurements show that UDG forms weak nonspecific complexes with dsDNA (KDns = 1.5 microM) and binds approximately 25-fold more tightly to Ubeta containing dsDNA (KDapp approximately 50 nM). Thus, base flipping contributes less than approximately 2 kcal/mol to the free energy of binding and is not a major component of the >10(6)-fold catalytic specificity of UDG. Kinetic studies at 25 degrees C show that site-specific binding occurs by a two-step mechanism. The first step (E + S left and right arrow ES) involves the diffusion-controlled binding of UDG to form a weak nonspecific complex with the DNA (KD approximately 1.5-3 microM). The second step (ES left and right arrow E'F) involves a rapid step leading to reversible uracil flipping (kmax approximately 1200 s-1). This step is followed closely by a conformational change in UDG that was monitored by the quenching of tryptophan fluorescence. The results provide evidence for an enzyme-assisted mechanism for uracil flipping and exclude a passive mechanism in which the enzyme traps a transient extrahelical base in the free substrate. The data suggest that the duplex structure of the DNA is locally destabilized before the base-flipping step, thereby facilitating extrusion of the uracil. Thus, base flipping contributes little to the free energy of DNA binding but contributes greatly to specificity through an induced-fit mechanism.

Interaction of the type I methyltransferase M.EcoR124I with modified DNA substrates: sequence discrimination and base flipping.

We have analysed the DNA-protein contacts made between the type I DNA methyltransferase M.EcoR124I and its recognition sequence. The effects of base modifications have been probed by measuring the affinity of M.EcoR124I for the modified sequences relative to that for the wild-type sequence by using gel-retardation competition assays. These results, along with those from methylation interference footprinting and photo-affinity cross-linking have identified the location of potential DNA contacts within the DNA recognition site. Substitution of 6-thioguanosine for each of the three specific guanines in the recognition sequence leads to a large (10-20-fold) decrease in the strength of DNA binding, indicating the importance of hydrogen-bonding interactions in the major groove of DNA. In contrast, replacement of either (or both) of the adenines at the target site for methylation by the enzyme, to produce either a base pair mismatch or loss of the base, leads to a marked increase in DNA-binding affinity. The results strongly support the proposal that type I methyltransferases employ a base-flipping mechanism to methylate their target base.

Structures of HhaI methyltransferase complexed with substrates containing mismatches at the target base.

Three structures have been determined for complexes between HhaI methyltransferase (M.HhaI) and oligonucleotides containing a G:A, G:U or G:AP (AP = abasic or apurinic/apyrimidinic) mismatch at the target base pair. The mismatched adenine, uracil and abasic site are all flipped out of the DNA helix and located in the enzyme's active-site pocket, adopting the same conformation as in the flipped-out normal substrate. These results, particularly the flipped-out abasic deoxyribose sugar, provide insight into the mechanism of base flipping. If the process involves the protein pushing the base out of the helix, then the push must take place not on the base, but rather on the sugar-phosphate backbone. Thus rotation of the DNA backbone is probably the key to base flipping.

Protein-mediated base flipping

Since the discovery that the DNA methyltransferase M. HhaI utilises a base flipping mechanism to expose its target cytosine during catalysis, this phenomenon has been observed in other nucleic acid modifying enzymes. The crystallographic analyses of such enzyme—DNA complexes have revealed the molecular features of extrahelical base stabilisation, but have been less informative about the flipping process itself.

Base flipping.

Base flipping is the phenomenon whereby a base in normal B-DNA is swung completely out of the helix into an extrahelical position. It was discovered in 1994 when the first co-crystal structure was reported for a cytosine-5 DNA methyltransferase binding to DNA. Since then it has been shown to occur in many systems where enzymes need access to a DNA base to perform chemistry on it. Many DNA glycosylases that remove abnormal bases from DNA use this mechanism. This review describes systems known to use base flipping as well as many systems where it is likely to occur but has not yet been rigorously demonstrated. The mechanism and evolution of base flipping are also discussed.

2-Aminopurine as a fluorescent probe for DNA base flipping by methyltransferases.

DNA base flipping, which was first observed for the C5-cytosine DNA methyltransferase M. Hha I, results in a complete removal of the stacking interactions between the target base and its neighbouring bases. We have investigated whether duplex oligodeoxynucleotides containing the fluorescent base analogue 2-aminopurine can be used to sense DNA base flipping. Using M. Hha I as a paradigm for a base flipping enzyme, we find that the fluorescence intensity of duplex oligodeoxynucleotides containing 2-aminopurine at the target site is dramatically enhanced (54-fold) in the presence of M. Hha I. Duplex oligodeoxynucleotides containing 2-aminopurine adjacent to the target cytosine show little fluorescence increase upon addition of M. Hha I. These results clearly demonstrate that duplex oligodeoxynucleotides containing 2-aminopurine at the target site can serve as fluorescence probes for base flipping. Another enzyme hypothesized to use a base flipping mechanism is the N6-adenine DNA methyltransferase M. Taq I. Addition of M. Taq I to duplex oligodeoxynucleotides bearing 2-aminopurine at the target position, also results in a strongly enhanced fluorescence (13-fold), whereas addition to duplex oligodeoxynucleotides containing 2-aminopurine at the 3'- or 5'-neighbouring position leads only to small fluorescence increases. These results give the first experimental evidence that the adenine-specific DNA methyltransferase M. Taq I also flips its target base.

Dynamic modes of the flipped-out cytosine during HhaI methyltransferase-DNA interactions in solution.

Flipping of a nucleotide out of a B-DNA helix into the active site of an enzyme has been observed for the HhaI and HaeIII cytosine-5 methyltransferases (M.HhaI and M.HaeIII) and for numerous DNA repair enzymes. Here we studied the base flipping motions in the binary M. HhaI-DNA and the ternary M.HhaI-DNA-cofactor systems in solution. Two 5-fluorocytosines were introduced into the DNA in the places of the target cytosine and, as an internal control, a cytosine positioned two nucleotides upstream of the recognition sequence 5'-GCGC-3'. The 19F NMR spectra combined with gel mobility data show that interaction with the enzyme induces partition of the target base among three states, i.e. stacked in the B-DNA, an ensemble of flipped-out forms and the flipped-out form locked in the enzyme active site. Addition of the cofactor analogue S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine greatly enhances the trapping of the target cytosine in the catalytic site. Distinct dynamic modes of the target cytosine have thus been identified along the reaction pathway, which includes novel base-flipping intermediates that were not observed in previous X-ray structures. The new data indicate that flipping of the target base out of the DNA helix is not dependent on binding of the cytosine in the catalytic pocket of M.HhaI, and suggest an active role of the enzyme in the opening of the DNA duplex.

Direct Real Time Observation of Base Flipping by theEcoRI DNA Methyltransferase

DNA methyltransferases are excellent prototypes for investigating DNA distortion and enzyme specificity because catalysis requires the extrahelical stabilization of the target base within the enzyme active site. The energetics and kinetics of base flipping by the EcoRI DNA methyltransferase were investigated by two methods. First, equilibrium dissociation constants (KDDNA) were determined for the binding of the methyltransferase to DNA containing abasic sites or base analogs incorporated at the target base. Consistent with a base flipping mechanism, tighter binding to oligonucleotides containing destabilized target base pairs was observed. Second, total intensity stopped flow fluorescence measurements of DNA containing 2-aminopurine allowed presteady-state real time observation of the base flipping transition. Following the rapid formation of an enzyme-DNA collision complex, a biphasic increase in total intensity was observed. The fast phase dominated the total intensity increase with a rate nearly identical to k(methylation) determined by rapid chemical quench-flow techniques (Reich, N. O., and Mashoon, N. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 9191-9193). The restacking of the extrahelical base also revealed biphasic kinetics with the recovered amplitudes from these off-rate experiments matching very closely to those observed during the base unstacking process. These results provide the first direct and continuous observation of base flipping and show that at least two distinct conformational transitions occurred at the flipped base subsequent to complex formation. Furthermore, our results suggest that the commitment to catalysis during the methylation of the target site is not determined at the level of the chemistry step but rather is mediated by prior intramolecular isomerization within the enzyme-DNA complex.

The Role of Base Flipping in Damage Recognition and Catalysis by T4 Endonuclease V

The process of moving a DNA base extrahelical (base flipping) has been shown in the co-crystal structure of a UV-induced pyrimidine dimer-specific glycosylase, T4 endonuclease V, with its substrate DNA. Compared with other enzymes known to use base flipping, endonuclease V is unique in that it moves the base opposite the target site extrahelical, rather than moving the target base itself. Utilizing substrate analogs and catalytically inactive mutants of T4 endonuclease V, this study investigates the discrete steps involved in damage recognition by this DNA repair enzyme. Specifically, fluorescence spectroscopy analysis shows that fluorescence changes attributable to base flipping are specific for only the base directly opposite either abasic site analogs or the 5'-thymine of a pyrimidine dimer, and no changes are detected if the 2-aminopurine is moved opposite the 3'-thymine of the pyrimidine dimer. Interestingly, base flipping is not detectable with every specific binding event suggesting that damage recognition can be achieved without base flipping. Thus, base flipping does not add to the stability of the specific enzyme-DNA complex but rather induces a conformational change to facilitate catalysis at the appropriate target site. When used in conjunction with structural information, these types of analyses can yield detailed mechanistic models and critical amino acid residues for extrahelical base movement as a mode of damage recognition.

An RNA enhancer in a phage transcriptional antitermination complex functions as a structural switch.

Antitermination protein N regulates the transcriptional program of phage lambda through recognition of RNA enhancer elements. Binding of an arginine-rich peptide to one face of an RNA hairpin organizes the other, which in turn binds to the host antitermination complex. The induced RNA structure mimics a GNRA hairpin, an organizational element of rRNA and ribozymes. The two faces of the RNA, bridged by a sheared GA base pair, exhibit a specific pattern of base stacking and base flipping. This pattern is extended by stacking of an aromatic amino acid side chain with an unpaired adenine at the N-binding surface. Such extended stacking is coupled to induction of a specific internal RNA architecture and is blocked by RNA mutations associated in vivo with loss of transcriptional antitermination activity. Mimicry of a motif of RNA assembly by an RNA-protein complex permits its engagement within the antitermination machinery.

Contrasting effects of single stranded DNA binding protein on the activity of uracil DNA glycosylase from Escherichia coli towards different DNA substrates.

Excision of uracil from tetraloop hairpins and single stranded ('unstructured') oligodeoxyribonucleotides by Escherichia coli uracil DNA glycosylase has been investigated. We show that, compared with a single stranded reference substrate, uracil from the first, second, third and the fourth positions of the loops is excised with highly variable efficiencies of 3.21, 0.37, 5.9 and 66.8%, respectively. More importantly, inclusion of E.coli single stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) in the reactions resulted in approximately 7-140-fold increase in the efficiency of uracil excision from the first, second or the third position in the loop but showed no significant effect on its excision from the fourth position. In contrast, the presence of SSB decreased uracil excision from the single stranded ('unstructured') substrates approximately 2-3-fold. The kinetic studies show that the increased efficiency of uracil release from the first, second and the third positions of the tetraloops is due to a combination of both the improved substrate binding and a large increase in the catalytic rates. On the other hand, the decreased efficiency of uracil release from the single stranded substrates ('unstructured') is mostly due to the lowering of the catalytic rates. Chemical probing with KMnO4showed that the presence of SSB resulted in the reduction of cleavage of the nucleotides in the vicinity of dUMP residue in single stranded substrates but their increased susceptibility in the hairpin substrates. We discuss these results to propose that excision of uracil from DNA-SSB complexes by uracil DNA glycosylase involves base flipping. The use of SSB in the various applications of uracil DNA glycosylase is also discussed.

Mechanistic link between DNA methyltransferases and DNA repair enzymes by base flipping.

Rotation of a DNA nucleotide out of the double helix and into a protein binding pocket ("base flipping") was first observed in the structure of a DNA methyltransferase. There is now evidence that a variety of proteins, particularly DNA repair enzymes, use base flipping in their interactions with DNA. Though the mechanisms for base movement into extrahelical positions are still unclear, the focus of this review is how base recognition is modulated by the stringency of binding to the extrahelical base(s) or sugar moiety.

Mechanistic link between DNA methyltransferases and DNA repair enzymes by base flipping

Mechanistic link between DNA methyltransferases and DNA repair enzymes by base flipping

DNA Distortion and Base Flipping by the EcoRV DNA Methyltransferase: A STUDY USING INTERFERENCE AT dA AND T BASES AND MODIFIED DEOXYNUCLEOSIDES

The EcoRV DNA methyltransferase introduces a CH3 group at the 6-amino position of the first dA in the duplex sequence d(GATATC). It has previously been reported that the methylase contacts the four phosphates (pNpNpGpA) at, and preceding, the 5'-end of the recognition sequence as well as the single dG in this sequence (Szczelkun, M. D., Jones, H., and Connolly, B. A. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 10734-10743). To study the possible role of the dA and T bases within the ATAT sequence, interference studies have been carried out using diethylpyrocarbonate and osmium tetroxide. The methylase bound very strongly to hemimethylated oligonucleotides modified at the second AT, of the ATAT sequence, in the unmethylated strand of the duplex. This probably arises because these modifications facilitate DNA distortion that follows the binding of the nucleic acid to the protein. Oligonucleotides containing modified bases at both the target dA base and its complementary T were used to determine whether this dA methylase flips out its target base in a similar manner to that observed for dC DNA methylases. In binary EcoRV methylase-DNA complexes, analogues that weakened the base pair caused an increase in affinity between the protein and the nucleic acid. In contrast, in ternary EcoRV methylase-DNA-sinefungin (an analogue of the natural co-factor, S-adenosyl-L-methionine (AdoMet)) complexes, only small differences in affinity were observed between the normal dA-T base pair and the analogues. These results are almost identical to those seen with DNA dC methylases (Klimasauskas, S., and Roberts R. J. (1995) Nucleic Acid Res. 23, 1388-1395; Yang, S. A., Jiang-Cheng, S., Zingg, J. M., Mi, S., and Jones, P. A. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 1380-1387) and support a base-flipping mechanism for DNA dA methylases.

Finding a basis for flipping bases

Rotation of a DNA nucleotide out of the double helix and into a protein binding pocket (‘base flipping’) was first observed in the structure of a DNA methyltransferase. There is now evidence that a variety of proteins use base flipping in their interactions with DNA. Though the mechanism for base flipping is still unclear, we propose a three-step pathway: recognizing the target site and increasing the interstrand phosphate–phosphate distance nearby, initiating base flipping by protein invasion of the DNA, and trapping the flipped DNA structure.

Targeted base stacking disruption by the EcoRI DNA methyltransferase.

We describe a novel fluorescence-based assay for detecting DNA conformational alterations within enzyme-DNA complexes. The target adenine for EcoRI DNA methyltransferase (GAATTC) was replaced with 2-aminopurine, which fluoresces upon excitation at 310 nm. Addition of the methyltransferase to the duplex binding site results in a 14-fold increase in fluorescence intensity with a 10 nm blue shift. The fluorescence is approximately 50% of that observed with equimolar free nucleoside, consistent with extrahelical stabilization of the target base in the enzyme-DNA complex. The shift in lambda max further implies the base is placed into a low dielectric environment. For adenine-specific DNA methyltransferases, a hydrophobic pocket composed of highly conserved amino acids lies proximal to the cofactor binding site. Substitution of 2-aminopurine adjacent to the target base also results in detectable changes in fluorescence emission following complex formation with the methyltransferase. Thus, other classes of enzymes hypothesized to utilize base flipping can be investigated by this method.

DNA Flips Out!

DNA Flips Out!

On base flipping

On base flipping

M.HhaI binds tightly to substrates containing mismatches at the target base.

The (cytosine-5) DNA methyltransferase M.HhaI causes its target cytosine base to be flipped completely out of the DNA helix upon binding. We have investigated the effects of replacing the target cytosine by other, mismatched bases, including adenine, guanine, thymine and uracil. We find that M.HhaI binds more tightly to such mismatched substrates and can even transfer a methyl group to uracil if a G:U mismatch is present. Other mismatched substrates in which the orphan guanine is changed exhibit similar behavior. Overall, the affinity of DNA binding correlates inversely with the stability of the target base pair, while the nature of the target base appears irrelevant for complex formation. The presence of a cofactor analog. S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine, greatly enhances the selectivity of the methyltransferase for cytosine at the target site. We propose that the DNA methyltransferases have evolved from mismatch binding proteins and that base flipping was, and still is, a key element in many DNA-enzyme interactions.