Basal Joint Research Articles

Can we decrease the duration of basal thumb joint distraction for early osteoarthritis from 8 to 6 weeks? Study protocol for a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

BackgroundTo our knowledge, to date, 52 patients with thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (CMC1 OA) were treated with joint distraction. So far, most patients experienced improved physical function and less pain. After 2 years, only 1 patient proceeded to trapeziectomy. This study assesses if we can safely lower the distraction duration from 8 to 6 weeks for CMC1 joint distraction, maintaining the improvement in physical function and pain.MethodsThis is a monocenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial that includes patients younger than 65 years of age with ongoing symptoms of CMC1 OA and an established indication for surgery. All patients will be treated with CMC1 joint distraction. The primary outcome is to assess whether 6 weeks of joint distraction is not inferior to 8 weeks in terms of physical function at 1 year after surgery. Secondary outcomes will identify differences between groups at 1 year in pain intensity, patient satisfaction, hand health status, adverse event rates, treatment failure, differences in thumb strength and range of motion, and radiographic changes.DiscussionIf safe, the duration of basal thumb joint distraction can be reduced to 6 weeks, reducing patient burden. Because this is a relatively new treatment, this trial will provide greater knowledge of potential adverse events. This knowledge allows for more informed decision making for patients considering CMC1 distraction treatment. Future studies can directly compare joint distraction to other treatments of CMC1 joint arthritis like splinting and trapeziectomy.Trial registrationCentral Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO), NL68225.100.18; registered on 9 August 2019. Medical Research Ethics Committees United (MEC-U), R19.003; registered on 9 August 2019. Netherlands Trial Register, NL8016; registered on 15 September 2019.

Thumb Metacarpal-Trapezoid Impingement as an Etiology of Pain After Trapeziectomy and Basal Joint Soft Tissue Arthroplasty: A Case Series

To report a poorly described etiology for pain after trapeziectomy and soft tissue basal joint arthroplasty, diagnosed with the aid of nuclear imaging. Five patients (4 women and 1 man), average age 62 years (range, 59-65 years) presented with pain an average of 7 months (range, 2-11 months) after basal joint arthroplasty. The dominant hand was involved in all cases. Advanced imaging including 25 mCi 99mTc methylene diphosphonate bone scintigraphy and single-photon emission computed tomography (CT) showed intense tracer uptake between the base of the thumb metacarpal and residual trapezoid. Computed tomography scans confirmed abutment between these bones. The symptoms were attributed to this finding, and revision surgery consisting of excision of the trapezoid and arthrodesis of the index and middle finger carpometacarpal joints was performed. Mean follow-up was 40 months (range, 12-60 months). Grip strength improved from a mean of 10.5 to 23 kg, and lateral pinch strength improved from a mean of 3 to 6.75 kg. Radiographic fusion of the index finger metacarpal to capitate was confirmed in 4 of 5 patients; it was indeterminate in one patient who was completely pain-free. Radiographic fusion of long finger carpometacarpal joints was indeterminate in 3 patients. Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation pain scores improved from 35 to 6, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation function scores from 78 to 14, and Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores from 37 to18. Impingement between the base of the thumb metacarpal and remaining trapezoid should be considered a potential source of pain after trapeziectomy and soft tissue arthroplasty. Advanced imaging (bone scintigraphy and single-photon emission CT and standard CT) are helpful to confirm the diagnosis. Therapeutic V.

Thumb-Basal Joint Arthroplasty Outcomes and Metacarpal Subsidence: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of Trapeziectomy With Suture Button Suspensionplasty Versus Ligament Reconstruction With Tendon Interposition.

Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthroplasty is a common procedure in the surgical management of symptomatic thumb basal joint arthritis. Following trapeziectomy, a number of suspensionplasty techniques are often used, but limited comparative evidence exists between these techniques. The central aim of this study was to prospectively compare the outcomes of 2 suspensionplasty techniques following trapeziectomy: suture button (TightRope) versus ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI). Prospective data were collected on 112 consecutive patients with Eaton stage III-IV thumb CMC arthritis who underwent open trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty. There were 53 LRTI and 59 TightRope suspensionplasty procedures. Outcomes were measured using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, radiographic analysis, and lateral pinch strength. Patient demographic data and complications were also recorded. Patients undergoing TightRope suspensionplasty had significantly higher trapeziometacarpal index and thus less subsidence than the LRTI group at 2 weeks (0.22 vs 0.17 [P < .0001]) and 3 months (0.17 vs 0.15 [P < .05]) postoperatively. TightRope suspensionplasty also had a significantly lower QuickDASH score at 2 weeks (64.7 vs 74.6 [P < .05]), 3 months (20.7 vs 32.5 [P < .05]), and 1 year postoperatively (7.57 vs 21.5 [P < .05]) compared with the LRTI group. However, there was no difference in VAS pain, lateral pinch strength, reoperation, or complications at any time point between groups. Thumb CMC joint arthroplasty performed with a TightRope suspensionplasty versus LRTI yielded short-term improved resistance to subsidence, long-term greater improvement in clinical outcome by QuickDASH, and no difference in pain or complication rates.

Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid osteoarthritis: From the joint to the patient

Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid osteoarthritis (STT OA) is common and often associated with thumb basal joint arthritis. Pain at the base of the thumb on the volar aspect and during resisted extension is characteristic of symptomatic STT OA. If conservative treatment fails, surgical treatment may be offered. In case of STT OA, treatment may range from arthrodesis to trapeziectomy (isolated or associated with ligament reconstruction and/or interposition). Any preoperative intracarpal instability (DISI) can be exacerbated by resecting more than 3 or 4 mm of the distal pole of scaphoid. For peritrapezial osteoarthritis, trapeziectomy is the logical solution, but it exposes the patient to known complications: loss of strength, long recovery, trapeziometacarpal impingement. Initial treatment of thumb basal joint arthritis by arthroplasty is also an option. Treatment of both sites is also possible by interposition of pyrocarbon implants. In all cases (isolated or associated STT OA) and no matter the technique chosen, maintaining the scaphoid height (arthrodesis, resection < 3 mm and/or associated interposition) and performing oblique trapezoidal osteotomy (to prevent scaphoid–metacarpal impingement) are the two crucial elements of surgical treatment.

Mouthparts and associated sensilla of adult Panorpidae (Insecta: Mecoptera)

Adult mouthparts and associated sensilla were investigated for five genera of Panorpidae in Mecoptera by scanning electron microscopy, including Panorpa liui Hua, 1997, Dicerapanorpa magna (Chou, 1981), Cerapanorpa dubia (Chou & Wang, 1981), Neopanorpa longiprocessa Hua & Chou, 1997 and Furcatopanorpa longihypovalva (Hua & Cai, 2009). The mouthparts are of the typical mandibulate type, consisting of a labrum-epipharynx, paired mandibles and maxillae, and unpaired labium and hypopharynx. The triangular labrum is longer in F. longihypovalva than in other species. The epipharynx is usually furnished with abundant microtrichia, except in N. longiprocessa. The blade-shaped mandibles terminate into two apical teeth. The hypopharynx bears numerous microtrichia on the posterior side, except for the glabrous hypopharynx in N. longiprocessa. The mouthparts have six types of sensilla: sensilla basiconica on the epipharynx, maxillary and labial palps; sensilla chaetica on the epipharynx and maxillary palps; sensilla palmata and trichodea on the epipharynx and maxillary palp; sensilla campaniformia and hair plates on the basal joints of palps. The number of sensilla basiconica I is four in P. liui and C. dubia, six in D. magna and eight in N. longiprocessa, respectively, but as two or four in F. longihypovalva. The characters of mouthparts and associated sensilla can be used for taxonomy and phylogenetic analyses of Panorpidae.

Trapeziometacarpal prostheses

In 1970, Jean-Yves de la Caffinière developed the first trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint prosthesis, a ball-and-socket design based on hip replacement implants. From 1970 to 1990, the first generation of cemented prostheses was developed. At that time, trapeziectomy, with tendon interposition or suspension arthroplasty, and Swanson silastic spacers remained the most widely used surgical procedures for thumb basal joint arthritis. From 1990 to 2010, a second generation of cementless prostheses was developed. The third generation was introduced after 2010 and consisted of dual mobility prostheses. In 2020, TMC arthroplasty (simple or dual mobility) is a reliable option in thumb basal joint arthritis with an implant survival rate of 90% at 10 years of follow-up, while providing pain relief and restoring strength and mobility. Restoration of the thumb’s length corrects most thumb Z-deformities, so the TMC joint prosthesis may be a viable alternative surgical solution to trapeziectomy, which remains the gold standard in English-speaking countries. Moreover, trapeziectomy after failed TMC arthroplasty provides outcomes equivalent to those of primary trapeziectomy.

Double Oblique Osteotomy and Rotation of the trapeziometacarpal Joint (DOOR procedure)

The double oblique osteotomy with rotation of the trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint procedure (DOOR procedure) is a surgical technique conceived to treat non-traumatic TMC instability, often responsible for TMC joint osteoarthritis. The main goal of this procedure is to correct the exaggerated slope of the trapezium. It also allows opening of the first web space, transfers pressure to healthy cartilage areas, and reverses the forces exerted on the trapeziometacarpal ligaments. The technique is demanding and should be learned in the anatomy laboratory. Since 2000, we have carried out 96 cases, evidence that this technique is reliable. Our case series consists of 88 patients (71 females, 17 males), with 8 patients operated bilaterally. The average age at the time of the procedure was 48 years. The first 22 operated (24 cases) between 2000 and 2005 were reviewed in 2015 with an average follow-up of 13 years. Pain averaged 0.5 on VAS. The average QuickDASH score was 6. The average mobility according to Kapandji's index was 9 for opposition and 3 for retropulsion. The grip strength compared to that of the contralateral side was 180%, the key pinch strength was 100% of the contralateral side and the tip pinch strength was 98%. This intervention makes up approximately 10% of our surgical indications in thumb basal joint arthritis. It is reserved for young women with early arthritis or unstable thumbs, and for men who perform manual labor. While the results take a long time to achieve (about 3 months), they remain highly satisfactory at the average follow-up of 13 years.

Trapeziectomy and All-Suture Anchor Suspensionplasty for Basal Joint Arthritis

This article illustrates a technique for the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal arthritis via trapeziectomy with suture anchor suspensionplasty. The benefits of decreased operative time, simplicity, and decreased morbidity of the procedure are the highlights of this presentation of surgical technique and example case.

What’s New in Hand and Wrist Surgery

What’s New in Hand and Wrist Surgery

Total trapeziectomy

Total trapeziectomy has been extensively studied and has been used to treat thumb basal joint arthritis for decades. It remains a simple and reliable technique that every hand surgeon must learn and master, as a primary or revision procedure. Several techniques have been described, but none of them seems better than the others. Without the need for an implant and because of its long-lasting benefits, total trapeziectomy is currently the only surgical technique for thumb basal joint arthritis that can lay claim to being a potential life-long procedure.

Revision procedures after trapeziometacarpal surgery

Surgical treatment of thumb basal joint arthritis generally yields good and excellent results. In case of failure, the surgeon will propose an appropriate solution to the patient, one that can be performed easily. Each technique has its own complications: shortening with trapeziometacarpal pain following trapeziectomy, loosening and instability following total arthroplasty, instability for some implants. There are also intolerances such as allergies to nickel, foreign body reactions to silicone and inflammatory reactions to some synthetic ligament implants. It is important to bear these complications in mind when determining the best possible surgical technique initially. The different surgical solutions are exposed here. Prosthetic replacement is preferred in case of loosening when it is technically possible in order to preserve the thumb’s length. A conversion to trapeziectomy with or without interposition (implant or ligament reconstruction) will be carried out in the other cases. In case of trapeziectomy failure, solutions are more difficult to find. In the current state of things, it seems that implant or biological tissue interposition is the best solution.

Basal joint arthroscopy indications in first CMC joint arthritis

Basal joint arthroscopy is one of the more recent evolutions of small joint arthroscopy in upper limb surgery. Conventional arthroscopy equipment is generally sufficient to perform these procedures without any specific adaptation. Arthroscopic exploration of the trapeziometacarpal joint is performed through 1R, 1U portals with the addition of a thenar portal in some indications. In the context of basal joint arthritis, we can distinguish diagnostic, preventive and therapeutic indications for arthroscopy. Diagnostic indications are the assessment of painful post-traumatic basal joint lesions of cartilage and ligaments, and the evaluation of chondromalacia and ligament attenuation to help classify basal joint osteoarthritis to provide additional clinical information, which can influence further treatment depending on the stage of the disease. Preventive indications are reduction of Bennett’s fracture, basal joint dislocation management to avoid post-traumatic instability and chondromalacia; it can also be indicated after decompensation of hyperlaxity. Therapeutic indications are debridement, ligament augmentation procedures or shrinkage ± interposition ± partial or total trapeziectomy, ligamentoplasty, etc. Basal joint arthroscopy appears to be the seat of advances in arthroscopic procedures with clinical results at least as effective as classical open surgery, but this technique still requires long-term evaluation.

Trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis

Arthrodesis of the trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint is one of the first surgical procedures used to treat thumb basal joint arthritis. From 1970 to 1990, we performed 254 TMC arthrodeses with crossed K-wires. From 2015 to 2016, we performed 12 TMC arthrodesis procedures with shape-memory staples. The results were evaluated with De La Caffinière’s classification and took into account patient satisfaction and any complications. The results were satisfactory overall, without any significant difference between the two fixation methods but with a rather high complication rate. The indication for arthrodesis in surgical treatment of thumb basal joint arthritis is based on the patient’s age and occupation. The best indication is a young active patient.

Trapeziometacarpal joint ligament reconstruction in early stages of first carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis

Trapeziometacarpal joint ligament reconstruction is a surgical option in the early stages of thumb basal joint arthritis when the joint is painful and unstable without chondropathy. Arthroscopy is invaluable here to ensuring the joint surfaces are intact, which is often underestimated by radiography. The Eaton–Littler procedure using a distally pedicled flexor carpi radialis slip has been studied the most in this context. This reconstruction provides pain relief while slowing the rapid development of osteoarthritis.

Anatomically based radiological classification of thumb basal joint arthritis

The numerous surgical techniques proposed for treating thumb basal joint arthritis (osteotomy of the first metacarpal, trapezial osteotomy, simple trapeziectomy, trapeziectomy with implant, total joint prosthesis, arthroplasty by interposition, etc.) necessitate an anatomically based radiological evaluation of the different pathological forms of thumb basal joint arthritis. Here, the author defines three parameters: narrowing of the trapeziometacarpal (TM) joint space: TMA; TM instability and subluxation: TM I; scaphotrapeziotrapezoid damage: STT. Four stages of TM osteoarthritic deterioration are defined: TMA0: no joint narrowing (painful and unstable joint); TMA1: narrowing <50%; TMA2: narrowing>50%; TMA3: disappearance of the joint space, bone erosions. For TM instability/subluxation: TMI 0: reducible subluxation (unstable and painful TM); TMI 1: reducible subluxation but with imperfect reintegration; TMI 2: non-reducible subluxation <1/3; TMI 3: subluxation>1/3. For STT damage, STT 0: radiograph is normal but anatomical damage is visible intraoperatively; STT 1: joint space narrowing <50%; STT 2: joint space is barely visible; STT 3: presence of erosion, sclerosis, irregularities. He outlines the shortcomings of the often-used Dell and Eaton-Littler classifications. A prospective study involving multiple cases having the same anatomical and radiological appearance that are assessed with sufficient follow-up is needed to standardize the modalities of surgical treatment.

The clinical and cost effectiveness of splints for thumb base osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

To investigate the clinical effectiveness, efficacy and cost effectiveness of splints (orthoses) in people with symptomatic basal thumb joint OA (BTOA). A pragmatic, multicentre parallel group randomized controlled trial at 17 National Health Service (NHS) hospital departments recruited adults with symptomatic BTOA and at least moderate hand pain and dysfunction. We randomized participants (1:1:1) using a computer-based minimization system to one of three treatment groups: a therapist supported self-management programme (SSM), a therapist supported self-management programme plus a verum thumb splint (SSM+S), or a therapist supported self-management programme plus a placebo thumb splint (SSM+PS). Participants were blinded to group allocation, received 90 min therapy over 8 weeks and were followed up for 12 weeks from baseline. Australian/Canadian (AUSCAN) hand pain at 8 weeks was the primary outcome, using intention to treat analysis. We calculated costs of treatment. We randomized 349 participants to SSM (n = 116), SSM+S (n = 116) or SSM+PS (n = 117) and 292 (84%) provided AUSCAN Osteoarthritis Hand Index hand pain scores at the primary end point (8 weeks). All groups improved, with no mean treatment difference between groups: SSM+S vs SSM -0.5 (95% CI: -1.4, 0.4), P = 0.255; SSM+PS vs SSM -0.1 (95% CI: -1.0, 0.8), P = 0.829; and SSM+S vs SSM+PS -0.4 (95% CI: -1.4, 0.5), P = 0.378. The average 12-week costs were: SSM £586; SSM+S £738; and SSM+PS £685. There was no additional benefit of adding a thumb splint to a high-quality evidence-based, supported self-management programme for thumb OA delivered by therapists. ISRCTN 54744256 (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN54744256).

Patient-reported outcomes following interposition arthroplasty of the basal joint of the thumb

The purpose of this study was (1) to evaluate the results following thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) interposition arthroplasties with patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in a large prospective series, (2) to evaluate the correlation between PRO and patient satisfaction following surgery, (3) to evaluate if age, gender, occupational status, sports activities or operative technique correlate with the PRO following surgery. Quick-DASH ranges from 0 to 100 with 100 being the worst score. The mean preoperative Quick-DASH was 49.9. The mean 6 months postoperative Quick-DASH was 25.4 showing an average improvement of 24.6 points. Mixed model analysis revealed a further improvement in Quick-DASH and pain after 6 months. Satisfied patients had significantly lower pain scores and lower Quick-DASH at follow up as compared to dissatisfied patients. Age, gender, hobby activities, occupational status and operative technique do not seem to influence PRO after CMC interposition arthroplasty of the thumb. Level of evidence II – prospective cohort.

Trapeziometacarpal prosthesis: an updated systematic review

The trapeziometacarpal prosthesis is mostly used in Europe to treat osteoarthritis of the basal joint of the thumb. Its supposed benefits are that it restores the length of the thumb, improves strength, function and mobility while reducing recovery time compared to other surgical treatments. However, previous reviews of the literature could not confirm these assumptions. This article provides an updated systematic review to help answer to these questions through a methodical statistical analysis and to quantify the two main complications, namely failure and deep infection. To achieve these aims, a selection of articles including implant case series was done in the Medline database based on specific criteria. Data about pain, function, strength, infection, and failure were compiled and a statistical analysis was performed. Results show a fast recovery in terms of pain and function but the positive effect on strength seems limited. The failure rate represented by the revision rate is high and the deep infection rate is fairly low. Randomized controlled studies are needed to obtain reliable data to compare the prosthesis to other surgical treatments.

Arthroscopic Trapeziectomy and Suture Button Suspensionplasty: A Review of the Literature and Description of the "Three-Step Arthroscopic Trapeziectomy Technique".

In the last two decades, surgeons have rapidly developed arthroscopic techniques to treat basal joint osteoarthritis. Such techniques spare the joint capsule and ligaments, allow more accurate staging of cartilage degeneration to determine the most appropriate treatment, and decrease the risk of injury to the radial artery and superficial branch of the radial nerve. Arthroscopic resection arthroplasty of the trapezium can be performed as either partial or complete trapeziectomy. Many papers have described partial trapeziectomy but few have discussed complete trapeziectomy. Suture button implants avoid the drawbacks of temporary fixation using Kirschner wire, as well as the drawbacks of ligament reconstruction, which necessitates the sacrifice of a tendon and involves both wide exposure and scar tissue. This paper aimed to review the published data on the arthroscopic treatment of basal thumb osteoarthritis, with a special focus on stabilization using suture button suspensionplasty, and to present a technique that structures this procedure into three steps, allowing it to be performed in an easier, more organized, and faster way.

F. Brunelli Ligamentoplasty as Treatment in Thumb Basal Joint Arthritis: Up to 9 Years Follow-up

Thumb basal joint arthritis treatment with biological arthroplasty is a widely used procedure in hand surgery centers. The several described techniques are based on the use of different tendons of the wrist, implying frequently a tenoplasty around flexor carpi radialis or transosseous tunnels to stabilize the articulation. The authors have been using, for many years, the technique conceived by F. Brunelli that relies on the anchorage of the volar band of the abductor pollicis longus tendon to the first intermetacarpal ligament, to obtain a suspension arthroplasty. Technical details are discussed. Sixty-seven patients in Eaton-Littler stage 2 or 3 with >4 years follow-up after surgery were evaluated. Each patient expressed a subjective evaluation relating to pain, functionality, strength, esthetic aspect, and general satisfaction. The following parameters have been considered as objective data: the angle of the first web space, the abduction and opposition of the first digit, the pinch, and the strength. X-rays were also performed to verify the distance between the scaphoid and the first metacarpal. In 84% of cases, a significant improvement was found in the considered parameters. Joint space was maintained in 76% of cases at radiologic follow-up. No patient needed surgical revision. The tenoplasty conceived by F. Brunelli presents several advantages, including the simple and reproducible execution, short surgical time, and comfortable postoperative course for the patient. After mid-term follow-up, authors believe this procedure is particularly respectful of the anatomy and physiology of the first ray and gives optimal results in most of the cases, but, in patients with severe subluxation of the 1st metacarpal (identifiable as Eaton-Littler stage 3), it is less reliable, because of the degeneration of the intermetacarpal ligament.